|
Council
MINUTES
FOURTEENTH
MEETING
|
|
August 29, 2011
|
|
The
Council meets in Regular Session in the Council Chambers this day at 5:00
p.m.
|
|
PRESENT: Acting Mayor B. Polhill,
Councillors W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe,
M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White, C. Saunders (City Clerk)
ALSO PRESENT: J.A. Fielding, R.L. Fair, G.T.
Hopcroft, E. Gamble, L.M. Rowe, B. Westlake-Power, V. McAlea Major, J.
Braam, J. Stanford, M. Turner, D. Ailles, J.P. Barber, K. Graham, R.
Armistead, D. Mounteer, J. Fleming, B. Campbell, J. Edward, J. Stanford.
ABSENT WITH REGRETS: Mayor J.F. Fontana
|
1.
|
Acting Mayor Polhill acknowledges the
2011 Queen Elizabeth Scholarships recipients: Amalia Cong, Central
Secondary School (average 99.83%) and Ryan Gauld, Saunders Secondary School
(average 98.00%).
|
2.
|
Ross Fair, Executive Director, Community
Services Department, makes a presentation to Acting Mayor Polhill regarding
the Urban League Green Brick Award to the Stoney Creek Community
Centre-YMCA-Library.
|
II
|
DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
|
Councillor
D. Brown discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 47 of the 19th Report of
the Built and Natural Environment Committee having to do
with amendments to the Traffic and Parking By-law by indicating that
her employer has a contract with the London Transit Commission. Councillor
D. Brown further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 22 of the 14th
Report of the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee having to do with the
Taxi/Limousine By-law Review by indicating that her employer operates taxis
and limousines.
Councillor D.
Brown also discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 11 of the 19th Report
of the Built and Natural Environment Committee having to do with amendments
to the Traffic and Parking By-law related to bus stop locations utilized by
the University of Western Ontario (UWO), by indicating that her employer
has a transportation contract with UWO.
|
Councillor White discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 30 of the 19th Report of the Built and Natural and
Environment Committee having to do with the development on Beaufort
Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street by indicating that her employer
has property on Gunn Street.
|
Acting
Mayor Polhill discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 2 of the 20th Report
of the Built and Natural Environment Committee having to do with property
located at 1025-1037 Wellington Road by indicating that his son sits on the
Committee of Adjustment.
|
Councillor
Branscombe discloses a pecuniary interest in clauses 15 and 17 of the 19th
Report of the Built and Natural Environment Committee, having to do with
the application of the Montessori House of Children relating to the
property at 719 Waterloo Street and the soil remediation of the Wellington
Street road allowance adjacent to Piccadilly Park respectively, by
indicating that her children are students of the Montessori school, and the
school makes use of the Piccadilly Park.
Councillor
Branscombe further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 3 of the 20th
Report of the Built and Natural Environment Committee, having to do with
soil remediation of the Wellington Street road allowance adjacent to
Piccadilly Park, by indicating that the Montessori school which her
children attend, makes use of the Park.
|
III
|
CONFIRMATION AND SIGNING OF THE MINUTES OF THE
THIRTEENTH MEETING HELD ON JULY 25, 2011
|
|
Motion made to Approve the Minutes of the
Thirteenth Meeting of London Council made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
IV
|
REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED
IN PUBLIC
|
|
|
|
The Council reviews the confidential
matters listed for consideration at this meeting and determines that none
should be considered in public.
|
V
|
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
|
1.
|
Request for City of London Policy with
Respect to Prohibition of the Leasing or Renting of City Owned Space to
Pornography Industry - Sponsored Events and a Request Related to the London
Public Library Board's Internet Policy. (Referred to the Community and
Neighbourhoods Committee Stage for Consideration with Clause 6 of the 14th
Report of the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee.)
|
a)
|
J. Morgan, Chair, London Public Library
Board
|
b)
|
M. Walker, Executive Director, London Abused
Women's Centre
|
2.
|
Updates on Green Bin Program and Zero
Waste Strategies. (Referred to the Community and Neighborhoods Committee
Stage for Consideration with Clause 14 of the 14th Report of the Community
and Neighbourhoods Committee.)
|
b)
|
C. McInnis, 299 Cheapside Street
|
3.
|
C. Cleaver, Siskinds Law Firm - Winter
Maintenance Equipment with Operators - Trucks with Sander/Salter Bodies
with Plow - Tender 11-56. (Referred to the Built and Natural Environment
Committee Stage for Consideration with Clause 4 of the 19th Report of the
Built and Natural Environment Committee.)
|
4.
|
C. Bray, 1310 Basswood Road - Hasham
Adbelsayed - 1472 Huron Street (Z-7887). (Referred to the Built and Natural
Environment Committee Stage for Consideration with Clause 30 of the 19th
Report of the Built and Natural Environment Committee.)
|
5.
|
City Clerk advised that the following
zoning by-laws have come into force and effect, namely:
|
a)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112004 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 725 Fanshawe Park Road West;
|
b)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112006 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 3718 Dingman Drive, 3766
Dingman Drive, 3812 Dingman Drive and 437 Exeter Road;
|
c)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112007 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 3854 Dingman Drive, 4112
White Oak Road and 4132 White Oak Road;
|
d)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112010 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1422 Fanshawe Park Road West,
located at the southeast corner of Fanshawe Park Road West and Hyde Park
Road;
|
e)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112011 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1960, 1970 and 1980 Hyde Park
Road;
|
f)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112012 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1878 Highbury Avenue North
and 1411 Fanshawe Park Road East;
|
g)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112016 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 513 Queens Avenue and 520
Dundas Street;
|
h)
|
By-law No. Z.1-112017 to amend By-law No.
Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1925 Dundas Street;
|
i)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112018 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 785 Wonderland Road South;
|
j)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112019 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 211, 215, 219 and 227
Fanshawe Park Road West;
|
k)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112020 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1603 Hamilton Road and 1844
Commissioners Road East;
|
l)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112021 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1769 Dundas Street and 400
Edmonton Street;
|
m)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112022 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone and area of land located at 244 Adelaide Street South;
|
n)
|
By-law No. Z-1-112023 to amend By-law No.
Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 6534 and 6570 Old Garrison
Boulevard and 3296 Crane Avenue;
|
o)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112024 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1311 and 1451 Wharncliffe
Road South and 149, 153 and 187 Southdale Road West;
|
p)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112031 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1, Section 4.20.3, Municipal Drains and Natural Watercourses to
apply the requirement for zoning setback regulations from municipal drains
and watercourses at it applies only to lands designated Agricultural and
Urban Reserve;
|
q)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112030 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone the northern portion of 1270 Sunningdale Road East and
Part of the South 1/2 Lot 11, Con 16 (Forest Hill Subdivision);
|
r)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112032 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1-34 Barberry Court, 35-48
Ivy Court, 49-81 Vinewood Court and 82-100 Primrose Court; and
|
s)
|
By-law No. Z.-1-112033 to amend By-law
No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 551-605 Millbank Drive and
931-1127 Southdale Road East.
|
6.
|
J. Bishop, E-mail - Updates on Green Bin
Program and Zero Waste Strategies. (Referred to CNC for consideration with
Clause 14 of the 14th Report of the Community and Neighbourhoods
Committee.)
|
7.
|
Raising Chickens in Poultry Pens within
Residential Zones (Referred to the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee
Stage for Consideration with Clause 16 of the 14th Report of the Community
and Neighbourhoods Committee.)
|
8.
|
J. Kennedy, London Development Institute
- City of London - Proposed Amendment to Section 4.14 Lots Reduced by
Public Acquisition (Z-7891). (Referred to the Built and Natural Environment
Committee Stage for Consideration with Clause 23 of the 19th Report of the
Built and Natural Environment Committee.)
|
VI
|
MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE IS GIVEN
|
Pursuant to section 7.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, a motion made to change the order of business to permit
the consideration of the Motion of which notice is given (Glanworth
Library), at 7:30 pm is made by Councillor S. Orser and seconded by
Councillor D. Brown.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Pursuant to section 7.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, a motion to change the order of business to permit the
consideration of clause 30 of the 19th Report of the Built and Natural
Environment Committee, having to do with the application of H. Adbelsayed
relating to the property located at 1472 Huron Street, following the
consideration of Glanworth Library is made by Councillor J.B. Swan and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
|
A motion to temporarily suspend section
9.15 of the Council Procedure By-law, to allow members to sit while speaking
and/or voting is made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and seconded by
Councillor J.B. Swan.
Motion
Passed
|
|
|
|
1.
|
20th
Report of the Built and Natural Environment Committee
|
|
2.
|
20th
Report of the Finance and Administration Committee
|
|
|
VIII
|
REPORTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Community and Neighbourhoods
Committee
Councillor Usher presents the 14th Report
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that,
on the recommendation of the City Clerk, the Mayor BE AUTHORIZED to write a
letter of support to the London Urban Services Organization (LUSO), for their
1,000 Acts of Kindness Challenge event, to encourage community members to
take part in the challenge and help spread kindness throughout the City of
London.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
2.
|
Introduction of
Ontario211 Service to London-Implications for the City of London
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to section 17.2 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor Van Meerbergen calls for a separate vote on part
(b) of clause 2.
The motion to adopt part (b) of clause 2 is
put and passed:
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: P. Van Meerbergen (1)
Part (b) of clause 2 reads as follows:
(b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to consider including a provision for
a City of London share of funding of the 211 Service in the 2012 budget; and,
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that,
on
the recommendation of the Executive Director of Community Services, the
following
actions
be taken with respect to the introduction of Ontario211 Service to the City
of London:
(a)
the
introduction of a 211 Service in the City of London, BE ENDORSED;
(c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to monitor the implementation and success of
the 211 Service in London, with an annual report back to the Municipal Council
through the appropriate Standing Committee.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
3.
|
Stewardship Ontario
Funding of the City's Household Special Waste Program
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that,
on
the recommendation of the Director of Environmental Programs and Solid Waste,
the attached proposed By-law (Appendix A) BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011, to approve a new
agreement with Stewardship Ontario for funding of the City’s Household
Special Waste Program.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
4.
|
Child and Youth
Network's Policy Position Brief: A Housing Benefit for Families with Low
Income
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Neighbourhood and Children’s Services,
with the concurrence of the Executive Director of Community Services, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Child and Youth Network’s
Policy Position Brief: “A Housing Benefit for Families with Low Income”:
(a) the
above-noted policy position brief, attached hereto as Appendix
A, BE ENDORSED by Municipal Council, it being noted that this would be a new,
provincially-funded benefit, program; and,
(b) the position
paper BE SUBMITTED to the Honourable Frances Lankin, P.C. and Dr. Munir
Sheikh, Commissioners for the Review of Social Assistance Review in Ontario
and to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for consideration in the
implementation and roll out of Ontario’s Long Term Affordable Housing
Strategy; and,
it being noted that the Community and Neighbourhoods
Committee received a communication, dated August 9, 2011, from J. Stickling,
Chair, London Homeless Coalition, indicating support for the above-noted
initiative.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
5.
|
Convert-to-Rent/Rehabilitation
Agreement 262 Clarence Street
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Municipal Housing, with the concurrence
of the Executive Director of Community Services, the following actions be
taken with respect to the Convert-to-Rent/Rehabilitation project at 262
Clarence Street in London, which was approved by Municipal Council on March
8, 2010:
(a) in accordance
with the Municipal Housing Facilities By-Law No A.-5814-11, the attached
proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council to be held on August
29, 2011, to authorize a Municipal Contribution Agreement substantially in
the form of the agreement appended to the by-law and to the satisfaction of
the City Solicitor; and,
(b) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the above-noted Agreement.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
6.
|
Request for the
City of London Policy with Respect to Prohibition the Leasing or Renting of
City Owned Space to Pornography Industry – Sponsored Events and a Request
Related to the London Public Board’s Internet Policy
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that the
following actions be taken with respect to the request dated August 4, 2011, from
the London Abused Women’s Centre, Men Against Sexual Trafficking (MAST) and
Stop Porn Culture, with respect to the leasing or renting of city-funded
space and the current internet service policy of the London Public Library:
(a) the request to
establish a policy to prohibit any directly or indirectly City-funded boards,
commissions and/or departments from leasing or renting space to any
pornography industry-sponsored events BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration
to report back to the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee (CNC) with a
proposed policy, including information pertaining to the implications of
implementing that policy;
(b) the
following recommendation BE REFERRED to the London Public Library Board:
The
City of London Municipal Council recommends that the London Public Library
Board undertake an immediate review of its Internet Service Policy and
consider the following amendments:
(i)
security filters
on public computers to prohibit access to pornography;
(ii)
implement a
policy related to the use of wireless internet so that users cannot be
anonymous; and,
(c) the
Mayor BE ASKED to write a letter to the Province of Ontario encouraging the
enactment of Bill 66, Education Statute Law Amendment Act (Electronic
Sexual Material), 2010, an Act to protect our children from
pornography, immediately following the fall provincial election;
it being noted that
the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee heard a presentation from M.
