|
Council
MINUTES
1ST MEETING
|
|
December 11, 2012
|
|
The Council meets in Regular Session in the
Council Chambers this day at 4:00 p.m.
|
|
PRESENT: Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill,
W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
and C. Saunders (City Clerk).
ABSENT: N. Branscombe.
ALSO PRESENT: A, Zuidema, J.P. Barber, G.
Belch, J. Braam, B. Coxhead, T.L. Dobbie (T.L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd.), J. Fleming,
E. Gamble, M. Hayward, G.T. Hopcroft, G. Kotsifas, B. Krichker, L.
Livingstone, V. McAlea Major, D. O’Brien, R. Paytner, M. Ribera, L.M. Rowe,
E. Soldo, R. Welker and B. Westlake-Power.
|
At the beginning of the Meeting all Members
are present, except Councillor N. Branscombe.
|
Councillor D. Brown discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 13 of the 1st Report of the Civic Works Committee, having
to do with the London Transit Commission Long Term Growth Plan Working Group,
by indicating that that her employer has a contract with the London Transit
Commission. Councillor D. Brown further discloses a pecuniary interest in
clause 19 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee,
having to do with the 4th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage
as it relates to the property known municipally as 75 Bathurst Street, by
indicating that her employer owns property in close proximity to the subject
property. Councillor D. Brown also discloses a pecuniary interest in those
parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee
dealing with the 2013 Budget related to the London Transit Commission, by
indicating that her employer has a contract with the London Transit
Commission. Councillor D. Brown also discloses a pecuniary interest in
Council Minutes of 19th Meeting, having to do with clause 5 of the 28th
Report of the Planning and Environment Committee relating to 89 York Street,
by indicating that her employer owns property in close proximity to the
subject property.
|
Councillor P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 4 of the 1st Report of the Community and Protective
Services Committee, having to do with the Purchase of Service Agreement for
Ontario Works Employment Assistance Services, by indicating that he is the
Executive Director of a social services agency that has dealings with Ontario
Works. Councillor P. Hubert further discloses a pecuniary interest in those
parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee
dealing with the 2013 Budget related to Ontario Works, by indicating that he
is the Executive Director of a social services agency that has dealings with
Ontario Works.
|
Councillor M. Brown discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 29 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment
Committee and the related Bill No. 31 and Communications #1, having to do
with the property located at 2095 Coronation Drive, by indicating that he
owns property lives in close proximity to the subject property.
|
Councillor S.E. White discloses a pecuniary
interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget that relate to the London
CAReS, by indicating that her employer is currently in negotiations with
WOTCH, which receives funding from the City of London.
|
Councillor B. Polhill discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 21 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment
Committee, having do with the application of London Property Corporation,
relating to the property located at 124 St. James Street, by indicating that
the property was the subject of an application before the Committee of
Adjustment and that his son is a member of the Committee of Adjustment.
|
Councillor J.B Swan discloses a pecuniary
interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and
Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget that relate to Orchestra
London, by indicating that Orchestra London is his employer. Councillor J.B.
Swan further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 8 of the 19th Report of
the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee, having to do with the Music
London Initiative, by indicating that the matter relates to a proposed
concert hall in the Downtown Core, which relates to his employer, Orchestra
London.
|
Mayor J.F. Fontana discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 15 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative
Services Committee and related Communication #3, having to do with a request
for the Mayor to take a paid leave of absence. Mayor J.F. Fontana further discloses
a pecuniary interest in the Motion of Which Notice was Given, having to do
with a options related to criminally charged or convicted elected officials.
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve that pursuant to section 7.4 of
the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED to permit
consideration of clause 13 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and
Administrative Services Committee, having to do with a financial plan for the
acquisition of the London Normal School, 165 Elmwood Avenue East, to be heard
at 5:15 PM.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baecher and
seconded by Councillor H.L Usher to Approve that pursuant to section 7.4 of
the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED in order to
consider the Motion of Which Notice is Given with clause 15 of the 32nd
Report of the Finance and Administrative Services Committee; and
that pursuant to section 7.4 of the Council
Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED to permit consideration of
clause 15 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative Services
Committee, having to do with a request for the Mayor to take a paid leave of absence,
to be heard after the 5:15 PM item and in camera session.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
II
|
REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS
TO BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC
None.
|
III
|
ADDED
REPORTS
|
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve the following additional reason
to the in camera session: “A matter pertaining to litigation or potential
litigation affecting the municipality; advice subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, as it relates
to leave of absence for a Member of Council.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: J.F. Fontana (1)
|
k)
|
A matter pertaining to personal information
about identifiable individuals including municipal employees, with respect to
employment-related matters; advice or recommendations of officers and employees
of the Corporation, including communications necessary for that purpose; and
for the purpose of providing instructions and directions to officers and
employees of the Corporation.
|
l)
|
A matter pertaining to litigation or
potential litigation affecting the municipality; advice subject to
solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that
purpose, as it relates to leave of absence for a Member of Council.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The Council rises and goes into Committee of
the Whole, in camera, at 4:16 PM, with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all
Members present, except Councillor N. Branscombe.
At 4:16 PM all staff leave the meeting except
A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, G. Belch, J. Braam, T.L. Dobbie (T.L. Dobbie
Consulting Ltd.), M. Hayward, V. McAlea Major, L. Rowe and C. Saunders.
At 4:30 PM all staff leave the meeting except
A. Zuidema, V. McAlea Major, L. Rowe and C. Saunders.
At 4:35 PM T.L. Dobbie enters the meeting.
At 4:40 PM Councillor S. Orser leaves the
meeting.
At 4:42 PM Councillor S. Orser enters the
meeting.
At 4:42 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places
Councillor H.L. Usher in the Chair and leaves the meeting.
At 4:42 PM J.P. Barber and G. Belch enter the
meeting.
The Committee of the Whole rises and Council
resumes in regular session at 5:17 PM with J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all
Members present, except Councillor N. Branscombe.
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve the Minutes of the Nineteenth
Meeting held on November 20, 2012.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve referral of the following communications
for consideration with the clauses noted:
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve referral of the following
communication for consideration with the clause noted:
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: M. Brown (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
and seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve referral of the following
communication for consideration with the clause noted:
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: J.F. Fontana (1)
|
IX
|
REPORTS
|
|
32nd Report of the Finance and
Administrative Services Committee
|
Councillor P. Hubert
presents.
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to
Approve clause 13.
13.
|
London Normal School - 165 Elmwood Avenue
East
|
That, subject to a report back from the
Civic Administration on a financial plan for the acquisition and capital
improvements required for the adaptive re-use of the Normal School, the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with “Option 1 – Acquire and Partner”,
for the property located at 165 Elmwood Avenue, the formal Normal School, as
detailed in the staff report dated November 26, 2012; it being noted that the
Finance and Administrative Services Committee heard a verbal overview from
the Manager, Policy Planning and Programs and heard the attached
presentation from George Sinclair with respect to this matter.
|
At 5:30 PM the Mayor J.F. Fontana places
Councillor M. Brown in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.
|
At 5:36 PM the Mayor J.F. Fontanta resumes
the Chair and Councillor M. Brown takes his seat at the Council Board.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Amend clause 13 by adding the following
new part b) as follows:
“b)
representatives of the London Economic Development Corporation, Tech Alliance
and the London Technology Development Centre BE REQUESTED to meet and explore
options to encourage and support the start up of technology-based businesses
and to report back to the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee with
respect to business plans in support of these initiatives.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Clause 13, as amended, reads as follows:
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the London Normal School, 165 Elmwood Avenue East:
a)
subject
to a report back from the Civic Administration on a financial plan for the
acquisition and capital improvements required for the adaptive re-use of the
Normal School, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with “Option 1 –
Acquire and Partner”, for the property located at 165 Elmwood Avenue, the
formal Normal School, as detailed in the staff report dated November 26, 2012;
it being noted that the Finance and Administrative Services Committee heard a verbal
overview from the Manager, Policy Planning and Programs and heard the attached
presentation from George Sinclair with respect to this matter; and,
b)
representatives
of the London Economic Development Corporation, Tech Alliance and the London
Technology Development Centre BE REQUESTED to meet and explore options to
encourage and support the start up of technology based businesses and to report
back to the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee with respect to
business plans in support of these initiatives
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to
Approve clauses 1 to 12, inclusive, and clause 14.
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
That it BE NOTED that Mayor J.F. Fontana
declared a pecuniary interest in clause 15 of this Report having to do with a
request for the Mayor to take a paid leave of absence.
|
2.
|
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy
Revision
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
revised attached proposed by-law, being a by-law to amend
By-Law No. A.-6151-17, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on
December 11, 2012, to revise Schedule “C” to By-Law No. A.-6151-17 being the
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy to:
a) increase
the dollar limit from $100,000 to $1,000,000 for Tenders that do not have an
irregular result as per section 13.2 in the Procurement of Goods and Services
Policy; and
b) add section 21.8 for the City of
London Regional Water Supply approval process.
|
3.
|
Taxation Changes at the Time of
Reassessment
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
staff report dated November 26, 2012 regarding taxation changes at the time
of a reassessment BE RECEIVED for information.
|
4.
|
2012 Operating Budget Status - Third
Quarter Report
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the 2012 Operating Budget Status –
Third Quarter Report for the General (Property Tax Supported), Water, and
Wastewater and Treatment Budgets:
a) the
2012 Operating Budget Status – Third Quarter Report for the General Budget
(Property Tax Supported refer to Appendix A), Water Budget and Wastewater and
Treatment Budget BE RECEIVED for information; it being noted that the Civic
Administration is projecting:
i)
$2.5
million in savings for the General (Property Tax Supported) Budget, noting
that the year-end position could fluctuate significantly based on factors
beyond the control of the Civic Administration such as Ontario Works caseload
and winter maintenance; it being further noted that consistent with Council
direction, the projected $2.5 million in savings will be contributed to the
Operating Budget Contingency Reserve at year end;
ii) a
$0.3 million deficit in the Water Budget; it being noted that consistent with
Council direction, the $0.3 million deficit in the Water rate supported
budget will be offset by a draw down from the Water Works Capital Reserve
Fund; and
iii) a
breakeven position in the Wastewater and Treatment Budget;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to transfer $2.0 million from the
Operating Budget Contingency Reserve to the City Facilities Reserve Fund
(subject to achieving the projected $2.5 million savings reported in a),
above), in order to provide a source of funding for facility-related
initiatives such as the Ontario Works Decentralization capital initiative; it
being noted that the Ontario Works Decentralization capital project is
subject to the review and approval of a strategy report and business case
by Council; and
c) the
Civic Administration’s contribution of $2,645,069 ($2,277,566 – property tax
supported; $163,430 – wastewater; and $204,073 – water) to the Efficiency,
Effectiveness and Economy reserves in 2012 BE RECEIVED for information.
|
5.
|
2012 Capital Budget Status - Third Quarter
Report
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken:
a) the 2012 Capital Budget Status -
Third Quarter Report BE RECEIVED for information;
b) the
capital projects listed in Appendix A to the staff report dated November 26,
2012, worth a total of $3.5 Million, BE CLOSED and the following further
actions be taken:
i) released
reserve fund draws of $1,869,732 BE TRANSFERRED back to the reserve funds
which originally funded the projects;
ii) released
pay-as-you-go funding of $375,270 BE TRANSFERRED to the capital receipts
account; and
iii) released
debt financing of $1,221,433 BE USED to reduce authorized debt.
|
6.
|
Request for Write Off of Provincial
Offences Act (POA) Accounts Receivable
|
That, on the recommendation of the Deputy
City Treasurer, the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to write off the
outstanding Provincial Offences Act accounts receivable, included as Appendix
A to the staff report dated November 26, 2012, and removed from the
Integrated Court Offences Network (ICON) system in accordance with the
Ministry of the Attorney General Write-Off Directive and the Civic
Administration’s Uncollectible Accounts Receivable Policy, and approval BE
GIVEN to cease collection activity on these delinquent cases.
|
7.
|
Request for Write Off of Miscellaneous and
Dearness Home Accounts Receivable
|
That, on the recommendation of the Deputy
City Treasurer, the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to write off the
outstanding Miscellaneous and Dearness accounts receivable, included as
Appendix A to the staff report dated November 26, 2012, to the Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts in accordance with the Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
Policy.
|
|
8.
|
Corporate Asset Management Plan and State
of the Infrastructure Report
|
|
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Deputy
City Treasurer, on the advice of the Division Manager, Corporate Asset
Management, the following actions be taken with respect to the Corporate
Assets Management process:
a) the
funding for Unit 4, Corporate Asset Management Plan and State of
Infrastructure Report, based on the accelerated contract price, $112,208,
HST excluded, (RFP 11-37) BE APPROVED as detailed in the Sources of
Financing Report include in the associated staff report dated November 26,
2012;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with the purchase of Unit 4; and
c) the
approval hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or having a purchase order, or contract record relating to
the subject matter of this approval.
|
9.
|
Code of Conduct for Members of Municipal
Council and Lobbyist Registry
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, the staff report dated November 26, 2012 providing an update on the
review of the Code of Conduct for Members of Municipal Council and a lobbyist
registry, as well as the attached communication dated November
26, 2012, from Councillor J.B. Swan, BE RECEIVED for information.
|
10.
|
Communication Strategy and Business Plan Review
Proposal
|
That the staff report dated November 26,
2012 regarding engaging assistance to develop a communications strategy for
advising Council Members about City-related matters affecting their wards BE
RECEIVED for information; it being noted that the engagement of Winther
Consulting, for an amount not to exceed $25,000, is in accordance with
Section 15.3 of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy and that funding
for the engagement will be accommodated within the 2012 approved Operating
Budget.
|
11.
|
Tender 12-92 Cellular Services and Hardware
|
That, on the recommendation of the Chief
Technology Officer, the following actions be taken with respect for Cellular
Services & Hardware for the supply of Cell Phones, Air Cards, BlackBerrys
(Hardware) and Cellular Communication Services for City of London and
participating Boards and Commissions:
a) the
tender for Cellular Services and Hardware for a term of three (3) years with
an option for a further two (2) additional one (1) year periods with the low
overall bidder Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers Wireless), 1 Mount
Pleasant Road, Toronto, ON M4W 1G9 at their tendered annual price of
$405,585.60 (excluding HST), BE ACCEPTED; it being pointed out that the bid
submitted by Rogers Communications Partnership (Rogers Wireless), was the
lowest of 4 compliant bids received and meets the City’s specifications and
requirements in all areas;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this contract; and
c) approvals
hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this
approval.
|
12.
|
Tax Adjustment Agenda
|
That the recommendations contained in the
Tax Adjustment Agenda dated November 26, 2012 BE APPROVED; it being noted
that there were no members of the public in attendance to speak to the
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, at the public hearing
associated with the Tax Adjustment Agenda.
|
14.
|
Nomination for the Queen Elizabeth ll
Diamond Jubilee Medal
|
That the following individuals BE NOMINATED
to receive the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal and the City Clerk BE
DIRECTED to contact the Council Members to seek any further nominations for
consideration at the Council Meeting to be held on December 11, 2012:
• Josh Morgan
• Sarah Merritt - Old East
Village
• Dan Ross
• David Broostad - Hamilton Road
Business Association
• Peter Johnson
• Amit Chakma
• Howard Rundle
• Mobray Sifton
• Gene Drewlo
• Don Crich
• Jim McKinnon
• Shmuel Farhi
• John Winston
• Michelle Campbell
• Ryan Mahy
|
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor D.G. Henderson calls for a separate vote on clause
10.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor J.B. Swan calls for a separate vote on clause 9.
