|
Council
MINUTES
1ST MEETING
|
|
December 8, 2015
|
|
The Council meets in Regular Session in the
Council Chambers this day at 4:00 PM.
|
|
PRESENT: Mayor M. Brown and Councillors M.
van Holst, B. Armstrong, M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan,
P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park and J.
Zaifman and C. Saunders (City Clerk).
ALSO PRESENT: A Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J.
Braam, N. Carbert, T. Corbett (Advocates LLP), B. Coxhead, S. Crawford, S.
Datars Bere, K. Dawtrey, J.M. Fleming, A. Hagan, K Huner, G. Kotsifas, V.
McAlea Major, D. O’Brien, L. Palarchio, R. Pedlow, M. Ribera, L.M. Rowe, S.
Sharma, C. Smith, J. Stanford, A. Vandervoort, B. Warner, B. Westlake-Power.
|
At the beginning of the Meeting all Members
are present, except Councillors V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher and J.
Zaifman.
|
At
4:02 PM Councillors S. Turner and H.L. Usher enter the meeting.
At
4:05 PM Councillor J. Zaifman enters the meeting.
Councillor B. Armstrong discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to the 2nd
Report of the Corporate Services Committee having to do with a matter
pertaining to personal matters, including information regarding identifiable
individuals, including current and former municipal employees, with respect
to employment-related matters; labour relations and employee negotiations;
litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality; advice that is
subject to solicitor-client privilege; and advice or recommendations of
officers and employees of the Corporation, including communications
necessary for that purpose.
|
Councillor P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 8 of the 1st Report of the Corporate Services Committee,
having to do with the Tax Adjustment Agenda, by indicating that he is the
Executive Director of Pathways who is the registered owner of one of the
properties that was vacant at that time.
|
Councillor J. Morgan discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 6 of the 2nd Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy
Committee having to do with London Medical Innovation and Commercialization
Network, by indicating that he is employed by Western University. Councillor
J. Morgan further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 7 of the 2nd
Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee having to do with
London Medical Innovation and Commercialization Network, by indicating that
he is employed by Western University. Councillor J. Morgan also discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to the 2nd
Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee having to do with a
matter pertaining to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege,
including communications necessary for that purpose, as it relates to the
London Medical Innovation and Commercialization Network Contribution
Agreement.
|
Councillor J. Zaifman discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 5 of the 1st Report of the Corporate Services Committee
having to do with City of London Days at the Budweiser Gardens. Councillor
J. Zaifman further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 12 of the 1st
Report of the Civic Works Committee.
|
None.
2.
|
His Worship the
Mayor presents the Diversity, Race Relations and Inclusivity Awards to the following
recipients: Ability First Coalition for the Tuesdays at Ten program; South
West Local Health Integration Network and Southwest Ontario Aboriginal Health
Access Centre for the Indigenous Cultural Safety Online Training Program for
Health Care Providers; London Committee for Cross Cultural Arts for Sunfest;
Muslim Resource Centre for Social Support and Integration for the Muslim
Family Safety Program; and At^lohsa Native Family Healing Services for and Kizhaay
Anishinaabe Niin.
|
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer and
seconded by Councillor J. Morgan to Approve that Council rise and go into
Committee of the Whole, in camera, for the purpose of considering the following
matters:
|
a)
|
A matter pertaining to instructions and
directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; reports or
advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial information
supplied in confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure
of which could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the
competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other
negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that
similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or
gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency;
commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to
the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value;
information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the
Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed
acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to
the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to
any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition. (C1/1/CSC)
|
b)
|
A matter pertaining to labour relations and
employee negotiations as it relates to the Corporations’ Associations or
Unions, including communications necessary for that purpose. (C2/1/CSC)
|
c)
|
A matter pertaining to personal matters,
including information regarding an identifiable individual, including a
municipal employee, with respect to employment related matters, advice or
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation including
communications necessary for that purpose and for the purpose of providing
instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation.
(C1/26/SPPC)
|
d)
|
(ADDED) A matter pertaining to an
educational or training session for Council Members in accordance with
Section 239 (3.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001. (C1/1/SPPC)
|
e)
|
(ADDED) A matter pertaining to personal
matters, including information regarding identifiable individuals, including
current and former municipal employees, with respect to employment-related
matters; labour relations and employee negotiations; litigation or potential
litigation affecting the municipality; advice that is subject to
solicitor-client privilege; and advice or recommendations of officers and
employees of the Corporation including communications necessary for that
purpose. (C1/2/CSC)
|
f)
|
(ADDED) A matter pertaining to personal
matters, including information regarding an identifiable individual,
including a municipal employee, with respect to employment-related matters;
advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation
including communications necessary for that purpose and for the purpose of
providing instructions and directions to officers and employees of the
Corporation. (C2/2/SPPC)
|
g)
|
(ADDED) A matter pertaining to advice that
is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary
for that purpose, as it relates to the London Medical Innovation and
Commercialization Network Contribution Agreement. (C1/2/SPPC)
|
h)
|
(ADDED) A matter pertaining to advice that
is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary
for that purpose as it relates to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Report. (C3/2/SPPC)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
The Council rises and goes into the
Committee of the Whole, in camera, at 4:24 PM, with Mayor M. Brown in the
Chair and all Members present, except Councillor V. Ridley.
|
At
4:26 PM Councillor J. Morgan leaves the meeting.
At
4:31 PM Councillor J. Morgan enters the meeting.
At
4:34 PM Councillor B. Armstrong leaves the meeting.
At
4:40 PM Councillor Zaifman leaves the meeting.
At
4:41 PM Councillor V. Ridley enters the meeting.
The
Committee of the Whole rises at 4:43 PM and Council reconvenes at 4:45 PM, with
Mayor M. Brown in the Chair and all Members present.
Motion made by Councillor J. Morgan and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve the Minutes of the 30th Meeting
held on November 24, 2015.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Cassidy and
seconded by Councillor J. Helmer to Approve referral of the following
communications, as noted on the Council Agenda:
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
None.
Councillor
J. Helmer presents.
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer to
Approve clauses 1 to 18, excluding clauses 8, 9, 12 and 13.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That Councillor M. van Holst BE ELECTED
Vice-Chair of the Civic Works Committee for the term ending November 30,
2016.
|
That the 10th Report of the Cycling
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 17, 2015, BE RECEIVED.
|
That the 6th Report of the Transportation
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 3, 2015, BE RECEIVED.
|
That the 3rd Report of the LTC Long Term
Growth Report Working Group, from its meeting held on November 18, 2015, BE
RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
proposed Street Encroachment Policy, appended to the staff report dated
December 1, 2015 to:
a) govern
the application and approval procedure for the authorization of encroachments
onto municipal streets and road allowances;
b) delegate
to the City Engineer the authority to approve or reject applications,
authorize encroachments and terminate existing Encroachment Agreements on
streets and road allowances within the City of London; and,
c) update
the fees and charges relating to Encroachment Agreements;
BE REFERRED to a
future meeting of the Civic Works Committee for public consultation.
(2015-D16)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the supply and delivery of light
duty replacement vehicles:
a) the
proposal submitted by Mt. Brydges Ford Sales Ltd., for the supply and
delivery of light duty vehicles, BE ACCEPTED for a three (3)-year term with
an option to extend the contract for two (2) additional, one-year terms at
the sole discretion of the City;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this award; and,
c) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or issuing a purchase order, or contract record relating to
the subject matter of this approval.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
proposed work plan for investigation of flooding causes and recommended
remedial actions BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Civic Works Committee
heard the attached presentation from J. Lucas, Director, Water
and Wastewater and R. Pedlow, Division Manager, Sewer Operations, with
respect to this matter. (2015-E05)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the supply and delivery of
pre-wetting and anti-icing liquids for road surfaces:
a) the
tendered price submitted by Pollard Highway Products, for the supply and
delivery of pre-wetting and anti-icing liquids for road surfaces, at their
estimated annual price of $187,500.00, excluding H.S.T., for a one (1) year
period with the option to renew annually up to four (4) additional years, BE
ACCEPTED; it being noted that this is being reported as an irregular bid as
per Purchasing Policy, Section 19.4 c), since only one (1) bid was received
for this tender;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
which are necessary in connection with this contract; and,
c) the
approval hereby BE GIVEN conditional upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract relating to the subject matter of this approval. (2015-F18)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Sarnia Road Improvements Phase
3 Project:
a) AECOM
Canada Ltd., BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to complete the detailed
design of the said project in the amount of $170,874.00, excluding H.S.T., in
accordance with Section 15.2 (e) of the Procurement of Goods and Services
Policy;
b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report appended to the staff report dated December 1, 2015, as Appendix A;
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this project;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the consultant for the work; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents,
if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2015-A05)
|
|
15.
|
Veterans Memorial
Parkway North Extension - Huron Street to Clarke Road - Detailed Design -
Appointment of Consulting Engineer
|
|
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Veterans Memorial Parkway
North Extension from Huron Street to Clarke Road:
a) Stantec
Consulting Limited BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers for the detailed design
of the said project, in the amount of $408,359.60, excluding H.S.T., in
accordance with Section 15.2 (e) of the City of London’s Procurement of Goods
and Services Policy;
b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of
Financing Report appended to the staff report dated December 1, 2015, as
Appendix A;
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this project;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the Consultant for the work; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2015-A05)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Development and Compliance Services, the Civic Administration BE
DIRECTED to dispose of 5 surplus parking meters, at no cost to Downtown
London, for the sole purpose of implementing Kindness Meters as a pilot
program; it being noted that the disposition is in accordance with Section 7.
b. iv. of Schedule “E” of the City of London’s Procurement of Goods and
Services Policy. (2015-T02)
|
That the 9th Report of the Cycling Advisory
Committee, from its meeting held on October 22, 2015, BE RECEIVED.
|
That the Civic Works Committee Deferred
Matters List, as at November 10, 2015, BE RECEIVED.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer to
Approve clause 8.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the assignment of consulting
services for the Environmental Assessment, Design and Contract Administration
for the Colonel Talbot Pumping Station & Sanitary Servicing works:
a) Stantec
Consulting Ltd. BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers in the amount of
$872,468.40, including 20% contingency, excluding H.S.T., based upon the Fee
Guideline for Professional Engineering Services, recommended by the Ontario
Society of Professional Engineers; and in accordance with Section 15.2 (e) of
the City of London’s Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
b) the
financing for the project BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of
Financing Report included on the Added Agenda as Item 8 a);
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this project;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2015-A05)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J. Helmer to Approve clause 9.
