That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 8th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage from
its meeting held on July 6, 2016:
a) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage (LACH) continues to support, and reiterates, its previous
recommendation related to the properties located at 100 Fullarton Street, 475
– 501 Talbot Street and 93 – 95 Dufferin, as follows, which was adopted by
Municipal Council at its meeting held on September 29, 2015:
“That the following actions be taken with respect to the 11th
Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage from its meeting held on
September 9, 2015:
a) the following actions be taken
with respect to part a) and b) of clause 6 of the 11th Report of the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage, having to do with the proposed designation of
the properties located at 79, 481, 483, 485, 487 and 489 Talbot Street
(Camden Terrace) and 93 – 95 Dufferin Avenue:
i) the owner BE REQUESTED to stabilize the
above-noted structures during the winter season;
ii) parts a) and b) of clause 6 of the 11th Report
of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage BE REFERRED to the Civic
Administration to consider in conjunction with the evaluation of future
planning applications regarding these properties; it being noted that part a)
and b) of clause 6 of the 11th Report of the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage reads as follows:
“a) a Notice under the provisions of Section 29(3)
of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 18, of the Municipal
Council’s intention to designate the properties located at 479, 481, 483,
485, 487 and 489 Talbot Street (Camden Terrace) to be of cultural heritage
value and interest BE GIVEN, for the attached reasons;
b) a Notice under the provisions of Section 29(3)
of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O. 18, of the Municipal
Council’s intention to designate the properties located at 93 – 95 Dufferin
Avenue to be of cultural heritage value and interest BE GIVEN, for the attached
reasons;”
iii) the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to work
with the developer to evaluate opportunities to integrate heritage elements
into the design;
it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee heard
verbal presentations from W. Kinghorn, Chair, LACH and J. Rodgers, Rygar
Properties Inc. and reviewed and received a communication dated September 15,
2015, from J. Rodgers, Rygar Properties Inc., with respect to these matters.”
it being noted that the LACH noted the
following additional information:
·
the
LACH approves of most of the aspects of the project, particularly with
respect to the heritage façades proposed to be incorporated in the project;
·
the
LACH supports the requirement that the designated elements may require
alteration to permit the removal of parts of structure(s); and,
·
the
LACH understands that potential difficulties with structures and site
conditions exist, and if it proves necessary, the LACH would support the
rebuilding of structures/facades, using original materials, in situ, within
the project;
it being further noted that the LACH
received delegations from M. Rivard, Stantec Consulting, on behalf of the
applicant, M. Tomazincic, Manager, Current Planning and J. Hunten and M.
Tovey;
b) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under Section 42 of the Ontario
Heritage Act to alter the pavilion located at 531 Ridout Street North
(Harris Park) BE PERMITTED as appended to the staff report dated July
6, 2016 as Appendix C, subject the following terms and conditions being met:
i)
photographic
documentation of the pavilion (before renovation, during renovation, and
after completion) be submitted to the Heritage Planner; and,
ii) the
final drawings to alter be provided to the Heritage Planner for approval
prior to issuance of the Building Permit;
c) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under Section 42 of the Ontario
Heritage Act to alter the West London Dyke, located within the
Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District (HCD), BE PERMITTED as
submitted, subject to the following terms and conditions being met:
i)
an
arborist report be prepared and submitted identifying existing species of
trees to be removed and provide recommendations for replacement species in
accordance with the policies and guidelines of the Blackfriars/Petersville
HCD Plan;
ii)
any
new vegetation added to the greenway conform to the policies and guidelines
of the Blackfriars/Petersville HCD, particularly for native and non-invasive
plant species;
iii)
documentation
of the West London Dyke be undertaken to contribute to the archival record of
this important piece of civic infrastructure, with above-noted documentation
to be submitted to the Heritage Planner to include the following information:
A)
photographic
documentation of the existing condition of the West London Dyke, (including
railings, concrete sloped wall, and surrounding environment);
B) measured
drawings or 3D digital modelling to maintain a record of the historic
structure; and,
C) photographic
documentation of the construction activities associated with the West London
Dyke alteration to be taken at regular intervals;
iv)
the
existing, historic railings from the West London Dyke be salvaged and be made
available to community members for installation as decorative features
preferably within the Blackfriars/Petersville HCD; and,
v)
implementation
of cultural heritage interpretive signage or public art that commemorates the
history of the West London Dyke, historic flooding in London, flood control
measures, and the Blackfriars/Petersville HCD along the West London Dyke be
encouraged; it being noted that topics should not be duplicated between
cultural heritage interpretive signage within Harris Park;
it being noted that
the London Advisory Committee on Heritage heard a presentation from the K.