The motion to Approve clauses 1 to 12,
inclusive, except clauses 9 and 10 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
The motion to Approve clause 9 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
The motion to Approve clause 10 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
At 5:56 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places
Councillor H.L. Usher in the Chair and leaves the meeting.
At 5:58 PM Councillor W.J. Armstrong leaves
the meeting.
VIII
|
MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE IS
GIVEN
|
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve that, pursuant to section 18.2 of
the Council Procedure By-law, leave be given for the introduction of an
emergent motion with respect to dealing with those situations where a Council
Member is charged and/or convicted of a criminal offence.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
|
At 5:59 PM Councillor W.J. Armstrong enters
the meeting.
1.
|
Councillor S. White - Motion of Which
Notice is Given - Options - Criminally Charged or Convicted Elected Officials
|
Motion made by Councillor S. White and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve part a) of the Motion of Which
Notice is Given.
That the following actions be taken with
respect to options for dealing with those situations where a Council Member
is charged and/or convicted of a criminal offence:
a) legal
advice BE PROVIDED as to what options might be available, under current
legislation, for dealing with the above-noted situations, with the intent of
maintaining public confidence in the work of the Municipal Council before and
after a decision of the Courts is rendered (e.g. leave of absence of the
affected member while awaiting trial, etc.); and
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Amend part b) of the Motion of Which
Notice is Given by deleting part b) in its entirety and by replacing it with
the following new part b):
“b)
the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back with alternatives for
proposed amendments to the Council policy related to the appointment of an
Acting Mayor.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve the Notice of Which Notice was
Given, as amended.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
The Motion of Which was Given, as amended,
reads as follows:
That the following actions be taken with
respect to options for dealing with those situations where a Council Member is
charged and/or convicted of a criminal offence:
a)
legal
advice BE PROVIDED as to what options might be available, under current
legislation, for dealing with the above-noted situations, with the intent of
maintaining public confidence in the work of the Municipal Council before and
after a decision of the Courts is rendered (e.g. leave of absence of the affected
member while awaiting trial, etc.); and
b)
the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back with alternatives for proposed
amendments to the Council policy related to the appointment of an Acting Mayor.
|
32nd Report of the Finance and
Administrative Services Committee (continued)
|
Councillor P. Hubert
presents
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to
Approve clause 15,
15. Motion –
Mayor – Leave of Absence
That the Mayor BE REQUESTED to take a leave
of absence with pay until final disposition of the criminal charges against
him; it being noted that the Finance and Administrative Services Committee
heard the attached presentation from Councillor J.L. Baechler
with respect to this matter.
|
The Chair rules that the motion made by
Councillor P. Hubert is not in order.
Councillor J.L.
Baechler appeals the decision of the Chair. The City Clerk put the
question “shall the ruling of the Chair be sustained?”
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: B. Polhill,
S. Orser, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L Usher (6)
NAYS: W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (7)
|
|
At 6:43 PM, Councillor Usher places
Councillor M. Brown in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.
|
At 6:49 PM Councillor H. L. Usher resumes
the Chair and Councillor M. Brown takes his seat at the Council Board.
|
Motion made by Councillor W.J. Armstrong
and seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve that pursuant to section
9.6 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor P. Hubert be permitted to
speak longer than 5 minutes with respect to clause 15.
Motion Passed
|
The motion to Approve clause 15 is put.
Motion Failed
YEAS: W.J. Armstrong, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, J.P. Bryant (5)
NAYS: B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (8)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Recess.
Motion
Passed
The Council recesses at 6:59 PM and
reconvenes at 7:41 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members
present except Councillors N. Branscombe, J.P. Bryant and S.E. White.
Councillor P. Van
Meerbergen presents.
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
to Approve all clauses, except clause 13.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That the 3rd Report of the Transportation
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 6, 2012, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, notwithstanding the recommendation of
the Director, Water and Wastewater and Treatment, a rebate of 25% of the
subject billing, less a previous credit of $329.89 BE PROVIDED to L. Stein,
475 McGarrell Dr., Unit 20, with respect to the water bill, issued to her on
February 27, 2012, in the amount of $3,583.00. (2012-W12-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City Engineer, the attached
proposed by-law (Appendix “A”) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting
to be held on December 11, 2012 for the purpose of amending the Traffic and
Parking By-law (P.S. 111). (2012-S09-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services & City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Single Source Procurement of
Positive Displacement Cold Water Meters With Encoder-Receiver-Transmitter attached:
a) the
quote from EMCO Corporation Waterworks, 944 Leathorne Street, London, ON, N5Z
3M5, for the supply, delivery and storage of 10,000 positive displacement
cold water meters with attached ERT, for the price of $1,250,000, HST extra,
BE ACCEPTED on a single source basis as per section 14.4 (k) of the
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
b) the
funding for this purchase BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of Finance
Report included into the staff report dated December 3. 2012;
c)
the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this contract; and,
d) the
approval hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or having a purchase order, or contract record relating to
the subject matter of this approval. (2012-W12-00)
|
That the report dated December 3, 2012,
from the Managing Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City
Engineer and the Managing Director, Development & Compliance Services
& Chief Building Official, with respect to overnight parking restrictions,
BE REFERRED to the 2013 Budget process. (2012-S04-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the award of a contract for the Hyde Park No. 4 Stormwater
Management Facility and Stanton Drain Remediation:
a) the
bid submitted by Bre-Ex Limited 247 Exeter Road, London, ON N6L 1A5 at its
tendered price of $5,719,479.55 (including contingency, excluding H.S.T.),
for the Hyde Park No.4 Stormwater Management Facility and Stanton Drain
Remediation Construction contract, BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid
received was the lowest of six (6) pre-qualified bids and meets the City's
specifications and requirements in all areas;
b) the
engineering fees for AECOM (Consultant) Citi Plaza 250 York Street, Suite 410
London, Ontario Canada, N6A 6K2 BE INCREASED to carry out additional design ($36,756)
inspection and general construction administration ($327,948) and monitoring
program ($58,564) of said project in the upset amount of $423,268, (including
contingency, excluding HST), based upon the Fee Guideline for Professional
Engineering Services, 2006, recommended by the Ontario Society of
Professional Engineers and in accordance with Section 15, Clause 15.2(g) of
the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
c) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report included in the staff report dated December 3, 2012;
d) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this work;
e) the
approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the material to be
supplied and the work to be done relating to this project (Tender 12-60);
and,
f) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents,
if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2012-W05-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the appointment of a consultant for the Powell Drain Remediation
Design:
a) DELCAN,
1069 Wellington Road South, Suite 214, London, Ontario, Canada BE APPOINTED
Consulting Engineers for the Powell Drain Remediation Design in the amount of
$93,247, excluding HST, in accordance with Section 15, Clause 15.2(d) of the
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
b) the
financing for this work BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report included in the staff report dated December 3, 2012;
c) the
consulting fees for the project identified in a) above, BE IN ACCORDANCE with
the estimate on file, which are based upon the Fee Guideline for Professional
Engineering Services, 2006, recommended by the Ontario Society of
Professional Engineers;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with the consultant for the work; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.
(2012-A03-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the construction timing of Stormwater Management (SWM) Facilities:
a) Old
Victoria No. 2 SWM facility BE CONSTRUCTED in 2013 subject to land
development approvals and acquisition of the land required for the facility;
b) Fox
Hollow No. 1 SWM Facility south cell and woodlot berms BE CONSTRUCTED in 2013
subject to obtaining consent to access adjacent lands for the purposes of
constructing the facility, land development approvals and amendment to the
Certificate of Approval associated with the SWM facility that are required due
to the adjustment in drainage areas to support the phasing of the facility;
and,
c) Old
Oak No. 2 SWM facility BE CONSTRUCTED in 2013 subject to obtaining consent to
access adjacent lands for the purpose of constructing the facility and land
development approvals. (2012-D18-00)
|
That Councillor H. L. Usher BE ELECTED as
the Civic Works Committee’s Vice-Chair for the term ending November 30, 2013.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Engineering and City Engineer:
a) the following actions be taken:
i) all
rates and charges related to the provision of Water Services BE MODIFIED to
reflect the new funding model effective March 1, 2013; and,
ii) the
attached revised proposed by-law to amend By-law No. WM-7 “A
by-law to provide for the setting of rates and charges for water supply in
the City of London” (Appendix A) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting on December 11, 2012 to effect the rates and charges noted in i),
above.
b) the following actions be taken:
i) all
rates and charges related to the provision of Wastewater and Treatment
Services BE MODIFIED to reflect the new funding model effective March 1,
2013;
ii) changes
to the storm drainage charge BE PHASED-IN over a three year period for
residential, commercial and institutional customers (Appendix B2); and,
iii) the
attached revised proposed by-law to amend the By-law No. WM 26 “A
by-law to establish the Schedule of Sewer System Fees and Charges.” (Appendix
B2) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on December 11, 2012 to
effect the rates and charges noted in i), above.
it being noted that the Civic Works
Committee heard the attached presentation from J. Braam,
Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services & City
Engineer, with respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
• C.
Gupta, 919 Plantation Road – expressing concern with respect to the future of
water and wastewater rates, stating that no economic studies have been
completed and there has been no consideration for capital and infrastructure
costs, questioning the costs associated with adding chemicals to the water.
• S.
Harrington, 1471 Webster Street – expressing concern with respect to all
residents being charged stormwater charges, regardless of whether the
residents have access or benefit from the stormwater drainage services.
• G.
Brown, 59 Ridout Street, Apt 35A – expressing that he is pleased with the new
progressive rate structure, stating that this may assist with more compact
and better designed use of industrial lands. (2012-W13-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Meadowlily Footbridge Rehabilitation:
a) the
Meadowlily Footbridge Rehabilitation Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
Schedule ‘B’ Screening Report BE ACCEPTED;
b) a
Notice of Completion of the Meadowlily Footbridge Rehabilitation Municipal
Class Environmental Assessment Screening Report BE ADVERTISED and BE FILED
with the Municipal Clerk; and,
c) the
Meadowlily Footbridge Rehabilitation Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
Screening Report BE PLACED on public record for a 30-day review period.
it being noted that the Civic Works
Committee heard the attached presentation from AECOM, with
respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made a written or oral submission in connection therewith:
• G.
Smith, President, Friends Of Meadowlily Woods Community Association – see attached
submission.
• G.
Brown – 59 Ridout Street, Apt 35A – expressing a concern with the detour
creating a challenge for pedestrians and requesting consideration of
prohibiting parking on the south side of the bridge for the safety of
pedestrians.
• G.
Struckett – 68 Meadowlily Road – expressing a concern with the inconvenience
of closing the bridge and requesting that staff review the possibilities of
convenient alternatives and installing surveillance cameras at the south side
of the bridge due to the increase in vandalism. (2012-S08-00)
|
|
14.
|
Tributary 'C'
Storm/Drainage and Stormwater Management, Transportation and Sanitary Trunk
Servicing Environmental Study Report Modifications
|
|
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
of Roads and Transportation, the following information BE RECEIVED, detailing
changes that were incorporated in the final Environmental Study Report (ESR)
for the Tributary ‘C’ Storm/Drainage and Stormwater Management (SWM),
Transportation and Sanitary Trunk Servicing Municipal Class Environmental
Assessment Study:
a) the
ecological buffers/setbacks size increase to the Tributary ’C’ coldwater
fishery system requested by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) and other
approval agencies;
b) the
recommended post-development monitoring program for the proposed Stormwater
Management Facility ‘A’ requested by the Munsee Delaware First Nation’s Peer
Review Consulting Team; and,
c) a
response to the concerns identified by West Kains Land Corporation in a
letter dated October 31, 2012; (2012-W10-00)
it being noted that the Civic Works
Committee heard a verbal presentation from C. Linton, Land Development
Project Manager, Norquay Developments with respect to this matter.
(2012-F06-00)
|
That the communications dated November 23,
2012 and November 3, 2012, from Councillor J. Bryant, with respect to a
request for temporary overnight parking passes for visitors of London BE
REFERRED to the Civic Administration to investigate and report back at a
future meeting of the Civic Works Committee. (2012-S04-00)
|
That the communication dated November 23,
2012, from Councillor D. Brown, with respect Trowbridge Avenue parking
restrictions BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration to investigate and
report back at a future meeting of the Civic Works Committee. (2012-S04-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
– Environmental Programs & Solid Waste, the following actions be taken
with respect to providing Blue Box processing services:
a) the
attached proposed by-law (Appendix A), BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting on December 11, 2012 to amend By-law No.
A.-6737-304 to delegate the authority to the Managing Director -
Environmental & Engineering Services & City Engineer to negotiate
agreements and establish pricing for companies wanting to use the Manning
Drive Regional Material Recovery facility to process recyclables;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this matter;
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back with any new agreements for
Blue Box processing services; and
d) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute all documents that are
necessary in connection with this matter.
|
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor D. Brown calls for a separate vote on clauses 3
and 16.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor S. Orser calls for a separate vote on clause 6.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor M. Brown calls for a separate vote on clause 7.
The motion to Approve clauses 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
to 12, inclusive, 14, 15 and 17 is put.
At 7:42 PM Councillor S.E. White enters the
meeting.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)
The motion to Approve Clause 3 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: B. Polhill (1)
At 7:43 PM Councillor J.P. Bryant enters the
meeting.
