Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve that, on the recommendation of the Director, Land Use Planning and
City Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the application
of The City of London relating to the properties located at 1607, 1609
(eastern portion), 1611, 1615, 1619, 1623, 1627, 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643,
1649, and 1653 Richmond Street:
a) the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix "A") BE INTRODUCED
at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan to change
the designation of the subject lands FROM a Low Density Residential
designation TO a Multi-Family, Medium Density Residential designation to
permit the development of multiple-attached dwellings, such as row houses or
cluster houses, low-rise apartment buildings, small-scale nursing homes, rest
homes, homes for the aged and a convenience commercial component within an
apartment building;
b) the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix “B”) BE INTRODUCED at a
future Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan by adding a new
special policy to Section 3.5 (Policies for Specific Areas) to guide the
future development of the subject properties;
c) pursuant
to Section 19.2 of the Official Plan, the attached Richmond
Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines (Appendix
“C”) BE ADOPTED at a future Municipal Council meeting;
d)
pursuant to Section 19.2.2 of the Official Plan, the attached
proposed by-law (Appendix “D”) BE INTRODUCED at a future
Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan by adding the “Richmond
Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines” to the
list of Council approved guideline documents;
e) the revised, attached
proposed by-law (Appendix "E") BE INTRODUCED at a future
Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part (a) above), to change
the zoning of the properties located at 1607, 1609 (eastern portion) and 1611
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits cluster single detached dwellings, cluster semi-detached dwellings,
cluster duplex dwellings, and cluster townhouse dwellings subject to a
special zoning provision which regulates the minimum lot area (0.6 ha.),
minimum lot frontage (70m), maximum lot coverage (35%), maximum density (30
units per hectare), maximum height (10.5m), minimum front yard depth (3m),
minimum rear yard depth (7.5m) and restrictions on the location of parking
areas and subject to a holding provision requiring a public site plan review
of the proposed development prior to the removal of the holding provision TO
a Holding Residential R5 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-(**)•R5-2(*)) Zone to
permit cluster townhouses and cluster stacked townhouses with a special
zoning provision which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot
area (0.4 ha.); maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum rear yard and south
interior side yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (35%); maximum density
(45 units per hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3);
and, maximum height (12.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western and
southern portions) subject to holding provisions to ensure that future
development is consistent with the Richmond Street-Old Masonville Master
Plan and Urban Design Guidelines and that a storm/drainage and stormwater management (SWM) servicing design report
has been prepared and accepted to
ensure that future development has the sufficient storm outlet and SWM
servicing;
f)
the
revised, attached proposed by-law (Appendix "F") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), as amended in part
(a) above, to change the zoning of the properties located at 1615, 1619, 1623 and
1627 Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5
Special Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14))
Zone which permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special
zoning regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision TO
a
Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-(**)•R9-7(***))
Zone to permit cluster townhouses, apartment buildings, senior citizen
apartment buildings, and continuum of care facilities with a special zoning
provision which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6
ha.); maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum rear yard depth (15m); maximum
lot coverage (40%); maximum density (150 units per hectare); maximum number
of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3); and, maximum height (15.0m on the eastern
portion and 9.5m on the western portion) subject to holding provisions to
ensure that
future development is consistent with the Richmond Street-Old Masonville
Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines and that storm/drainage and a stormwater management (SWM) servicing design
report has been prepared and
accepted to ensure that future development has the sufficient storm outlet
and SWM servicing;
g)
the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix "G") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part
(a) above), to change the zoning of the properties located at 1631, 1635, and 1639
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special zoning
regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision (1631 and 1635
Richmond Street) AND a Residential R5 Special Provision/Residential R6
Special Provision (R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which permits the above listed
uses and subject to the above listed special zoning regulations (1639 Richmond Street)
TO a Residential R9 Special Provision/Convenience Commercial Special
Provision (R9-7(**)/CC4(*)) Zone to permit cluster townhouses, apartment
buildings, senior citizen apartment buildings, and continuum of care