Walker, London Abused Women’s Centre, and also received communications from
the following individuals, with respect to this matter:
- J. Levitt,
President, SX Marketing Inc., 2700 Steeles Avenue, Concord, ON, dated
August 15, 2011;
- L. Patterson,
Service Consultant, Bell Business Markets, 100 Dundas Street;
- P. Grant, 46
Meadowridge Crescent;
- K. McComb, 49
Hughes Street, dated August 11, 2011
- A. Burditt,
Chair, London Anti Human Trafficking Committee, 281 Wellington Street,
dated August 9, 2011; and,
- S. J. Burditt,
Founder, Men Against Sexual Trafficking, dated August 9, 2011.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
7.
|
Museum London
By-law
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that the proposed by-law to
continue the London Regional Art and Historical Museums as Museum London, BE
REFERRED back to Museum London to:
(a)
undertake
additional consultation with the public and affected stakeholders; and,
(b)
consider
the following direction based on the public submissions to the Community and
Neighbourhoods Committee:
(i)
the
continued representation on the Museum Board and Nominating Committee from
the Museum London volunteers and Canadian Artists’ representation; and,
(ii)
the
terms under which appointed Members may be removed from the Board by
Municipal Council, if required;
it being noted that the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee (CNC) heard verbal delegations from the
following individuals with respect to this matter:
· M. Lake Collins, President, the
Volunteer Committee to Museum London, and received a communication, dated
August 8, 2011, as included as item 23(f) on the CNC added communications
agenda;
·
J. Hubbard,
London Artist, 565 Leyton Crescent,
and received the attached
communication dated August
16, 2011, the attached
petition signed by approximately 104
individuals, supporting
the representation of artists on the Museum London’s Board of Directors, (the
entire petition is on file in the City Clerk’s Office), as well as the points addressed in his
submission as included as item #23(e) on the CNC added communications agenda; and,
· B. Meehan,
Executive Director, Museum London;
it being further noted that the CNC
received written communications from the following individuals with respect
to this matter:
· S. Martin, 260
Sydenham Street;
· L. Brown, London
Museum Volunteer;
· W. Thomas, Creative
Art & Frame, 109 Fanshawe Park Road East;
· C. A. Leith, President of the Volunteer
Committee; and,
· S. Hubbard Krimmer, CEO and Chief
Librarian, London, Public Library
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
8.
|
8th Report of the
London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee - Education Sub
Committee
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that the
following actions be taken with respect to the Education Sub-committee report
of the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee (LDRACC)
related to the proposed “Breakfast with the LDRRAC”:
(a)
on the recommendation
of the LDRRAC:
(i)
the Mayor’s Office BE
CONSULTED to determine the Mayor’s availability and to establish a potential date,
in October or November, for the above-noted event;
(ii)
Human Resources, BE
REQUESTED to provide assistance with event planning; and,
(iii)
the 7th Report of the
LDRRAC, from its meeting held on June 16, 2011, BE AMENDED in clause 4, by
adding at the end “the LDRRAC approved the proposed budget of $1,200.00 and
the proposed program format for the event”; and,
(b)
notwithstanding the
recommendation of the LDRRAC, the request for assistance from Corporate
Communication BE REFERRED back to the LDRRAC for additional consideration; it
being noted that Corporate Communications has indicated it does not have the
capacity to undertake in-house design;
it being further noted that the LDRRAC
received a verbal presentation and the attached report from R.
Howse, Chair, Education Sub-Committee.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
|
9.
|
Amendment to the
Dog Licensing & Control By-law
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director, Environmental Programs and Solid
Waste, the attached proposed By-law (Appendix A) BE INTRODUCED at
the Municipal Council Meeting to be held on August 29, 2011, to amend the Dog
Licensing and Control By-law PH-4, with respect to clarifying the offence of
failing to have a current valid licence for a dog; it being pointed out that
at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, no
individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith.
|
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
|
|
10.
|
Amendment to the
Municipal Waste and Resource Materials Collection By-law
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director, Environmental Programs and Solid
Waste, the draft amending By-law, attached as Appendix A, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011, to
amend By-law WM-12, the Municipal Waste & Resource Materials Collection
By-law, to increase the size of allowable blue box receptacles.
|
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
|
|
11.
|
Amendment to the
Waste Management System Fees and Charges By-law
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director, Environmental Programs and Solid
Waste, the draft amending By-law, attached as Appendix A, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011, to
amend By-law WM-27, the Waste Management Fees and Charges By-law, to
eliminate fees for appliances with freon at City drop-off depots; it being
pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this
matter, no individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith.
|
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
|
|
12.
|
Rocks within the
Public Boulevard at 965 Westdel Bourne
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to
Approve that, on the recommendation of the Director, Environmental Programs
and Solid Waste, the following actions be taken with respect to rocks within
the public boulevard at 965 Westdel Bourne:
(a) (a) the Municipal Council BE ADVISED that the
property owner at 965 Westdel Bourne has placed large rocks within the public
boulevard in contravention to the City’s Streets By-law and has requested an
exemption to the By-law to allow the rocks to remain;
(b)
(b) the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to grant an exemption to the S-1 Streets By-law at
965 Westdel Bourne by entering into a Licensing Agreement with the property
owner to allow the rocks to remain as they currently exist, for a two-year
period; it being noted that the License Agreement shall clearly contain
clauses relating to indemnification of the City and proof of insurance that
transfer the liability, risk and all expenses related to the rock feature to
the property owner at 965 Westdel Bourne; and,
(c)
the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to enforce the removal of the rocks within the
public boulevard in the event that the property owner at 965 Westdel Bourne
does not enter into the Licensing Agreement noted in (b) above, within 30
days of the Municipal Council meeting on August 29, 2011, to the satisfaction
of the City Clerk and City Solicitor.
it
being noted that the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee heard a verbal
delegation from Mr. S. Cambria, 965 Westdel Bourne, with respect to this
matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
13.
|
Municipal Partner
Agreements for Blue Box Processing Services
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve that, on
the recommendation of the Director, Environmental Programs and Solid Waste,
the following actions be taken with respect to municipal partner agreements
for Blue Box processing services:
(a) the attached
proposed By-Law (Appendix A) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting
to be held on August 29, 2011, for the purpose of approving the standard
Municipal Partner Blue Box Recyclables Processing Agreement between the City
and Municipalities wanting to process recyclables at the City’s new regional
material recovery facility;
(b) the Executive
Director of Planning, Environmental and Engineering Services BE DELEGATED the
authority to establish the pricing in Schedule C of the standard Municipal
Partner Blue Box Recyclables Processing Agreement for each agreement with
a partner municipality;
(c) the
Mayor and Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute all agreements on behalf of the Corporation
of the City of London, substantially in the form as approved by the City
Solicitor employing the standard form, with no further approval required from
Council;
(d)
the Civic
Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are
necessary in connection with this matter;
(e)
the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Community and Neighbourhoods
Committee on any agreements signed; and
(f) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to develop principles that would be used to
establish pricing when responding to Request for Proposals or Tenders from
municipalities seeking Blue Box processing services and report back at a
future meeting of the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
14.
|
Updates on Green
Bin Program and Zero Waste Strategies (City Clerk's Note: In accordance with
section 13.7 of the Council Procedure By-law, the reconsideration of this
matter requires the approval of at least two-thirds of the whole Council.)
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Part 13 of the Council
Procedure By-law, a motion for Reconsideration is made by Councillor H.L.
Usher and seconded by Councillor S. Orser, with respect to the Green Bin
Program, as it relates to clause 14 of the Community and Neighbourhoods
Committee Report.
|
Pursuant to section 9.6 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor Orser moves, seconded by Councillor D. Brown,
that Councillor Van Meerbergen be permitted to speak longer than 5 minutes
with respect to the Green Bin Program and Zero Waste Strategies. Motion
Passed
|
At 6:12 p.m. Acting Mayor Polhill places Councillor
M. Brown in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.
At 6:17 p.m., Acting Mayor Polhill returns
to Chair and Councillor M. Brown takes his seat at the Council Board.
|
The Motion for Reconsideration is put and
Fails, the Members voting as follows:
YEAS: B. Polhill, S. Orser, D.G. Henderson,
P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown (5)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L.
Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E.
White (9)
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that the
report dated August 16, 2011, from the Director of Parks and Recreation, with
the concurrence of the Executive Director of Community Services, with respect
to the Parks
and Recreation Strategic Master Plan and 2009-2010 accomplishments, BE
DEFERRED to the September 13, 2011 meeting of the Community and
Neighbourhoods Committee.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
|
16.
|
Raising Chickens In
Poultry Pens within Residential Zones
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to
Approve that the following details of the public participation meeting held
on August 16, 2011 relating to raising chickens in poultry pens within
residential zones, BE RECEIVED and that NO FURTHER ACTION BE TAKEN with
respect to this matter:
·
L. Adams, 740
Valetta Street and G. Abayan-Dabuet, 172 West Rivertrace – providing comments
as outlined in the attached presentation, as well as noting the
points addressed in the submission as included as item #22(n) on the CNC
added communications agenda.
·
B. Warshawsky,
Associate Medical Officer of Health, Middlesex-London Health Unit – providing
comments as outlined in the attached communication.
·
R. Morley,
Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE) – providing comments as outlined
in the attached communication.
·
M. Shepherd,
Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (AWAC) – noting the points addressed in the
AWAC submission, as included as item 22(o) on the CNC added communications
agenda.
·
L. Gerow, 172
West Rivertrace Walk – providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication and as included as item 20(b) on the CNC agenda.
·
W. O. Rosas,
1647 Kathryn Drive – indicating that he is against a by-law prohibiting
backyard chickens; asking why there are only the privileged few that are
allowed chickens, the by-law is void if it favors a certain class of persons,
some people were allowed just because they have had chickens before;
expressing that this is discriminatory because it prohibits some and allows
others to have chickens; noting that a by-law to prohibit chickens is unjust.
·
M. Temme, 66
Palmer Street - noting the points addressed in her submission, dated August
7, 2011, as included as item 20(c) on the CNC agenda.
·
S. O’Neil, 534
Princess Avenue - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication.
·
Z. O’Neil, 534
Princess Avenue - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication.
·
D. Fortney, 28
Argyle Street – indicating that she has concerns with having backyard
chickens; noting that everything you read online contradicts the idea that
chickens do not attract predators, we already have problems with coyotes;
expressing a concern that people will not get chickens from a responsible
breeder but go to places where hundreds of animals are in wire cages, it is
not ethical; also indicating that Council is fully aware of the London Animal
Care Centre contract so why should we introduce another animal into the City
when we can’t take care of the ones we have; and lastly, just go vegan.
·
V. Van Linden,
431 Ridgewood Crescent – expressing that a handful of eggs is not enough to
keep a family going, lentils and beans are a much better source of protein;
indicating that there are a lot of blog stories on how to kill a chicken, the
Council of Canadians blog is linked to the Operation Chicken facebook page;
this shouldn’t be happening.
·
L. Matthews, 935
Princess Avenue – expressing that by being able to have backyard chickens
means that you are able to grow your own food, and children are more
connected to their food system; indicating that it may not be economical but
it connects her children to their food source and allows them to be more
self-sufficient.
·
O.
Hobson, 45 Evergreen Avenue – noting
the points addressed in his submission, dated August 5, 2011, as included as
item 20(g) on the CNC agenda.
·
S.
King, London, ON – indicating that he recently moved to the London area;
noting that he has visited chicken quota farms and the feces pile up all year
and the chickens are pumped with antibiotics; expressing that if backyard
chickens get to run around and eat bugs, they are healthy and provide healthy
food.
·
J. Dixon, 185
Marconi Boulevard – expressing support for having backyard chickens to
provide the communities in London with a sustainable food source; indicating
that she has visited a chicken quota business as well; expressing her willingness
to step forward as a backup for training, education and support for those
that have chickens.
·
R. Corrie, 193
Duchess Street – noting that as an urban farmer there are raccoons and skunks
coming through the yard all the time and has to farm under bird netting;
indicating support for backyard chickens for those that want them; expressing
willingness to help with backyard chicken training or as a babysitter for
those that go out of town.
·
J. LaMantia,
1663 Jubilee Drive – noting the points addressed in his submission, as
included as item 22(h) on the CNC added communications agenda.
·
C. Lightale, 500
Exmouth Circle – expressing that we are so disconnected from where our food
comes from, wanting to be able to show my children where food comes from;
noting that the benefits far outweigh the problems associated with backyard
chickens – it is important to know where our food comes from.
·
J. Fradette, 25
Susan Avenue – indicating that she would like five roosters, noting that hens
attract a lot of rodents.
·
G. Lewis –
indicating that he has several years experience with chickens and that he is
representing an animal rights group.
·
S. Lemire, 406B
Grey Street – noting that if the City of London is looking at composting, the
chickens love compost and would help the City in reducing its landfill
intake; indicating that she had three chickens in Nova Scotia and those
chickens would eat small snakes and mice if they came into their pen, so the
City doesn’t need to worry about small rodents.
·
M. Rogers, 638
Platt’s Lane – expressing that it has been an amazing experience for his
children to see where food comes from; noting that if the coops are designed
properly the pests will not increase in the City; further expressing that
chickens are not pets, they are for food.
·
K. Lomack, 25
Beattie Street - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication and as included as item 22(f) on the CNC added communications
agenda.