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Amend clause 6, in the fourth
line, by inserting the word “expanded” after the words “with respect
to".
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: S. Orser (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Refer clause 6, as amended, to the
Civic Works Committee to hold a Public Participation Meeting to receive
additional public input.
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: W.J. Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, P. Hubert, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (6)
NAYS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher (8)
|
The motion to Approve clause 6, as amended,
is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: P. Hubert, J.P. Bryant (2)
|
Clause 6, as amended, reads as follows:
That the report dated December 3, 2012, from
the Managing Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City
Engineer and the Managing Director, Development & Compliance Services &
Chief Building Official, with respect to expanded overnight parking
restrictions, BE REFERRED to the 2013 Budget process. (2012-S04-00)
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Amend clause 7 by adding the
following new part b), and renumbering the remaining parts:
“b)
the scope of Phase 1 (Tender 12-60), noted in part a) above, BE EXPANDED to
include the culvert replacement on the Shaw lands, previously scheduled to be
a part of Phase 2.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The motion to Approve clause 7, as amended,
is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Clause 7, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Director,
Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with respect to the
award of a contract for the Hyde Park No. 4 Stormwater Management Facility and
Stanton Drain Remediation:
a)
the
bid submitted by Bre-Ex Limited 247 Exeter Road, London, ON N6L 1A5 at its
tendered price of $5,719,479.55 (including contingency, excluding H.S.T.), for
the Hyde Park No.4 Stormwater Management Facility and Stanton Drain Remediation
Construction contract, BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid received was
the lowest of six (6) pre-qualified bids and meets the City's specifications
and requirements in all areas;
b)
the
scope of Phase 1 (Tender 12-60), noted in part a) above, BE EXPANDED to include
the culvert replacement on the Shaw lands, previously scheduled to be a part of
Phase 2
c) the
engineering fees for AECOM (Consultant) Citi Plaza 250 York Street, Suite 410
London, Ontario Canada, N6A 6K2 BE INCREASED to carry out additional design
($36,756) inspection and general construction administration ($327,948) and
monitoring program ($58,564) of said project in the upset amount of $423,268,
(including contingency, excluding HST), based upon the Fee Guideline for
Professional Engineering Services, 2006, recommended by the Ontario Society of
Professional Engineers and in accordance with Section 15, Clause 15.2(g) of the
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;
d) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report included in the staff report dated December 3, 2012;
e) the Civic
Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are
necessary in connection with this work;
f) the
approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the material to be
supplied and the work to be done relating to this project (Tender 12-60); and,
g) the Mayor
and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if
required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2012-W05-00)
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Amend clause 16 by adding the following
new part b):
“b)
the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to implement an immediate allowance for
the affected residents, and their guests, to park on Trowbridge Avenue, until
such time as the above-noted report comes back to the Committee.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: W.J. Armstrong (1)
|
The motion to Approve clause 16, as amended,
is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Clause 16, as amended, reads as follows:
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Trowbridge Avenue parking restrictions:
a)
the
communication dated November 23, 2012, from Councillor D. Brown BE REFERRED to
the Civic Administration to investigate and report back at a future meeting of
the Civic Works Committee; and,
b)
the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to implement an immediate allowance for the
affected residents, and their guest, to park on Trowbridge Avenue, until such
time as the above-noted report comes back to the Committee.
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher to
Approve clause 13.
13.
|
3rd Report of the LTC Long Term Growth Working
Group
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 3rd Report of the LTC Long Term Growth Report Working Group,
from its meeting held on November 8, 2012:
a) the following actions be taken
with respect to Bus Rapid Transit proposed financing:
i) the
Municipal Council BE REQUESTED to endorse, in principle, the provisional
capital and operating budget estimates and plan, as outlined in the attached
presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, recognizing that the capital funding will
be divided ½, 1/3 1/3; it being noted that this is consistent with the
approved 2030 Transportation Master Plan (TMP);
ii) the
above-noted plan BE INCLUDED in the City’s 2014 Draft Budget; and,
b) clauses 2 through 4 BE RECEIVED.
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Amend clause 13 in line 5 of part a) i)
by deleting the fraction “1/2” and by replacing it with the fraction
“1/3"
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (11)
NAYS: D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (2)
RECUSED: D. Brown (1)
|
The motion to Approve clause 13, as amended,
is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (11)
NAYS: D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (2)
RECUSED: D. Brown (1)
|
Clause 13, as amended, reads as follows:
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 3rd Report of the LTC Long Term Growth Report Working Group,
from its meeting held on November 8, 2012:
a) the following actions be taken
with respect to Bus Rapid Transit proposed financing:
i) the
Municipal Council BE REQUESTED to endorse, in principle, the provisional
capital and operating budget estimates and plan, as outlined in the attached
presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer, recognizing that the capital funding will be divided
1/3, 1/3 1/3; it being noted that this is consistent with the approved 2030
Transportation Master Plan (TMP);
ii) the
above-noted plan BE INCLUDED in the City’s 2014 Draft Budget; and,
b) clauses 2 through 4 BE RECEIVED
Councillor B. Polhill
presents.
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clauses 1 to 32, excluding clauses 4, 8, 9, 21, 25, 26 and 29
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor B. Polhill
disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 21 of this Report having to do with
the application of London Property Corporation, relating to the property
located at 124 St. James Street, as the application was dealt with by the
Committee of Adjustment, by indicating that his son is a member of the
Committee of Adjustment.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to the letters of appeal to
the Ontario Municipal Board, dated August 21, 2012 and August 24, 2012 and
submitted by Barry Card, (on behalf of Arnon Kaplansky), Brian Toth, Jon
Leahy, (Escalade Property Corp), and Twee Brown (Adamas Group), relating to
applications for amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. Z.-1,
which were passed by the Municipal Council concerning lands generally bounded
by Fanshawe Park Road/Thames River (North Branch)/Kilally Road to the north,
Aldersbrook Road/Wonderland Road to the west, the Thames River (South
Branch)/Dundas Street to the south, and Clarke Road to the east, as well as
City-wide changes to various zoning regulations, the Ontario Municipal Board
BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council has reviewed its decision relating to
these matters and sees no reason to alter it. (2012-D11-02)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to the letters of appeal to
the Ontario Municipal Board, dated August 30, 2012 and submitted by Donald
Cornell, relating to Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments (File No.
OZ-8048) concerning 75 Blackfriars Street, the Ontario Municipal Board BE
ADVISED that the Municipal Council has reviewed its decision relating to
these matters and sees no reason to alter it. (2012-D11-02)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to the letter of appeal to
the Ontario Municipal Board, dated April 23, 2012 and submitted by Avinoam
Chernick, Beth Hickey, Rachel Joseph and Chris McDonnell, relating to
applications for amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. Z.-1,
which was approved by the Municipal Council concerning 1103 Adelaide Street
North, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council has
reviewed its decision relating to these matters and sees no reason to alter
it.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the appeal of Official Plan Amendment No. 510, the London
Psychiatric Hospital Secondary Plan by the Fairmont Lawn Bowling Club:
a) the
attached Minutes of Settlement BE APPROVED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012;
b) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to execute the above-noted Minutes of
Settlement on behalf of the City; and,
c) the
Ontario Municipal Board BE REQUESTED to allow the Appeal in part, by amending
paragraph 3 of Section 20.4.3.3.3.ii), by deleting the words “on the rear
portion of” and replacing them with the word “within”, in accordance with the
above-noted Minutes of Settlement. (2012-D11-09)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of the City of London to amend the Official Plan,
relating to Section 3.2.3.1 “Residential Intensification Definition” and
Section 3.2.3.5 “Public Site Plan Review and Urban Design”:
a) the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend the Official Plan by
amending Section 3.2.3.1 “Residential Intensification Definition” and Section
3.2.3.5 “Public Site Plan Review and Urban Design” to add a policy clarifying
the intent of the intensification policies; and,
b) based
on the proposed Official Plan amendment identified in part a) above, the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to amend the Site Plan Control By-law, to
clarify the site plan matters to be considered in the review of
intensification proposals, including a requirement for Public Site Plan
review, in those instances where intensification may occur where no planning
application or process, other than site plan review, is required;
it being noted that the residential
intensification policies will be subject to further review as part of the
ReThink London Official Plan review process. (2012-D11-09)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Civic Administration’s Report, dated
November 26, 2012, relating to the City of London’s review of the Provincial
Policy Statement 5 Year Review BE FORWARDED to the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing for their consideration. (2012-D0-00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager
of Development Services and Planning Liaison, based on the application by
Highland Ridge Land Corp., relating to a portion of the property located at
890 Southdale Road West, the attached proposed by-law BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2102,
to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R1 Special
Provision (h.h-94.R1-6(4)) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h.h-94.R1-8) Zone,
a Holding Residential R1 (h.R1-8) Zone and a Holding Residential R1 Special
Provision (h.R1-8(4)) Zone TO a Holding Residential R1 Special Provision
(h-94.R1-6(4)) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h-94.R1-8) Zone, a Residential
R1 (R1-8) Zone and a Residential R1 Special Provision (R1-8(4)) Zone, to
remove the “h” holding provision. (2012-D11-03)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, based on the application by Pemic Land Corp,
relating to the lands located at 1480 Riverbend Road and the City-initiated
review of the zoning on a portion of the property at 1552 Riverbend Road, the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, to
change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a holding Residential
R1/Neighbourhood Facility (h•R1-4/NF) Zone TO a Residential R1/ Neighbourhood
Facility (R1-4/N/F) Zone and FROM a holding Residential R1 (h•R1-4) Zone TO a
Residential R1 (R1-4) Zone, to remove the holding provisions. (2012-D11-06)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, based on the application of Zelinka Priamo
Ltd., relating to the properties located at 311-319 Wharncliffe Road North,
the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No.
Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the
subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R8 Special Provision (h • h-5 •
R8-4(18)) Zone TO a Residential R8 Special Provision (R8-4(18)) Zone, to
remove the “h” and “h-5” holding provisions. (2012-D11-08)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager
of Development Services and Planning Liaison, based on the application of
Sifton Properties Limited, relating to the property located at 3455 Morgan
Crescent, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning
By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning
of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R5/R6/R7
(h•h-53•R5-4/R6-5/R7•D100•H-30) Zone TO a Residential R5/R6/R7
(R5-4/R6-5/R7•D100•H-30) Zone, to remove the holding provisions. (2012-D11-07)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to
the application of Tricar Developments Inc., relating to the property located
at 160 Sunningdale Road West:
a) the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands
FROM a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h • h-100 • h-119 • R9-7(16)
• H48) Zone, a Holding Residential R4 (h • h-100 • R4-6) Zone, a Holding
Residential R1 (h • h-100 • R1-5) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h • h-100 •
R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h • h-82 • h-94 • R1-6) Zone, a Holding
Residential R1 (h • h-94 • h-100 • R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h •
h-94 • h-100 • R1-6) Zone TO a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision
(h-100 • R9-7(16) • H48) Zone, to remove the h. and h-119 holding provisions;
and,
b) the
application to change the zoning of a portion of the subject lands FROM a
Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-100 • R9-7(16) H48) Zone, a
Holding Residential R1 (h • h-100 • R1-5) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h •
h-100 • R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h • h-82 • h-94 • R1-6) Zone, a
Holding Residential R1 (h • h-94 • h-100 • R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential
R1 (h • h-94 • h-100 • R1-6) Zone and a Holding Residential R4 (h • h-100 •
R4-6) Zone TO a Residential R9 Special Provision (R9-7(16) • H48) Zone
Residential R1 (R1-5) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1
(R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone and a
Residential R4 (R4-6) Zone, BE DEFERRED until such time as the holding
provisions have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City. (2012-D11-07)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to entering
into a subdivision agreement between The Corporation of the City of London
and Sifton Properties Limited for the subdivision of land over Part of Lot
35, Concession 2, (Geographic Township of Westminster), City of London,
County of Middlesex, situated generally between Southdale Road West and
Wharncliffe Road South, municipally known as 1451 Wharncliffe Road South:
a) the
attached Special Provisions to be contained in a Subdivision
Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Sifton
Properties Limited for the Andover Trails Subdivision, Phase 4 (39T-07510), BE
APPROVED;
b) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute this Agreement referred to
in part a) above, any amending agreements and all documents required to
fulfill its conditions;
c) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Source of
Financing Report” provided as Schedule “A” and the associated Claims and
Revenues provided as Schedule “B” to the associated staff report, dated
November 26, 2012;
d) the
Municipal Council BE ADVISED that the anticipated reimbursements from the
Capital Works Budget have been negotiated for the cost of a pathway in Park
Block 8 in this Plan; it being noted that the estimated cost of the pathway
is $6,000; it being further noted that the cost is being limited to a maximum
amount of $6,000; and,
it being further
noted that prior to execution of the subdivision agreement, final
registration of the plan and removal of the holding provisions on the lands
within this subdivision, the City will confirm the implications of the
request for a Part II Order on the Municipal Class EA Study for the Pincombe
Drain Storm/Drainage and Drain Restoration. (2012-D26-05)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official,
the report, dated November 26, 2012, relating to the recent fire at 1156
Dundas Street, BE RECEIVED. (2012-P09-00)
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the 4th Report of the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE)
from its meeting held on November 7, 2012:
a) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to provide the Thames River/Creek Survey
Annual Report to the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE); it being
noted that the ACE received a presentation from A. Van Rossum, Environmental
Services Engineer, with respect to the Thames River Annual Report; and,
b) that
clauses 2 through 6, inclusive, of the 4th Report of the ACE, BE RECEIVED AND
NOTED.