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the implementation of the Red Light
Camera Enforcement Program BE DEFFERED until more information is available
from the Province of Ontario with respect to fine administration. (2015-T08)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J. Helmer to Approve clause 12.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following
actions be taken with respect to the appointment of Consulting Engineers for
the 2015 Stormwater Management Facility (SWMF) Design and Construction
Program in accordance with the 2016 Growth Management Implementation Strategy
(GMIS):
a) Stantec
Consulting Ltd. BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to complete the Functional
Design, Detailed Design, Inspection and General Construction Administration
of the North Lambeth P9 SWMF (ESSWM-DCNLP9), in the total amount of
$427,165.00, plus an additional $136,042.00 for contingency, provisional
items and allowances, excluding H.S.T.;
b) Development
Engineering (London) Limited BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to complete
the Functional Design, Detailed Design, Inspection and General Construction
Administration of the Parker SWMF (ESSWM-PKR), in the total amount of
$530,660.00, plus an additional $160,256.00 for contingency, provisional
items and allowances, excluding H.S.T.;
c) IBI
Group Inc BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to complete the Functional Design,
Detailed Design, Inspection and General Construction Administration of the
Pincombe Drain SWMF 3 (ESSWM-PD3), in the total amount of $365,060.00, plus
an additional $102,706.00 for contingency, provisional items and allowances,
excluding H.S.T.;
d) MTE
Consultants Inc. BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to complete the Detailed
Design, Inspection and General Construction Administration of the Stoney
Creek SWMF No. 2 (ESSWM-SC2), in the total amount of $209,608.00, plus an
additional $85,249.00 for contingency, provisional items and allowances,
excluding H.S.T.;
it being noted that the consulting fees for
the projects identified in a) through d) above, are in accordance with the
estimates on file, which are based upon the Fee Guideline for Professional Engineering
Services, 2015, recommended by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers;
and in accordance with Section 15.2 (e) of the Procurement of Goods and
Services Policy;
e) the
financing for these works BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of
Financing Report included on the Added Agenda as Item 12 a);
f) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with these works;
g) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into
formal contracts with these consultants for the works; and,
h) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contracts or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2015-A05)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park (14)
RECUSED: J. Zaifman (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J. Helmer to Approve clause 13.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Bradley Avenue Extension from
Wharncliffe Road South to Wonderland Road South:
a) Archibald,
Gray & McKay Engineering Ltd. BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers to
complete the detailed design of the said project in the amount of
$364,452.00, excluding H.S.T., in accordance with Section 15.2 (e) of the
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report appended to the staff report dated December 1, 2015, as Appendix A;
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this project;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the consultant for the work; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2015-A05)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Councillor
P. Hubert presents.
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to
Approve clauses 1 and 2.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the McCormick Area Secondary Plan:
a) the
McCormick Area Secondary Plan appended to the staff report dated November 26,
2015, as Schedule 2 BE ADOPTED;
b) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to amend the
Official Plan to:
i) amend
Chapter 20 – Secondary Plans BY ADDING “McCormick Area Secondary Plan” to the
list of Secondary Plans adopted by the Municipal Council in Section 20.2 i)
of the Official Plan for the City of London;
ii) amend
Chapter 20 – Secondary Plans BY ADDING Section 20.8 – McCormick Area
Secondary Plan to the Official Plan for the City of London; and,
iii) ADD
the naming and delineation of the “McCormick Area Secondary Plan” to Schedule
“D” – Planning Areas; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to initiate the required Zoning By-law
amendments to implement the McCormick Area Secondary Plan; it being noted
that the Zoning By-law Amendments will be presented at a public
participation meeting at a future meeting of the Planning and Environment
Committee;
it being pointed out that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications,
with respect to this matter:
• a communication dated September
11, 2015, from B. Brock, by e-mail;
• a communication from M.
Whalley, ACO London Region; and,
• a
communication dated November 23, 2015, from S.T. Merritt, Old East Village
Business Improvement Area;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated
on the attached public participation meeting record made oral
submissions in connection therewith. (2015-D09)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Motion
made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 3.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of City of London, Realty Services Division,
relating to the property located at 1156 Dundas Street:
a) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2015 as
Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be
held on December 8, 2015 to amend the Official Plan to change the designation
of the subject lands FROM a General Industrial and Low Density Residential
designation TO Main Street Commercial Corridor and Multi-Family, Medium
Density Residential designation; and, TO amend Chapter 10 of the Official
Plan (Policies for Specific Areas) to add a site-specific policy;
b) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law (Appendix "B") BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015
to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan as
amended in part a) above), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM
a General Industrial (GI1) Zone TO a Holding Residential R1
(h-67•h-(*)•h-(**)•h-(****)•R1-2) Zone, a Holding Residential R6 Special
Provision (h-5•h-67•h-120•h-149•h-(**)•h-(***)•h-(****)•R6-5(_)) Zone, a
Holding Residential R6 Special Provision
(h-5•h-67•h-120•h-149•h-(**)•h-(***)•h-(****)•R6-5(_)•H15) Zone, a Holding
Business District Commercial Special Provision (h-5•h-67•h-120•h-149•h-(***)•h-(****)•BDC2(_)•D150•
H35) Zone and an Open Space (OS1) Zone;
c) the
Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to consider the following design
issues through the Site Plan approval process:
i) the
inclusion of environmentally sustainable and energy efficient technologies as
recommended in the proposed McCormick Area Secondary Plan; and,
ii) the
implementation of the Urban Design Guidelines, as appended to the staff
report dated November 26, 2015 as Schedule “2” to Appendix 'B', the By-law to
amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1156 Dundas
Street; and,
d) pursuant
to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal
Council, no further notice BE GIVEN as the amendments were minor in nature
and were in accordance with the public notice;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated
on the attached public participation meeting record made oral
submissions in connection therewith. (2015-D09)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 4.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of the City of London, relating to an Official
Plan Amendment to introduce new city-wide policies relating to secondary
dwelling units and a Zoning By-law Amendment to introduce regulations related
to secondary dwelling units:
a) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2015 as
Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be
held on December 8, 2015 to amend the City of London Official Plan to update
secondary dwelling unit polices in accordance with changes to the Planning Act;
b) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law (Appendix "B") BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to
amend the City of London Zoning By-law Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official
Plan, as amended in part a) above), to provide secondary dwelling unit
regulations in accordance with changes to the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990;
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to implement required changes to the
Residential Rental Unit Licensing By-law to address Secondary Dwelling Unit
uses;
d) the
policies for Secondary Dwelling Units BE INCORPORATED into the final draft of
The London Plan; and,
e) pursuant
to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal
Council, no further notice BE GIVEN as the amendments were minor in nature
and were in accordance with the public notice;
it being pointed out that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications,
with respect to this matter:
• a communication from B.
Lansink, by e-mail;
• a communication from D.
Hinschberger, 430 Lawson Road; and,
• a
communication dated November 23, 2015, from K. Hale, Advocacy Centre for
Tenants Ontario;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated
on the attached public participation meeting record made oral
submissions regarding this matter. (2015-D09)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Squire and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve that
clause 4 of the 26th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee (PEC)
regarding secondary dwelling units BE REFERRED back to the Civic
Administration to be considered and reported back on as part of the
Great-Near Campus Neighbourhoods Strategy Review currently being undertaken;
it being noted that the Civic Administration should include in the Review,
consideration of issues related to secondary dwelling units and the potential
“grandfathering” of existing units that may have been created without a
building permit, but could meet the zoning, building and fire code
regulations being proposed for the secondary dwelling units.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, M. Salih, J.
Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
NAYS: B. Armstrong (1)
|
Councillor
P. Hubert presents.
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve
clauses 1 to 5, inclusive.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the 13th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage from
its meeting held on November 11, 2015:
a) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage (LACH) reviewed the Notice of Revised Application dated October 28,
2015, from M. Davis, Planner II, with respect to an application from the
Corporation of the County of Middlesex relating to the property located at 50
King Street, and reiterated the previous comment from the LACH from its
meeting held on July 9, 2014, which read:
“That the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) reviewed and received a Notice dated
June 18, 2014, from B. Turcotte, Senior Planner, with respect to an
application submitted by The Corporation of the County of Middlesex relating
to the property located at 50 King Street. The LACH expressed concern about the
impact of the proposed amendment on Heritage buildings within and surrounding
the site, recognizing that the site falls within the Downtown Heritage
Conservation District and near the Forks of the Thames; it being noted that
the LACH looks forward to receiving the Heritage Impact Assessment for this
area”;
b) the
following actions be taken with respect to the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application for the property located at 89 York Street:
i) consistent
with the Delegated Authority By-Law (By-Law No. C.P.-1502-129), and as
recommended by the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH), the
alterations to the designated property located at 89 York Street, within the
Downtown Heritage Conservation District, BE PERMITTED by the City Planner,
with the following terms and conditions:
A)
the
final drawings submitted for Site Plan approval and Building Permit be
consistent with the features described in this proposal included in the staff
report dated November 11, 2015, to the satisfaction of the City Planner; and,
B) the
display of a Heritage Alteration Permit be placed in a location visible from
the street during the construction of the structure; and,
ii) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the LACH expressed the following
comments with respect to this matter:
A) given
the location of the site and the relatively low proposed height and small lot
area, the LACH supports the Heritage Alteration Permit application; and,
B) the
LACH received and concurred with the Heritage Impact Statement dated October
26, 2015, prepared by Kirkness Consulting;
it
being noted that the LACH reviewed and received the Heritage Impact Statement
and heard verbal delegations from L. Kirkness, Kirkness Consulting Inc., E.
Lui, Jing for Jing and E. Poletti, Architect Inc., with respect to this
matter; it being further noted that the LACH was impressed with the
thoroughness of the Heritage Impact Statement and more specifically found
“Table 1 – Proposed Development Design Response to HCD Plan Guidelines”
helpful in understanding the decision making process;
c) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage (LACH) indicated its support of the proposed HER Zone as outlined in
the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated October 27, 2015, prepared by ERA
Architects Inc., for the properties located at 179-181 and 183 King Street;
it being noted that the LACH acknowledged the thoroughness of the HIA;
d) consistent
with the Delegated Authority By-law (By-law No. C.P.-1502-129), and as
recommended by the London Advisory Committee on Heritage, the alterations to
the heritage designated properties located at 515 and 517 Princess Avenue,
within the East Woodfield Heritage Conservation District, BE PERMITTED, with
the following terms and conditions:
i) the
proposed vinyl shingles in the gable of the awning roof be replaced by a
painted wood cladding, with trim;
ii) the
proposed aluminium post outside the entry doors be replaced by a painted wood
post or painted wood bracket; and,
iii) the
display of a Heritage Alteration Permit be placed in a location visible from
the street, until the work is completed;
e) clauses
1, 2, 4, 5, 9 to 11, BE RECEIVED.
|
The following actions be taken with respect
to the 9th Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory
Committee from its meeting held on November 19, 2015:
a) C.
Kushnir and S. Peirce BE APPOINTED as the Environmental and Ecological
Planning Advisory Committee representative and alternate, respectively, to
the Dingman Creek Subwatershed: Stormwater Servicing Strategy, Schedule C
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment; and,
b) clauses 1 to 17, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the brownfield incentive application of 2386225 Ontario Ltd.,
relating to the property located at 585 Waterloo Street:
a) the
application of 2386225 Ontario Ltd., for brownfield incentives under the
Community Improvement Plan for Brownfields Incentives for a reimbursement on
50% of Development Charges paid by the applicant, up to a maximum amount of
$275,000 BE APPROVED; and,
b) the
applicant BE REQUIRED to enter into an agreement with the City of London to
be executed by the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner or designate,
outlining relevant terms and conditions of the Community Improvement Plan; it
being noted that the agreement between the City and 2386255 Ontario Ltd.,
will be transferable and binding on any subsequent property owner(s); it
being further noted that Financial Planning and Policy staff have identified
that there are sufficient funds in the Community Improvement Program – Grant
Reserve Fund to finance this grant. (2015-D19)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of
Catherine Burns, relating to the property located at 1895 Blue Heron Drive,
the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated November 30, 2015, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to
amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Light Industrial Special
Provision (LI1(3)) Zone TO a Light Industrial Special Provision (LI1(_))
Zone;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individual indicated
on the attached public participation meeting record made an
oral submission in connection therewith. (2015-D09)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Motion
made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 6.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of
Sifton Properties Limited, relating to the properties located at 1155-1236
Gough Road and 1974-2119 Gough Avenue, the proposed by-law appended to the
staff report dated November 30, 2015, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands
FROM a Residential R1 Special Provision (R1-3(7)) Zone TO a Residential R1
Special Provision (R1-3(_)) Zone;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individual indicated
on the attached public participation meeting record made an
oral submission in connection therewith. (2015-D09)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, B. Armstrong, M. Salih, J.
Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J.
Zaifman (11)
NAYS: M. van Holst, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S, Turner (4)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 7.
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to
the application by Sifton Properties Limited, for approval of a Draft Plan of
Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, for lands
located at 1080 Westdel Bourne, bounded by Oxford Street West, Westdel Bourne,
Shore Road and Kains Road:
a) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated November 30, 2015 as
Appendix “A” BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
December 8, 2015, to amend the Official Plan for lands bounded by Oxford Street
West, Westdel Bourne, Shore Road and Kains Road BY ADDING a specific policy to
Section 10.1.3 – Policies for Specific Areas and to change the land uses
designations on Schedule ‘A’ – Land Use FROM “Community Commercial Node”
TO “Multi-family, Medium Density Residential” and FROM “Multi-family, Medium
Density Residential” TO “Multi-family, High Density Residential”;
b) the proposed by-law
appended to the staff report dated November 30, 2015 as Appendix "B"
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015,
to amend
Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in
part a) above), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM an Urban Reserve
(UR3) Zone, a Community Shopping Area (CSA5) Zone, and a holding Community
Shopping Area (h•h-25•CSA5) Zone TO:
·
a
Holding Business District Commercial Special Provision (h•h- •BDC( ))
Zone, to permit a range of uses such as animal clinics, apartment buildings,
assembly halls, bake shops, cinemas, clinics, commercial recreation
establishments, convenience service establishments, financial institutions,
hotels, medical/ dental offices, nursing homes, offices, places of
entertainment, private clubs, private schools, restaurants, retail stores,
service and repair establishments, supermarkets, taverns, cluster townhouses,
cluster stacked townhouses and street townhouses together with special zone
regulations for a front and exterior side yard depth maximum of 8.0 metres;
interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a residential zone of 6.0
metres; interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a non-residential
zone of 3.0 metres from any other zone boundary and 0.0 metres within the same
BDC( ) zone; building height minimum of 8.0 metres; building height maximum of
38.0 metres; gross floor area for retail uses maximum 30,000 square metres;
total gross floor area for office uses maximum 9,500 square metres; gross floor
area for offices per building maximum 5,000 square metres; landscaped open
space minimum 10%; lot coverage maximum 60%; off-street parking minimum for
commercial – one (1) space per 30 square metres; off-street parking minimum for
office – one (1) space per 40 square metres; off-street parking minimum for
residential – one (1) space per unit; distance of surface parking areas from a
public road allowance minimum 3.0 metres; residential density maximum 100 units
per hectare; it being noted that uses shall be permitted in a shopping centre
building, a stand-alone building or a mixed use multi-storey building
(including live-work format); (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate
provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the
required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval
will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development;
(h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established through the
subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a
development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future
development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in
the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision/Community Facility Special
Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )/CF1( )) Zone to permit various
forms of cluster housing including single detached, semi-detached, duplex,
triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and apartment buildings up to a
maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a special provision for maximum
lot coverage of 50%, minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main
building of 3.0 metres; and to permit a limited range of Community Facility
uses such as community centres and libraries; (h) – to ensure orderly
development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall
not be deleted until the required security is provided and that the conditions
of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior
to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established
through the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be
approved and a development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that
future development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts
identified in the West Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further
refinement through the subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval
process, to the satisfaction
of the City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential Special Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )) Zone to
permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached,
semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and
apartment buildings up to a maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a
special provision for maximum lot coverage of 50%, and minimum front and
exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0 metres; (h) – to ensure
orderly development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol
shall not be deleted until the required security is provided and that the
conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision
agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives
established through the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan
shall be approved and a development agreement shall be entered into which
ensures that future development is in keeping with the design principles and
concepts identified in the West Five Urban Design Guidelines, and
subject to further refinement through the subdivision Design Studies and/or
Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R7/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5(
)/ R7•D75•H18/R8-4( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing
including single detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse
and stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a
special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15
metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0
metres; and, to permit such uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens
apartment buildings, nursing homes, continuum-of-care facilities and emergency
care establishments up to a maximum density of 75 units per hectare and maximum
height of 18 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision
of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to
ensure that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review
process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West Five
Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5(
)/R8-3( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single
detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse and stacked
townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a special
provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15 metres and
minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0 metres; and,
to permit such uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment
buildings, continuum-of-care facilities and emergency care establishments up to
a maximum density of 65 units per hectare with a special provision for maximum
height of 15 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision
of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to
ensure that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review
process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West Five
Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5( ))
Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached,
semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, apartment buildings, townhouse and
stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a
special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15
metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0
metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of municipal
services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required security is
provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the
execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure
that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review process
are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development agreement shall
be entered into which ensures that future development is in keeping with the
design principles and concepts identified in the West Five Urban
Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the subdivision
Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R10 (h•h-54•h- •R10-3•H55) Zone to permit such
uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment buildings and
continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum density of 250 units per hectare
and maximum height of 55 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and
adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted
until the required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan
approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to
development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established through
the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and
a development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future
development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in
the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London; (h-54) – to ensure the owner implements all noise attenuation
measures as recommended in noise assessment reports, acceptable to the City of
London;
·
an
Open Space (OS1) Zone to permit such uses as conservation lands, conservation
works and public parks;
·
an
Open Space (OS3) Zone to permit cemeteries; and,
·
a
Holding Community Shopping Area Special Provision (h•h-25•CSA5( )) Zone with a
special provision that the Total Gross Floor Area for Office Uses (Maximum)
within this zone and the adjacent BDC( ) Zone combined shall not exceed 9,500
square metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of
municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development;
c) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the
public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held
with respect to these matters, the following issues were raised:
i)
the
possibility of townhouses backing onto Shore Road across from an existing
development;
ii)
the
increase in traffic and the safety of the area residents;
iii)
the
flexibility of the mixed use, as it allows the developer to build whatever they
wish;
iv)
the
building heights in the most dense area of the proposed development; and,
v)
the
number of iterations of the plan; noting that the changes are not outlined;
d)
the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council
supports the Approval Authority issuing draft approval of the proposed plan of
subdivision, submitted
by Sifton Properties Limited (File No. 39T-14503), prepared by GSP Group and
certified by Jason Wilband, Ontario Land Surveyor dated May 6, 2015 (Project
No. 8103), as red-line amended, which shows one (1) medium density
residential block, three (3) medium density residential/mixed use blocks, one
(1) mixed use block, one (1) high density residential/mixed use block, served
by one (1)
primary collector, two (2) local streets, one (1) road widening block, and five
(5) reserve blocks SUBJECT TO the conditions appended to the staff report dated
November 30, 2015 as Appendix "C" and the adopted Official Plan
Amendment coming into effect;
e)
the
request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject
lands FROM an Urban Reserve (UR3) Zone, a Community Shopping Area (CSA5) Zone
and a holding Community Shopping Area (h•h-25•CSA5) Zone TO a Mixed Use (MU)
Zone BE REFUSED for the following reasons:
i)
the
requested amendment proposes to introduce a new zone category to the Zoning
By-law which currently does not exist, and which is not considered necessary;
and,
ii)
the
requested amendment can be accommodated through existing zone categories; and,
f) the
financing for the project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Estimated Claims
and Revenues Report” appended to the staff report dated November 30, 2015 as
Appendix "D";
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on
the attached public participation meeting record made oral
submissions in connection therewith. (2015-D09/D12)
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve that clause 7 be amended as
follows:
i)
by
deleting part b) in its entirety and by replacing it with the following new
part b):
“b) the proposed attached
revised by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
December 21, 2015, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity
with the Official Plan, as amended in part a) above), to change the zoning of
the subject lands FROM an
Urban Reserve (UR3) Zone, a Community Shopping Area (CSA5) Zone, and a
holding Community Shopping Area (h•h-25•CSA5) Zone TO:
·
a
Holding Business District Commercial Special Provision (h•h- •BDC(
)) Zone, to permit a range of uses such as animal clinics, apartment
buildings, assembly halls, bake shops, cinemas, clinics, commercial
recreation establishments, convenience service establishments, financial
institutions, hotels, medical/ dental offices, nursing homes, offices, places
of entertainment, private clubs, private schools, restaurants, retail stores,
service and repair establishments, supermarkets, taverns, cluster townhouses,
cluster stacked townhouses and street townhouses together with special zone
regulations for a front and exterior side yard depth maximum of 8.0 metres;
interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a residential zone of 6.0
metres; interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a non-residential
zone of 3.0 metres from any other zone boundary and 0.0 metres within the
same BDC( ) zone; building height minimum of 8.0 metres; building height
maximum of 38.0 metres; gross floor area for retail uses maximum 30,000
square metres; total gross floor area for office uses maximum 9,500 square
metres; gross floor area for offices per building maximum 5,000 square
metres; landscaped open space minimum 10%; lot coverage maximum 60%;
off-street parking minimum for commercial – one (1) space per 30 square
metres; off-street parking minimum for office – one (1) space per 40 square
metres; off-street parking minimum for residential – one (1) space per unit;
distance of surface parking areas from a public road allowance minimum 3.0
metres; residential density maximum 100 units per hectare; it being noted
that uses shall be permitted in a shopping centre building, a stand-alone
building or a mixed use multi-storey building (including live-work format);
(h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of municipal
services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required security is
provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the
execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure
that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review
process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision/Community Facility Special
Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )/CF1( )) Zone to permit various
forms of cluster housing including single detached, semi-detached, duplex,
triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and apartment buildings up to
a maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a special provision for
maximum lot coverage of 50%, minimum front and exterior side yard depth to
main building of 3.0 metres; and to permit a limited range of Community
Facility uses such as community centres and libraries; (h) – to ensure
orderly development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h”
symbol shall not be deleted until the required security is provided and that
the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a
subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban
design objectives established through the subdivision review process are
being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development agreement shall be
entered into which ensures that future development is in keeping with the
design principles and concepts identified in the West Five Urban
Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the subdivision
Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential Special Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )) Zone
to permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached,
semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and
apartment buildings up to a maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a
special provision for maximum lot coverage of 50%, and minimum front and
exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0 metres; (h) – to ensure
orderly development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h”
symbol shall not be deleted until the required security is provided and that
the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a
subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban
design objectives established through the subdivision review process are
being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development agreement shall be
entered into which ensures that future development is in keeping with the
design principles and concepts identified in the West Five Urban
Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the subdivision
Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R7/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6(
)/R6-5( )/ R7•D75•H18/R8-4( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster
housing including single detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex,
townhouse and stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per
hectare with a special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum
height of 15 metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main
building of 3.0 metres; and, to permit such uses as apartment buildings,
senior citizens apartment buildings, nursing homes, continuum-of-care
facilities and emergency care establishments up to a maximum density of 75
units per hectare and maximum height of 18 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly
development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol
shall not be deleted until the required security is provided and that the
conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision
agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design
objectives established through the subdivision review process are being met,
a site plan shall be approved and a development agreement shall be entered
into which ensures that future development is in keeping with the design
principles and concepts identified in the West Five Urban
Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the subdivision
Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5(
)/R8-3( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single
detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse and stacked
townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a special
provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15 metres and
minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0 metres;
and, to permit such uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment
buildings, continuum-of-care facilities and emergency care establishments up
to a maximum density of 65 units per hectare with a special provision for
maximum height of 15 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate
provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until
the required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan
approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to
development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established
through the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be
approved and a development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that
future development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts
identified in the West Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to
further refinement through the subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan
Approval process, to the satisfaction of the City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5( ))
Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached,
semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, apartment buildings, townhouse and
stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a
special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15
metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0
metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of
municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will
ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) –
to ensure that urban design objectives established through the subdivision
review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R10 (h•h-54•h- •R10-3•H55) Zone to permit such
uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment buildings and
continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum density of 250 units per hectare
and maximum height of 55 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and
adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted
until the required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan
approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to
development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established
through the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be
approved and a development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that
future development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts
identified in the West Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to
further refinement through the subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan
Approval process, to the satisfaction of the City of London; (h-54) – to ensure
the owner implements all noise attenuation measures as recommended in noise
assessment reports, acceptable to the City of London;
·
an
Open Space (OS1) Zone to permit such uses as conservation lands, conservation
works and public parks;
·
an
Open Space (OS3) Zone to permit cemeteries; and,
·
a
Holding Community Shopping Area Special Provision (h•h-5•CSA5( )) Zone with
a special provision that the Total Gross Floor Area for Office Uses (Maximum)
within this zone and the adjacent BDC( ) Zone combined shall not exceed
9,500 square metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate
provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until
the required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan
approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to
development;
·
a Holding Provision
(h-5) for Blocks 1 to 6, inclusive, to ensure that development takes a form
compatible with adjacent land uses, agreements shall be entered into
following public site plan review specifying the issues allowed for under
Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, prior to the
removal of the "h-5" symbol;” and,
ii)
by
adding the following new part g):
“g) that
pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the
Municipal Council, no further notice be given as the amendment is minor in
nature.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. van Holst, B. Armstrong, M. Salih,
J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, J. Morgan, V. Ridley, T. Park (8)
NAYS: M. Brown, P. Squire, P. Hubert, A.