·
Resident, 500
Sarnia Road – expressing that all she is hearing is eggs, eggs, eggs, but it
is also a source of meat; indicating that poultry is not considered an
animal; noting that people may be well intentioned but animals rarely win;
further indicating that those with their manicured lawns should turn them
into vegetable gardens.
·
F. Morrison, 803
Waterloo Street - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication and as included as item 22(b) on the CNC added communications
agenda.
·
M. Kuijper,
Kings College - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication.
·
C.
Kuijpers-Hannink, 333 Tecumseh Avenue – indicating that she heard that it
would cost $35 to put down a chicken in a humane manner by a vet; noting that
most people she knows would not pay that kind of money, they would just use
an axe; asking how will the City reinforce humane killing of chickens when
they cannot reinforce the spaying and neutering of cats and dogs; expressing
that if we allow backyard chickens we are welcoming backyard slaughterhouses.
·
J. Collins, 763
Second Street – noting that chickens give us eggs and substance, the comments
she has heard tonight seem to be fear based; indicating that the City has no
belief in its people to handle this and keep it balanced.
·
G.
Sanio-O’Neill, 534 Princess Avenue – providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication.
·
M. Pearson, 1106
Gatewood Road – indicating that there are three types of chickens, egg
layers, meat chicken, and the muli-purpose chicken; noting that the City of
London wants the egg layer as an egg from an egg laying chicken doesn’t
become a chicken unless the egg is fertilized.
it being noted that the CNC heard a
verbal delegation from the Director, Environmental Programs and Solid
Waste and received the
following communications with respect to this matter:
·
Councillor
S. Orser, dated May 29, 2011 – Kingston City Council decision regarding hens;
·
P.
Reid, 1639 Scott Street, dated June 30, 2011 – in support of backyard
chickens;
·
A.
Berchtold, 652 Elias Street, dated May 27, 2011 – in support of backyard
chickens;
·
A.
Redmond (e-mail) – in support of backyard chickens;
·
Rare
Breeds Canada, 2495 boul’. Perrot. N. D. de L’lle Perrot, Quebec City - in
support of backyard chickens;
·
S.
Price, 50 Forward Avenue - in support of backyard chickens;
·
J.
Dunn, 1420 Westdel Bourne – opposed to having backyard chickens within
residential zones;
·
C.
Murphy, 269 Taylor Street – in support of backyard chickens;
·
Dr.
R. Harmsen, Queens University at Kingston – in support of backyard chickens;
·
F.
Gross, 7 Caldwell Place – opposed to having backyard chickens in residential
areas in London;
·
R.
Blissett, 27 Laurel Street – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
D.
Gailbraith, 2425 Main Street – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
D.
Bridger, 590 Steeplechase Drive – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
R.
Scherle, 65 Archer Crescent – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
P.
Larsen, 539 Ontario Street – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
K.
Lomack, 25 Beattie Avenue – opposed to having backyard chickens;
·
G.
Sass, 101 Forward Avenue;
·
D.
Roberts, 35-375 Thistledown Way – opposed to having backyard chickens; and,
·
B. Wells, 408-190
Cherryhill Circle – in support of a backyard chicken pilot project.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen,
D. Brown, H.L. Usher (10)
NAYS: S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (4)
|
|
17.
|
M&M National
Family Dinner Night
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that the
Mayor BE ASKED to write a letter of support related to the attached
letter from K. Bejczak, Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada with respect
to the M & M National Family Dinner Night.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Usher to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Executive Director of Community Services, the
policy paper entitled “Towards a Community Addiction and Mental Health
Strategy for the City of London”, attached hereto as Appendix
A, BE ENDORSED; it
being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter, no individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Chair directs that the following report
clauses be noted.
|
That the Community
and Neighbourhoods Committee reviewed and received the Dearness Home Community
Newsletter for August 2011.
That the Community
and Neighbourhoods Committee reviewed and received the 5th Report of the London
Housing Advisory Committee (LHAC) from its meeting held on July 13, 2011.
That the Community and
Neighbourhoods Committee reviewed and received the 7th Report of the Animal
Welfare Advisory Committee from its meeting held on July 26, 2011.
That the Community and Neighbourhoods Committee (CNC) reviewed and
received an information
report, dated August 16, 2011, from the Director of Building Controls and Chief
Building Official, with respect to the Taxi/Limousine By-law review and the vehicle age of
limousines;
it being noted that the CNC received a communication, dated August 12,
2011, from B. Rice, General Manager, Checker Limousine, and heard verbal
delegations from the following individuals with respect to this matter:
·
Q. Abdi, London Checker
Limousine Brokers and Drivers Association, and received a communication dated
August 9, 2011;
·
J. Donnelly, President,
Aboutown Group of Companies, and received a communication dated August 12,
2011;
·
H. Savehilaghi,
President, Yellow London Taxi Inc.; and,
·
R. Amini, President,
London Taxi Association.
That the Community
and Neighbourhoods Committee reviewed and received clauses 2 to 12, inclusive,
of the 8th Report of the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee
from its meeting held on July 21, 2011.
Councillor Orser moves, seconded by
Councillor Usher, that Council recess. Motion passed.
The Council recesses at 6:56 pm and
reconvenes at 7:42 pm, with Acting Mayor Polhill in the Chain and all Members
present except Mayor Fontana.
Motion of Which
Notice is Given
Councillor Orser moves, seconded by
Councillor Usher, that pursuant to section 18.2 of the Council Procedure
By-law, leave be given for the introduction of a motion with respect to the
Glanworth Library.
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong (1)
|
Councillor White moves, seconded by
Councillor Usher, that the following motion be adopted:
That the London
Public Library Board BE REQUESTED to report back to the Community and
Neighbourhoods Committee, by September 30, 2011,with details as to the decision
making process the London Public Library Board has followed in deciding to
close the Glanworth Library, with those details to include the following
information:
(a) the public
consultation process that was followed;
(b) the level of
awareness the local community had that such a decision was imminent;
(c) what solutions were
explored with the local community to try and keep the Glanworth Library open;
(d) what funding
solutions were explored with the City of London in order to address the
maintenance issues, emergency and ongoing, so that the Glanworth Library could
remain open and continues to serve the local community; and,
(e) what is the procedure
the London Public Library Board follows in determining if a library branch
should be closed and how such a closure will be implemented.
Councillor Orser moves, seconded by Councillor
M. Brown, that pursuant to section 9.6 of the Council Procedure By-law,
Councillor Usher be permitted to speak longer than 5 minutes with respect to
the motion related to the Glanworth Library. Motion Passed
Councillor Orser
moves, seconded by Councillor White, that the Glanworth Library motion be
amended by adding a new part (f), as follows:
“(f) that City of
London staff investigate possible future investments regarding the Library and
other issues, with input from the Glanworth residents.”
Pursuant to section 11.6 of the Council
Procedure By-law, the motion, as amended, moved by Councillor White and
seconded by Councillor Usher is, at the joint request of the mover and seconder
and with the consent of the Council, withdrawn.
Councillor White moves, seconded by
Councillor Usher, that the London Public Library Board BE REQUESTED to take
following actions with respect to the proposed closure of the Glanworth
Library, scheduled for December 31, 2011:
(a) until such time as further public
consultation with the community can be undertaken, no further action related to
the proposed closure be taken; it being noted that this consultation will
include the Ward Councillors;
(b) the Chief Librarian discuss the matter
with the Services Review Committee; and,
(c) the Council be provided with an update
on the above-noted actions prior to December 31, 2011.
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (10)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, N. Branscombe, M.
Brown, P. Hubert (4)
Councillor Swan moves, seconded by
Councillor White, that Council recess. Motion passed.
The Council recesses at 9:22 pm and
reconvenes at 9:29 pm, with Acting Mayor Polhill in the Chair and all Members
present except Mayor Fontana, and Councillors Orser and White.
|
Built and Natural
Environment Committee
Councillor Swan
presents the 19th Report
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve that
the following actions be taken with respect to the application of Hasham
Abdelsayed relating to the property located at 1472 Huron Street:
(a) the
request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject
lands from a Convenience Commercial (CC2) Zone which permits convenience
stores, restaurants, financial institutions without a drive through and
medical/dental offices to a Convenience Commercial Special Provision (CC2
(__)) Zone which allows for the above uses and a pharmacy use without a drive
through, a minimum rear yard setback of 1.7m, a minimum west interior side
yard setback of 1.7m, a minimum east side yard setback of 0.0m, a minimum
front yard setback to a parking area of 2.1m, a minimum east side yard
setback to a parking area of 0.0m, a maximum lot coverage of 35%, a minimum
of 39 parking spaces including 1 handicapped parking space based on a gross
floor area of 730m2, and which prohibits a methadone clinic and methadone
dispensary use BE REFUSED for the following reason:
(i) concerns
with respect to the possibility of the dispensing of methadone from the
proposed pharmacy and the lack of enforcement of methadone dispensing; and,
(b) the
request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the lands
located 1472 Huron Street from a Convenience Commercial (CC2) Zone which
permits convenience stores, restaurants, financial institutions without a
drive through and medical/dental offices to a Convenience Commercial Special
Provision (CC6 ( )) Zone which permits for the above uses with a lot coverage
of 35% and 40 parking space minimum BE REFUSED for the following reason:
(i) the
full range of uses in the Convenience Commercial (CC6) Zone variation uses
may not be appropriate on this site;
it being
pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this
matter, the following individuals made an oral submission in connection
therewith:
·
L.
Kirkness, Kirkness Consulting Inc., on behalf of the applicant – correcting
the Staff report by indicating that the applicant’s last name is spelled
“Abdelsayed” and by indicating that the consultant should be “Kirkness
Consulting Inc.”; expressing concern with the lack of clarity of enforcement;
indicating that there is no need for enforcement on this property; advising
that this business would operate on a smaller scale than what he already
operates in other areas of the City; and indicating that the applicant is
involved in the methadone clinic on Dundas Street.
·
C.
Irwin, 1347 Basswood Place – advising that she has lived at this address for
22 years; indicating that her property abuts the plaza; expressing objection
to the proposed pharmacy; advising that there are currently two part-time
doctors in this location and that it won’t address London’s doctor shortage;
advising that there are three pharmacies within 1,000 feet of the plaza;
advising that the City has no way of policing what is dispensed at the
pharmacy; asking that greater caution be exercised before opening the
pharmacy; indicating that there is no way to track the amount of methadone
being dispensed; recommending that the plaza be brought up to community
standards as the plaza is covered in graffiti and doesn’t comply with
existing rules; requesting that the zoning not be amended to allow the
pharmacy use; advising that there is a huge loop hole that must be closed;
requesting that the neighbourhood be supported by turning down the
application.
·
R.
Moss, 1 Redwood Lane – advising that there are three schools in the area and
five pharmacies within two kilometres of the plaza; advising that it is
understood that methadone is not allowed, but also realize that the
dispensing of methadone can’t be enforced.
·
B.
Mann, 26 Redwood Lane – indicating that he lives 115 metres west of the
plaza; indicating that the convenience/commercial property is separated by
residences and has not been a problem in the past; advising that with the
proposed revised drawings suggested that it should be the new owner is going
to make improvements to the plaza, but the owner may not make if he doesn’t
get his amendment; advising that there is an abundance of pharmacies within
one kilometre of the plaza; indicating that he is not here to regulate the
business or stop the business but the plaza doesn’t need a pharmacy;
indicating that a medical clinic is already permitted; indicating that the
only reason for rezoning is for the inclusion of a pharmacy as the
medical/dental use is already permitted; advising that City Staff have
indicated that the issue of regulating methadone clinics has not been
resolved; indicating that methadone clinics would be detrimental to the
neighbourhood; requesting that the Committee consider carefully if they would
like to support the rezoning for this use.
·
S.
Irwin, 1347 Basswood Place – expressing opposition to the application;
suggesting that the issues should be separated, that the applicant is saying
that “if I get this, I will do that”, you have a person who wants to open a
pharmacy and be a landlord; indicating that no effort has been made to clean
up the graffiti or garbage at the plaza, which has been a long-standing
complaint; suggesting that the owner should be doing improvements to the
plaza to fit in with the community; advising that he is aware that the
applicant is the owner of 528 Dundas Street and the issues that are going on
at that address; suggesting that the owner should make changes voluntarily.
·
Resident,
1458 Huron Street – advising that her property is an acre; indicating that
she is still in contact with the original owners; advising that this is an
old community, with people living in their homes for a long time; suggesting
that homes have been put up for sale because of this application and the
potential for a methadone clinic; advising that she doesn’t want kids jumping
her fence or kids getting attacked going to the convenience store; advising
that there are several public schools and churches in the area; and
requesting that the Committee reject the application.
·
L.
Smith, 7 Bellrock Crescent – expressing opposition to the application; indicating
that the plaza is near schools, day cares, community centres, and churches.
·
A.
Carter, 1252 Sorrell Road – advising that she lives approximately 2 to 2 ½
kilometres from the plaza; indicating that she can see her neighbourhood
being affected if the application is approved; and advising that if a person
brings in a prescription, the pharmacist cannot legally refuse to fill it;
indicating that the proposed pharmacy will devalue the properties in the
neighbourhood and requesting that people boycott the pharmacy.
·
P.