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the 4th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH)
from its meeting held on November 14, 2012:
a) the following actions be taken
with respect to the Stewardship Sub-Committee report:
i)
the
Heritage Planner BE REQUESTED to forward the Statement of Significance, for
the property located at 3378 Homewood Lane, to the owner for signature;
ii)
the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building
Official BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH)
does not have sufficient reason to designate the property located at 75
Bathurst Street;
iii)
an
expenditure of up to $100.00 BE APPROVED, for refreshments to be provided at
the Stewardship Sub-Committee meeting to be held on December 5, 2012, with
public history students from the University of Western Ontario; it being
noted that the LACH has sufficient funds in its 2012 budget for this
expenditure; and,
iv) the
Stewardship Sub-Committee minutes from its meeting held on October 31, 2012,
BE RECEIVED;
b) the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building
Official BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH)
does not have sufficient reason to designate the property located at 1523
Bradley Avenue; it being noted that the LACH requested that the Heritage
Planner be allowed to document the building and that all salvageable heritage
aspects of the property be retained; it being further noted that the LACH
heard a verbal presentation from D. Menard, Heritage Planner, with respect to
this matter;
c)
on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
application of G. & M. Baumann, requesting permission for window
replacement to the designated heritage property located at 195 Elmwood Avenue
East, BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the
proposed window replacement and has advised that the impact of such alteration
on the heritage features of the property identified in the reasons for
designation, is acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory
Committee on Heritage heard a verbal presentation from P. Molloy, Duo
Construction, with respect to this matter;
d) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
application of New Brighton Housing Co-op, requesting permission for an
alteration to the designated heritage property located at 473 Baker Street, BE
APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed
alteration and has advised that the impact of such alterations on the
heritage features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation,
is acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage heard verbal presentations from L. Baker and M. Simpson, with
respect to this matter;
e) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
application of E. Greenfield, requesting permission for a roof material
replacement to the designated heritage property located at 986 Richmond
Street, BE APPROVED and that the owner BE ASKED to salvage the reusable
slate; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed
replacement and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the
heritage features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation,
is acceptable;
f) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
application of the City of London, requesting permission for an alteration to
the designated heritage property located at 10 Meadowlily Road South, BE
APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed
alteration and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage
features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation, is
acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory Committee on
Heritage heard verbal presentations from T. Fediv, AECOM and K. Grabowski,
Transportation Design Engineer, City of London, with respect to this matter;
g) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to prepare an integrated plaque for the
heritage features of the entire Meadowlily area, including the former mill;
h) that
clause 14 of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE AMENDED by adding the words “and
that the property located at 283 South Street is a Priority 1 listed building
on the 2006 Inventory of Heritage Resources”;
i) that
clause 16, of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE AMENDED by deleting the number
“527” and replacing it with the number “272”; and,
j) that
clauses 8 through 13, inclusive, clause 15, and clauses 17 to 20, inclusive,
of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE RECEIVED AND NOTED;
it being noted that
the Planning and Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from G.
Goodlet, Chair, LACH, with respect to these matters.
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the 3rd Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning
Advisory Committee (EEPAC) from its meeting held on November 15, 2012:
a) the
following actions be taken with respect to the Applewood Hills Sergautis
Lands located at 660 Sunningdale Road East:
i)
the
Managing Director, Planning and City Planner BE REQUESTED to consider, as
part of the Official Plan review process, changing the Environmental Impact
Study (EIS) process from being development based to a natural heritage system
approach; and,
ii) the
attached comments, prepared by the Environmental and Ecological
Planning Advisory Committee (EEPAC) Working Group, with respect to the
Applewood Hills Sergautis Lands located at 660 Sunningdale Road East, BE
FORWARDED to N. McKee, Senior Planner, for her review and consideration;
b) that
clauses 2 through 25, inclusive, of the 3rd Report of the EEPAC, BE RECEIVED
AND NOTED;
it being noted that
the Planning and Environment Committee did not hear a verbal presentation
from D. Sheppard, Chair, EEPAC, with respect to these matters.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, based on the application of Millennium
Downtown Corporation, relating to the property located at 195 Dundas Street,
the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No.
Z.-l, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to extend the Temporary Use
(T-54) Zone, which permits a surface commercial parking lot along the Dundas
Street frontage, for a period not exceeding three (3) years;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication, dated November
22, 2012, from J. MacDonald, Executive Director, Downtown London, with
respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
A.R.
Patton, Patton, Cormier & Associates, on behalf of the applicant –
expressing support for the application. (2012-D11-05)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken
with respect to the site plan approval application of 789220 Ontario Limited,
relating to the property located at 129 Riverside Drive:
a) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that at the public meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, the following issues
were raised by the neighourhood with respect to the application for Site Plan
approval to permit a three storey, twenty-eight unit, apartment building:
i) the
significant loss of trees on the site;
ii) the
increase in traffic; and,
iii) the
unattractiveness of the proposed building; and,
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the
granting of approval of the site plan and elevations, as submitted in the
Civic Administration’s Report dated November 26, 2012;
it
being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received
a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from J. Price, by e-mail, with
respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Harry
Froussios, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – responding to
the public’s comments; advising that part of the tree removal issue is the
installation of a privacy fence that the applicant has agreed to install; and
noting that some of the trees to be removed are not healthy.
·
Joe
McCarthy, 13 Moir Street – advising that the property is zoned R9 and Office
1; and noting that, in the City’s Official Plan, this is for Office Use only.
·
Peter
Maglaris, 150 Mount Pleasant Avenue – expressing concern with the amount of
traffic currently travelling along Mount Pleasant Avenue; noting that there
is a school bus zone and a church pick up zone in the area; indicating that
this will increase the volume of traffic; expressing concern with congestion
and children playing in the area; and indicating that the aesthetics of the
proposed building are boring and unimaginative.
·
Krissy
Dougherty, 162 Mount Pleasant Avenue – enquiring as to the status of the
zoning variance. (2012-D25-00)
|
24.
|
Request for Demolition - Property located
at 1523 Bradley Avenue
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner,
the following actions be taken with respect to the property located at 1523
Bradley Avenue:
a)
the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not object to the request
for demolition for the Priority 2 listed property located at 1523 Bradley
Avenue; and,
b)
the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building
Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not wish to issue
a notice of Intent to Designate this property under Section 29 of the Ontario
Heritage Act;
it being noted that the London Advisory
Committee on Heritage has been consulted on this request for demolition;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2012-D10-00)
|
27.
|
Property located at 450 Oxford Street West
(OZ-8003)
|
That, notwithstanding the recommendation of
the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the application of
Bluestone Properties Inc, relating to the property located at 450 Oxford
Street West BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration to report back at a
public participation meeting in May, 2013 regarding the following matters:
a)
nothwithstanding
the High Density Residential land use designation, an Office Area designation
is supportable within the area of the property available for development;
and,
b)
the
Civic Administration and the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority to
identify the flood line;
it
being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received
the following communications, with respect to this matter:
·
a communication, dated November 20, 2012, from J. Johnston,
1114-605 Proudfoot Lane; and,
·
a communication, dated November 19, 2012, from H. Katz,
Esam Construction Limited;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
A.R.
Patton, Patton, Cormier and Associates, on behalf of the applicant –
expressing opposition to the Civic Administration’s recommendation;
indicating that the property is located on the corner of an arterial road and
a collector road; noting that the roads are serviced by the London Transit
Commission; indicating that the property is fully serviced, with water, storm
and sanitary sewer; advising that this area of the city is growing quickly;
indicating that this property is designated and zoned for offices and
daycares; indicating that it is unfair to say that the proposal needs over
300 parking spaces; indicating that his client has received interest from a
bank and offices; indicating that his client only needs 129 parking spaces;
requesting that the Committee refer the application to the Civic
Administration to prepare an implementing enacting zoning by-law to be
brought back to the Committee in January or February of 2013; reiterating
that there is no reason to refuse this application; advising that in 2007,
Mr. E. Wszol was appointed the Engineer for Mud Creek; indicating that the
flood line is a moving target; noting that it is not rocket science; advising
that the line should be able to be nailed down; indicating that parking can
be permitted; advising that the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority
comments are not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement; indicating
that bits and pieces of the process have been very frustrating; indicating
that his clients were promised the Mud Creek study in 2011; advising that
landowners paid for a study to be completed in 2007 out of their own pockets
and the City will not release the Study information.
·
Michael
Hannay, MBTW Group – advising that a site
plan was submitted with the application; indicating that the proposal was
submitted to the Urban Design Peer Review Panel in April, 2011; indicating
that they have received very positive comments from the Peer Review Panel;
indicating that the dotted line on the application is their best guess where
the flood line is; indicating that the issue of the scale is uncertain;
advising that the proposed building is close to the street; noting that it is
a strong, forward looking building with a high level of finish on all sides;
and reading the “Discussion” section of page 351 of the Planning and
Environment Committee agenda.
·
Ed
Wszol, Designated Consulting Engineer, Development Engineering – indicating
that the flood line has been a fluid exercise over the years; indicating that
there are ways to mitigate any impact; noting that the Manager of Stormwater verbally
referred to work that was proposed earlier in the meeting this evening;
noting that the Civic Administration could not come up with a cost effective
solution; further noting that the Civic Administration were presented with
five to seven solutions; indicating that the applicant would reconstruct and
lower the culvert located under the CN Rail; noting that the culvert was
originally constructed in the 1920’s; further noting that the culvert was
constructed when the land was used for farm purposes and orchards; indicating
that the culvert needs to be rebuilt and they hope to do so with the
cooperation of CN Rail; indicating that there is an opportunity to provide
for a stormwater management solution; and indicating that they have not been
able to review the information provided by Delcan and would like an
opportunity to address the Delcan report.
·
Bernie
Bierbaum, President and CEO, Bluestone Properties – advising that they have
had a lot of patience in dealing with this application; indicating that he
has been involved with this for 15 years; advising that his most recent
involvement was in 2006/2007; indicating that he attended all three public
meetings; advising that ESAM represents the majority of the landowners;
indicating that, after the series of public meetings, he thought the
development was moving forward; noting that there has been no movement;
indicating that the flood line going down is good news for them; advising
that he met with the Stormwater Management Unit in 2012; indicating that the
Civic Administration was going to provide the flood plain information to
Stantec by November, 2010; noting that, to date, no information has been
received from the Civic Administration; advising that he met with former City
Manager, Jeff Fielding, to try to resolve this issue; indicating that, in February,
2011, the Corporate Approvals Team met on this issue; indicating that the
Stormwater Management Unit indicated that it could have the information
within seven months; advising that he went ahead and worked with the
Consultants on the application late last year; advising that the information
that he was provided in 2007 indicated that the flood line was ok to use for
development; advising that he has not received the information that he was
promised; requesting that the application be approved; and asking to work
with the Civic Administration on this application.
·
A.
M. Valastro, 1-133 John Street – indicating that the floodplain is occupied
by deer, geese and goslings; advising that it is a wildlife corridor;
indicating that a fast talking lawyer wants to put through development;
advising that deer are showing up downtown as there is no longer a buffer;
advising that these places are very valuable; and indicating that she does
not want to see a pushy lawyer twisting the Councillors arms.
·
Jean
Johnston, 1114-605 Proudfoot Lane – advising that she has lived in her
residence for 18 years; agreeing that the area is a wildlife corridor;
indicating that Mud Creek currently floods; reading the communication she
submitted on the Added Agenda; indicating that there are deer, rabbits,
squirrels, chipmunks and a pair of snapping turtles in the area; advising
that ever year, ducks land in the swimming pool in Forest Hill and are
removed; indicating that it is a marvelous area; noting that the Creek needs
some cleaning up; advising that she knows the difference between Oak and
Maple trees.
·
Jeff
Brick, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority – advising that the
Provincial Policy Statement, the City’s Policies and the Upper Thames River
Conservation Authority policies do no allow development in floodplains;
noting that parking is development; advising that there is no firm indication
for the floodplain; indicating that modeling needs to be completed; advising
that the City cannot advise on the elevation; advising that the Upper Thames
River Conservation Authority needs to peer review the application; and
advising that they will provide the floodplain information once they have
it. (2012-D11-01)
|
28.
|
Demolition Request - Property located at 75
Bathurst Street
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner,
the following actions be taken with respect to the property located at 75
Bathurst Street:
a)
the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not object to the request
for demolition for the Priority 1 listed property located at 75 Bathurst
Street; and,
b) the
Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not wish to issue a notice
of Intent to Designate this property under Section 29 of the Ontario
Heritage Act;
it being noted that the London Advisory
Committee on Heritage has been consulted on this request for demolition;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
Tanya
Park, 300 South Street, President, SOHO Community Association – expressing
support for the application. (2012-D10-00)
|
30.
|
Beaufort/Irwin/Gunn/Saunby/Essex
("BIGS") Street Neighbourhood Plan
|
That, the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED
to report back at a future public participation meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee with a final Beaufort/Irwin/Gunn/Saunby/Essex (BIGS)
Street Neighbourhood Plan, with respect to the following:
a)
investigate
the residents’ concerns expressed at the public participation meeting held on
Monday, November 26, 2012;
b)
take
into consideration the comments received from agencies and other City
Departments; and,
c)
further
consultation be undertaken with the affected neighours;
it
being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received
the following communications, with respect to this matter:
·
a communication, dated November 12, 2012, from D. & T.
Gonyou, 350 Wharncliffe Road North;
·
communications, dated November 19 and 23, 2012, from S.
Scott, 372 Cedar Avenue;
·
a communication, dated November 22, 2012, from P. & H.
Cortese, 383 Cedar Avenue;
·
a communication, dated November 23, 2012, from M. & B.
Nolan, 396 Cedar Avenue;
·
a communication, dated November 12, 2012, from E.A. Smuck,
928 Western Road;
·
a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from C. Crncich,
384 Cedar Avenue;
·
a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from J. & R.
Carvalho, 388 Cedar Avenue;
·
a communication from W.H. Liu, 390 Cedar Avenue; and,
·
a communication, dated November 23, 2012, from R. Salazar,
376 Wharncliffe Road North;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Edgar
Allen Smuck, 928 Western Road – advising that at the community public
meeting, there were three plans presented; noting that they were the preserve
model, the urban model and the village model; advising that the community
rejected the village model; indicating that an on-site manager should be
required for cluster dwellings; enquiring as to whether people want to see
the area remain the same, whether people want to see real change or whether
or not people want to see Mr. Smith’s village plan that was rejected by the
community; indicating that he supports the high rise plan; noting that there is
one developer willing to build in this area; advising that the area was
enlarged to allow the increase in the Western University to be managed;
referring to the 2008 Wynfield case; and advising that he provided Mr. C.
Parker, Senior Planner, with a 21-page communication on why Mr. P. Smith’s
report should be rejected.
·
Morrison
Reid, 376 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that he is a business owner;
advising that the residents need more time to read the Peter J. Smith Report
as the residents living outside of the Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn
Street and Saunby Street area did not know they were included in the
Neighbourhood Plan; advising that, approximately 15 years ago, an application
for a high rise in this area was rejected by the Ontario Municipal Board;
indicating that this Plan would destabilize a stable community; indicating
that the Peter J. Smith report is flawed; and indicating that many of the
houses are owner occupied.