facilities in the R9-7(**) Zone with a special zoning provision which
includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6 ha.); maximum
front yard depth (3m); minimum interior side yard depths (3m); minimum rear
yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (45%); maximum density (200 units per
hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3); maximum height
(20.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western portion); and permits
convenience service establishments, convenience stores, financial
institutions, personal service establishments, and take out restaurants in
the CC4(*) Zone with a special zoning provision which includes: a maximum
gross floor area for convenience commercial uses (200.0m2); and,
no additional parking requirements for commercial uses;
h)
the
revised, attached proposed by-law (Appendix "H") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part
(a) above), to change the zoning of the properties located at 1643, 1649, and 1653
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special zoning
regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision TO a Holding
Residential R9 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-55•R9-7(*)) Zone for
the properties located at 1643, 1649, and 1653 Richmond Street to
permit cluster townhouses, apartment buildings, senior citizen apartment
buildings, and continuum of care facilities with a special zoning provision
which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6 ha.);
maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum interior side yard depths (3m);
minimum rear yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (45%); maximum density
(200 units per hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3);
maximum height (20.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western portion)
subject to a holding provision to ensure that future development is consistent with
the Richmond Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines
and to require the completion of a traffic impact study prior to site
plan approval to determine the location and number of access points, the
traffic impact on surrounding roads, and the roadway improvements required to
accommodate this development;
i) three
readings of the by-laws enacting the Official Plan and Zoning By-law
amendments, as recommended in clauses (a) to (h) above, BE WITHHELD
until such time as site plan approval has been obtained for the properties at
1631, 1635, and 1639 Richmond Street, following a public site plan review,
and a development agreement entered into with the City of London, which is
consistent with the site plan drawings and elevation drawings attached
hereto as Appendix “I”; and,
j) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to retain a consultant to undertake a
transportation study, including traffic impact analysis, for the
neighbourhood, bounded by Louise Blvd (to the west), Taplow Rd, Hillside Dr,
McStay Rd and Shavian Blvd (to the south), Richmond Street (to the east)
Fanshawe Park Road and Hillview Blvd (to the north) (the “Study Area”) that
will:
A) identify
concerns, with a specific emphasis on cut-through traffic, speeding and
hazardous driving on local streets and recommend mitigation measures to
address these concerns;
B) recommend
measures to enhance pedestrian quality and safety;
C) recommend
appropriate road layout and design that will mitigate traffic impacts of the
proposed development on the Study Area; and,
D) include
input from the residents of the Study Area throughout the Study process;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with
respect to this matter:
·
a
Municipal Council resolution adopted at its meeting held on March 8, 2010;
·
M.
Lake-Collins, dated December 7, 2011;
·
F.
Metwaly, 1631, 1635 and 1639 Richmond Street, dated December 8, 2011;
·
B.
Davis, President, Old Masonville Ratepayers’ Association, dated December 9,
2011;
·
S.
& R. Poole, 51 Shavian Boulevard, dated December 12, 2011;
·
C.
Lynn, dated December 12, 2011; and,
·
L.
Culhane, 110 St. Bees Close, dated December 12, 2011;
it being pointed
out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the
following individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
J.
Lowman, 1650 Hillside Drive – advising that she is an active member of the
Home and School Council at Masonville Public School; advising that there are
a number of traffic regarding school safely due to the lack of sidewalks;
advising that she personally approves of the plan as it is the lesser of two
evils; hoping that the city addresses traffic concerns; advising that on
Cherokee, there are no sidewalks and that all streets do not have street
lights; advising that two kids have been clipped by side view mirrors on
cars; and asking that people and children are put first and traffic is put
second.
·
M.
Shmukler, 1643 Hillside Drive – advising that he approves of the plan as it
is far superior to the previous plan; advising that a traffic study was to be
done when the three north properties are developed and indicating that he
would like to see the traffic study completed now; advising that roads are
designed to push traffic through and that these are residential streets with
families and children; requesting that a vehicular study be undertaken to
ensure that traffic slows down, with an emphasis on families and children, as
a neighbourhood where children ride their bicycles, neighbourhours walk their
dogs; and suggesting that this be done as a pilot project.
·
B.
Davis, President, Old Masonville Ratepayers’ Association (OMRA) – indicating
that the OMRA supports this application; advising that they share the traffic
concerns; and expressing support for the recommendation of a traffic study in
the spring and the requirement for a holding provision.
·
F.