Sobko, 1400 Basswood Road – advising that he has lived at his place of
residence for 32 years; indicating that he heard a rumour about a road going
through Stronach Park and was advised by the City that a road wouldn’t go
through the Park and now there is a road going through the Park and advising
that his wife has lost day care clients due to this application.
·
S.
Butler, 46 Christians Drive – advising that there are 10 schools in the area,
two high schools, Stronach Arena, ball parks, playgrounds, a pool; and
enquiring as to the need for a pharmacy in this location.
·
G.
Schneider, 978 Apache Road – enquiring as to the rationale for the proposed
zoning.
·
Resident,
Address Unknown - enquiring as to whether or not the applicant owns or has
interests in any other methadone clinics.
·
B.
MacDonald, 1204 Lancaster Street – advising that he was the Councillor for
this ward for 28 years and worked hard to remove the “east of Adelaide”
stigma; expressing opposition to the application; indicating that once the
pharmacy is installed, it is up to the doctor or pharmacist to control what
drugs they dispense; advising that this community is a jewel in the east end
of the city and that this application is like a slap in the face to the
community.
·
M.
Turner, 1217 Farnsborough Crescent – indicating that a certain number of
spots need to be set aside for parking in the parking lot for medical
appointments; noting that cars are not allowed to park along the boulevard;
and that there is a fast response to calls to the Police Department.
·
M.
Prudhomme, 42 Redwood Lane – advising that he has worked in the mental health
field and that there are going to be problems with drugs if the pharmacy is
permitted.
·
C.
Turner, 1327 Basswood Place – hoping that Council will look after them when
casting their votes.
·
D.
Allerston, 102 Christian’s Court – expressing concern with the convenience
store currently located in the plaza; advising that adding the pharmacy is
going to increase the problems; advising that East of Adelaide should look
better and indicating that plaza should already have been cleaned up.
·
Resident,
30 Silverbrook Drive – advising that he is the co-ordinator for the
condominium complex and that values of the community and ambiance for the
children growing up in the area will be affected; and asking the Committee to
ensure the needs of the entire community are met, especially little kids.
·
B.
Yates, 14 Kaladar Place – advising that he received a letter from the city to
clean up his property because he had two unlicensed cars on his property;
indicating that he has a handicapped child and he opposes drug paraphernalia.
·
G.
Eggle, 1447 Huron Street – advising that he is the property manager for the
condominium complex; advising that it is easy to remove graffiti and that the
artists get tired and stop when you remove their graffiti and advising that
there is a wide demographic that rents in this area.
·
L.
Ackford, 1453 Huron Street – advising that the co-operative housing unit is
only one year old; questioning the loop holes in the by-law; advising that
another pharmacy is not necessary; and indicating that she would hate to see
her new home tainted or ruined.
·
B.
Vijay, 1 Christian’s Drive – indicating that he is originally from North Bay
and that, in his mind, if the application is approved, it raises red flags.
·
M.
Irwin, 1347 Basswood Place – advising that opening this door is a big risk
for a small reward and doesn’t benefit anyone.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (12)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Councillor Orser returns to the meeting.
Councillor White returns to the meeting.
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Executive Director - Planning,
Environmental and Engineering Services, the engagement of John Fitzgerald up
to a maximum of $8,500 BE ENDORSED with respect to providing external
consulting support in relation to the matters outlined in this report,
generally relating to the background work on the Greenway Pollution Control
Centre Expansion and Upgrade.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (12)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer the
following actions be taken with respect to the Request for Proposal 11-29,
Provide Fiscal Agent Services:
(a) the
proposals submitted by the following proponents BE ACCEPTED:
RBC
Dominion Securities Inc., operating as RBC Capital Markets
Royal
Bank Plaza, 200 Bay Street, 2nd Floor, North Tower
Toronto,
ON M5J 2W7
CIBC
World Markets Inc.
Brookfield
Place, 161 Bay Street, 5th Floor
Toronto,
ON M5J 2S8
TD
Securities Inc.
222 Bay
Street, 7th Floor
Toronto,
ON M5K 1A2
(b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts that
are necessary in connection with securing this service; and
(c) the
approval, hereby given, BE CONDITIONAL on the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the successful proponents.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (12)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the attached
proposed by-law (Appendix A) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting
of August, 29, 2011 to amend By-law No. A.-6680-171, to reflect the name
change of the Ontario Infrastructure Projects Corporation (OIPC) to the
Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation (OILC).
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (12)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer:
(a) the
annual statement of the City Treasurer (Appendix A and Appendix B attached)
with respect to the operation of the City Services Reserve Funds and Urban
Works Reserve Funds for the year ended December 31, 2010 BE RECEIVED for
information; and
(b) a
copy of the annual statement BE FORWARDED to the Minister of Municipal
Affairs and Housing in compliance with Section 43(3) of the Development Charges
Act, 1997.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (12)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that the
following actions be taken with respect to residual local government funding
arising from the recent governance restructuring:
(a)
the
actions of the Municipal Council taken at its meeting held on June 20, 2011,
in having adopted clause 3(a) of the 16th Report of the Finance and
Administration Committee concerning the allocation of residual local
government funding arising from the recent governance restructuring BE
RECONSIDERED;
(b)
the
said clause 3(a) of the 16th Report of the Finance and Administration
Committee from its meeting held on June 15, 2011 BE RESCINDED; and
(c)
the
following actions be taken with respect to the residual local government
funding arising from the recent governance restructuring:
(i)
$50,000
of the residual local government funding arising from the recent governance
restructuring BE ALLOCATED, on a one-time basis for 2011, to the Mayor’s
Office for the purpose of improving constituency liaison initiatives; and,
(ii)
a
small sub-working group comprised of members of the Governance Working Group
BE ESTABLISHED to review options for allocating the unallocated balance of
the residual local government funding arising from the recent governance
restructuring.
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Refer clause 5 of FAC report back to
the September 28th meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee for
consideration, following consultation with the Chair of the Governance
Working Group and selected Members of Council and in conjunction with the
presentation of the Dobbie Report,.
|
Motion to Refer Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
6.
|
Declare Surplus and
Sale of Part of the Unopened Original Baseline Road Allowance East of Jarvis
Street
|
|
|
|
Motion
made by Councillor Bryant to Approve that, on
the recommendation of the Managing Director - Corporate Assets, on the advice
of the Manager Realty Services, the unopened original Baseline Road road
allowance east of Jarvis Street, identified as parts 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 9, &
10 of a draft Reference Plan, containing an area of approximately 0.453 acres
and shown as Area ”A” on the attached sketch, BE DECLARED
SURPLUS, and following actions be taken with respect to the offers submitted
for the purchase of the surplus land:
(a) the offer from 1767127
ONTARIO INC. for Parts 9 & 10 of a draft Reference Plan, to purchase
the subject lands from the City for the sum of $24,000, BE ACCEPTED
subject to the following conditions:
(i)
Part 9 being subject to a right-of way in
favour of others;
(ii)
the completion of this transaction being
conditional upon the completion of two other transactions disposing of Parts
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 to the abutting land owners;
(iii)
the Purchaser agreeing to prepare and
deposit on title, on or before closing and at their expense, a Reference Plan
as shown on Schedule A;
(b) the offer from VIVIAN AND
MARK WELLS (55 Rose Hip Place) for Parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, &
7 of a draft Reference Plan, to purchase the subject lands from the City for
the sum of $4,000, BE ACCEPTED subject to the following conditions:
(i)
easements in favour of the City of London,
London Hydro and Bell Canada;
(ii)
Parts 4 & 6 being subject to a
right-of-way in favour of others;
(iii)
the completion of two other transactions
disposing of parts 3, 8, 9, & 10 to the abutting land owners;
(c) the offer from THADATHIL
AND CACHIKUTTY PHILIP (51 Rose Hip Place) for Parts 3 & 8 of a draft
Reference Plan, to purchase the subject lands from the City for the sum of
$4,000, BE ACCEPTED subject to the following conditions:
(i)
easements in favour of London Hydro and
Bell Canada;
(ii)
completion of two other transactions
disposing of parts 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 to the abutting land owners.
All parcels of land being disposed of will be
consolidated with abutting land owners properties.
(d) the
attached proposed by-laws BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council Meeting on August 29, 2011, to approve the sale of lands
to 1767127 Ontario Inc., Vivian and Mark Wells, and Thadathil and
Cachikutty Philip, and TO AUTHORIZE the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreements
of Purchase and Sale.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
7.
|
By-law Amendments
to Provide for Appeals to a Hearings Officer
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the City Clerk, the following actions be taken
to amend certain municipal by-laws to provide for the delegation of powers of
decision to City of London Hearings Officers:
(a)
the
proposed revised by-law attached as Schedule ‘A’ BE INTRODUCED
at the Municipal Council meeting on August 29, 2011 to amend By-law
No. C.P.-19, entitled “A by-law to provide for the licensing and regulation
of Residential Rental Units in the City of London”;
(b)
the
proposed revised by-law attached as Schedule ‘D’ BE INTRODUCED
at the Municipal Council meeting on August 29, 2011 to amend By-Law No.
S.-3775-94 entitled “A by-law prohibiting and regulating signs
and other advertising devices, and regulating the placing of signs and
canopies upon
highways”;
(c)
the
proposed by-law attached as Schedule ‘B’ to amend By-law L-6
entitled, “A by-law to provide for the licensing and regulation of various
businesses” BE REFERRED back to staff for further consideration and report
back at a future date; and
(d)
the
proposed by-law attached as Schedule ‘C’ to amend By-law L-7
entitled, “A by-law to provide for licensing the business of a pawnbroker” BE
REFERRED back to staff for further consideration and report back at a future
date;
it being pointed
out that there were no oral submissions made at the public participation
meeting held in connection with this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
8.
|
2011 User Fees and
Charges
|
|
|
|
Motion made by
Councillor Bryant to Approve that, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, the attached proposed by-law (Appendix “A”) to amend
By-law No. A-40 entitled “A by-law to provide for Various Fees and Charges”
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011
to amend the fee related to Civil Marriage Ceremonies to increase the fee
from $150 to $250, with an additional fee of $25 per witness, if required;
it being pointed
out that there were no oral submissions made at the public participation
meeting held in connection with this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
9.
|
Council’s
Investment and Economic Prosperity Agenda (City Clerk's Note: In accordance
with section 13.7 of the Council Procedure By-law, the reconsideration of
this matter requires the approval of at least two-thirds of the whole
Council.)
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Part 13 of the Council
Procedure By-law, a motion for Reconsideration is made by Councillor J.P.
Bryant and seconded by Councillor M. Brown, with respect to the implementation
of the Council’s Investment and Economic Prosperity Agenda, as it relates to
clause 9 of the Finance and Administration Committee Report.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that the following actions be taken with respect to the Municipal Council’s Investment
and Economic Prosperity Committee:
(a) the
actions of the Municipal Council taken at its meeting held on July 25, 2011,
in having adopted clause 15(d) of the 17th Report of the Finance and
Administration Committee concerning the implementation of the proposed
governance model on December 1, 2011 BE RECONSIDERED;
(b) the
said clause 15(d) of the 17th Report of the Finance and Administration
Committee from its meeting held on July 20, 2011 BE RESCINDED; and
(c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake the necessary measures to
implement the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee by October 3,
2011, with the balance of the new Committees to be implemented by December 1,
2011;
(d) the
membership of the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee BE SET at 6,
plus the Mayor (ex officio);
(e) jurisdiction
to consider and recommend strategies to Council for fulfilling the economic
objectives/priorities set by the Municipal Council BE INCORPORATED into the
mandate of the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee, noting that
approval of certain operational steps to implement the strategies recommended
by the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee will often fall to
another Standing Committee (e.g. planning matters, etc.);
(f) the
City Clerk BE DIRECTED to canvass the Members of Council to determine which
Members are interested in serving on the Investment and Economic Prosperity
Committee and to place their names on the September 20, 2011 agenda of the
Committee of the Whole for consideration and recommendation to the October 3,
2011 meeting of the Municipal Council; and
(g) for
the purposes of continuity, the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to take the necessary
steps to provide for the initial appointments to the Investment and Economic
Prosperity Committee to extend to November 30, 2012, rather than November 30,
2011.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
10.
|
Childhood Cancer
Awareness
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that the Mayor BE REQUESTED to write a letter to Childcan in support of
Childhood Cancer Awareness Month.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
11.
|
Upcoming Session -
Council Values
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that the City Clerk BE REQUESTED to identify the legislated duties of the
Mayor and Councillors for consideration as part of the Municipal Council’s
discussions at its future session with respect to setting expectations for
Council Members as it relates to its values of open and accountable
government, citizen engagement, fiscal responsibility and respect and
integrity.
|
Motion made by Councillor D.G. Henderson
and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Refer clause 11 to a future
meeting in 2012.
|
Motion to Refer Failed
YEAS: D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (2)
NAYS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
|
The motion to adopt clause 11 is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
12.
|
Provincial
Legislation - Practices and Procedures - Meetings of Council
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Bryant to Approve
that the City Clerk and the City Solicitor BE REQUESTED to report back to the
Finance and Administration Committee with an information report containing
possible amendments to the Municipal Act, 2001, for petitioning the Province,
that would provide greater latitude for those situations where a quorum of
Council Members is present but it is not the intent for the situation to be
deemed a Council Meeting, while still recognizing the need for accountability
and transparency by the Municipal Council.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion by Councillor N. Branscombe and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler that pursuant to Section 2.4 of the
Council Procedure By-law, section 11.10 of the said by-law be suspended for
the purpose of permitting the meeting to proceed beyond 11:00 p.m.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler,
N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (10)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, D.G.