·
Sheila
Scott, 372 Cedar Avenue – advising that she has happily lived there for 40
years; requesting that the Wharncliffe Road and Cedar Avenue area be
protected and be preserved; indicating that a majority of the people in the
Wharncliffe Road/Cedar Avenue area did not know that they were included in
the study area; advising that she has attended both community meetings;
indicating that the community was provided with three models to choose from;
and indicating that the whole study involves students; and enquiring as to
whether or not any students have been consulted on this matter.
·
Rosine
Salazer, 376 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that she has respectfully
lived near students for years; indicating that the single family dwellings
should remain single family dwellings; requesting that the Committee drive by
their properties to see that they are ranches, not cottages; and advising
that the Peter J. Smith report includes the bike path along Wharncliffe Road
which leads to the Thames River; and noting that the bike path leads to a
cliff.
·
Glen
Matthews, on behalf of Gitta Kulczycki, Vice-President, Resources and
Operations, Western University – see attached communication.
·
Jackson
Carvalho, 388 Cedar Avenue – advising that he has lived in his residence for
17 years; indicating that the document that the City is using has no credibility
as the information is wrong; and advising that other owners live in the area;
noting that the study indicates that the area is not owner occupied.
·
Anna
Maria Valastro, 1-133 John Street – advising that, earlier in the meeting,
there was a similar issue in North London; indicating that it is only a
priority to the City if the area is owner occupied; advising that the renters
of the properties are not notified of the meetings; indicating that this
happens in every city; and requesting that the City give value to its
renters.
·
Wanda
Graham, 387 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that she owns a duplex and
rents out the other half to a University professor; expressing disagreement
with the proposed changes in the Peter J. Smith report; advising that there
are student renal signs in the neighbourhood; indicating that the Smith
report is incorrect; and advising that the area backing onto Gibbons Park is
all owner occupied.
·
Christine
Crncich, 384 Cedar Avenue – indicating that she was away most of the summer;
expressing alarm upon reading the report; indicating that she has the poor
condition home on the street; noting that she sided her house in board and
batton; indicating that she has deer and foxes eat from her garden every day;
advising that she is proud to have the woods, the River and the deer;
indicating that she likes to stay hidden; indicating that they do not have
street lights and their street does not get plowed; enquiring as to how the
most disagreed on Plan is the one that was chosen; requesting the Councillors
drive through the neighbourhood at night to see the stars; indicating that,
from her property on, all 32 of the houses were counted as rental properties;
indicating that one of her neighbours has won the Trillium Award seven years
for her beautiful gardens; indicating that no one in her area received the
notice as all properties were thought to be rentals; indicating that she did
not know that Essex Street and Hollywood Avenue was included in the Study;
and enquiring as to who hired Peter J. Smith with her tax dollars.
·
Dan
McFadden, Real Estate Agent – advising that there are beautiful houses on
Cedar Avenue; indicating that the area has deep value; advising that the last
two sales in the area sold for $1,200,000; indicating that the houses in the
Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street area that he has
torn down have been condemned; and indicating that he was one of the first to
build new houses in this area.
·
Andre
G., 371 Cedar Avenue – advising that the has owned this property for three
years; noting that he purchased the property as an investment; indicating
that he has spent a lot of money in renovations; indicating that the area is
beautiful; advising that he was about to ask his tenants to leave so that he
could move in when they advised him that they were moving out; and advising
that this area is too beautiful to change.
·
Annette
Lance, 72 Gunn Street – requesting some control and balance in the
neighbourhood; indicating that the City Council is doing the neighbourhood
residents a disservice; indicating that a lot of mature trees will be removed
if Mr. Peter J. Smith’s recommendations are implemented; advising that the
setback is closer to the street than the existing homes on the street;
advising that one of the developments that was built had to resize the
foundation as the foundation was too large and the neighbours called and
complained; indicating that the neighbourhood is a lost cause; and expressing
home that other neighbourhoods have more success.
·
James
Corcoran, 43 Gunn Street – indicating that the study was not their idea;
advising that, in a short time, eight oversize duplexes have been built in
the Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street area;
indicating that the neighbourhood is now like the Wild West; indicating that
only part of the area is not under floodplain control; indicating that this
is the path of least resistance for developers; advising that the few
remaining single family houses in the neighbourhood do not fit in with the big
box houses; indicating that there is a fourplex and a duplex boxed in beside
the Varsity Mills townhouse development; and requesting that the
neighbourhood be rezoned from an R2-3 Zone to a R3-2 Zone. (2012-D11-00)
|
31.
|
Old East Village Enhanced Incentives
Programs
|
That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED
to report to the appropriate Committee with respect to the financial
implications of granting a two year extension of the Forgivable Upgrade to
Building Code Loan Program and the Forgivable Façade Improvement Loan Program
to the Old East Village Business Improvement Area and Downtown London;
it
being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received
the following communications, with respect to this matter:
·
a
communication from K. Keane, Chair, Old East Village Business Improvement
Area; and,
·
a
communication, dated November 20, 2012, from J. MacDonald, Executive
Director, Downtown London, with respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that the Planning and
Environment Committee received the attached presentation from
Clark Bryant, Board Member, Old East Village Business Improvement Area, with
respect to this matter. (2012-F12-00)
|
That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED
to report to a future meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with
respect to an update on the status of the completion of Dalmagarry Road and
the reason for the delay.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clause 4.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor J.B. Swan calls for a separate vote on parts a)
and b) of clause 4.
4.
|
Property located at 754 Maitland Street -
Notice of Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (Z-8065)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken in
response to the letter of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, dated
October 31, 2012 and submitted by Arnon Kaplansky (Kapland Inc.), relating to
Zoning By-law application No. Z-8065 concerning 754 Maitland Street:
a)
the
Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council has reviewed
its decision relating to this matter and sees no reason to alter it; and,
b)
the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back to the appropriate Committee
with respect to the amount of the Civic Administration’s time and financial
resources that have been expended on this matter;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation and reviewed and received
communications, dated November 23 and 24, 2012, from A. Kaplansky, Kapland
Construction Management Ltd., with respect to this matter. (2012-D11-04)
|
The motion to Approve part a) of clause 4 is
put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The motion to Approve part b) of clause 4
is put
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: S. Orser, D.G. Henderson, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher (4)
NAYS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (10)
|
Clause 4 as amended reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to letters of appeal to the
Ontario Municipal Board, dated October 31, 2012 and submitted by Arnon
Kaplansky (Kapland Inc.), relating to Zoning By-law application No. Z-8065
concerning 754 Maitland Street, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that
the Municipal Council has reviewed its decision relating to this matter and
sees no reason to alter it; it being noted that the Planning and Environment
Committee heard a verbal presentation and reviewed and received
communications, dated November 23 and 24, 2012, from A. Kaplansky, Kapland
Construction Management Ltd., with respect to this matter. (2012-D11-04)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clause 8.
8.
|
Planning Division 18 Month Work Program
|
That, notwithstanding the recommendation of
the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the Planning Division Work
Program Priorities BE REFERRED to the Strategic Planning and Priorities
Committee for consideration.
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: J.B. Swan, D.G. Henderson (2)
NAYS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve that the Planning Division Work
Program Priorities BE RECEIVED; it being noted that these priorities will
serve as the focus of the Division’s activities over the next 18 months.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clause 9.
9.
|
Member Composition for the Urban Design
Peer Review Panel
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to
revise the Terms of Reference for the Urban Design Peer Review Panel to
update the composition of the Panel members to include the following
positions:
i) three (3) Architects; and,
ii) three
(3) other professionals that influence the design of the built environment
and are registered in their field; it being noted that these fields include,
in order of preference, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design, Planning or
other professional fields that influence the design of the built
environment.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Amend clause 9, in line 4 of part ii), by
removing all the words following the word "Planning".
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
The motion to Approve clause 9, as amended,
is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
|
Clause 9, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to
revise the Terms of Reference for the Urban Design Peer Review Panel to update
the composition of the Panel members to include the following positions:
i) three (3) Architects; and,
ii) three
(3) other professionals that influence the design of the built environment and
are registered in their field; it being noted that these fields include, in
order of preference, Landscape Architecture, Urban Design, Planning.
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White to
Approve clause 21.
21.
|
Property located at 124 St. James Street
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, the following actions be taken with respect to the site
plan approval application of London Property Corporation, relating to the
property located at 124 St. James Street:
a) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that at the public meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, the following issues
were raised by the neighourhood with respect to the application for Site Plan
approval to permit two, three and one-half storey thirty-six unit apartment
buildings with each unit containing three bedrooms:
i)
the
significant loss of trees on the site;
ii)
the
addition of windows and dormers to the proposed development;
iii)
the
possible groundwater contamination; and,
iv)
the
stability of the ground for the proposed development; and,
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, upon the applicant fulfilling the areas
of concern noted in part a) above, the Municipal Council supports the
granting of approval of the site plan and elevations, as submitted in the
Civic Administration’s Report dated November 26, 2012; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to meet with the Ward Councillor and the
Neighbourhood Community Association to address the concerns identified at the
public participation meeting;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Harry
Froussios, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – advising that
they have had discussions with the residents, the Community Association and
the Civic Administration; indicating that an application for minor variance
was applied for and has been appealed; advising that the core of the
neighbourhood supports the application; advising that the reports that have
been submitted permit the development to proceed; indicating that they asked
for a one metre height variance; indicating that the second building could be
higher; indicating that the proposal is in keeping with the neighbourhood;
and that the applicant will endeavor to retain the existing trees without
compromising the development.
·
Anna
Maria Valastro, 1–133 John Street – advising that she lives just outside of
this area; indicating that she has requested that the hydrology and soil
density reports be released to the public; noting that, in the Engineering Report,
the ground is not stable due to its proximity to the flood plain; indicating
that the proposed development is being forced; indicating that the project
has failed to look at the impacts on the roots of existing trees; indicating
that the project will contaminate the groundwater; requesting that the
surplus parking spaces not be built to allow the existing trees to remain;
reiterating that there are two city trees that are not to be removed;
requesting that the black walnut tree not be removed, but that the building
be built around the tree; advising that the development is exclusionary;
indicating that the development should be welcoming to everyone; and
requesting that a second meeting be held with respect to this matter.
·
Nancy
Whynot, 428 St. George Street – advising that the proposed design seems more
inclined to arterial roads; and advising that it does not fit where it is
being proposed.
·
Mary
Cave, 220 St. George Street – expressing support for the groundwater and
floodplain concerns that were previously mentioned; advising that the
structure is unattractive for the area that it is proposed to be built in;
indicating that St. George Street is becoming an artery for people travelling
west on Oxford Street or east onto Talbot Street; indicating that the four-way
stop at St. George Street is tenuous; and expressing concern with traffic
only having one entrance and exit on the proposed development.
·
Tom
Miles, 114 Sydenham Street – advising that the proposed student residences
are identical to the student rentals located on Wharncliffe Road; expressing
concern that the proposed development is not on a main artery, but now in a
residential neighbourhood; indicating that you will always be able to retain
students; advising that people who want to live in Old North, and have always
lived in Old North, are now living in apartments in Old North; indicating
that a four storey building on a two lane street is overwhelming; advising
that the trees are jewels the City should want to maintain; indicating that
the Ivey family is a wonderful family for the City; noting that they have
owned many homes in North London; indicating that he has met with Mr. Stanton
and requested that the residential be built prior to the student housing;
expressing praise for the Grosvenor Community Association who realized that
they were unable to stop the development; and advising that the Community
Association does not represent everyone in the area. (2012-D25-00)
|
Motion made by Councillor S.E. White and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Amend clause 21, in line 1 of part b), by
deleting the word “fulfilling” and by replacing it with the words
“addressing”.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: B. Polhill (1)
|
The motion to Approve clause 21, as amended,
is put.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, W.J. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
RECUSED: B. Polhill (1)
|
Clause 21, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, the following actions be taken with respect to the site
plan approval application of London Property Corporation, relating to the
property located at 124 St. James Street:
a) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that at the public meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, the following issues
were raised by the neighourhood with respect to the application for Site Plan
approval to permit two, three and one-half storey thirty-six unit apartment
buildings with each unit containing three bedrooms:
v)
the
significant loss of trees on the site;
vi)
the
addition of windows and dormers to the proposed development;
vii)
the
possible groundwater contamination; and,
viii)
the
stability of the ground for the proposed development; and,
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, upon the applicant addressing the areas of
concern noted in part a) above, the Municipal Council supports the granting of
approval of the site plan and elevations, as submitted in the Civic
Administration’s Report dated November 26, 2012; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to meet with the Ward Councillor and the
Neighbourhood Community Association to address the concerns identified at the
public participation meeting;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Harry
Froussios, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – advising that they
have had discussions with the residents, the Community Association and the
Civic Administration; indicating that an application for minor variance was
applied for and has been appealed; advising that the core of the neighbourhood
supports the application; advising that the reports that have been submitted
permit the development to proceed; indicating that they asked for a one metre
height variance; indicating that the second building could be higher;
indicating that the proposal is in keeping with the neighbourhood; and that the
applicant will endeavor to retain the existing trees without compromising the
development.
·
Anna
Maria Valastro, 1–133 John Street – advising that she lives just outside of
this area; indicating that she has requested that the hydrology and soil
density reports be released to the public; noting that, in the Engineering Report,
the ground is not stable due to its proximity to the flood plain; indicating
that the proposed development is being forced; indicating that the project has
failed to look at the impacts on the roots of existing trees; indicating that
the project will contaminate the groundwater; requesting that the surplus
parking spaces not be built to allow the existing trees to remain; reiterating
that there are two city trees that are not to be removed; requesting that the
black walnut tree not be removed, but that the building be built around the
tree; advising that the development is exclusionary; indicating that the
development should be welcoming to everyone; and requesting that a second
meeting be held with respect to this matter.
·
Nancy
Whynot, 428 St. George Street – advising that the proposed design seems more
inclined to arterial roads; and advising that it does not fit where it is being
proposed.
·
Mary
Cave, 220 St. George Street – expressing support for the groundwater and
floodplain concerns that were previously mentioned; advising that the structure
is unattractive for the area that it is proposed to be built in; indicating
that St. George Street is becoming an artery for people travelling west on
Oxford Street or east onto Talbot Street; indicating that the four-way stop at
St. George Street is tenuous; and expressing concern with traffic only having
one entrance and exit on the proposed development.