Matwaly, Applicant – indicating that he has been working closely with Ward
Councillor M. Brown, Mr. Tomazincic, Planner II, and the community; advising
that the Ontario Municipal Board has approved the site plan application for
the properties located at 1631 and 1635 Richmond Street; advising that the
City did not approve his request for a traffic light at Jacksway Crescent;
advising that the application is not correct and needs to be modified;
indicating that it is necessary for a traffic light on Jacksway Crescent; advising
that without the Stormwater Management upgrade, the application is useless;
indicating that he had to find his own solution five years ago; expressing
concern with the withholding of the three readings; advising that he does not
want to spend a lot of time and money only to have the application appealed;
requesting that both applications be approved tonight; and advising that he
currently has Ontario Municipal Board approval.
·
J.
Wright, 45 Hillview Boulevard – advising that she purchased her property in
2009; expressing appreciation to Mr. Matwaly; advising that she has been a
realtor for 27 years; indicating that she loves the design; applauding the
City for dealing with a plan that includes people over 65; advising that
Richmond Street could be a beautiful corridor; indicating that this plan
looks like something you would find in Yorkville; advising that Mr. Matwaly
has provided a nice design; indicating that traffic is an issue; expressing
concern that the new building will have 400+ cars that will be exiting onto
Hillview Boulevard; advising that residents of Cherokee prefer a 50 foot
setback; indicating that there are no sidewalks or streetlights on Cherokee
Road and that you cannot see anything at night; and advising that new
families are moving into the neighbourhood.
·
M.
McDermid, 29 Cherokee Road – advising that she has lived at her residence
since 1977; advising that the area residents have worked as a community with
the City; expressing pleasure with the new attitude of the Council;
indicating that traffic is a problem, but that it is a problem everywhere;
and congratulating the City for doing this.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler,
N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)
Motion is put to adopt clause 17, as
amended.
Motion Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler,
N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)
Clause 17, as amended reads as follows:
that, on the recommendation of the
Director, Land Use Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken
with respect to the application of The City of London relating to the
properties located at 1607, 1609 (eastern portion), 1611, 1615, 1619, 1623,
1627, 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643, 1649, and 1653 Richmond Street:
a) the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix "A") BE INTRODUCED
at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan to change
the designation of the subject lands FROM a Low Density Residential
designation TO a Multi-Family, Medium Density Residential designation to
permit the development of multiple-attached dwellings, such as row houses or
cluster houses, low-rise apartment buildings, small-scale nursing homes, rest
homes, homes for the aged and a convenience commercial component within an
apartment building;
b) the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix “B”) BE INTRODUCED at a
future Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan by adding a new
special policy to Section 3.5 (Policies for Specific Areas) to guide the
future development of the subject properties;
c) pursuant
to Section 19.2 of the Official Plan, the attached Richmond
Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines (Appendix
“C”) BE ADOPTED at a future Municipal Council meeting;
d)
pursuant to Section 19.2.2 of the Official Plan, the attached
proposed by-law (Appendix “D”) BE INTRODUCED at a future
Municipal Council meeting to amend the Official Plan by adding the “Richmond
Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines” to the
list of Council approved guideline documents;
e) the revised, attached
proposed by-law (Appendix "E") BE INTRODUCED at a future
Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part (a) above), to change
the zoning of the properties located at 1607, 1609 (eastern portion) and 1611
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits cluster single detached dwellings, cluster semi-detached dwellings,
cluster duplex dwellings, and cluster townhouse dwellings subject to a
special zoning provision which regulates the minimum lot area (0.6 ha.),
minimum lot frontage (70m), maximum lot coverage (35%), maximum density (30
units per hectare), maximum height (10.5m), minimum front yard depth (3m),
minimum rear yard depth (7.5m) and restrictions on the location of parking
areas and subject to a holding provision requiring a public site plan review
of the proposed development prior to the removal of the holding provision TO
a Holding Residential R5 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-(**)•R5-2(*)) Zone to
permit cluster townhouses and cluster stacked townhouses with a special
zoning provision which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot
area (0.4 ha.); maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum rear yard and south
interior side yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (35%); maximum density
(45 units per hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3);
and, maximum height (12.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western and
southern portions) subject to holding provisions to ensure that future
development is consistent with the Richmond Street-Old Masonville Master
Plan and Urban Design Guidelines and that a storm/drainage and stormwater management (SWM) servicing design report
has been prepared and accepted to
ensure that future development has the sufficient storm outlet and SWM
servicing;
f)
the
revised, attached proposed by-law (Appendix "F") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), as amended in part
