20TH REPORT OF THE
Strategic
Priorities and Policy Committee
meeting held on July
27, 2015, commencing at 4:06 PM, in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, London
City Hall.
PRESENT: Mayor M. Brown and Councillors M.
van Holst, B. Armstrong, M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan,
P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, H.L. Usher, T. Park and J. Zaifman and L.
Rowe (Secretary).
ABSENT: Councillor S. Turner.
ALSO PRESENT: A. Zuidema, R.
Armistead, J. Braam, P. Christiaans, S. Datars Bere, P. Foto, K. Graham, C.
Saunders, S. Spring, A. Vandervoort and P. Yeoman.
That it BE NOTED that
Councillor J. Helmer disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 5 of this Report
having to do with the Canada Post Community Mailbox Program by indicating that
his spouse is an employee of Canada Post.
That, on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Finance and Corporate Services and
City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the staff report dated July 27, 2015
regarding proposed amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997 BE RECEIVED
for information and the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to consult with
industry representatives and other stakeholders on this matter; it being noted
that staff will provide a follow up report to the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee regarding Bill 73 and its implications on the 2019 Development
Charges Background Study, once it has received Royal Assent.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
III.
|
SCHEDULED ITEMS
|
|
|
|
None.
That the matter of requesting the London
Arts Council to consider amending its membership to include a Council Member
BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for a report back on the current
relationship between The Corporation of the City of London and the London
Arts Council, in order to provide Council Members with additional information
to take into consideration when determining whether or not to request the
above-noted change in membership.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, J. Helmer, M.
Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley, H.L. Usher,
T. Park, J. Zaifman (12)
NAYS: B. Armstrong, M. Salih (2)
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 4th Report of the Governance Working Group, from its meeting
held on July 6, 2015:
a) the
following actions be taken with respect to the use of a ranked voting system
for the appointment of citizens to boards, commissions and advisory
committees:
i) the
City Clerk BE REQUESTED to prepare a procedure and process for the use of a
ranked voting system for the City of London appointment of citizens to
boards, commissions and advisory committees; and,
ii) the
City Clerk BE REQUESTED report back to the Corporate Services Committee with
required changes to Council Policy 5(16) General Policy for Advisory
Committees to reflect the implementation of a) above;
it
being noted that the Governance Working Group reviewed information provided
by Councillor J. Morgan and the City Clerk with respect to this matter;
b) NO
ACTION BE TAKEN with respect to the review of the legislative authority to
discuss board, commission and advisory committee appointments in closed
session;
c) NO
ACTION BE TAKEN with respect to a the implementation of a process to provide
an update to Members of Council and the public as to the status of major
initiatives; it being noted that the Civic Administration has processes in
place, by means of the annual calendar of meetings, the Standing Committees’
deferred lists and Standing Committee agenda management, to address the
concerns raised by the Governance Working Group (GWG);
d) the
review of the provision of a process to provide a current list of projects to
Members of Council BE DEFERRED to a future meeting of the Governance Working
Group (GWG) for further discussion; it being noted that input from the City
Manager will be sought at that time; and
e) clauses 1 to 3 BE RECEIVED.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, J. Helmer, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins,
V. Ridley, H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (14)
|
|
5.
|
Proposed
Implementation of Community Mailboxes by Canada Post
|
|
|
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Canada Post Community Mail Box Program:
a)
Canada
Post BE REQUESTED to delay further implementation of Community Mailboxes in
the City of London until such time as a satisfactory response to the matters referenced
in b), c) and d), below, has been received by the Municipal Council:
b)
as
Canada Post has not had an opportunity to report back to the Municipal
Council with respect to the public consultation process undertaken prior to
the installation of the community mail boxes being commenced and the need to
provide a mechanism for members of the public to express safety concerns with
respect to the installation, the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to advise
the Ward Councillors of any safety and operational concerns raised with
respect to the proposed location of a community mail box resulting from the
submission of an application for a Permit for Approved Works (PAWS); it being
noted that Ward Councillors will advise the Civic Administration of any
concerns that have come to their attention from members of the public with
respect to the location of a community mail box;
c)
the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to make the list of locations submitted
through the Permit for Approved Works process available to the public,
subject to meeting the requirements of the Municipal Freedom of Information
and Protection of Privacy Act;
d) the Civic Administration BE
REQUESTED to report back with respect to an Agreement with Canada Post to
formalize responsibilities as follows:
·
installation of the new Community Mailboxes to be done
entirely at Canada Post’s expense;
·
Canada Post to be fully responsible for maintenance
including snow-clearing and graffiti-removal. Litter pick up would not be
provided by Canada Post, however actions would be undertaken such as the
distribution of “good-customer” letters encouraging good behaviours where
concerns arise;
·
Canada Post would not require the City of London to
provide lighting nor would the City of London be installing lighting;
·
sidewalk
locations would be preferred but it is anticipated that this will not be
possible within many existing neighbourhoods. Where street-facing Community
Mailboxes are necessary, accessible curb cuts would be constructed at the
cost of Canada Post;
e) the
communication dated June 16, 2015 from Karen D., expressing concern with the
Community Mailbox Program, BE RECEIVED.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: M. Brown, M. van Holst, B. Armstrong,
M. Salih, M. Cassidy, P. Squire, J. Morgan, P. Hubert, A. Hopkins, V. Ridley,
H.L. Usher, T. Park, J. Zaifman (13)
|
V.
|
DEFERRED
MATTERS/ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
|
|
|
|
None.
(See Confidential Appendix to the 20th
Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee enclosed for Members
only.)
|
The Strategic Priorities and Policy
Committee convened in camera from 6:10 PM to 6:27 PM after having passed a
motion to do so, with respect to the following matter:
|
The meeting Adjourned at 6:28 PM.