·
Tom
Miles, 114 Sydenham Street – advising that the proposed student residences are
identical to the student rentals located on Wharncliffe Road; expressing
concern that the proposed development is not on a main artery, but now in a
residential neighbourhood; indicating that you will always be able to retain
students; advising that people who want to live in Old North, and have always
lived in Old North, are now living in apartments in Old North; indicating that
a four storey building on a two lane street is overwhelming; advising that the
trees are jewels the City should want to maintain; indicating that the Ivey
family is a wonderful family for the City; noting that they have owned many
homes in North London; indicating that he has met with Mr. Stanton and
requested that the residential be built prior to the student housing;
expressing praise for the Grosvenor Community Association who realized that
they were unable to stop the development; and advising that the Community
Association does not represent everyone in the area. (2012-D25-00)
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clause 25.
25.
|
Properties located at 510, 518 and 526
Southdale Road East (Z-8092)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of Dr. Afzal Mohammed, relating to the properties
located at 510, 518 and 526 Southdale Road East:
a)
the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Residential R3 Office Conversion (R3-2/OC5) Zone at 510
Southdale Road East and a Residential R3 (R3-2) Zone at 518, 526 Southdale
Road East, which permits single detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings,
duplex dwellings, triplex dwellings, converted dwellings, and fourplex
dwellings in the R3-2 Zone and dwelling units, medical/dental offices in
existing buildings and offices in existing buildings in the OC5 Zone TO a
Restricted Office Special Provision (RO2( )) Zone, which permits clinics,
medical/dental offices, medical/dental laboratories and offices including a
minimum parking setback of 15 meters from the ultimate road allowance; and,
b)
the
Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to address the following design
issues through the site plan process:
i) a
site plan identifying phases of development, and a landscape plan which
identifies continuous screening of parking areas along the Southdale Road
frontage, to provide an attractive street edge condition, until the frontage
is occupied by built form;
ii) ensure
landscaping along Nixon Avenue screens adjacent parking areas from the street;
it being noted that this may include a low-rise wall clad with materials also
used on the building, in addition to plantings;
iii) provide
or relocate an entrance at the street corner “two storey commercial building”
to offer convenient pedestrian access from the street intersection;
iv) ensure
a street corner height element is provided in the street corner “two storey
commercial building” and articulated sufficiently to identify it as a special
focal element at the street intersection;
v) provide
or relocate an entrance on the “medical building” facing Southdale Road to
offer convenient pedestrian access from the sidewalk;
vi) include
landscaping techniques along the Southdale Road frontage, such as a paved
forecourt and a broad sidewalk between buildings, to create functional and
pleasant pedestrian connections between the building entrances and public
sidewalks; and,
vii) consider
the October 17, 2012 advice of the Urban Design Peer Review Panel to maximize
the qualitative contribution the development makes in the enhancement of the
street corner location;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Laverne
Kirkness, Kirkness Consulting Inc., on behalf of the applicant – expressing
support for the application; advising that they have worked with the Civic
Administration and the Urban Design Review Panel throughout the application
process; indicating that during the site plan process, special provision was
made to plant trees along the property line to ensure that the people
abutting the property would see a fence and backdropped landscaping; advising
that the proposed development conforms to the Urban Design Review
requirements; indicating that the application is in conformity with the
Official Plan; and advising that there is a good demand for medical/dental at
this corner.
·
John
Collins, 537 Winblest Avenue – expressing opposition to the application;
indicating that his father built the house he now resides in; indicating that
the house was in the middle of nowhere when it was first built; indicating
that the subdivision is comprised of ½ acre lots; indicating that the current
residents were not expecting houses at their backyards when they purchased
their properties; advising that, across the street, half of the mall is empty
and wondering why that space cannot be used instead; indicating that, 10
years ago, his father fought against the building of a gas station in the
area; advising that this affects the entire subdivision; indicating that
there is a group home moving into the area; noting that the people they back
onto will not be looking at a parking lot; reiterating that this is not
necessary, there is lots of room in the mall; advising that residents on
Winblest Avenue are going to be looking at an 8 foot fence along the back of
their properties; indicating that there is a Rexall on the other side of the
street; indicating that the applicant is proposing to tear down houses to
build new houses; and indicating that if you allow this on one corner, you
need to allow it all down the street. (2012-D11-05)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve
clause 26.
26.
|
Property located at 1205 Riverside Drive
(39CD-12512/Z-8099)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services Division, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of Riverwood (London) Corporation, relating to the
property located at 1205 Riverside Drive:
a) the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM
a Residential R5 (R5-1) Zone, which permits a wide range of housing including
single detached cluster housing and cluster stacked townhouse dwellings TO a
Residential R6 Special Provision (R6-2()) Zone, to permit single detached
cluster housing with a 1.2 metre side-yard setback on the corner units
(numbered 8 and 16), in place of the minimum requirement of 3 metres where
there are no windows to habitable rooms, and 6 metres where the wall of a unit
contains windows to habitable rooms, to permit 40% lot coverage maximum in
place of the 30% and a minimum rear yard setback of 8 metres;
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that there were no issues raised at the public
participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with respect to
the proposed draft Vacant Land Condominium application;
c) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that there were no issues raised at the public
participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with respect to
the proposed Site Plan Approval application;
d) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the granting
of approval to the vacant land condominium for 23 cluster single detached
residential units;
e) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the granting
of approval to the Site Plan applications for 23 cluster single detached
residential units; and,
f) the
Approval Authority BE DIRECTED to utilize, if possible, one agreement in place
of a separate development agreement, condominium agreement and servicing
agreement, to address the development of this site;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
Laverne
Kirkness, Kirkness Consulting Inc., on behalf of the applicant – expressing
support for the recommendation; expressing appreciation to the Civic
Administration for their efforts on this application; and advising that the
applicant will make the development beautiful. (2012-D11-06/D25-00)
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Councillors M. Brown and W.J. Armstrong leave
the meeting at 8:50 PM.
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clause 29.
29.
|
Property located at 2095 Coronation Drive
(Z-8076)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of Banman Developments (West) Inc., relating to the
property located at 2095 Coronation Drive:
a) the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Community Facility/Residential R1 (CF1/CF3/R1-13) Zone, which
permits churches, community centres, elementary schools, group homes,
libraries, post office depots, private schools, secondary schools, police
stations, public recreational buildings, public swimming pools, studios and
single detached dwellings TO a Holding Residential R5 Special Provision
(h.h-5.R5-5( )) Zone, to permit a cluster townhouse development with a reduced
front yard setback and maximum deck heights no higher than the first finished
floor level for each dwelling; it being noted that holding provisions require
that a development agreement be entered into, full municipal services, and the
holding of a public site plan meeting before the development can proceed;
b) the
Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to address the following design
objectives through the site plan application process:
i)
a
site plan and building elevations of a higher standard of design than shown in
the illustrations be submitted;
ii)
minimize
the number of points of egress and ingress to the site and at these points, use
building materials on the adjacent units to create a gateway effect;
iii)
no
garages fronting onto Coronation Drive;
iv) corner
units at the intersection of the private road and Coronation Drive to
incorporate the same building form, architectural elements, and materials as
those units seen from the street to create a gateway effect;
v) buildings
shall be located to frame the public park and architectural elements, such as
principal entrance doors and windows, are to be located on building facades
facing the park;
vi) fencing
around the perimeter of the park to be low in height and of a high quality e.g.
decorative black iron;
vii) internal
sidewalks around the perimeter of the park should connect with sidewalks in the
neighbourhood;
viii) landscape
features are recommended at entrances from the sidewalks into the public park;
ix) landscape
features to attenuate the visual effect of parking areas are to be provided;
x) pedestrian
access to the park at the end of the driveway into the neighbourhood should be
considered;
xi) landscaping
is to be provided on the west side of the site along Coronation Drive to
strengthen the street edge; it being noted that landscaping to screen the
parking area at the south driveway into the site should be provided;
xii) privacy
for residential properties to the north and east of the site should be
considered;
xiii) incorporate
architectural variations in the individual units of the elevations on the
street and park frontages;
xiv) limit
the maximum deck heights to no higher than the first finished floor level for each
dwelling; and,
xv) ensure
the property is graded to not flood the neighbouring properties;
it
being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received a
communication, dated November 26, 2012, from R. Knutson, Knutson Development Consultants
Inc., with respect to this matter;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
R.
Knutson, Knutson Development Consultants Inc., on behalf of the applicant –
expressing support for a majority of the Civic Administration’s recommendation;
indicating that he does not support part b) vi), by indicating that this is
modest, not upscale housing and the cost of the wrought iron fencing being
asked for by the City is three times the cost of the city standard fencing;
further indicating that he does not support part b) x), by indicating that the
public park will be connected to Coronation Street; noting that the townhouse
development is different than the current existing housing; and expressing
concern with the liability of having a public thoroughfare; requesting a legal
agreement; requesting that this be left as an open issue; indicating that the
sidewalk will end at the Park along Coronation Drive; advising that there will
be no sidewalk along the perimeter; indicating that there will be no finished
decks above the first finished floor; noting that some decks are walkout units
which caused privacy issues for the abutting neighbours; advising that the
setbacks have been reduced; indicating that there were a number of issues
raised at the community meeting; advising that the number of vacant condominium
units in the area are likely because they tried to hit the market too high;
advising that his client purchase the subject lands from West Park Baptist
Church; advising that the proposal is in accordance with the Hyde Park
Community Plan and the Official Plan; and indicating that the grading issues
will be dealt with by a stormwater management facility on the property.
·
M.
Enrices, Kimball Crescent – expressing opposition to the application;
indicating that he takes his grandson to the park; indicating that they
currently cross the empty lot without any problems; advising that he was expecting
to have a community centre, not more housing; indicating that he would rather
see a community centre built; advising that his church deals with troubled kids
from the area and provides them with healthy entertainment; indicating that he
received three parking tickets because he parked his work vehicle on the road
as he had nowhere else to park it; and reiterating that they work with kids
with social issues from the surrounding area and that a community centre would
be beneficial on this site.
·
Jeff
Whitney, 1828 Bayswater Crescent – advising that the neighbourhood has concerns
with this development; noting that privacy concerns are not identified;
indicating that the application has gone from nice iron fencing to low quality
fencing; enquiring as to where else the applicant is cutting costs; indicating
that they do not want raised decks so that no one is peering into their
backyards; enquiring why another medium-density development meetings to be
built in this area; noting that the intersection of Hyde Park Road and North
Rutledge Road has vacancies; further noting that only half of the lot on the
northwest corner is built and the other half is an eyesore; also noting that
the southwest corner was recently purchased by Palumbo Homes and it is not
complete; advising that most of these developments were started five to seven
years ago; and requesting that the existing vacant lands be utilized.
·
Tim
Boston, 1852 Bayswater Crescent – advising that the townhouses will be built
three feet onto his property from the south side; indicating that if he places
a laser level on the top of his fence, it is six and a half feet high; noting
that with a six foot fence, people will be peering over his fence; indicating
that he has had flooding issues; indicating that the city built a berm and
enquiring as to where the water is going to go if this development is built.
·
Andrew
Vamos, 1888 Bayswater Crescent – indicating that this subdivision consists of
single family detached homes; advising that the developer wants to install medium
density, attached homes in the middle of the subdivision; indicating that this
will detract from the makeup and style of the current housing; indicating that
the proposed development is a repetitive style and will change the
neighbourhood, as all the current houses are different; advising that this will
directly and indirectly affect the value of homes; expressing concern with the
volume of traffic; indicating that Hyde Park Road will not be expanded for
years; indicating that this proposal will put a lot of traffic through the core
of a residential subdivision; indicating that this will not fulfill the needs
of the community and requesting that the current zoning remain.
·
Ali
Medhi, 2055 North Routledge Park – advising that he has owned their residence for
two years; noting that he owns the third house from the corner; indicating that
it takes a few minutes every day to get out of his driveway; indicating that
you can sit in traffic on Hyde Park Road for 15 to 20 minutes any time of day;
enquiring as to where the neighbourhood children are going to go to school;
advising that he was informed that there would be no townhouses in the
subdivision; enquiring as to why 102 more townhouses are necessary; requesting
that the space be used as a community centre or turned into a park; and
indicating that if houses are built, they should be single family dwellings,
not medium density attached homes. (2012-D11-01)
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
|
At 8:52 PM Councillors W.J. Armstrong and M.
Brown enter the meeting.
Councillor D. Brown
presents.