(a) above, to change the zoning of the properties located at 1615, 1619, 1623 and
1627 Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5
Special Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14))
Zone which permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special
zoning regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision TO
a
Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-(**)•R9-7(***))
Zone to permit cluster townhouses, apartment buildings, senior citizen
apartment buildings, and continuum of care facilities with a special zoning
provision which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6
ha.); maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum rear yard depth (15m); maximum
lot coverage (40%); maximum density (150 units per hectare); maximum number
of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3); and, maximum height (15.0m on the eastern
portion and 9.5m on the western portion) subject to holding provisions to
ensure that
future development is consistent with the Richmond Street-Old Masonville
Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines and that storm/drainage and a stormwater management (SWM) servicing design
report has been prepared and
accepted to ensure that future development has the sufficient storm outlet
and SWM servicing;
g)
the
revised attached proposed by-law (Appendix "G") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part
(a) above), to change the zoning of the properties located at 1631, 1635, and 1639
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special zoning
regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision (1631 and 1635
Richmond Street) AND a Residential R5 Special Provision/Residential R6
Special Provision (R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which permits the above listed
uses and subject to the above listed special zoning regulations (1639 Richmond Street)
TO a Residential R9 Special Provision/Convenience Commercial Special
Provision (R9-7(**)/CC4(*)) Zone to permit cluster townhouses,
apartment buildings, senior citizen apartment buildings, and continuum of
care facilities in the R9-7(**) Zone with a special zoning provision which
includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6 ha.); maximum
front yard depth (3m); minimum interior side yard depths (3m); minimum rear
yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (45%); maximum density (200 units per
hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3); maximum height
(20.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western portion); and permits convenience
service establishments, convenience stores, financial institutions, personal
service establishments, and take out restaurants in the CC4(*) Zone with a
special zoning provision which includes: a maximum gross floor area for
convenience commercial uses (200.0m2); and, no additional parking
requirements for commercial uses;
h)
the
revised, attached proposed by-law (Appendix "H") BE
INTRODUCED at a future Municipal Council meeting to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part
(a) above), to change the zoning of the properties located at 1643, 1649, and 1653
Richmond Street FROM a Holding Residential R5 Special
Provision/Residential R6 Special Provision (h-5•R5-2(12)/R6-4(14)) Zone which
permits the above listed uses, subject to the above listed special zoning
regulations, and subject to the above listed holding provision TO a Holding
Residential R9 Special Provision (h-(*)•h-55•R9-7(*)) Zone for
the properties located at 1643, 1649, and 1653 Richmond Street to
permit cluster townhouses, apartment buildings, senior citizen apartment
buildings, and continuum of care facilities with a special zoning provision
which includes: a minimum lot frontage (70m); minimum lot area (0.6 ha.);
maximum front yard depth (3m); minimum interior side yard depths (3m);
minimum rear yard depth (15m); maximum lot coverage (45%); maximum density
(200 units per hectare); maximum number of bedrooms per dwelling unit (3);
maximum height (20.0m on the eastern portion and 9.5m on the western portion)
subject to a holding provision to ensure that future development is consistent with
the Richmond Street-Old Masonville Master Plan and Urban Design Guidelines
and to require the completion of a traffic impact study prior to site
plan approval to determine the location and number of access points, the
traffic impact on surrounding roads, and the roadway improvements required to
accommodate this development;
i) three
readings of the by-laws enacting the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments,
as recommended in clauses (a) to (h) above, BE WITHHELD until such
time as site plan approval has been obtained for the properties at 1631,
1635, and 1639 Richmond Street, following a public site plan review, and a
development agreement entered into with the City of London, which is
consistent with the site plan drawings and elevation drawings attached
hereto as Appendix “I”; and,
j) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to retain a consultant to undertake a
transportation study, including traffic impact analysis, for the
neighbourhood, bounded by Louise Blvd (to the west), Taplow Rd, Hillside Dr,
McStay Rd and Shavian Blvd (to the south), Richmond Street (to the east)
Fanshawe Park Road and Hillview Blvd (to the north) (the “Study Area”) that
will:
A)
identify concerns, with a specific emphasis on cut-through traffic, speeding
and hazardous driving on local streets and recommend mitigation measures to
address these concerns;
B) recommend
measures to enhance pedestrian quality and safety;
C) recommend
appropriate road layout and design that will mitigate traffic impacts of the
proposed development on the Study Area; and,
D) include
input from the residents of the Study Area throughout the Study process;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with
respect to this matter:
·
a
Municipal Council resolution adopted at its meeting held on March 8, 2010;
·
M.