Hopkins, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, J. Zaifman (7)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 7, as amended.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Clause
7, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to
the application by Sifton Properties Limited, for approval of a Draft Plan of
Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, for lands
located at 1080 Westdel Bourne, bounded by Oxford Street West, Westdel Bourne,
Shore Road and Kains Road:
a) the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated
November 30, 2015 as Appendix “A” BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 8, 2015, to amend the Official Plan for lands
bounded by Oxford Street West, Westdel Bourne, Shore Road and Kains Road BY
ADDING a specific policy to Section 10.1.3 – Policies for Specific Areas and to
change the land uses designations on Schedule ‘A’ – Land Use FROM “Community
Commercial Node” TO “Multi-family, Medium Density Residential” and FROM
“Multi-family, Medium Density Residential” TO “Multi-family, High Density
Residential”;
b) the proposed attached
revised by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
December 21, 2015, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with
the Official Plan, as amended in part a) above), to change the zoning of the
subject lands FROM an
Urban Reserve (UR3) Zone, a Community Shopping Area (CSA5) Zone, and a holding
Community Shopping Area (h•h-25•CSA5) Zone TO:
·
a
Holding Business District Commercial Special Provision (h•h- •BDC( ))
Zone, to permit a range of uses such as animal clinics, apartment buildings,
assembly halls, bake shops, cinemas, clinics, commercial recreation
establishments, convenience service establishments, financial institutions,
hotels, medical/ dental offices, nursing homes, offices, places of
entertainment, private clubs, private schools, restaurants, retail stores,
service and repair establishments, supermarkets, taverns, cluster townhouses,
cluster stacked townhouses and street townhouses together with special zone
regulations for a front and exterior side yard depth maximum of 8.0 metres;
interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a residential zone of 6.0
metres; interior side and rear yard depth minimum abutting a non-residential
zone of 3.0 metres from any other zone boundary and 0.0 metres within the same
BDC( ) zone; building height minimum of 8.0 metres; building height maximum of
38.0 metres; gross floor area for retail uses maximum 30,000 square metres;
total gross floor area for office uses maximum 9,500 square metres; gross floor
area for offices per building maximum 5,000 square metres; landscaped open
space minimum 10%; lot coverage maximum 60%; off-street parking minimum for
commercial – one (1) space per 30 square metres; off-street parking minimum for
office – one (1) space per 40 square metres; off-street parking minimum for
residential – one (1) space per unit; distance of surface parking areas from a
public road allowance minimum 3.0 metres; residential density maximum 100 units
per hectare; it being noted that uses shall be permitted in a shopping centre
building, a stand-alone building or a mixed use multi-storey building
(including live-work format); (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate
provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the
required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval
will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development;
(h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established through the
subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a
development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future
development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in
the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision/Community Facility Special
Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )/CF1( )) Zone to permit various
forms of cluster housing including single detached, semi-detached, duplex,
triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and apartment buildings up to a
maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a special provision for maximum
lot coverage of 50%, minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main
building of 3.0 metres; and to permit a limited range of Community Facility
uses such as community centres and libraries; (h) – to ensure orderly
development and adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall
not be deleted until the required security is provided and that the conditions
of draft plan approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement
prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives
established through the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan
shall be approved and a development agreement shall be entered into which
ensures that future development is in keeping with the design principles and
concepts identified in the West Five Urban Design Guidelines, and
subject to further refinement through the subdivision Design Studies and/or
Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential Special Provision (h•h- •R5-3( )/R6-5( )) Zone to
permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached, semi-detached,
duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse, stacked townhouse and apartment buildings
up to a maximum density of 35 units per hectare with a special provision for
maximum lot coverage of 50%, and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to
main building of 3.0 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate
provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the
required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval
will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development;
(h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established through the
subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a
development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development
is in keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West Five
Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R7/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5(
)/ R7•D75•H18/R8-4( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing
including single detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse
and stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a
special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15
metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0
metres; and, to permit such uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens
apartment buildings, nursing homes, continuum-of-care facilities and emergency
care establishments up to a maximum density of 75 units per hectare and maximum
height of 18 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision
of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to
ensure that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review
process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West Five
Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6/R8 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5(
)/R8-3( )) Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single
detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, townhouse and stacked
townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a special provision
for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15 metres and minimum
front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0 metres; and, to
permit such uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment buildings,
continuum-of-care facilities and emergency care establishments up to a maximum
density of 65 units per hectare with a special provision for maximum height of
15 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of
municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to
ensure that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review
process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development
agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future development is in
keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in the West Five
Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R5/R6 Special Provision (h•h- •R5-6( )/R6-5( ))
Zone to permit various forms of cluster housing including single detached,
semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex, apartment buildings, townhouse and
stacked townhouses up to a maximum density of 50 units per hectare with a
special provision for a maximum lot coverage of 50%, maximum height of 15
metres and minimum front and exterior side yard depth to main building of 3.0
metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of municipal
services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required security is
provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure the
execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development; (h-_) – to ensure
that urban design objectives established through the subdivision review process
are being met, a site plan shall be approved and a development agreement shall
be entered into which ensures that future development is in keeping with the
design principles and concepts identified in the West Five Urban
Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the subdivision
Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London;
·
a
Holding Residential R10 (h•h-54•h- •R10-3•H55) Zone to permit such
uses as apartment buildings, senior citizens apartment buildings and
continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum density of 250 units per hectare
and maximum height of 55 metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and
adequate provision of municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted
until the required security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan
approval will ensure the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to
development; (h-_) – to ensure that urban design objectives established through
the subdivision review process are being met, a site plan shall be approved and
a development agreement shall be entered into which ensures that future
development is in keeping with the design principles and concepts identified in
the West
Five Urban Design Guidelines, and subject to further refinement through the
subdivision Design Studies and/or Site Plan Approval process, to the satisfaction of the
City of London; (h-54) – to ensure the owner implements all noise attenuation
measures as recommended in noise assessment reports, acceptable to the City of
London;
·
an
Open Space (OS1) Zone to permit such uses as conservation lands, conservation
works and public parks;
·
an
Open Space (OS3) Zone to permit cemeteries; and,
·
a
Holding Community Shopping Area Special Provision (h•h-5•CSA5( )) Zone with a
special provision that the Total Gross Floor Area for Office Uses (Maximum)
within this zone and the adjacent BDC( ) Zone combined shall not exceed 9,500
square metres; (h) – to ensure orderly development and adequate provision of
municipal services, the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required
security is provided and that the conditions of draft plan approval will ensure
the execution of a subdivision agreement prior to development;
·
a Holding Provision
(h-5) for Blocks 1 to 6, inclusive, to ensure that development takes a form
compatible with adjacent land uses, agreements shall be entered into following
public site plan review specifying the issues allowed for under Section 41 of
the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, prior to the removal of the “h-5”
symbol;” and,
c) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the
public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held
with respect to these matters, the following issues were raised:
i)
the
possibility of townhouses backing onto Shore Road across from an existing
development;
ii)
the
increase in traffic and the safety of the area residents;
iii)
the
flexibility of the mixed use, as it allows the developer to build whatever they
wish;
iv)
the
building heights in the most dense area of the proposed development; and,
v)
the
number of iterations of the plan; noting that the changes are not outlined;
d) the Approval
Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the Approval Authority
issuing draft approval of the proposed plan of subdivision, submitted
by Sifton Properties Limited (File No. 39T-14503), prepared by GSP Group and
certified by Jason Wilband, Ontario Land Surveyor dated May 6, 2015 (Project
No. 8103), as red-line amended, which shows one (1) medium density residential
block, three (3) medium density residential/mixed use blocks, one (1) mixed use
block, one (1) high density residential/mixed use block, served by one (1) primary
collector, two (2) local streets, one (1) road widening block, and five (5)
reserve blocks SUBJECT TO the conditions appended to the staff report dated
November 30, 2015 as Appendix "C" and the adopted Official Plan
Amendment coming into effect;
e) the request to amend Zoning By-law
No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM an Urban Reserve (UR3)
Zone, a Community Shopping Area (CSA5) Zone and a holding Community Shopping
Area (h•h-25•CSA5) Zone TO a Mixed Use (MU) Zone BE REFUSED for the following
reasons:
i)
the
requested amendment proposes to introduce a new zone category to the Zoning
By-law which currently does not exist, and which is not considered necessary;
and,
ii)
the
requested amendment can be accommodated through existing zone categories; and,
f) the
financing for the project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Estimated Claims
and Revenues Report” appended to the staff report dated November 30, 2015 as
Appendix "D"; and,
g) that pursuant to
Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal Council, no
further notice be given as the amendment is minor in nature
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on
the attached public participation meeting record made oral
submissions in connection therewith. (2015-D09/D12)
Motion
made by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 8.