Gonyou, Heritage Planner and C. McIntosh, Environmental Service Engineer and
L. Jones, Stantec, with respect to this matter;
d) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit Application of
R.Teves for the erection of a new residence on the property located at 104
Wortley Road BE PERMITTED as described in the drawing appended to the staff
report dated July 6, 2016 as Appendix 3;
e) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect
to the request for the demolition of a heritage listed property located at
269 Thames Street:
i) the
Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that Municipal Council regretfully
consents to the demolition of this property; it being noted that the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage cautioned against the nearby archaeological
significance being affected by the demolition;
ii) 269
Thames Street BE REMOVED from the Inventory of Heritage Resources
(Register); and,
iii) the
London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee BE CONSULTED during
the development of interpretive signage for the area;
f) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under section 42 of the Ontario
Heritage Act to alter the porch located at 853 Waterloo Street, within
the Bishop Hellmuth Heritage Conservation District, BE PERMITTED, in
accordance with the sketch appended to the staff report dated July 6, 2016,
with the following terms and conditions being met:
i) the
Heritage Alteration Permit be displayed in a location visible from the street
until the work is completed;
ii) photographic
documentation of the work be submitted to the Heritage Planner upon completion;
iii) all
exposed wood be painted; and,
iv) the
handrails and spindles be installed 1&3/4” square and set 3&1/2” apart between
centres, as
shown on the above-noted sketch;
it being noted that
consideration should be given for the substitution of the box piers with wood
Ionic columns, as well as the application of a decorative relief pattern on
the porch skirting;
g) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under section 42 of the Ontario
Heritage Act to alter the porch located at 216 Wharncliffe Road North,
within the Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District, BE
PERMITTED in accordance with the sketch appended to the staff report dated
July 6, 2016, with the following terms and conditions being met:
i)
the
final drawings, showing all details, be provided to the Heritage Planner for
approval prior to issuance of the Building Permit;
ii) the
Heritage Alteration Permit be displayed in a location visible from the street
until the work is completed;
iii) photographic
documentation of the work be submitted to the Heritage Planner upon
completion; and,
iv) all
exposed wood be painted;
h)
on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City
Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the application of S.
Randhawa under section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act to demolish the
building located at 102 Wharncliffe Road North, within in the
Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District, BE PERMITTED with the
following terms and conditions being met:
i)
the
property owner obtain a Heritage Alteration Permit for an approved
replacement structure that is compatible with the goals of the
Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Plan prior to the
initiation of the demolition permit;
i) documentation,
including as-built drawings, property history, and photographs, be completed
by the property owner be submitted, prior to the initiation of demolition
activities to the satisfaction of the Heritage Planner; and,
ii) the
property owner be encouraged to salvage any reusable elements from the
existing building;
j) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage (LACH) supports the Heritage Impact Assessment, dated March 2016,
prepared by Pol Associates Inc., and the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for
the property located at 66 Byron Avenue East; it being noted that the LACH
expressed concerns with the proposed elevations noted in the Heritage Impact Assessment
as to the compatibility within the Wortley Village Heritage Conservation
District; and,
k)
clauses
1, 4, 6 to 17, 20 and 25, BE RECEIVED;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee heard a verbal delegation from D. Dudek, Chair, London
Advisory Committee on Heritage, with respect to these matters.
|