Lake-Collins, dated December 7, 2011;
·
F.
Metwaly, 1631, 1635 and 1639 Richmond Street, dated December 8, 2011;
·
B.
Davis, President, Old Masonville Ratepayers’ Association, dated December 9,
2011;
·
S.
& R. Poole, 51 Shavian Boulevard, dated December 12, 2011;
·
C.
Lynn, dated December 12, 2011; and,
·
L.
Culhane, 110 St. Bees Close, dated December 12, 2011;
it being pointed
out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the
following individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
J.
Lowman, 1650 Hillside Drive – advising that she is an active member of the
Home and School Council at Masonville Public School; advising that there are
a number of traffic regarding school safely due to the lack of sidewalks;
advising that she personally approves of the plan as it is the lesser of two
evils; hoping that the city addresses traffic concerns; advising that on
Cherokee, there are no sidewalks and that all streets do not have street
lights; advising that two kids have been clipped by side view mirrors on
cars; and asking that people and children are put first and traffic is put
second.
·
M.
Shmukler, 1643 Hillside Drive – advising that he approves of the plan as it
is far superior to the previous plan; advising that a traffic study was to be
done when the three north properties are developed and indicating that he would
like to see the traffic study completed now; advising that roads are designed
to push traffic through and that these are residential streets with families
and children; requesting that a vehicular study be undertaken to ensure that
traffic slows down, with an emphasis on families and children, as a
neighbourhood where children ride their bicycles, neighbourhours walk their
dogs; and suggesting that this be done as a pilot project.
·
B.
Davis, President, Old Masonville Ratepayers’ Association (OMRA) – indicating
that the OMRA supports this application; advising that they share the traffic
concerns; and expressing support for the recommendation of a traffic study in
the spring and the requirement for a holding provision.
·
F.
Matwaly, Applicant – indicating that he has been working closely with Ward
Councillor M. Brown, Mr. Tomazincic, Planner II, and the community; advising
that the Ontario Municipal Board has approved the site plan application for
the properties located at 1631 and 1635 Richmond Street; advising that the
City did not approve his request for a traffic light at Jacksway Crescent;
advising that the application is not correct and needs to be modified;
indicating that it is necessary for a traffic light on Jacksway Crescent;
advising that without the Stormwater Management upgrade, the application is
useless; indicating that he had to find his own solution five years ago;
expressing concern with the withholding of the three readings; advising that
he does not want to spend a lot of time and money only to have the
application appealed; requesting that both applications be approved tonight;
and advising that he currently has Ontario Municipal Board approval.
·
J.
Wright, 45 Hillview Boulevard – advising that she purchased her property in
2009; expressing appreciation to Mr. Matwaly; advising that she has been a
realtor for 27 years; indicating that she loves the design; applauding the
City for dealing with a plan that includes people over 65; advising that
Richmond Street could be a beautiful corridor; indicating that this plan
looks like something you would find in Yorkville; advising that Mr. Matwaly
has provided a nice design; indicating that traffic is an issue; expressing
concern that the new building will have 400+ cars that will be exiting onto Hillview
Boulevard; advising that residents of Cherokee prefer a 50 foot setback;
indicating that there are no sidewalks or streetlights on Cherokee Road and
that you cannot see anything at night; and advising that new families are
moving into the neighbourhood.
·
M.
McDermid, 29 Cherokee Road – advising that she has lived at her residence
since 1977; advising that the area residents have worked as a community with
the City; expressing pleasure with the new attitude of the Council;
indicating that traffic is a problem, but that it is a problem everywhere;
and congratulating the City for doing this.
|