That, on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the
following actions be taken with respect to the application of Old Oak
Properties Inc., relating to the property located at 2300 Richmond Street:
a)
the
request to amend the Official Plan to change the designation of the subject
lands FROM a Low Density Residential designation TO a Multi-family, High
Density Residential designation, BE REFUSED for the following reasons:
i) it
is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as it contributes to an
oversupply of lands designated for high density residential development and an
imbalance in the range and mix of residential densities in the area;
ii) there
is an existing oversupply of vacant land planned for Multi-family, High Density
Residential in the area that better meets the locational criteria of the
Official Plan;
iii) it
undermines the ability of other, better located, lands planned for high density
residential development in the area to perform their planned function in
relation to surrounding components
of the broader planning area, including the relationship of high density
residential land uses to commercial nodes, the sites already planned for high
density residential uses, and public transit services;
iv) it
undermines the planned function of superior sites identified for high density
residential uses within the Built-area Boundary (intensification);
v) it
undermines the planned function of the Masonville Transit Node;
vi) it
is not in keeping with the Uplands North Area Plan; and,
vii) it
is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as the Provincially
Significant Wetlands and other natural features have not been accurately
delineated and it has not been demonstrated that high density residential
development at this location will have no negative impacts to the Provincially
Significant Wetlands, other natural features on the north part of the property
and to the immediate south of the subject property, and species at risk;
b)
the
request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM an Open Space (OS5) Zone, an Urban Reserve (UR4) Zone and a
Holding Urban Reserve Special Provision (h-54•UR4(1)) Zone TO a Residential R8
Special Provision (R8-4(_)) Zone, a Residential R9 Special Provision (R9-7(_))
Zone, and an Open Space Special Provision (OS5(_)) Zone BE REFUSED for
the following reasons:
i) it
is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as it contributes to an
oversupply of lands designated for high density residential development and an
imbalance in the range and mix of residential densities in the area;
ii) there
is an existing oversupply of vacant land planned for Multi-family, High Density
Residential in the area that better meets the locational criteria of the
Official Plan;
iii) it
undermines the ability of other, better located, lands planned for high density
residential development in the area to perform their planned function in
relation to surrounding components
of the broader planning area, including the relationship of high density
residential land uses to commercial nodes, the sites already planned for high
density residential uses, and public transit services;
iv) it
undermines the planned function of superior sites identified for high density
residential uses within the Built-area Boundary (intensification);
v) it
undermines the planned function of the Masonville Transit Node;
vi) it
is not in keeping with the Uplands North Area Plan;
vii) it
is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement as the Provincially
Significant Wetlands and other natural features have not been accurately
delineated and it has not been demonstrated that high density residential
development at this location will have no negative impacts to the Provincially
Significant Wetlands, other natural features on the north part of the property
and to the immediate south of the subject property, and species at risk;
viii) should
the request for the Multi-family, High Density Residential designation be
refused, a rezoning to permit the requested range of uses and densities is not
in keeping with the existing Low Density Residential designation in the
Official Plan;
ix) there
is no Official Plan policy basis to support the requested increase in
residential density above the maximum of 150 units per hectare for high density
uses outside of Central London through the use of lands designated as
Environmental Review and Open Space, or lands zoned Open Space, as part of the
land area for residential density calculations; and,
x) no
other rationale for an increase in density above 150 units per hectare was
provided for consideration;
it being pointed out that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated November 25,
2015, from S. Stapleton, Vice-President, Auburn Developments, with respect to
this matter; and,
it
being further pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated
with this matter, the individual indicated on the attached public
participation meeting record made an oral submission in connection therewith.
(2015-D09)
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Councillor
M. Cassidy presents.
Motion made by Councillor M. Cassidy to
Approve clauses 1, 2, 4, 7, 9 and 11 of the 1st Report of the Corporate
Services Committee and clause 1 of the 2nd Report of the Corporate Services
Committee.
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor J. Zaifman
disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 5 of this Report, having to do with
City of London Days at the Budweiser Gardens, by indicating that his mother
is on the Board of the organization that has applied for a City of London Day
at the Budweiser Gardens.
|
That Councillor J. Morgan BE ELECTED Vice
Chair of the Corporate Services Committee for the term ending November 30,
2016.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
attached revised proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to repeal Council Policy 28(1)
entitled “Travel and Business Expenses” and replace it with a revised Council
Policy 28(1), in order to incorporate the following amendments to the Policy:
a) revise the Expense Review
Officer for the Mayor;
b) revise
the local mileage provisions to exclude Council Member’s (with the exception
of the Head of Council) who now have local mileage expenses provided for
under Council Policy 28(2);
c) revise
the provision for out-of-town mileage reimbursement for individuals who
receive a monthly vehicle allowance when travel exceeds 150km; and,
d) revise
the Risk Management Policy appendices for personal and rented vehicles to
reflect more current terminology.
|
That,
on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the following actions be taken:
a) the
2015 Capital Budget Status - Third Quarter Report BE RECEIVED for
information;
b) the
capital projects listed in Appendix A of the staff report dated December 1,
2015, with a total of $17.9 million of net surplus funding, BE CLOSED and the
following actions be taken:
i) reserve
fund draws of $11,710,607.86 BE TRANSFERRED back to the reserve funds which
originally funded the projects;
ii) pay-as-you-go
funding of $109,339.31 BE TRANSFERRED to the capital receipts account; and,
iii) authorized
debt financing of $6,032,887.41 BE RELEASED, resulting in a reduction of
authorized debt.
|
That Covent Garden Market BE AUTHORIZED to
spend an amount of approximately $85,000 to cover the cost of replacing the
elevator in the Covent Garden Market in January 2016, notwithstanding that
approval of the Capital Budget will not occur until a later date.
|
That the Corporate Services Committee
meeting originally scheduled for February 22, 2016 BE CHANGED to February 16,
2016 at 12 Noon.
|
|
2nd Report of the Corporate Services
Committee
|
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Motion
made by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 3 of the 1st Report of the
Corporate Services Committee.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, on
the advice of the Division Manager, Corporate Asset Management, the staff
report dated December 1, 2015 regarding the Corporate Asset Management Plan
2015 Review BE RECEIVED for information.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, M. Salih, J.
Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
RECUSED: B. Armstrong (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 5 of the 1st Report of the
Corporate Services Committee.
That, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, and notwithstanding Council Policy 3(8) – City of London Days at the
Budweiser Gardens, which restricts a group from having more than two event
days over a five year consecutive period, the request from the Parkinson
Society Southwestern Ontario to host a Charity Lunch Event featuring local
restaurants on June 13, 2016 BE APPROVED as a City of London Day at the Budweiser
Gardens; it being noted that no other request has been received for 2016 to
date.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park (14)
RECUSED: J. Zaifman (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 6 of the 1st Report of the
Corporate Services Committee.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the 2015 Operating Budget Status –
Third Quarter Report for the Property Tax Supported, Water, and Wastewater
and Treatment Budgets:
a) the
2015 Operating Budget Status – Third Quarter Report for the Property Tax
Supported (refer to Appendix A of the staff report dated December 1, 2015),
Water, and Wastewater and Treatment Budgets BE RECEIVED for information, it
being noted that Civic Administration is projecting:
i) $4.7
million in net savings for the Property Tax Supported Budget as identified by
the Civic Administration and Boards and Commissions. The year-end position
could fluctuate significantly based on factors beyond the control of the
Civic Administration such as Ontario Works caseload pressures, winter
maintenance conditions and mandatory community improvement plan program
incentives. It should also be noted that the Civic Administration increased
the London Police Service budget by $1.6 million in the 3rd quarter to
address budget-related matters concerning policing services by a
corresponding budget reduction in Financial Management;
ii) $1.1
million deficit in the Water Rate Supported Budget;
iii) $0.2
million deficit in the Wastewater and Treatment Rate Supported Budget;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to contribute to/draw down from the
Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to balance year-end operations of the
Property Tax Supported Budget should the Budget be in a surplus/deficit
position;
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to contribute to the Unfunded Liability
Reserve, any operational savings realized from personnel and contingency
budgets at 2015 year-end; it being noted that the net unfunded liability
balance as reported in the 2014 Financial Statement is at $94.6 million;
d) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to draw down from the Social Services
Reserve Fund to offset transitional costs associated with the establishment
of the Northeast and Southeast Ontario Works (OW) locations; it being noted
that if sufficient savings to cover the transitional costs exist within the
OW service area the draw down will not be taken;
e) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to contribute to/draw down from the Water
Capital Reserve Fund to balance year-end operations of the Water Budget
should the Budget be in a surplus/deficit position;
f) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to contribute to/draw down from the
Wastewater Rate Stabilization Reserve to balance year-end operations of the
Wastewater & Treatment Budget should the Budget be in a surplus/deficit
position; and
g) details
of the Civic Administration’s contribution of $926,303 ($692,227 – Property
Tax Supported; $165,160 – Water; and $68,916. – Wastewater) to the
Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economy reserves in 2015 BE RECEIVED for
information.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 8 of the 1st Report of the
Corporate Services Committee.
That the recommendations contained in the
Tax Adjustment Agenda dated December 1, 2015, as revised by the revisions
included on the Added Agenda as Item 8 a), BE APPROVED; it being noted that
there were no members of the public in attendance to speak to the Corporate
Services Committee, at the public hearing associated with the Tax Adjustment
Agenda.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve clause 10 of the 1st Report of the
Corporate Services Committee.
That the following actions be taken with
respect to refugee resettlement:
a) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to update City Council on their current
plans for the refugee families arriving in London, and any additional
measures the City of London can take to better support newcomers;
b) the
Mayor BE REQUESTED to send letters of support to the Provincial and Federal
Governments, demonstrating a collective commitment to resettling refugees;
and
c) the
Members of City Council who sit on the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’
Board of Directors and Standing Committees (Deputy Mayor M. Cassidy,
Councillor H.L, Usher and Councillor J. Zaifman) BE REQUESTED to further
pursue these national conversations and opportunities to co-ordinate efforts.
|
At 6:12 PM, His Worship the Mayor places
Councillor P. Hubert in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.
|
At 6:17 PM, His Worship the Mayor resumes
the Chair and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council Board.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Councillor
T. Park presents.
Motion made by Councillor T. Park to
Approve clause 1.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
|
1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee
|
Councillor
T. Park presents.
Motion
made by Councillor T. Park to Approve clause 1.
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
2nd Report of the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee
|
Councillor T. Park
presents.
Motion made by Councillor T. Park to
Approve clauses 1 to 12, excluding clauses 2, 6 and 7.
|
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor J. Morgan
disclosed a pecuniary interest in the following matters as he is employed by
Western University:
a)
clause
6 of this Report having to do with the London Medical Innovation and
Commercialization Network;
b)
clause
7 of this Report having to do with the London Medical Innovation and
Commercialization Network; and
c)
clause
C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to this Report having to do with a matter
pertaining to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including
communications necessary for that purpose, as it relates to the London Medical
Innovation and Commercialization Network Contribution Agreement.