Henderson (3)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor Bryant to Approve leave pursuant to section 17.4 of
the Council Procedure By-law to permit the discussion and debate and the
making of a substantive motion with respect to clause 16 of the 19th Report
of the Finance and Administration Committee, having to do with the shut-down
of the CBC transmitter in London.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: S. Orser (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor Bryant to Approve that the Director, Intergovernmental
and Community Liaison be requested to investigate and report back at a future
meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee regarding potential
opportunities to continue to advocate the requirement for the CBC to continue
to provide a television transmitter for the London area and to evaluate other
opportunities to for potential invention to maintain a television transmitter
for the London area.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.L.
Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (11)
NAYS: J.B. Swan, S. Orser, H.L. Usher (3)
|
The
Chair directs that the following report clauses be noted.
That the Finance and
Administration Committee received and noted an information report from the
Chief Administrative Officer with respect to integrated Accessibility Standard
under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005
(AODA).
That the Finance and
Administration Committee received and noted an information report from the
Managing Director – Corporate Assets with respect to an update on Realty
Services’ agency of record.
That the Finance and
Administration Committee received and noted an information report from the
Managing Director – Corporate Assets with respect to failed municipal tax sale
properties at 200-202 Adelaide Street North and 1851 Pension Lane.
That the Finance and
Administration Committee received an information report from the City Solicitor
with respect to reporting of Statements of Claims for the period of April 1,
2011 to July 15, 2011.
That the Finance and
Administration Committee received a communication from Randy P. Warden,
Chairperson, London Celebrates Canada, Event Organizer with respect to Canada
Day 2011.
That the Finance and
Administration Committee (FAC) passed the following resolution prior to moving
in camera from 10:56 a.m. to 11:39 a.m.:
That the Finance and
Administration Committee move in camera to consider the following:
(a) A
matter
pertaining to
litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality, personal matters
about an identifiable individual and information whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation
or instructions to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried
on by or on behalf of the Corporation as it relates to a property damage claim;
(b) A
matter
pertaining to
litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality, personal matters
about an identifiable individual and information whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation
or instructions to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried
on by or on behalf of the Corporation as it relates to a property damage claim;
(c) A
matter pertaining to reports, advice and recommendations of officers and
employees of the Corporation concerning labour relations and employee
negotiations in regard to one of the Corporation’s associations or unions;
(d) A
matter pertaining to the purpose of instructions and directions to officers and
employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications
necessary for that purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers
and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
commercial and financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to the
proposed acquisition the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to,
prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly
with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in
similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is in
the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied, and
result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial
institution or agency; commercial, information relating to the proposed
acquisition that belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or
potential monetary value; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose
disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of
the Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the
proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be
injurious to the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be
applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of
the Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition; and
(e) A
matter pertaining to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege
concerning potential litigation and litigation involving a request for
indemnity from the Mayor and for the purpose of giving directions to the
solicitors for the municipality.
Councillor Bryant moves, seconded by
Councillor Swan that Council recess for 5 minutes. Motion Passed.
The Council recesses at 10:25 p.m. and
reconvenes at 10:33 p.m., with all Members present except Mayor Fontana.
|
Finance and
Administration Committee
Councillor
Bryant presents the 20th Report.
The
Chair directs that the report clauses be noted.
1. Confidential
Matters
That the Finance and
Administration Committee (FAC) passed the following resolution prior to moving
in camera from 3:30 p.m. to 3:47 p.m.:
That
the Finance and Administration Committee move in camera to consider for the
purpose of considering a matter pertaining to instructions
and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed disposition of land; advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; reports or
advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed disposition of land; financial information supplied in
confidence pertaining to the proposed disposition the disclosure of which could
reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive position or
interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of the
Corporation, result in similar information no longer being supplied to the
Corporation where it is in the public interest that similar information
continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or gain to any person,
group, committee or financial institution or agency; commercial, information
relating to the proposed disposition that belongs to the Corporation that has
monetary value or potential monetary value; information concerning the
proposed disposition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice
the economic interests of the Corporation or its competitive position;
information concerning the proposed disposition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to be injurious to the financial interests of the
Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any negotiations carried on or
to be carried on by or on behalf of the Corporation concerning the proposed
disposition.
Motion
made by Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the
Managing Director – Corporate Assets and the Fire Chief, the following
actions be taken with respect to the appointment of an architect for the new
No. 7 Fire Station (Project PP1089):
(a) the
proposal submitted by Cornerstone Architecture, 110-700 Richmond Street,
London, Ontario N6A 5C7, in the amount of $133,500.00, including a
disbursements allowance of $5,000, and excluding HST, BE ACCEPTED; it being
pointed out that the proposal submitted by Cornerstone Architecture was
deemed to provide the best technical and financial value to the Corporation,
meets the City’s requirements in all areas and its acceptance is in
accordance with Section 15.2 of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
(b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report, attached as Appendix “A”;
(c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with the project; and,
(d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the contractor for the work.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
2.
|
Request from
Municipality of Middlesex Centre – Sanitary Servicing for Arva
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to:
(a) draft
an amendment to the servicing agreement between The Corporation of the City
of London and the Municipality of Middlesex Centre which includes:
(i) additional
sewer servicing capacity;
(ii) the use
of development charges; and,
(iii) potential
ongoing revenue mechanisms;
(b) provide
the appropriate Standing Committee with any potential subsequent agreement,
for review and approval;
it being noted that the Civic
Administration was asked to report back to a future meeting of the Built and
Natural Environment Committee with respect to this matter;
it being further noted that the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received the attached
communication dated August 15, 2011, from L. Langdon, Executive Director,
London Home Builders’ Association, with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, S.E. White (6)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (8)
|
Motion made by
Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the Director of
Water and City Engineer, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take the
following actions with respect to the proposed fixed rate structure for water
and sanitary charges as part of the water, sanitary and storm rate structure
review:
(a)
prepare
a proposal for a fixed rate component to the charges for water and sanitary
servicing which is consistent with fixed costs related to billing and capital
renewal;
(b)
inform
stakeholders of the need for the proposed change(s) to the rates, the
rationale for any proposed change(s) and the potential impact of any changes
to customers; and,
(c) hold
a public participation meeting at a Built and Natural Environment Committee meeting
in the Fall of 2011, for the purpose of receiving public input; and, if
appropriate;
(d) report
back with a by-law to authorize the implementation of a rate structure change
related to a fixed component to the water and sanitary rates, with the 2012
Budget;
it being noted that
the structural change will be revenue neutral and no additional revenues will
be realized in the 2012 Budget year; and,
it being further noted that this is an
interim measure and subsequent changes to the rate structures, as previously
presented, will be brought before the appropriate Standing Committee in 2012.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
4.
|
Winter Maintenance
Equipment with Operators – Trucks with Sander/Salter Bodies with Plow –
Tender 11-56
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director of Water and City Engineer,
the following actions be taken with respect to the purchase of winter
maintenance equipment with operators – trucks with sand/salter bodies:
(a) the tender bids received for
winter maintenance equipment with operators, trucks with sander/salter bodies
BE ACCEPTED, as follows:
(i)
B & A Davies Trucking Inc., 5279 Colonel
Talbot Road, London, ON N6P 1H8 – 4 Units $117.75/hr., $118.75/hr.,
$123.93/hr. and $134.43/hr.;
(ii)
Mobil Striping & Sweeping Ltd., 35 Bayview
Court, London, ON N5W 5W4 – 2 Units $124.50/hr. and $124.50/hr.;
(iii) Edgar Diversified Inc., 28 Portal Crescent, London, ON
N5X 2E4 – 1 Unit $128.00/hr.;
(iii)
BLR Contracting & Excavating, 250 West
Street, Belmont, ON N0L 1B0 - 2 Units $129.40/hr. and $139.40/hr.;
(iv) Roy Wonnacott Trucking Ltd., 5309 Nine Mile Road, R.R.
#3, Ilderton, ON N0M 2A0 – 2 Units $134.00/hr. and $138.00/hr.;
(v)
1841635 Ontario Inc., 15095 Eight Mile Road,
Arva, ON N0M 1G0 – 2 Units $138.00/hr. and $138.00/hr.;
(vi)
A.C. Hunter Trucking Ltd., 1781 Phillbrook
Court, London, ON N5X 2Z3 – 1 Unit $138.88/hr.;
(vii)
S & B Construction Ltd., 36312 Talbot
Line, Shedden, ON N0L 2E0 – 2 Units $137.99/hr. and $139.99/hr.; and,
(viii)
Allan Cunningham, 35317 Coursey Line, R.R. #1,
Lucan, ON N0M 2J0 – 2 Units $134.75/hr. and $134.75/hr.;
(b)
the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to
undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with
these contracts; and,
(c)
the approval hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon
the Corporation entering into a formal contract or having a purchase order,
or contract record relating to the subject matter of this approval.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director Wastewater and Treatment and the
Managing Director - Corporate Assets, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Greenway Flotation building upgrades, (ES5083):
(a) the bid
submitted by Elgin Contracting and Restoration Ltd., 100 Ross Street, St.
Thomas, Ontario N5R 3X8, in the amount of $259,000.00, excluding HST, BE
ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted was an irregular bid as only
one (1) bid was received and the irregular bid process was followed for this
project and the irregular bid meets all terms, conditions and specifications
of the City;
(b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report attached hereto as Appendix “A”;
(c) the Civic
Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this project; and,
(d) the approval
given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract with the contractor for the work.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
6.
|
Fox Hollow
Development Area Stormwater Management Facility #2 – Depressurization Wells
and Groundwater Works
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director, Wastewater and Treatment, the
unexpended funds and remaining contingency from the Stormwater Management
Facility #2 site preparation contract (Tender T11-13) BE TRANSFERRED to
the Construction
Contract for the Fox Hollow Development Area SWM Facility #2 (Tender T11-40)
for the construction of depressurization wells.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
7.
|
Contract Award –
Stoney Creek Erosion Control Wetland Stormwater Management Facility
Construction (ES2477) – Tender 11-12
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director, Wastewater and Treatment, the following
actions be taken with respect
to the construction of the Stoney Creek Erosion Control Wetland Stormwater
Management Facility:
(a) the bid submitted by Bre-Ex
Limited, 1069 Wellington Road, London, ON N6E 2H6, in the amount of
$1,726,679.88, excluding HST, BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid
submitted by Bre-Ex Limited was the lowest of seven (7) pre-qualified bids
received and meets the City's specifications and requirements in all areas;
(b) Delcan Consulting, 1069
Wellington Road, London, ON N6E 2H6, BE AUTHORIZED to carry out the
Inspection and General Construction Administration, in accordance with the
estimated amount of $195,000, including contingency, excluding HST, based
upon the Fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services, 2006, recommended
by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers;
(c) the financing for this work BE
APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report attached
hereto as Appendix "A";
(d) the Civic Administration BE
AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in
connection with this work;
(e) the approvals given herein BE
CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract with the
consultant for the work; and,
(f) the
Mayor and City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
8.
|
Contract Award –
2011 Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project – Fitzwilliam Boulevard (ES2464,
ES5424) – Tender 11-67
|
|
|
|
Motion made by
Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the Director, Wastewater
and Treatment, the following actions be taken with respect to the
construction of Fitzwilliam Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Improvement (ES2464 and
ES5424):
(a) the bid submitted by TRI-CON
Excavating Inc., 113-4023 Meadowbrook Drive, London ON, N6L 1E7, in the
amount of $309,686.70, excluding HST, BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the
bid submitted by TRI-CON Excavating Inc. was the lowest of 6 bids received
and meets the City's specifications and requirements in all areas;
(b) minor future
additional annual operating costs of $400.00 BE RECOGNIZED as a result of
this project; it being noted that these costs are as a result of new
infrastructure installation and will be considered and accommodated within
future Wastewater & Treatment operating budgets;
(c) the financing for this project
BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report attached
hereto as Appendix "A";
(d) the Civic Administration BE
AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in
connection with this project;
(e) the approval given herein BE
CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract for the
material to be supplied and the work to be done; and,
(f)
the Mayor and City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or
other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
9.