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown to
Approve clauses 1 to 11, inclusive.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That the 3rd Report of the London Housing
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 14, 2012, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
of Municipal Housing, the following actions be taken:
a) Andover
Gardens Seniors Apartment Inc. BE APPROVED for an allocation of up to
$502,279 (incl. HST) for capital repairs at 1 Andover Drive in London, as
outlined in the report dated December 3, 2012; and,
b) the
funding allocation from the Social Housing Major Repairs and Upgrades
Stabilization Reserve Fund as set out in the Sources of Financing, appended
to the above-noted staff report, BE APPROVED. (2012F12-00)
|
4.
|
Purchase of Service Agreements - Ontario
Works Employment Assistance Services
|
That, on the recommendation of the Acting
Administrator of Ontario Works, a by-law substantially in the form attached,
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting of December 11, 2012 to:
a) approve the Ontario Works
Employment Assistance Services Agreements with:
• Collège Boréal, 355 Wellington
St, Unit 279, London, ON N6A 3N7;
• Daya Counselling Centre, 141
Dundas St, 6th floor, London, ON N6A 1G3;
• Goodwill Industries, Ontario
Great Lakes, 255 Horton St, London, ON N6B 1L1;
• Hutton
House Association for Adults with Disabilities, 654 Wonderland Rd N, London,
ON N6H 3E5;
• LEADS Employment Services
London Inc., 171 Queens Av, Ste 410, London, ON
• N6A 5J7;
• Literacy Link South Central,
255 Horton St, 3rd floor, London, ON N6B 1L1;
• LUSO Community Services, 1193
Oxford St E, Unit 2, London, ON N5Y 3M2;
• Nokee Kwe, 1069 Wellington Rd
S, Unit 104, London, ON N6E 2H6;
• Pathways
Skill Development & Placement Centre, 210 Dundas St, 2nd floor, London,
ON N6A 5J3
• Rehabilitation
Foundation for the Disabled (known as March of Dimes), 920 Commissioners Rd
E, London, ON N5Z 3J1;
• The
London Community Small Business Centre, Inc., 316 Rectory St, 3rd floor,
London, ON N5W 3V9;
• WIL
Counselling and Training for Employment, 141 Dundas St, 4th floor, London,
ON, N6A 5J3; and
• Youth Opportunities Unlimited,
141 Dundas St, 2nd floor, London, ON N6A 1G3;
b) authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the above-noted Ontario Works Employment
Assistance Services Agreements; and
c) authorize
the City Manager, or designate, to represent the City with respect to the
Ontario Works Employment Assistance Services Agreements. (2012-L03-00)
|
That the 4th Report of the London Diversity
and Race Relations Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 27,
2012, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of Tim Dobbie,
Consultant, the 2013-14 Community Accountability Planning Submission for
Dearness Home Adult Day Program and Homemaking Program, as appended to the
Report dated December 3, 2012, BE APPROVED for submission to the South West
Local Health Integration Network (LHIN); it being noted that it is a
requirement of the LHIN that the Planning Submission be approved by the Board
of Directors of the Home which is London City Council.
|
That, on the recommendation of Tim Dobbie,
Consultant, the 2013-2016 Long-Term Care Home Accountability Planning
Submission for Dearness Home, as appended to the original Report dated
December 3, 2012, BE APPROVED for submission to the South West Local Health
lntegration Network (LHIN); it being noted that it is a requirement of the
LHIN that the Planning Submission be approved by the Board of Directors of
the Home which is London City Council.
|
That Councillor B. Armstrong BE ELECTED
Vice Chair of the Community and Protective Services Committee, for the term
ending November 30, 2013.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 3rd Report of the Community Safety and Crime Prevention
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 22, 2012:
a) clause
1 BE REFERRED to the 2013 Budget process; it being noted that clause 1 reads
as follows:
“That the Municipal
Council BE REQUESTED to consider a $21,000 2013 Budget increase, to the
London Block Parent® Program, per year for 3 years, to accommodate the
additional office hours and staff required to the provide the new
re-screening process to its Block Parent families; it being noted that the
London Police Services previously provided this service for the Block Parent®
Program; it being further noted that the Community Safety and Crime
Prevention Advisory Committee (CSCP) reviewed and received a communication
and heard the attached presentation from G. McMahon, London
Block Parent®, with respect to this matter.”; and,
b) clauses 2 to 7, inclusive, BE
RECEIVED.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 4th Report of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee, from its
meeting held on November 1, 2012:
a) clause
1 BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for consideration in conjunction
with the previous direction of Council; it being noted that clause 1 reads as
follows:
“That the following
actions be taken with respect to wildlife and how it is considered and
accommodated in municipal planning and decisions, where existing wildlife
and/or habitat is potentially affected:
(a)
the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to research, consider and discuss humane
solutions from the simplest (e.g., install flow devices to allow water flow
through beaver dams) to the more comprehensive (e.g., expropriating or
purchasing land adjacent to rather than on natural heritage system land) so
that appropriate measures are taken;
(b)
the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to consult with the Environmental, Parks
and Planning Departments, including the City Ecologist, to ensure all
possible humane solutions are found; and,
(c)
the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to advise the Animal Welfare Advisory
Committee (AWAC) with respect to any actions arising from (a) or (b), above;
it being noted that
the AWAC reviewed and received a report from its Wildlife Subcommittee dated
November 1, 2012, with respect to this matter.”; and,
b) that clauses 2 to 10, inclusive,
BE RECEIVED.
|
That the inquiry of T. Vieira, with respect
to a request for delegation status related to licensing issues regarding
public garages, BE NOTED AND FILED; it being noted that the Community and
Protective Services Committee received a verbal update from the Manager II,
By-law Enforcement with respect to this matter.
|
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor P. Hubert calls for a separate vote on clause 4.
The motion to Approve clauses 1 to 11, excluding
clause 4, is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
The motion to Approve clause 4 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(13)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Councillor D.G.
Henderson presents.
Motion made by Councillor D.G. Henderson to
Approve clauses 1 to 13, except clauses 4 and 5.
That it BE NOTED that the following
pecuniary interests were disclosed:
a) Councillor
J.B. Swan discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 2013 Budget
that relate to Orchestra London by indicating that Orchestra London is his
employer. Councillor J.B. Swan further discloses a pecuniary interest in any
fees and charges related to Centennial Hall as his employer rents space from
Centennial Hall.
b) Councillor
D. Brown discloses a pecuniary interest those parts of the 2013 Budget that
relate to the London Transit Commission by indicating that her employer has a
contract with the London Transit Commission.
c) Councillor
P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 2013 Budget
that relate to Ontario Works by indicating that he is the Executive Director
of a social services agency that has dealings with Ontario Works.
d) Councillor
S. White discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 2013 Budget
that relate to London CAReS by indicating that her employer is currently in
negotiations with WOTCH, which receives funding from the City of London.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director of Neighbourhood, Children’s and Fire Services, and at the request
of Council on October 30, 2012, the following actions be taken with respect
to the Service London initiative:
a) the staff report dated December
4, 2012 BE RECEIVED for information, and
b) as
recommended to the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee on October 29,
2012, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with the first three
years of the attached Service London Implementation Plan,
including the creation of a temporary Service London Office to implement the
Plan; it being noted that this can be accommodated through the already
committed one-time funding of $2.3 million and no new funding is being
requested at this time.
|
That the presentation by the City Manager
and the Manager, Corporate Initiatives, with respect to the 2012 Report to
the Community BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Corporate Communications, the following actions be taken with
respect to the work of the Community Engagement Task Force (CETF):
a) the
attached final recommendations of the CETF BE REFERRED to the
Civic Administration for review and consideration; and
b) the
members of the CETF BE THANKED for their efforts in concluding the tasks
assigned by the Municipal Council.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning & City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to ReThink London:
a) the
draft Values, Vision Statement and Directions, attached hereto
BE ENDORSED in principle,
b) the
staff report dated December 4, 2012 on the status of ReThink London Community
London BE RECEIVED; and
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to continue to engage the public to solicit
feedback on the draft Values, Vision Statement and Directions;
it being noted that the Strategic
Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation
from the Managing Director, Planning & City Planner, the Manager III,
Land Use Planning Policy, and the Manager, Urban Design, with respect to this
matter.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken:
a) the
implementation of the Official Plan growth management policies applicable to
the financing of growth-related infrastructure works the Growth Management
Implementation Strategy Update BE APPROVED as attached in Appendix
“A”, it being noted that:
i) this
strategy will provide direction on future development applications and be
used as a guidance document for the 2014 Development Charge By-law update
process; and
ii) the
Growth Management Implementation Strategy will be used to adjust the 10-year
Capital Program for growth infrastructure;
b) the
emerging possibility of large scale deferrals of SWM ponds or an increase in
the stormwater management component of the development charge as a result of
a deteriorating position of the Development Charge SWM Reserve Fund BE NOTED,
and that staff BE ENCOURAGED to continue to monitor the situation, develop
alternative financing approaches through the ongoing work on the 2014
Development Charge study and report back in early 2013 in conjunction with
other Development Charge policy review matters;
it being noted that the Strategic
Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation
from the Director, Development Finance, with respect to this matter.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken regarding
the Industrial Lands Review:
a) the
Industrial Lands Study, dated November 2012, and the associated staff report
dated December 4, 2012 BE RECEIVED for information, and this information BE
CIRCULATED for public and agency consultation; and
b) following
a public consultation process, Planning staff BE DIRECTED to prepare an
Official Plan Amendment for the expansion of the Urban Growth Area for the
designation of approximately 500 hectares of new Urban Reserve Industrial
Growth lands;
it being noted that the Strategic
Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation
from Managing Director, Planning and City Planner and the Manager III, Land
Use Planning Policy with respect to this matter.
|
That the following individuals BE APPOINTED
to the Argyle BIA Board of Management for the term ending November 30, 2014:
• Councillor B. Armstrong
• Jeff, Baggaley - Color Company
• Brendan Colafranceschi - The
Co-operators
• Scott Coulter - Coulter's
Pharmacy
• Sandy Desmarais - CIBC
Securities Inc
• Peter DeMelo - Subway
• Elissa Ielapi - Libro Financial
Group
• Brock Merrifield - Staples
Canada Inc
• Bill Ross - M&M Meat Shops
|
11.
|
Appointment Recommendations for the London
Convention Centre Board of Directors
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to appointments to the London Convention Centre (LCC) Board of
Directors:
a) a second 3-year
term for Jeannine Cookson, Fanshawe College and Dr. Ted Hewitt, UWO for the
first two-years of the second term to run until November 30, 2014 BE
APPROVED;
b) a second 2-year
term for Michael Seabrook, CEO of the London International Airport for 2013
to November 30, 2014 BE APPROVED; and
c) the
appointment of Stephen Peters to the London Convention Centre Board of
Directors for an initial two year term effective January 1, 2013 to November
30, 2014 BE APPROVED.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Municipal Council’s appointment to the London Police Services
Board:
a) the
communication dated November 22, 2012 from M. Deeb, Chair, London Police
Services Board regarding the resignation of Mayor J. F. Fontana from
the London Police Services Board BE RECEIVED; and
b) Councillor
D. Brown BE APPOINTED to fill the vacancy on the London Police Services Board
arising from the resignation of Mayor J.F. Fontana
|
That, on the recommendation of the London
International Airport Board of Directors, the current appointment of Jeff
Brown BE EXTENDED for two years effective August, 2014.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
The motion to Approve clause 4 is put.
4.
|
Tabling of the 2013 Draft Budget
|
That the 2013 Draft Budget BE RECEIVED and
BE REFERRED to the 2013 Budget review process; it being noted that the
Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached
presentation from the Managing Director, Corporate Services & City
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and the Director, Financial Planning and
Policy, with respect to this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The motion to Approve clause 5 is put.
5.
|
Amendments to Consolidated Fees and Charges
By-law
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and
City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the attached proposed
by-law (Appendix “A”) BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on
December 11, 2012 for the purpose of repealing By-law No. A-42, as amended,
being “A by-law to provide for Various Fees and Charges” and replacing it
with a new Fees and Charges By-law that updates, adds and increases certain
fees and charges for services or activities provided by the City of London;
it being noted that there were no members of the public in attendance to
speak to the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee, at the public hearing
associated with the Amendments to Consolidated Fees and Charges By-law; it
being further noted that Page 2 of the staff report related to this matter
was replaced with a revised Page 2.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.L. Baechler (1)
|
At 9:06 PM Councillor S. Orser leaves the
meeting.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor H.L. Usher calls for a separate vote on clause 11.
The motion to Approve clause 11 is put.
11.
|
Appointment Recommendations for the London
Convention Centre Board of Directors
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to appointments to the London Convention Centre (LCC) Board of
Directors:
a) a
second 3-year term for Jeannine Cookson, Fanshawe College and Dr. Ted Hewitt,
UWO for the first two-years of the second term to run until November 30, 2014
BE APPROVED;
b) a second 2-year
term for Michael Seabrook, CEO of the London International Airport for 2013
to November 30, 2014 BE APPROVED; and
c) the
appointment of Stephen Peters to the London Convention Centre Board of
Directors for an initial two year term effective January 1, 2013 to November
30, 2014 BE APPROVED.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
At 9:10 PM Councillor S. Orser enters the
meeting.
Councillor J.B. Swan
presents.
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan to
Approve clauses 1 – 10, except clauses 7 and 8.
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor J.B. Swan
disclosed a pecuniary interest in Item #7 and Item #8 of this Report having
to do with the Grand Theatre Proposal and the Music London Initiative by
indicating that both are related to a proposed concert hall in the Downtown
Core, which relates to his employer, Orchestra London.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
of Corporate Investments and Partnerships, the updated investment and
economic prosperity proposal assessment plan BE ENDORSED, in order to guide
the timeline by which proposals will be evaluated and the process by which
selected proposals will evolve from ideas to executable projects; it being
noted that Mr. Filger gave the attached presentation with
respect to this matter.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Chief
Technology Officer and the Managing Director, Development and Compliance
Services and Chief Building Official, the staff report dated November 27,
2012, with respect to guidelines for establishing a small business, BE
RECEIVED for information.
|
That the 2nd Report of the London Diversity
& Race Relations Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on October 18,
2012, BE RECEIVED.
|
That the 3rd Report of the Creative City
Committee, from its meeting held on October 10, 2012, BE RECEIVED.
|
6.
|
Ontario Concrete Pipe Association
|
|
That the communication dated October 5,
2012, from H. Brown, President, Brown & Cohen Communications & Public
Affairs, BE NOTED AND FILED and Mr. Brown BE ADVISED that while the City is
always interested in potential economic development opportunities, any
discussions will have to wait until after the City of London’s 2013 Budget
deliberations have concluded; it being noted that discussions may also take
place with other industry and technology representatives.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Social Innovation
Shared Space Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That the communication from Pillar
Nonprofit Network, with respect to a Social Innovation Shared Space proposal,
BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for review and assessment in
developing its report back on the various investment and economic prosperity
proposals.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Councillor D.G.
Henderson - Survey - Development Proposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor D.G.
Henderson advised the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee that he is
surveying developers to see what proposals they might be able to bring
forward to add to the list of investment and economic prosperity proposals,
at no cost to the City, in order to further London’s economic position.
|
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor H.L. Usher calls for a separate vote on clauses 6
and 10.
The motion to Approve clauses 1 to 5,
inclusive and clause 9 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
The motion to Approve clause 6 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
The motion to Approve clause 10 is put.
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: P. Hubert, H.L. Usher (2)
The motion to Approve clauses 7 and 8 is put.
7.
|
Grand Theatre Proposal
|
That the communication dated November 15,
2012, with respect to the Grand Theatre’s proposal for a Downtown concert
hall, BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for review and assessment in
developing its report back on the various investment and economic prosperity
proposals.
|
8.
|
Music London Initiative
|
That the communication dated November 22,
2012, with respect to Orchestra London’s proposal for a Downtown concert
hall, BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for review and assessment in
developing its report back on the various investment and economic prosperity
proposals.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
Councillor P. Hubert
presents.