3.
|
Surplus/Deficit Policy
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the establishment of a Surplus
/Deficit Policy:
a) the
attached revised proposed by-law (Appendix “A”) BE INTRODUCED at
the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to enact a
Surplus/Deficit Policy, in order to provide the Civic Administration with a set
of guidelines to manage yearly surplus or deficit positions, subject to the
contribution to the Operating Budget Contingency Reserve (OBCR) being confirmed
by the Municipal Council;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to bring forward the necessary by-laws
regarding the establishment of a Community Investment Reserve Fund and a
Capital Infrastructure Gap Reserve Fund; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to bring forward a report providing
information with respect to the Corporation’s current unfunded liability.
4.
|
Strategic Plan for The City of London
2015-2019: Proposed Reporting Process and Year One Update
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Manager, the following actions be taken with respect to the City of London’s
Strategic Plan:
a) the
proposed reporting process and timelines to demonstrate the progress being made
on the Strategic Plan for the City of London for 2016 – 2019, as contained in
the staff report dated December 7, 2015, BE ENDORSED; and
b) the
Annual Report to the Community summarizing the work accomplished on the
Strategic Plan for the City of London, for the period March 2015 to October
2015, BE RECEIVED for information.
5.
|
City of London Community Grants Program
Proposed Evaluate Criteria and Revised Community Grants Policy and Grant
Agreement
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director of Neighbourhood, Children and Fire Services, the following actions be
taken with respect to the municipal granting process for not-for-profit
organizations:
a) the
attached revised proposed by-law (Appendix 1) BE INTRODUCED at
the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to delete Council
Policy 8(11) – Grants and Capital Grants Policy and replace it with a new City
of London Community Grants Policy, included as Schedule “A” to the by-law;
b) the
attached revised proposed by-law (Appendix 2), BE INTRODUCED at
the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 8, 2015 to:
i)
approve
and adopt the standard form Grant Agreement for the London Community Grants
Program;
ii) delegate
authority to:
A) act
as the City Representative for the purposes of the standard form Grant
Agreement approved and adopted in i), above;
B) amend
certain items within the standard form Grant Agreement approved and adopted in
i), above;
C) execute
the standard form Grant Agreement approved and adopted in i), above, on behalf
of The Corporation of the City of London, provided that any agreement does not
require additional funding or such funding is provided for in the City’s current
budget; and
c) repeal
By-law No. 7073-73 regarding the standard form Grant Agreement under the
Strategic Funding Framework.
8.
|
Public Participation Meeting – 2016 Water
and Wastewater Rates
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services & City Engineer, and the
Managing Director, Corporate Services & City Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer the following actions be taken with respect to Wastewater and Treatment
rates and charges and Water rates and charges:
a) all
rates and charges related to the provision of Wastewater and Treatment
Services, with the exception of charges related to the installation or
replacement of Private Drain Connections, BE INCREASED by 3%, effective January
1, 2016;
b) subject
to the approval of a), above, the proposed by-law to amend the Wastewater and
Treatment Rates and Charges By-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting on December 8, 2015 to effect the rates and charges increase noted in
a), above; and
c) all
rates and charges related to the provision of Water Services, with the
exception of the Customer Assistance charge, BE INCREASED by 3%, effective
January 1, 2016;
d) subject
to the approval of c), above, the proposed by-law to amend the Water Rates and
Charges By-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on December 8,
2015 to effect the rates and charges increase noted in c), above; and
e) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to review factors affecting revenue forecasts
and report back to Council;
it
being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached
presentation from the Director, Water and Wastewater with respect to this
matter.
9.
|
Small City Strategy Terms of Reference
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director,
Planning & City Planner, the Terms of Reference for the Smart City Strategy
as appended to the staff report dated December 7, 2015, BE APPROVED;
it
being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached
presentation from the Manager, Urban Design and GIS, with respect to this
matter.
10.
|
Consideration of Appointments to the
County/City Liaison Committee
|
That the following individuals BE APPOINTED
to the County/City Liaison Committee for the term ending November 30, 2018:
Councillor T. Park (Member)
Councillor P. Squire (Member)
Councillor
J. Zaifman (Alternate Member)
11.
|
Confirmation of Appointment to the
Outstanding London Ambassador Award Committee
|
That
Dan Doroshenko BE APPOINTED as the Urban League of London’s representative on
the Outstanding London Ambassador Award Committee.
12.
|
8th Report of the Governance
Working Group
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 8th Report of the Governance Working Group, from its meeting
held on November 25, 2015:
a) the
Governance Working Group (GWG) Terms of Reference BE AMENDED to extend the term
to June 30, 2016, in order to provide additional time for the GWG to complete
its work; and
b) clauses
1 to 4 BE RECEIVED.
Motion
Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
Motion
made by Councillor T. Park to Approve clause 2.
2.
|
Municipal Implications of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission Report
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director,
Community and Economic Innovation, the following actions be taken with respect
to the municipal implications of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Report:
a) the
Civic Administration and the Mayor’s Office BE DIRECTED to participate in the
Big City Mayors’ Aboriginal Partnership and Reconciliation Working Group; and
b) the staff report dated December 7,
2015 BE RECEIVED for information.
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer and
seconded by Councillor M. Salih to Amend clause 2 by adding the following new
parts c), d) and e)”:
“c) the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to Strategic Priorities and Policy
Committee with a plan to act on two recommendations of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission Report being Recommendation 57, related to
intercultural competency training for municipal employees; and Recommendation
77, related to municipal and community archives working with the National
Centre for Truth and Reconciliation to identify and collect copies of all
records relevant to the history and legacy of the residential school system; it
being noted that this report should include a work plan and overview of the
budgetary implications of completing the work plan;
d) the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to consult and collaborate with the London Public
Library with respect to Recommendation 77 noted in part c) above;
e) the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee on developing a prominent memorial in London, acknowledging
the history of Canada’s residential school system and its former students.”
Motion
made by Councillor V. Ridley and seconded by Councillor T. Park to Amend part
a) of clause 2, by adding the following words “with regular progress updates
to be provided to the Municipal Council, through the appropriate standing committee”
after the words “Group;”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor S. Turner to Approve clause 2, as amended.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
|
Clause
2, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Director,
Community and Economic Innovation, the following actions be taken with respect
to the municipal implications of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Report:
a) the
Civic Administration and the Mayor’s Office BE DIRECTED to participate in the Big
City Mayors’ Aboriginal Partnership and Reconciliation Working Group, with
regular progress updates to be provided to the Municipal Council, through the
appropriate standing committee;
b) the staff report dated December 7,
2015 BE RECEIVED for information;
c)
the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee with a plan to act on two recommendations of the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission Report being Recommendation 57, related to
intercultural competency training for municipal employees; and Recommendation
77, related to municipal and community archives working with the National
Centre for Truth and Reconciliation to identify and collect copies of all
records relevant to the history and legacy of the residential school system; it
being noted that this report should include a work plan and overview of the
budgetary implications of completing the work plan;
d)
the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to consult and collaborate with the London
Public Library with respect to Recommendation 77 noted in part c) above; and,
e)
the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee on developing a prominent memorial in London, acknowledging
the history of Canada’s residential school system and its former students.
Motion
made by Councillor T. Park to Approve clauses 6 and 7.
6.
|
London Medical Innovation and
Commercialization Network
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
proposed by-law attached as Appendix ‘A’ to the staff report
dated December 7, 2015 BE INTRODUCED at the Council meeting on December 8, 2015
to:
a)
authorize
and approve an Agreement with the London Medical Innovation & Commercialization
Network to bind the Network directly to the obligations previously imposed upon
the London Health Sciences Foundation and St. Joseph’s Health Care Foundation,
including the disbursement of grant monies and associated reporting thereof to
the City; and
b) authorize
the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement substantially in the form
of the Agreement attached as Schedule ‘A’ to the by-law noted in
part (a) above.
7.
|
London Medical Innovation and
Commercialization Network Update (Paul Paolatto and Peter White)
|
That the attached presentation
from P. Paolatto and P. White, both of Western University, providing an update
on the London Medical Innovation and Commercialization Network, BE RECEIVED for
information.
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
RECUSED: J. Morgan (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor T. Park to Approve clause 13.
13.
|
Request for Delegation Status – Expansion
of London Optimist Sports Centre (BMO Centre)
|
That the Committee Secretary BE DIRECTED to
place Mr. T. Partalas, President, London Optimist Sports Centre, as a
delegation on a future agenda of the Community and Protective Services
Committee, with respect to the London Optimist Sports Centre’s request for
additional funding from the City of London, and to include a business case on
that agenda.
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
NAYS: J. Helmer, A. Hopkins (2)
|
Motion made by Councillor V. Ridley and
seconded by Councillor A. Hopkins to Approve that Council recess.
|
Motion Passed
The Council recesses at 6:43 PM and
reconvenes at 7:25 PM with Mayor M. Brown in the Chair and all Members present.
Motion made by Councillor M. van Holst and
seconded by Councillor J. Helmer that Council rise and go into the Committee of
the Whole, in camera, for the purpose of considering the following matter:
|
A matter pertaining to personal matters,
including information regarding an identifiable individual, including a
municipal employee, with respect to employment related matters, advice or
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation including
communications necessary for that purpose and for the purpose of providing
instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (15)
The Council rises and goes into the Committee
of the Whole, in camera, at 7:26 PM, with Mayor M. Brown in the Chair and all
Members present.
The Committee of the Whole rises at 8:58 PM,
and Council reconvenes at 9:00 PM, with Mayor M. Brown in the Chair and all
Members present, except Councillor P. Hubert.