|
Infrastructure
Stimulus Fund – Contract Award – innovation Park Industrial Subdivision
Phases 1 and 2 – Site Grading and Surface Works – Tender 11-78
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director, Wastewater and Treatment, the following
actions be taken with respect to Phases 1 and 2, Site Grading and Surface
Works Project, for the Innovation Park Industrial Subdivision, (ID1168-1239
and ID1168):
(a) the bid submitted by L82
Construction Ltd., 2070 Huron Street, London, Ontario,
N5V 5A7, in the amount of $2,777,750.00, excluding HST, BE
ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted by L82 Construction Ltd. was
the lowest of 3 bids received and meets the City’s specifications and
requirements in all areas;
(b) the financing for
the project BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of Financing Report attached
hereto as Appendix ‘A’;
(c) the Civic Administration BE
AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in
connection with this project;
(d) the approval given herein BE
CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a
purchase order for the material to be supplied and the work to be done
relating to this project (Tender 11-78); and,
(e) the Mayor and City Clerk BE
AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give
effect to these recommendations;
it being recognized
that
this
project is being made possible through the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund
Program, funded jointly by the federal and provincial governments and by the
City. These investments in jobs total almost $100 million for London and will
provide an immediate and positive impact on our community and our economy; it being
noted that the award of this contract is in compliance with the Corporation’s
Purchasing By-law and Policy; it being further noted that this project
reflects a successful Project Scope Change Application in an effort to fully
utilize available stimulus funding.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
10.
|
Greenway PCP
Incinerator No. 1 – Decommissioning (Multi-Hearth) – Project No. ES2095 –
Tender 11-72
|
|
|
|
Motion made by
Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the Director of Wastewater
and Treatment, the
following actions be taken with respect to the decommissioning of the
Greenway Pollution Control Center Incinerator No. 1:
(a)
the proposal
submitted by Quantum Murray BP Inc., 345 Horner Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto
Ontario, M8W 1Z6, in the amount of $937,000.00, excluding HST, BE ACCEPTED;
it being noted that the tender submitted by Quantum Murray BP Inc. was deemed
to provide the best value of the two submitted bids;
(b)
the financing
for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report attached
hereto as Appendix ‘A’;
(c)
AECOM Canada
Ltd., 250 York Street, Suite 410, London, Ontario K6A 6K2, BE AUTHORIZED to
carry out the resident inspection and contract administration in accordance
with the estimate, on file, to an upset limit of $240,660.00 excluding
H.S.T., noting that this firm completed the demolition design, based upon the
Fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services 2006. The award is in
accordance with Section 15, Clause 15.2 (g) of the Procurement of Goods and
Services Policy;
(d)
the Civic
Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that
are necessary in connection with these projects; and,
(e)
the approvals
given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or issuing a purchase order for the work to be done.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
11.
|
Amendments to the
Traffic and Parking By-law
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Acting Director, Roads &
Transportation, the proposed by-law to amend the Traffic and Parking By-law
(P.S. 111), BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for further consideration
related to the bus stop locations that the University of Western Ontario
would be utilizing.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSE: D. Brown
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Acting Director, Roads &
Transportation, the attached proposed by-laws (Appendices “A”
and “B”) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August
29, 2011 for the purpose of amending the Traffic and Parking By-law (P.S.
111) to allow enact parking changes during the dates of the Western Fair.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
13.
|
Veterans Memorial
Parkway South Extension Class Environmental Assessment – Appointment of
Consulting Engineer – Project No. TS1037
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Acting Director, Roads and
Transportation, the following actions be taken with respect to the Veterans
Memorial Parkway South Extension Planning, Preliminary Design and Class
Environmental Assessment Study:
(a)
McCormick
Rankin Corporation, 300-2655 North Sheridan Way, Mississauga, ON, L5K 2P8, BE
APPOINTED Consulting Engineers for the above-noted project, in the amount of
$289,850, excluding HST, in accordance with Section 15(g) of the Procurement
of Goods and Services Policy;
(b)
$12,000
required for internal (City-related) expenses BE APPROVED within the project
budget;
(c)
the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of Financing
Report attached hereto as Appendix ‘A’;
(d)
the
consulting fees for this project BE IN ACCORDANCE with the estimate, on file,
which is based upon the Fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services
2006, recommended by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers;
(e)
the
approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the consultant for the work; and,
(f)
the
Mayor and City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents,
if required, to give effect to these recommendations.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
14.
|
Land Valuation for
Storm Water Management Facilities Located Outside the Urban Growth Boundary –
Wickerson Stormwater Management Pond Lands
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, the
following actions be taken with respect to the reimbursement of
the land costs for the Wickerson Stormwater Management Pond to Sifton
Properties Limited:
(a)
based
on fair market value, $100,000.00 per hectare BE APPROVED for reimbursement
to Sifton Properties Limited; and,
(b)
in
accordance with the policies of the Urban Works Reserve Fund, the City of
London BE REIMBURSED for its legal costs;
it being noted that
the Built and Natural Environment Committee received the attached
communication, dated August 15, 2011, from P. Masschelein, Vice-President, Neighbourhood
Developments, Sifton Properties Limited and reviewed and received an
information report from the Managing Director, Development Approvals Business
Unit and a communication dated August 12, 2011, from METRIX Realty Group,
with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
15.
|
Montessori House of
Children – 719 Waterloo Street and Related Lands (Z-7686)
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning
and City Planner, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to meet with
Montessori House of Children and the neighbourhood community association to
discuss limiting the scope of the proposed Official Plan Amendment; it being
noted that the Built and Natural Environment Committee received the attached
communication dated August 15, 2011 from R. Zelinka, Zelinka Priamo Ltd.,
with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSE: N. Branscombe (1)
|
|
16.
|
Residential
Intensification Policies
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, the
following actions be taken with respect to Residential Intensification
Policies:
(a)
the
attached proposed Official Plan Amendment to clarify the intent
of the Official Plan intensification policies related to when public site
plan will be required BE CIRCULATED for public review and comment; and,
(b) based
on the proposed Official Plan amendment, the Site Plan Control By-law BE
AMENDED to clarify the site plan matters to be considered in the review of
intensification proposals, including the requirement for Public Site Plan
review when intensification may occur, even though no planning application or
process other than site plan review is required.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
17.
|
Soil Remediation in
Wellington Street Road Allowance Adjacent to Piccadilly Park
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan and seconded
by Councillor D. Brown to Refer clause 17 of the 19th Report of the Built and
Natural Environment Committee (BNEC), having to do with soil remediation in
Wellington Street road allowance, adjacent to Piccadilly Park, for consideration
with 20th Report of BNEC.
|
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
|
18.
|
Comprehensive
Official Plan Review and Komoka-Kilworth Secondary Plan – Municipality of
Middlesex Centre
|
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City
Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the proposed
amendment to Middlesex Centre’s Official Plan:
(a) the following comments BE FORWARDED
to Middlesex Centre:
(i) the
City of London supports the redistribution and reallocation of vacant lands
from the hamlet areas to Urban Settlement Areas, where full municipal
services will be available to support future growth;
(ii) the
City of London supports the redesignation of the Hamlet land use and
Settlement Area boundary changes as proposed for Hamlet Areas of Birr,
Denfield, Melrose and Poplar Hill/Coldstream, and the redesignation of 12.2
ha of Residential Lands to Agriculture and the Settlement Area boundary
change proposed for the Arva Community Settlement Area;
(iii) the
City of London has significant concerns regarding the extent of new
developable lands being added to the Komoka-Kilworth Urban Settlement Area.
The Official Plan Amendment proposes to add and convert the following lands
to the Komoka-Kilworth Urban Settlement Area:
-
42
ha of Residential land;
-
67
ha of Settlement Employment land;
-
Convert
51 ha of Settlement Employment land to 35 ha of Residential land, 5 ha
Natural Environment land and 11 ha Village Centre land;
-
Convert
10 ha of Settlement Commercial land to Residential land; and,
-
Convert
25 ha of Residential land to 11 ha of Settlement Employment land and 14 ha of
Parks and Recreation land;
it being noted that
this would result in 67 ha of urban land use designations being added to the
Komoka-Kilworth Urban Settlement Area;
(iv)
the
City of London has concerns regarding the extent of new developable lands
being added to the Ilderton Urban Settlement Area. The Official Plan
Amendment proposes to add or convert the following lands to the Ilderton
Urban Settlement Area:
-
34.2
ha of Residential land;
-
Convert
4.2 ha of Rural Commercial to Residential;
-
Convert
15 ha of Rural Industrial to Residential; and,
-
Convert
21.6 ha of Rural Industrial to Agriculture;
it
being noted that this would result in a total of 53.4 ha of additional land
for Residential development being added to the Ilderton Urban Settlement
Area;
(b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to meet with Planning Staff from Middlesex
Centre to discuss these concerns regarding the Municipality’s draft Official
Plan Amendment and the Komoka-Kilworth Secondary Plan; and,
(c) the
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing BE ADVISED that the City of London
has concerns with respect to the number of urban services vs. rural services
growth centres.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: H.L. Usher (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Development Planning and the Managing
Director, Development Approvals Business Unit, the following actions be taken
with respect to entering into a subdivision agreement between The Corporation
of the City of London and Westbury International (1991) Corporation for the
subdivisions of land in the City of London, situated on the North side of
Wharncliffe Road South, municipally referred to as 1311 Wharncliffe Road
South:
(a)
the
attached Special Provisions to be included in the above-noted
Subdivision Agreement BE APPROVED;
(b)
the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement, any amending
agreements and all documents required to fulfill its conditions; and
(c)
the
applicant BE ADVISED that the Director of Development Finance has estimated
the following Revenues and Claims:
Related Estimated Costs and Revenues –
Phase 1
Estimated Costs – This Agreement –
Developer Built
|
|
Urban Works Reserve Fund – General
|
Nil
|
Urban Works Reserve Fund – Stormwater
Management
|
Nil
|
Capital Expense – Parks Planning
|
$88,400
|
Other
|
Nil
|
Total
|
$88,400
|
Estimated Revenues This Agreement
|
|
CSRF
|
$2,148,184
|
UWRF
|
$880,868
|
Total
|
$3,029,051
|
NOTE:
1.
Estimated
revenues are calculated using current rates for engineering services and the
information is reported all in accordance with the Development Charges By-law
(ie C.P.-1473-212), and any amendments thereto.
2.
Estimated
claims are based on information provided by the applicant. Actual claims
will be determined in conjunction with the subdivision agreement and the
applicable by-law.
3.
The
Owner should take note that there are currently significant delays in payment
of claims from the Urban Works Reserve Fund.
it being noted that
Parks Planning expenditures will require commitment through future capital
budget projects.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
20.
|
Development on
Irwin, Gunn, Saunby and Beaufort Streets
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, that the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back at the
September 12, 2011 Built and Natural Environment Committee (BNEC) meeting
with respect to the potential actions that can be taken to stop in-fill
intensification in the Irwin Street, Gunn Street, Saunby Street and Beaufort
Street area; it being noted that the BNEC heard the attached
presentation and reviewed and received a communication dated September 8,
2011, from J. Corcoran, BIGS Community Association, with respect to this
matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)
RECUSE: S.E. White (1)
|
|
21.
|
Proposed Amendments
to the Site Plan Approval Process and the Site Plan Control Area By-law
|
|
|
|
Motion made by
Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the
Managing Director of the Development Approvals Business Unit, the following
actions be taken with respect to revisions to the site plan approval process,
the Site Plan Control Area By-law and the Municipal Council Policy as it
pertains to Site Plan Approvals:
(a)
the attached
by-law, (Appendix ‘B’) to amend the Site Plan Control Area By-law, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011;
and,
(b)
the attached
proposed by-law to amend Council Policy 19 (25A) BE REFERRED to the Civic
Administration for a legal review of Appendix ‘C’ and the associated Appendix
19(25A) entitled “Appendix to Site Plan Approval and Enforcement Policy”;
it being
pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this
matter, the following individuals made an oral submission in connection
therewith:
·
J.
Kennedy, London Development Institute – indicating that Official Plan
Amendment 438 defined the uses of intensification and affects the entire
City; expressing concern with the recommendation and recommending that the
matter be referred to the Civic Administration for further consideration;
indicating that when builders have to hold a public participation meeting, it
slows down the process and costs more money; and advising that there is
already a proposed amendment to the Official Plan.
·
L.
Langdon, London Home Builders Association – indicating that she did not
receive a copy of the Staff Report; and enquiring as to the impact on new
home builders and renovations to existing homes.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
22.
|
City of London –
Proposed Amendment to Section 5.2.4 Scale of Office Development (O-7935)
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City
Planner, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011 to
amend Section 5.2.4 of the Official Plan by adding a policy to define the
scale of office development to clarify the intent of the designation;
it being pointed
out that there were no oral submissions made at the public participation
meeting held in connection with this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
23.
|
City of London –
Proposed Amendment to Section 4>14 Lots Reduced by Public Acquisition
(Z-7891)
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to refer
consideration of clause 23 of the 19th Report of the Built and Natural
Environment Committee (BNEC), in order to obtain additional information.