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert to
Approve clauses 1 to 5, inclusive.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services & City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer
and the Managing Director, Environmental & Engineering Services &
City Engineer the following actions be taken with respect to brownfields
management :
a) the
report dated November 29, 2012 with respect to this matter BE RECEIVED for
information;
b) the
next steps to be undertaken as contained in the above-noted report, BE
ENDORSED; and
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to submit a report to the Audit Committee in
November 2013, providing a further update on this matter.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Quarterly Report on Internal Audit Results, dated November 29,
2012, from PricewaterhouseCoopers:
a) Expenditure
Approval and Payment – the Action Plans included as Appendix ‘A’ of the
above-noted report BE IMPLEMENTED; and,
b) the
remaining two 2012 internal audit projects, Succession Planning and Payroll
Administration, BE RECOMMENDED for presentation at the Audit Committee
meeting to be scheduled for January 2013; it being noted that January 31,
2013 was suggested as a meeting date.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Audit
Committee, the City Manager and the Audit Chair BE REQUESTED to jointly
approach the City of London’s Boards and Commissions to:
a) request
and encourage the Boards and Commissions to engage the services of
PricewaterhouseCoopers for the purpose of an internal audit of their existing
processes, under the City’s existing terms of engagement and at the City’s
expense, subject to:
i)
annual
budget availability;
ii)
submission of detailed requests to the City of London’s Audit Committee; and,
iii)
prioritization of the annual audit plan by the City of London’s Audit
Committee; and
b) suggest
that any operational savings resulting from an internal audit of a board or
commission be returned to the City of London to assist in covering the costs
of the audit and, where there are “go-forward” savings, to reduce the overall
budget of the Board or Commission;
it being noted that the Middlesex London
Housing Corporation recently undertook such an audit and is reviewing the
potential implementation of the recommendations and the associated
cost-savings.
|
That the attached KPMG LLP
Audit Planning Report, for the year ending December 31, 2012, BE APPROVED; it
being noted that, as required, the Members of the Audit Committee noted no
instances of, actual, suspected or alleged fraud or non-compliance with laws
and regulations, including misconduct or unethical behaviour related to
financial reporting or misappropriation of assets.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: J.B. Swan (1)
Councillor J.P.
Bryant presents.
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant to
Approve clauses 1 to 4, inclusive.
|
1.
|
Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest
|
That
it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Municipal Infrastructure
Investment Initiative (MIII) – Capital Program; it being noted that eligible
recipients may receive contributions up to a maximum of 90% of the project or
$2 million (whichever is less) under this Program:
a) the
Expression of Interest included as Appendix A to the staff report dated
December 11, 2012 BE APPROVED for submission under the Municipal
Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) – Capital Program; and
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to submit necessary applications and
prepare any necessary by-laws regarding projects that are approved for
funding under the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Initiative (MIII) –
Capital Program.
|
That Councillor J.P. Bryant BE ELECTED as
Vice Chair of the Corporate Services Committee for the term ending
November 30, 2013.
|
That the following
actions be taken with respect to the Minutes of the 1st Meeting of the
County/City Liaison Committee:
a) the
following actions be taken with respect to cost apportionment arrangements
for social housing and land ambulance, renewal of agreements for the delivery
of child care and Ontario Works and compensation for County roads:
i) the Civic Administration for
the City of London BE DIRECTED to continue to meet to negotiate a
potential resolution towards renewing the service agreements between the
County and the City for Social Housing, Ontario Works, Child Care and Land
Ambulance services; and
ii) consent BE GIVEN to mediation, if necessary,
prior to taking any steps toward arbitration, with a view to a potential
resolution towards renewing the service agreements between the County and the
City for Social Housing, Ontario Works, Child Care and Land Ambulance
services;
it being noted that
the County/City Liaison Committee heard a presentation from the Chief
Administrative Officer for the County of Middlesex and received a City of
London staff report dated May 7, 2012, addressed to the City of London’s
Finance and Administrative Services Committee, with respect to this matter;
b) the
County/City Liaison Committee’s terms of reference BE AMENDED to provide
for a minimum of two meetings per year; and
c) clauses 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 BE
RECEIVED;
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
1st Report of the Committee of the Whole
|
Councillor H.L Usher
presents.
PRESENT: Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and
C. Saunders (City Clerk).
ABSENT: N. Branscombe
ALSO PRESENT: A, Zuidema, J.P. Barber, G.
Belch, J. Braam, B. Coxhead, T.L, Dobbie (Tim L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd.) M.
Hayward, V. McAlea Major and L.M. Rowe.
Councillor H.L. Usher reports progress with
respect to the following matters:
a)
|
A matter pertaining to personal matters
about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees
relating to the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal.
|
b)
|
A matter pertaining to litigation currently
before the Ontario Court of Justice, pertaining to charges under the Environmental
Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E. 19, as amended related to the Greenway
WPCC or potential litigation affecting the municipality and arising of the
aforementioned litigation; and advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose. (CWC)
|
c)
|
A matter pertaining to personal matters
about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees
relating to the 2013 Mayor’s New Year’s Honour List. (PEC)
|
d)
|
A matter pertaining to personal matters
involving identifiable individuals who are municipal employees with respect
to employment related matters. (FASC)
|
e)
|
A matter pertaining to reports, advice and
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation, concerning
labour relations and employee negotiations in regard to one of the
Corporation's associations or unions and litigation or potential litigation,
including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the
municipality. (FASC)
|
f)
|
A matter pertaining to personal information
about identifiable individuals including municipal employees, with respect to
employment-related matters; advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; advice or
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation, including
communications necessary for that purposes; and for the purpose of providing
instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation.
(FASC)
|
g)
|
A matter pertaining to advice and
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation concerning
labour relations and employee negotiations relating to one of the
Corporation's associations or unions. (FASC)
|
i)
|
A personal matter pertaining to
identifiable individual, including municipal employees, with respect to the
2013 Mayor's New Years Honour List. (IEPC)
|
j)
|
A personal matter pertaining to
identifiable individual, including municipal employees, with respect to the
2013 Mayor's New Years Honour List. (IEPC)
|
l)
|
A matter pertaining to litigation or
potential litigation affecting the municipality; advice subject to
solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that
purpose, as it relates to leave of absence for a Member of Council.
|
1.
|
Organizational Matters Update
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher that,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239 (6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services & Chief Human Resources Officer, the
contract with Tim L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd, dated August 13, 2012, BE AMENDED
to increase the amount payable under the contract by up to an additional
$75,000, exclusive of HST, and to extend the term of the contract for an
additional three months up to June 13, 2013;
it being noted that the Finance and
Administrative Services Committee heard a verbal update from the Managing
Director, Corporate Services & Chief Human Resources Officer and T.L.
Dobbie, Tim L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd. with respect to organizational matters.
|
2.
|
Update Dearness Matters
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher that, as
a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239 (6) of the Municipal Act, 2001,
the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for deliberation and
a vote in public session:
That, on the recommendation of the Civic
Administration, the following actions be taken with respect to the Dearness
Home:
i)
the
City Clerk BE DIRECTED to bring forward, in public session, for consideration
by the Municipal Council at its meeting on December 11, 2012, by-laws to:
A)
approve
an Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and peopleCare Inc.,
28 William Street North, Tavistock, Ontario, N0B 2R0 to provide operational
consulting services up to March 31, 2013, at a cost of $25,000.00 per month,
plus HST and disbursements, substantially in the form attached, and to
delegate authority to the City Manager to provide written notice of termination
of this Agreement pursuant to the termination provisions of the Agreement;
B)
approve
the Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and peopleCare
Inc., 28 William Street North, Tavistock, Ontario, N0B 2R0 to provide the
services of an Administrator up to March 31, 2013, at a cost of $15,000.00 per
month, plus HST and disbursements, substantially in the form attached,
and to delegate authority to the City Manager to provide written notice of
termination of this Agreement pursuant to the termination provisions of the
Agreement; and
ii)
the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with the Agreements noted above; and
iii)
the
sources of funding for the Agreements outlined above, estimated at a maximum
cost of $175,000.00, including HST, BE APPROVED as a drawdown from the
Operating Budget Contingency Reserve.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
None.
None.
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve leave to introduce a
motion related to a reception for the presentation of the Queen's Diamond
Jubilee medals pursuant to section 11.4 of the Council Procedure By-law.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
At 9:40 PM Councillor W.J. Armstrong leaves
the meeting.
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve that the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to
make the necessary arrangements to hold a reception, prior to February 28,
2013, to present Queen’s Diamond Jubilee medals to all recipients nominated
by by Municipal Council.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND
THIRD TIME:
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve 1st reading of Bill No. 31.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: M. Brown (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve 2nd reading of Bill No. 31.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: M. Brown (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve 3rd reading and enactment of Bill
No. 31.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: M. Brown (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve 1st reading of Bill No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Orser and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve 2nd reading of Bill No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Orser and seconded
by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve 3rd reading and enactment of Bill
No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve leave to introduce the added
by-laws.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve 1st reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2, 4
to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Approve 2nd reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2,
4 to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve 3rd reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2, 4
to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: S. Orser (1)
|
The following by-laws are passed and enacted
as by-laws of The Corporation of the City of London:
Bill No. 1
By-law No. A.-6892-1
|
A by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council Meeting held
on the 11th day of December, 2012. (City Clerk)
|
Bill No. 2
By-law No. A.-6151(f)-2
|
A By-law to amend
By-law A.-6151-17, being a by-law to establish policies for the sale and
other disposition of land, hiring of employees, procurement of goods and
services, public notice, accountability and transparency, and delegation of powers and duties, as required under section 270(1) of the Municipal Act, 2001. (2/32/FASC)
|
Bill No. 3
By-law No. A.-6893-3
|
A By-law to approve
Agreements for Ontario Works Employment Assistance Services with 13
corporations. (4/1/CPSC)
|
Bill No. 4
By-law No. A-46
|
A by-law to provide
for Various Fees and Charges. (5/1/SPPC)
|
Bill No. 5
By-law No. C.P.-1284(sw)-4
|
A by-law to amend
the Official Plan for the City of London Planning Area, 1989. (7/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 6
By-law No. PS-111-13116
|
A
by-law to amend By-law PS-111 entitled, “A by-law to regulate traffic and the
parking of motor vehicles in the City of London.” (4/1/CWC)
|
Bill No. 7
By-law No. S.-5494-5
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (as part of Blackacres Boulevard, west of Thackerey Place) (Chief
Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 8
By-law No. S.-5495-6
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (as part of Callingham Drive, west of Quarrier Road) (Chief
Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 9
By-law No. S.-5496-7
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (as widening to Trafalgar Street, east of Hamilton Road and as
widening to Hamilton Road, east of Trafalgar Street) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 10
By-law No. S.-5497-8
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (as widening to Commissioners Road East, at Frontenac Road) (Chief
Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 11
By-law No. S.-5498-9
|
A by-law
to lay out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of London as public highway. (as part of Sumac
Way, west of Warbler Woods Walk) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 12
By-law No. S.-5499-10
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (for the purposes of a public highway for pedestrian use only, west
of Ballymote Avenue) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 13
By-law No. S.5500-11
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (for the purposes of a public highway for pedestrian use only, east
of Callingham Drive) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 14
By-law No. S.-5501-12
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public
highway. (for the purposes of a public highway for pedestrian use only,
between Silverfox Drive and Silverfox Crescent) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 15
By-law No. S.-5502-13
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish
and assume lands in the City of London as public highway. (as widening to
Fanshawe Park Road East, west of Adelaide Street North) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 16
By-law No. S.-5503-14
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of London as public highway. (as part of Elson
Road, west of Smither Road) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 17
By-law No. S.-5504-15
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish
and assume lands in the City of London as public highway. (for the purposes
of a public highway for pedestrian use only, south of Singleton Avenue) (Chief
Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 18
By-law No. W.-5329-16
|
A by-law to authorize
the the SWM Facilities – Fox Hollow 1 (Project No. ES3020-FH1) (5/17/CWC)
|
Bill No. 19
By-law No. W.-5330-17
|
A by-law to authorize
the the SWM Facilities – Fox Hollow 3 (Project No. ES3020-FH3) (5/17/CWC)
|
Bill No. 20
By-law No. W-7-13008
|
A by-law to amend
By-law W-7 entitled, “A by-law to provide for the setting of rates and
charges for water supply in the City of London.” (11/1/CWC)
|
Bill No. 21
By-law No. WM-26-13011
|
A
by-law to amend By-law WM-26 entitled, “A by-law to establish the Schedule of
Sewer System Fees and Charges.” (11/1/CWC)
|
Bill No. 22
By-law No. W.M.-11-18
|
A bylaw to
authorize the the
construction of a watermain along a portion of Fanshawe
Park Road East from Highbury Avenue to 375 meters east of Fanshawe Park Road
East
as a local improvement pursuant to section 5 of Ontario Regulation 586/06
under the Municipal Act, 2001. (City Engineer)
|
Bill No. 23
By-law No. Z.-1-132151
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to remove the holding provision from the zoning on a portion
of the land located at 890 Southdale Road West. (11/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 24
By-law No. Z.-1-132152
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to remove the holding provisions from the zoning for an area
of land located at 1480 and 1552 Riverbend Road. (12/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 25
By-law No. Z.-1-132153
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to remove holding provisions from the zoning for a portion of
land located at 311-319 Wharncliffe Road North. (13/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 26
By-law No. Z.-1-132154
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to remove the holding provisions from the zoning on the land
located at 3455
Morgan Crescent. (14/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 27
By-law No. Z.-1-132155
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to remove holding provisions from the zoning for a portion of
land located at 160 Sunningdale Road West. (15/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 28
By-law No. Z.-1-132156
|
A by-law
to extend the Temporary Use of an area of land located at 195 Dundas Street.
(22/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 29
By-law No. Z.-1-132157
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 510, 518 and 526
Southdale Road East. (25/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 30
By-law No. Z.-1-132158
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1205
Riverside Drive. (26/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 31
By-law No. Z.-1-132159
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 2095 Coronation
Drive. (29/30/PEC)
|
Bill No. 32
By-law No. A.- 6737(a)-19
|
A By-law
to amend By-law No. A.-6737-305 Entitled “A by-law to delegate powers to the
Executive Director of Planning, Environmental and Engineering Services to
prepare and submit bids to provide Blue Box processing services to other
municipalities.” (17/1/CWC)
|
Bill No. 33
By-law No. A.-6894-20
|
A by-law
respecting an Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and
peopleCare Inc. for the provision of the services of an Administrator for the
Dearness Home. (7/1/CW)
|
Bill No. 34
By-law No. A.-6895-21
|
A by-law
respecting an Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and peopleCare
Inc. for the provision of consulting services to the Dearness Home. (7/1/CW)
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Adjourn.
Motion Passed
The meeting adjourned at 9:55 PM.
_________________________________
Joe
Fontana, Mayor
_________________________________
Catharine
Saunders, City Clerk