At 9:00 PM Councillor P. Hubert leaves the
meeting.
Councillor
J. Morgan presents.
PRESENT: Mayor M. Brown and Councillors M.
van Holst, B. Armstrong, M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan,
P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park and J. Zaifman
and C. Saunders (City Clerk).
ALSO PRESENT: A Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J.
Braam, J. Corbett (Advocates LLP), S. Datars Bere, K. Dawtrey, A. Hagan, V.
McAlea Major, L. Palarchio, L.M. Rowe, J. Stanford and B. Warner.
Motion made by Councillor J. Morgan to
Approve that, as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239 (6) of the
Municipal Act, 2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City
Council for deliberation and a vote in public session:
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering
Services and City Engineer, on the advice of the Manager of Realty Services,
the following actions be taken with respect to the property at 3713 Scotland
Drive:
a) the
offer submitted by Ashley Hennessy and Suzanne Hennessy to sell to the City
the property municipally known as 3713 Scotland Drive, located on the south
side of Scotland Drive, further described as Part of North ½ Lot 19
Concession 6, Designated as Part 7, Reference Plan 33R1297, containing an
area of approximately 18.5 hectares (45.8 acres), for the purpose of
buffering the City’s W12A landfill site, for the sum of $756,000.00, BE
ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO the City agreeing to pay the Vendor’s reasonable legal
fees, including fees, disbursements and applicable taxes, to complete this
transaction, subject to assessment; and
b) the
financing for this acquisition BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of
Financing Report attached hereto as Appendix “A”.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
None.
None.
Motion made by Councillor T. Park and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve that pursuant to section 19.2 of
the Council Procedure By-law, leave be given for the introduction of an
emergent motion to amend the annual meeting calendar by deleting the December
21, 2015 Council Meeting date and by replacing it with a January 4, 2016
Council Meeting date, with the meeting commencing at 4:00 PM.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor T. Park and seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve that
the annual meeting calendar be amended by deleting the December 21, 2015
Council Meeting date and by replacing it with a January 4, 2016 Council
Meeting date, with the meeting commencing at 4:00 PM.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
NAYS: J. Helmer (1)
|
BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND
THIRD TIME:
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor M. van Holst to Approve Introduction and First Reading
of Bill No.s 1 to 4, 6 to 15, 17, and 21 to the added Bill No. 26, excluding
Bill No. 23.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. van Holst and
seconded by Councillor S. Turner to Approve Second Reading of Bill No.s 1 to
4, 6 to 15, 17 and 21 to the added Bill No. 26, excluding Bill No. 23.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor J. Zaifman and
seconded by Councillor S. Turner to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No.s 1 to 4, 6 to 15, 17 and 21 to the added Bill No. 26, excluding Bill
No. 23.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
S. Turner, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. van Holst and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve Introduction and First Reading
of Bill No 18.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
NAYS: S. Turner (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. van Holst and
seconded by Councillor M. Salih to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 18.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
NAYS: S. Turner (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor J. Helmer and
seconded by Councillor B. Armstrong to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No. 18.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
NAYS: S. Turner (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Turner and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve Introduction and First Reading
of Bill No. 20.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park (12)
NAYS: J. Helmer, J. Zaifman (2)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Turner and
seconded by Councillor J. Morgan to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 20.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L.
Usher, T. Park (11)
NAYS: M. Salih, J. Helmer, J. Zaifman (3)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Turner and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No. 20.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner, H.L.
Usher, T. Park (11)
NAYS: M. Salih, J. Helmer, J. Zaifman (3)
|
|
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Turner and
seconded by Councillor T. Park to Approve Introduction and First Reading of
Bill No. 23.
|
|
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
RECUSED: J. Morgan (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor J. Zaifman and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 23.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
RECUSED: J. Morgan (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Turner and
seconded by Councillor M. Cassidy to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No. 23.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, S. Turner,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
RECUSED: J. Morgan (1)
|
The
following by-laws are introduced and enacted as by-laws of The Corporation of
the City of London:
Bill
No. 1
By-law
No. A.-7328-1
|
A
by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council Meeting held on the 8th
day of December, 2015. (City Clerk)
|
Bill
No. 2
By-law
No. A.-7329-2
|
A
by-law to repeal and replace Council Policy 28(1) entitled “Travel &
Business Expenses”. (4/1/CSC)
|
Bill
No. 3
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(sb)-3
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to
the McCormick Area Secondary Plan lands. (2/26/PEC)
|
Bill
No. 4
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(sc)-4
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to
1156 Dundas Street. (3/26/PEC)
|
DELETED
Bill
No. 5
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(sd)-___
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to
secondary dwelling unit policies. (4/26/PEC)
|
Bill
No. 6
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(se)-5
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to
lands bounded by Oxford Street West, Westdel Bourne, Shore Road, and Kains
Road. (7/27/PEC)
|
Bill
No. 7
By-law
No. C.P.-1508-6
|
A
by-law to exempt from Part Lot Control, lands located on the north side of
Silverfox Crescent, at Denview Avenue, legally described as part of Block
81 in Registered Plan 33M-622, more particularly
described as Parts 1-15 in Plan 33R-19336 in the City of London and County of
Middlesex. (5/12/PEC-2014)
|
Bill
No. 8
By-law
No. S.-5765-7
|
A by-law to permit
Michael Sims and Janet Anne Michelle Winder to maintain and use a boulevard
parking area upon the road allowance for 44 Palace Street, City of London.
(City Clerk)
|
Bill
No. 9
By-law
No. S.-5766-8
|
A
by-law to assume certain works and services in the City of London. (Automall
Subdivision; 33M-659) (City Engineer)
|
Bill
No. 10
By-law
No. S.-5767-9
|
A
by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume certain
reserves in
the City of London as public highway. (as part of Eagletrace
Drive and as part of Foxcreek Road). (to permit
unobstructed legal access throughout the subdivision) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill
No. 11
By-law
No. S.-5768-10
|
A
by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume certain
reserves in the City of London as public highway. (as
part of Raleigh Boulevard). (to permit unobstructed
legal access throughout the subdivision) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill
No. 12
By-law
No. S.-5769-11
|
A
by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of
London as public highway. (as widening to Robin’s Hill Road, north of Huron
Street). (to permit additional widening to Robin’s Hill Road over existing
City owned lands in compliance with the Official Plan and Z-1 Zoning By-law)
(Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill
No. 13
By-law
No. S.-5770-12
|
A
by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Sunningdale Road West, west of Richmond Street).
(pursuant to Consent B.023/14 and in accordance with Zoning By-law Z-1)
(Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill
No. 14
By-law
No. S.-5771-13
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of
London as public highway. (as part of Seven Oaks Ridge). (to permit
unobstructed legal access throughout the subdivision) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill
No. 15
By-law
No. Z.-1-162440
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1156
Dundas Street. (3/26/PEC)
|
DELETED
Bill
No. 16
By-law
No. Z.-1-16____
|
A
by-law to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to add secondary dwelling unit
provisions. (4/26/PEC)
|
Bill
No. 17
By-law
No. Z.-1-162442
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1895
Blue Heron Drive. (5/27/PEC)
|
Bill
No. 18
By-law
No. Z.-1-162443
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at
1155-1236 Gough Road and 1974-2119 Gough Avenue. (6/27/PEC)
|
DELETED
Bill
No. 19
By-law
No. Z.-1-16____
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land bounded by Oxford
Street West, Westdel Bourne, Shore Road and Kains Road.
(7/27/PEC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 20
By-law
No. A.-7330-14
|
A
by-law to establish a Surplus/Deficit Policy. (3/2/SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 21
By-law
No. A.-7331-15
|
A by-law to delete the current Grants and Capital
Grants Policy 8(11) and replace it in its entirety with the City of London
Community Grants Policy. (5(1)/2/SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 22
By-law
No. A.-7332-16
|
A By-law to approve and adopt the standard form Grant
Agreement (London Community Grants Program); and to authorize a City
Representative to insert information and execute agreements which employ this
form and to repeal by-law A.-7073-73 being “A by-law to approve and adopt the
standard form Grant Agreement (Strategic Funding Framework)”; and to authorize
a City Representative to insert information and execute agreements which
employ this form. (5(2)/2/SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 23
By-law
No. A.-7333-17
|
A
by-law to authorize an Agreement between The Corporation of the City of
London and the London Medical Innovation & Commercialization Network, and
to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement. (6/2SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 24
By-law
No. WM-28-16003
|
A
by-law to amend By-law WM-28 entitled, “A by-law for regulation of wastewater
and stormwater drainage systems in the City of London”. (8a/2/SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 25
By-law
No. W-8-16004
|
A
by-law to amend By-law W-8 entitled, “Regulation of Water Supply in the City
of London”. (8b/2/SPPC)
|
ADDED
Bill
No. 26
By-law
No. A.-7334-18
|
A
by-law to authorize and approve an Agreement of Purchase and Sale between The
Corporation of the City of London and Ashley Hennessy and Suzanne Hennessy
for the acquisition of a 18.5 hectare (45.8 acre) parcel of property
municipally known as 3713 Scotland Drive, for the City’s W12A landfill site,
and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
(1C/1/CSC)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J. Zaifman and seconded by Councillor A. Hopkins to Adjourn.
Motion
Passed
The
meeting adjourns at 9:22 PM.
_________________________________
Matt
Brown, Mayor
_________________________________
Catharine
Saunders, City Clerk