|
Recommendation: That, the following
actions be taken with respect to the 1st Report of the London Advisory
Committee on Heritage, from its meeting held on December 10, 2014:
a) the
following actions be taken with respect to the 12th Report of the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage:
i)
the
transfer of $2,557, the remainder of the LACH 2014 budget allocation, to the
Cultural Office’s “Downtown Interpretive Signage Project”, BE APPROVED; and,
ii)
it
BE NOTED that the 12th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage
(LACH), from its meeting held on November 12, 2014, was received;
b) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit Application
for the designated heritage property located at 176-178 Dundas Street, within
the Downtown Heritage Conservation District, BE APPROVED; it being noted that
the London Advisory Committee on Heritage heard a verbal delegation from M. Manuel,
Property Owner and applicant and M. Wasylko, with respect to this matter;
c) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application requesting
approval for an addition to the designated heritage property located at 165
Elmwood Avenue East (London Normal School), and other changes to the
property, BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed
the proposed addition and has advised that the impact of such an alteration
on the heritage features of the property identified in the reasons for
designation is acceptable; it being further noted that this recommendation
relates to the heritage impact of the proposed use but does not relate to the
ongoing site plan process or the Parks Planning process involving
consultation with the community for the village green; it being also noted
that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage reviewed and received the
communication, as appended to the December 10, 2014, London Advisory
Committee on Heritage Report, from K. Aravopoulos, Ontario Heritage Trust and
heard a verbal delegation from M. Sawicki, P. Sapounzi and J. Devito,
Supervisor, Facilities Design and Construction, with respect to this matter;
d) the
following actions be taken with respect to the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application for the heritage designated property located at 797 Hellmuth
Avenue, within the Bishop Hellmuth Heritage Conservation District:
i) the
existing columns BE REPAIRED to match the original profile; and,
ii) at
the discretion of the Heritage Planner, should the above-noted repair of the
columns be deemed impractical, the recommendation dated December 10, 2014,
from the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to this
matter, BE APPROVED;
e) the
Heritage Alteration Permit application for the heritage designated property
located at 1576 Richmond Street BE REFERRED back to the Civic Administration
for a legal review and further discussion with the applicant, relating to the
proposed demolition of the greenhouse and any potential conflict with the
Ontario Municipal Board decision relating to this matter and to report back
at the next Planning and Environment Committee meeting;
f) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application for the heritage designated property located at 43-45 Palace
Street, within the East Woodfield Heritage Conservation District, BE
APPROVED; it being noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage
requested that the centre peak gable be finished in stucco and the floor deck
be completed in tongue and groove;
g) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application for the heritage designated property located at 596 Dufferin
Avenue BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the
proposed window replacement and has advised that the impact of such
alteration on the heritage features identified in the reasons for designation
is negligible;
h) the
following actions be taken with respect to the list of “London Doorways”, as
appended to the December 10, 2014 London Advisory Committee Report, submitted
by M. Whalley, President, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO), London
Region:
i) the
list BE REFERRED to the London Advisory Committee on Heritage Stewardship
Sub-Committee for review; and,
ii) the
buildings identified with “no protection” BE CONSIDERED for evaluation
for listing and/or designation; and,
i) clauses
1 to 3, 5 to 10, 17 and 19, BE RECEIVED;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from W. Kinghorn, Chair,
LACH, with respect to these matters.
|