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
Clause 23, as referred, reads as follows:
“That, on the recommendation of the
Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, the attached
proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
August 29, 2011 to amend Section 4.14 of the Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the Zoning By-law Z.-1 by:
(a) removing
the words “has been”, and “the location of any permitted building or
structure relative to the required side or rear yards”; and,
(b) to include the word “density” in
the last paragraph by:
(i) deleting
the last paragraph of Section 4.14; and,
(ii) by
inserting in its place “In the case of a road widening dedication, the land
that will be dedicated shall be included in any calculation for the purpose
of determining lot area, coverage, height, parking, landscaped open space,
floor area, floor area ratio and density provided any building or structure
is located wholly within the boundary of the land remaining after the
dedication”;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting held in connection
with this matter.”
|
|
24.
|
1383266 Ontario
Limited – Variance from Sign and Canopy By-law – 715-725 Wellington Road
South
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Director of Building Controls,
Ms. Phuong BE GRANTED a temporary exemption from the Sign and Canopy By-law
relating to the property located at 715-725 Wellington Road South for one
year, pending the outcome of the Civic Administration’s review of the Sign
and Canopy By-law; it being noted that the Built and Natural Environment
Committee heard verbal presentations from S. Rae representing Ms. Phuong and
from Ms. Phuong.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City
Planner, based on the application of City of London relating to the property
located at 310, 318, 322 and 330 Wellington Road, the attached
proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
August 29, 2011 to amend the Official Plan to change the designation of the
subject lands FROM a Low Density Residential designation which allows single
detached, semi-detached, duplex and converted dwellings TO a Community
Commercial Node to allow all types of retail outlets including department
stores, home improvement and furnishings stores, supermarkets, food stores
and pharmacies; convenience commercial uses; personal services; restaurants;
commercial recreation establishments; financial institutions and services; a
limited range of automotive services; service-oriented office uses such as
real estate, insurance and travel agencies; community facilities, such as
libraries or day care centres; professional and medical/dental offices; and
commercial and private schools; it being noted that within Community
Commercial Nodes, office uses and places of entertainment will be permitted
in limited amounts;
it being pointed
out that there were no oral submissions made at the public participation
meeting held in connection with this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
26.
|
CN Rail and RCC
Media – Minor Variance to the Sign and Canopy By-law to Permit Third Party
Advertising on Railway Overpasses
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Director of Building Controls, the
following actions be taken with respect to the request by CN Rail and RCC
Media for a variance to the Sign & Canopy By-law to permit non-accessory
banner signs on railway overpasses:
(a)
a
variance to the Sign and Canopy By-law BE APPROVED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on August 29, 2011;
(b)
CN
Rail and RCC Media BE REQUESTED to enter into a Licensing Agreement with the
City of London before any permits are issued for the placement of banner
signs on two CN railway overpasses; and,
(c)
the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the above-noted Licensing
Agreement and any other documents necessary to facilitate such an agreement;
it being noted that
the Built and Natural Environment Committee received the attached
presentation from J. Matsui, Makin Headlines Ltd., with respect to this
matter.
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan and seconded
by Councillor D. Brown to Amend clause 26 by including the following working
at the end of part (b): “for a pilot project, with a maximum period of two
years”.
|
Motion to amend is passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, J.P. Bryant (2)
|
Motion, as amended, passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong, J.P. Bryant (2)
|
Clause 26, as amended, reads as follows:
That on the
recommendation of the Director of Building Controls, the following actions be
taken with respect to the request by CN Rail and RCC Media for a variance to
the Sign & Canopy By-law to permit non-accessory banner signs on railway
overpasses:
(a)
a
variance to the Sign and Canopy By-law BE APPROVED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on August 29, 2011;
(b)
CN
Rail and RCC Media BE REQUESTED to enter into a Licensing Agreement with the
City of London before any permits are issued for the placement of banner
signs on two CN railway overpasses for a pilot project, with a maximum period
of two years;
and,
(c)
the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the above-noted Licensing
Agreement and any other documents necessary to facilitate such an agreement;
it being noted that
the Built and Natural Environment Committee received the attached
presentation from J. Matsui, Makin Headlines Ltd., with respect to this
matter.
|
|
27.
|
Old North Traffic
Calming Plan – Results of Opinion Poll
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on the recommendation of the Acting Director, Roads and Transportation
and notwithstanding the January 18, 2010 Municipal Council resolution
relating to the implementation plan for the Old North Neighbourhood Traffic
Calming Study, the Old North Neighbourhood Traffic Calming Study and its
recommendations BE IMPLEMENTED on an individual project basis with traffic
calming measures, if any, being reflective of residents’ input and needs as
identified during the project design phase; it being noted that this approach
varies from the original study implementation plan.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
28.
|
Zelinka Priamo
Limited – 2310, 2330, 2350 and 2362 Dundas Street (OZ-7919)
|
|
|
|
Motion made by
Councillor Swan to Approve that, on the recommendation of the
Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, the following actions be
taken with respect to the application of Zelinka Priamo Limited relating to
the properties located at 2310, 2330, 2350 and 2362 Dundas Street:
(a) the attached
proposed by-law (Appendix "A") BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011 to amend the
Official Plan FROM General Industrial and Light Industrial TO Auto
Oriented Commercial Corridor;
(b) the attached,
revised, proposed by-law (Appendix "B") BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 29, 2011 to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part
(a) above), to change the zoning as follows:
(i)
the north
portion of 2310 Dundas
Street FROM a Light
Industrial (LI2) Zone and a Holding General Industrial (h*GI1) Zone TO a
Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision (h*h-11*RSC1( ))
Zone to allow for restricted service commercial (RSC1) uses as well as
“Automotive Use”;
(ii)
the north
portion of 2330 and 2350 Dundas Street FROM a Holding General Industrial (h*GI1)
Zone TO a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision
(h*h-11*RSC1( )) Zone to allow for restricted service commercial (RSC1)
uses as well as “Automotive Use”;
(iii)
the south
portion of 2310 Dundas Street FROM a Light Industrial (LI2) Zone and a
Restricted Service Commercial (RSC1/RSC5) Zone TO a Holding Restricted
Service Commercial (h*h-11*RSC2/RSC3/RSC4/RSC5)) Zone to allow for automotive
repair garages, automotive sales and service establishments, automotive
supply stores, automotive uses, restricted, dry cleaning and laundry depots,
pharmacies, emergency care establishments, convenience service
establishments, restaurants, financial institutions, building or contracting
establishments, support offices and industrial mall;
(iv)
the south portion
of 2330 Dundas Street FROM a Holding General Industrial (h*GI1) Zone and a
Restricted Service Commercial (RSC1/RSC5) Zone TO a Holding Restricted
Service Commercial (h*h-11*RSC2/RSC3/RSC4/RSC5)) Zone; to allow for
automotive repair garages, automotive sales and service establishments,
automotive supply stores, automotive uses, restricted, dry cleaning and
laundry depots, pharmacies, emergency care establishments, convenience
service establishments, restaurants, financial institutions, building or
contracting establishments, support offices and an industrial mall; and,
(v)
the south
portion of 2350 Dundas Street FROM a Holding Highway Service
Commercial/Restricted Service Commercial (h*HS1/HS4/RSC2/RSC3/RSC4/ RSC5)
Zone TO a Holding Restricted Service Commercial/Highway Service Commercial
(h*h-11*HS1/HS4/RSC2/RSC3/RSC4/RSC5)) Zone; to allow for automotive repair
garages, automotive sales and service establishments, automotive supply
stores, automotive uses, restricted, dry cleaning and laundry depots, pharmacies,
emergency care establishments, convenience service establishments,
restaurants, financial institutions, building or contracting establishments,
support offices and an industrial mall;
(c) pursuant
to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, it BE DETERMINED that no
further notice related to the By-law is required;
it being
pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this
matter, the following individual made an oral submission in connection
therewith:
- G. Priamo,
Zelinka Priamo Limited - indicating that he has no concerns with the
analysis for the recommendation; requesting that the requirement for a
holding provision be removed; indicating that the by-law already has a
holding provision on it; noting that at the bottom of page 14 of the
Staff Report, the requirement for a holding provision is redundant as a
development agreement has already been entered into; indicating that the
holding provision was not put in the agreement, but that Staff put it
in; advising that there may be modest arterial uses from Dundas Street
frontage; and indicating that they are not asking for approval for
access.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
29.
|
Agreement with
Horticultural Trades Association Inc. for the Future Enhancement of the
Veterans Memorial Parkway
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that,
on the recommendation of the Executive Director of Planning, Environmental
and Engineering Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the
creation of a community-led initiative to complete the planned enhancements
to Veterans Memorial Parkway:
(a)
the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix ‘A’) BE INTRODUCED at a
future meeting of the Municipal Council to authorize an agreement between The
Corporation of the City of London and the Horticultural Trades Association
Incorporated, operating as Landscape Ontario, to lead the Veterans Memorial
Parkway Community Programme and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the Agreement;
(b)
the
approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal Agreement with the Horticultural Trades Association Incorporated;
(c)
the
Source of Financing for the City of London’s 2011 financial obligations, as
detailed in Section 31 of the Agreement BE APPROVED as set out in the attached
Source of Financing Report (Appendix ‘B’);
(d)
the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this Agreement; and,
(e)
Landscape
Ontario BE THANKED for taking a leadership role for this community-led
venture;
it being noted that
municipal financing to support the Agreement has been included in the
proposed 2012 Capital Budget (Enhanced Veterans Memorial Parkway – PD1142)
over a five-year period and is subject to annual budget approval by the
Municipal Council.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan,
J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: S. Orser (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that no
action BE TAKEN with respect to parking regulations on Corinth Court; it
being noted that the Built and Natural Environment Committee reviewed and
received a communication dated August 3, 2011, from Councillor S. Orser, with
respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: S. Orser (1)
|
The Chair directs that the following Report
Clauses be noted.
|
That the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received the 8th Report of the
Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee, from its meeting held
on July 21, 2011.
That the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received a Municipal Council
resolution adopted at its meeting held on July 25, 2011 with respect to the
Bierens Draft Plan of Subdivision 39T-08502.
That the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received an information report,
dated August 15, 2011, from the Chief Administrative Officer with respect to an
update on initiatives within the Development Approvals Business Unit.
That the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received an information report,
dated August 17, 2011, from the Executive Director, Planning, Environmental and
Engineering Services, with respect to an update on the Water Technology Centre
initiative.
That the Built and
Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received an information report,
dated August 15, 2011, from J. Braam, Director, Water and City Engineer, with
respect to an update on the source water protection process for the Thames
Sydenham Source Water Protection Region.
That
the Built and Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received an
information report dated August 15, 2011, from the Acting Director, Roads and
Transportation, with respect to Oxford Park Community Area.
That
the Built and Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received an
information report dated July 15, 2011, from the Acting Director, Roads and
Transportation, with respect to the proposed advance left-turn signal at the
intersection of Highbury Avenue North and Trafalgar Street.
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee reviewed and received an information report dated August 4, 2011,
from the Director, Land Use Planning and City Planner, with respect to the
Ontario Municipal Board decision relating to the Methadone Clinic and
Dispensary Interim Control By-law.
|
|
41.
|
Building Division
Monthly Report
|
|
|
|
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee reviewed and received the monthly report from the Director of
Building Controls and Chief Building Official, relating to Building Activity
and Inspector Workloads for June, 2011.
|
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee (BNEC) received a communication from Councillor W. J. Armstrong
with respect to cul-de-sac parking during summer. The BNEC postponed
consideration of this matter to its September meeting at the request of
Councillor W. J. Armstrong.
|
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee (BNEC) reviewed and received a communication, dated July 26, 2011,
from G. Thompson, President, Old East Village Community Association, with
respect to the completion of the McCormick Area Plan. The BNEC referred the
communication to the Civic Administration for consideration with its review
of the current workload.
|
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee reviewed and received communications dated July 28, 2011 and August
15, 2011, from G.Thompson, President and S. Levin, Member, the Urban League
of London and J. Kennedy, President, London Development Institute,
respectively, with respect to Capital Works Projects. The BNEC referred the
communications to the Civic Administration for consideration.
|
That the Built and Natural Environment
Committee (BNEC) requested the Civic Administration to provide an information
report at a future meeting of the BNEC with respect to the authority
delegated to the Administration related to the Sign and Canopy By-law.
|
That Mayor J. F. Fontana disclosed a
pecuniary interest in clause 2 of this report having to do with the request
for sanitary servicing for Arva from the Municipality of Middlesex-Centre, by
indicating that he lives in Arva.
|
That Councillor D. Brown disclosed a
pecuniary interest in clause 11 of this report having to do with amendments
to the Traffic and Parking By-law by indicating that her employer has a
contract with the London Transit Commission.
|
That Councillor S. White disclosed a
pecuniary interest in clause 20 of this report having to do with the
development on Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street
by indicating that her employer has property on Gunn Street.
|
Built and Natural
Environment Report
Councillor Swan
presents the 20th Report
1. City of
London – 2430 Bradley Avenue
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Development Planning and the Managing
Director – Development Approvals and Business Unit, based on the application
of the City of London relating to the property located at 2430 Bradley
Avenue, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting on August 29, 2011 to amend Zoning By-law No.
Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the
subject lands FROM an Urban Reserve (UR6) Zone which permits
agricultural uses, conservation lands, passive recreation uses, kennels, and
riding stables TO a holding Light Industrial Special Provision (h•h-11•h-18•LI2(9))
Zone to permit such uses as manufacturing and assembly industries,
pharmaceutical and medical product industries, research and development
establishments, warehouse establishments, food, tobacco and beverage
processing industries, service trades, textile processing industries,
electrical and electronic products industries, office, store and business
electronics industries; it being noted that Holding (h, h-11, and h-18)
Provisions will require that full municipal services are available and a
subdivision agreement or development agreement is entered into, that the site
plan and development agreement provides for appropriate access arrangements
to the satisfaction of the City and that an archaeological resource
assessment is carried out together with appropriate mitigation measures prior
to development, to the satisfaction of the City and the Ministry of Tourism
and Culture;
and,
it being pointed
out that there were no oral submissions made at the public participation
meeting held in connection with this matter;
it being further
noted that the Built and Natural Environment Committee reviewed and received
a communication from S. P. Renaud, Vice-President, Operations, The Original
Cakerie Ltd., with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
2. Jennum
Wellington Properties Inc. – 1025-1037 Wellington Road
Motion made by Councillor Swan to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, the
following actions be taken with respect to the application of Jennum
Wellington Properties Inc. relating to the properties located at 1025-1037
Wellington Road:
(a)
in
response to the letter of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, dated June
17, 2011, submitted by Townsend and Associates, on behalf of Jennum
Wellington Properties Inc., relating to the minor variance application A.034/11 concerning 1025 –
1037 Wellington Road, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the
Municipal Council does not support the Committee of Adjustment decision to
refuse the minor variance;
(b)
the
City Solicitor and Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner BE DIRECTED
to provide legal and planning representation at the Ontario Municipal Board
Hearing to support Municipal Council’s decision;
(c)
in
response to the letter of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, dated July
29, 2011, submitted by Barry R. Card, on behalf of The Standard Life
Assurance Company of Canada., relating to the minor variance application A.070/11 concerning 1025 –
1037 Wellington Road, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the
Municipal Council supports the Committee of Adjustment decision to grant the
minor variance; and,
(d)
the
City Solicitor and Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner BE DIRECTED
to provide legal and planning representation at the Ontario Municipal Board
Hearing to support the Committee of Adjustment’s and Municipal Council’s
decision.
|
Councillor Hubert calls the question.
Motion Passed
YEAS: W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser,
J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSE: W.J. Polhill (1)
|
3. Soil
Remediation – Piccadilly Park
Motion made to Approve made by J.B. Swan
that the
Civic Administration BE ASKED to undertake the following actions with respect
to the soil remediation in the Wellington Street road allowance adjacent to
Piccadilly Park:
(a)
explore
options to enhance the existing parking lot (ie. installing a gazebo or
covering the parking lot with soil and planting vegetation);
(b)
with
the use of consultants and a maximum budget of up to $39,660, determine the
extent of the contamination; and,
(c)
include
community consultation;
it being noted that
the Built and Natural Environment Committee received a report dated July 7,
2011, from the Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, a
communication dated July 6, 2011, from A. Woodson, Executive Director,
Piccadilly Area Neighbourhood Association and a verbal presentation from the
Manager III, Parks Planning and Design, with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSE: N. Branscombe (1)
|
The Chair directs that report clauses be
noted.
|
4. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest – Councillor W. J.
Polhill
That
Councillor W. J. Polhill disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 2 of this
Report having to do with the application of Jennum Wellington
Properties Inc. relating to the properties located at 1025-1037 Wellington Road by indicating that his son is on the Committee of
Adjustment.
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that, on
the recommendation of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following timetable for the 2012 Budget BE APPROVED:
Timetable for 2012 Budget Political
Review
Date
|
What
|
Who
|
Tuesday
October
4, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Tabled
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Tuesday
November
8, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Review
(including
Public Participation)
|
Committee of the Whole – Public
Participation
|
Monday
November
21, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Approved
|
Council
|
Tuesday
December
6, 2011
|
Property
Tax Budget Tabled
(Operating
and Capital Budgets)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Monday
December
19, 2011
|
Budget
Orientation and Strategic Planning
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Saturday
January
14, 2012
|
Public
Engagement – Shopping Malls
|
Council Members
|
Monday
January
16, 2012
|
Public
Participation (Property Tax - Operating and Capital Budgets)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
January
26, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Capital Budget Review
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
2, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Operating Budget Review
(complete
Capital Budget Review (if needed))
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
9, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Operating Budget Review (if needed)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
16, 2012
|
Property
Tax Budget Approved
|
Council
|
Notes:
1. 2011 dates correspond
with currently scheduled Committee of the Whole and Council meetings.
2. Committee names and
meeting dates may be affected by the ongoing governance review and may have
to be amended in keeping with governance changes adopted by the Municipal
Council.
3. The Shopping Mall public
outreach initiative may be affected by the outcomes of the current review of
citizen engagement strategies.
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert and
seconded by N. Branscombe to amend clause 1 by adding the following words,
after the words “BE APPROVED”, “subject to changes necessitated by the new
Committee structure, including the potential for holding the meetings during
the day to reduce the number of evening meetings subject to changes
necessitated by the new Committee structure”.
|
Motion
to amend is Passed
YEAS:
B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS:
D. Brown (1)
|
Motion,
as amended, Passed
YEAS:
B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E.
White (12)
NAYS:
D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (2)
|
Clause
1, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation
of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the following timetable for
the 2012 Budget BE APPROVED subject to changes necessitated by the new Committee
structure, including the potential for holding the meetings during the day to
reduce the number of evening meetings subject to changes necessitated by the
new Committee structure:
Timetable for 2012 Budget Political
Review
Date
|
What
|
Who
|
Tuesday
October
4, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Tabled
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Tuesday
November
8, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Review
(including
Public Participation)
|
Committee of the Whole – Public
Participation
|
Monday
November
21, 2011
|
Water
and Wastewater Budgets Approved
|
Council
|
Tuesday
December
6, 2011
|
Property
Tax Budget Tabled
(Operating
and Capital Budgets)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Monday
December
19, 2011
|
Budget
Orientation and Strategic Planning
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Saturday
January
14, 2012
|
Public
Engagement – Shopping Malls
|
Council Members
|
Monday
January
16, 2012
|
Public
Participation (Property Tax - Operating and Capital Budgets)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
January
26, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Capital Budget Review
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
2, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Operating Budget Review
(complete
Capital Budget Review (if needed))
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
9, 2012
|
Property
Tax - Operating Budget Review (if needed)
|
Committee of the Whole
|
Thursday
February
16, 2012
|
Property
Tax Budget Approved
|
Council
|
Notes:
1. 2011 dates correspond
with currently scheduled Committee of the Whole and Council meetings.
2. Committee names and
meeting dates may be affected by the ongoing governance review and may have
to be amended in keeping with governance changes adopted by the Municipal
Council.
3. The Shopping Mall public
outreach initiative may be affected by the outcomes of the current review of
citizen engagement strategies.
|
The
Chair directs that the following Report clauses be noted.
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 9, 2011, from Greg Thompson, resigning
his appointment to the London Advisory Committee on Heritage. The CW
accepted the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter
of appreciation to Mr. Thompson.
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 15, 2011, from Jay McGuffin, resigning
his appointment to the London Advisory Committee on Heritage. The CW
accepted the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter
of appreciation to Mr. McGuffin.
|
|
4.
|
Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory
Committee Resignation
|
|
|
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 11, 2011, from Ryan Warren, resigning his
appointment to the London Advisory Committee on Heritage. The CW accepted
the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter of
appreciation to Mr. Warren.
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 22, 2011, from Brenda Ryan, resigning her
appointment to the Accessibility Advisory Committee. The CW accepted the
resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter of
appreciation to Ms. Ryan.
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 21, 2011, from Stephanie Joselyn-Fogarty,
resigning her appointment to the London Housing Advisory Committee. The CW
accepted the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter
of appreciation to Ms. Joselyn-Fogarty.
|
|
7.
|
London Housing Advisory Committee Resignation
|
|
|
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated June 18, 2011, from Scott Courtice, resigning
his appointment to the London Housing Advisory Committee. The CW accepted
the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a letter of
appreciation to Mr. Courtice.
|
|
8.
|
London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee
Resignation
|
|
|
|
That the Committee of the Whole (CW)
received a communication dated July 21, 2011, from U. Shabazz, resigning his
appointment to the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee.
The CW accepted the resignation with regret and asked the Mayor to forward a
letter of appreciation to Mr. Shabazz.
|
That the Committee of the Whole passed the
following resolution prior to moving in camera from 4:14 p.m. to 8:15 p.m.:
That the Committee of the Whole move in
camera to consider a matter pertaining to an educational or training session
for Council Members in accordance with Section 239 (3.1) of the Municipal
Act, 2011.
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the
Chief Administrative Officer BE REQUESTED to report back with refinements to
the City of London’s current Vision Statement that would include:
a)
revised
wording that speaks to where the City of London wants to be, rather than how
the City of London sees itself today;
b)
more
concise and more dynamic wording (e.g. creative, enthusiastic,
compassionate);
c)
greater
distinction between “growing” and “growth”; and
d)
emphasis
on economic prosperity, quality of life, opportunity, inclusiveness (e.g.
age, culture, etc.), sustainability/green, neighbourhoods, owning London’s
strengths.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson,
P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the Chief Administrative Officer BE DIRECTED to undertake a civic
engagement process to update the style of the City of London’s logo; it being
noted that the Chief Administrative Officer provided the attached
handout with respect to the elements of London’s civic brand; it being
further noted that the Committee of the Whole identified the following
additional elements that should be attributable to the City of London’s civic
brand: green/sustainability; opportunity, healthy/health, diversity,
“growing”.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the Council values of open and accountable government, citizen
engagement, fiscal responsibility and respect and integrity BE ADOPTED and
additional work BE UNDERTAKEN with respect to setting expectations for
Council Members as it relates to the aforementioned values.
|
Motion made by Councillor Swan and seconded
by Councillor White to Amend clause 3, related to Council Values, by adding
the following words at the end, “; it being noted that a meeting date and
time will be determined by the City Clerk”.
|
Motion to amend Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion, as amended, Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
The motion, as amended, reads as follows:
That the Council values
of open and accountable government, citizen engagement, fiscal
responsibility and respect and integrity BE ADOPTED and additional work BE
UNDERTAKEN with respect to setting expectations for Council Members as it relates
to the aforementioned values; it being noted that a meeting date and time will be
determined by the City Clerk.
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the Chief Administrative Officer BE DIRECTED to incorporate target
setting into the annual Report Card/Progress Report.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the
Chief Administrative Officer BE REQUESTED to consider the comments of the
Council Members related to strategic priorities for the City of London, in
consultation with local agencies, and report back with a suggested priority
listing and a proposed budget for undertaking a public survey to further
refine the City of London’s strategic priorities.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor Hubert to Approve
that the following actions be taken with respect to major initiatives
for the 2011-2014 Municipal Council:
(a)
the
following matters BE IDENTIFIED as the short list of major initiatives
for the 2011-2014 Municipal Council:
(i) Downtown
Investments: new City Hall, Performing Arts Centre, downtown presence for the
University of Western Ontario);
(ii) London
Gateways: bus rapid transit expansion/initiatives, Transportation Master
Plan, Veterans Memorial Parkway lands with servicing, Veterans Memorial
Parkway/Bradley Avenue interchange, Hwy #401/Colonel Talbot land; overpass;
(iii) Economic
Initiatives: Southwest Area Plan, food innovation strategy and digital media;
and
(iv) Community
Program: SOHO Community Plan, Ontario Works in the community, green bin
program and 311;
(b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back with a financing plan
for the matters noted in (a), above.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
The
Chair directs that the report clauses be noted.
That the Chief Administrative Officer
provided the attached presentation with respect to strategic
planning for the City of London.
|
Motion made by Councillor Branscombe to
Approve that,
on the recommendation of the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the 2012-2016 Business Plan
summaries:
(a) the
2012 – 2016 Business Plan summaries BE RECEIVED for future review by the
Services Review Committee;
(b) the
process for review of 2012 – 2106 Business Plan Summaries BE APPROVED as
outlined in the City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer’s report dated July
26, 2011;
(c) the
process for community involvement BE ENDORSED as outlined in the City
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer’s report dated July 26, 2011; and
(d) all
civic departments, boards and commissions BE REQUESTED to complete an annual
update of their respective Business Plan Summaries for the applicable
service(s), within the format and guidelines provided by the Finance
Division.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
2.
|
London Police Services
Business Cases
|
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor Branscombe to
Approve that the City Solicitor, in consultation with the City Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer, BE REQUESTED to provide a report related to
legislative restrictions with respect to the provision of information in
support of the requests of the London Police Services Business Cases and
budget submissions.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The Chair directs that the following Report
clauses be noted.
|
That the Services Review Committee received a
communication
dated September 21, 2010, from the City Clerk, with respect to the delivery of
corporate communications services.
That the Services Review Committee received
a communication dated November 2, 2010, from the Committee Secretary, with
respect to roadside turf maintenance and weed control.
|
That the next meeting of the Services
Review Committee (SRC) is tentatively scheduled to be held on August 15,
2011.
|
No enquiries
|
At 12:28 a.m. W.J. Polhill puts Councillor
Hubert in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.
|
1. Councillor B. Polhill
and Councillor P. Van Meerbergen - Reconsideration of July 25, 2011 Emergent
Motion - Zebro Holdings - 1010 and 1068 Fanshawe Park Road East.
Pursuant to Part 13 of the Council
Procedure By-law, a motion for Reconsideration is made by Councillor Hubert
and seconded by Councillor Swan, with respect to the Emergent Motion of the
July 25, 2011 Council meeting, as it relates to Zebro Holdings.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, S.E. White (10)
NAYS: J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant (4)
|