|
Recommendation: That, the following
actions be taken with respect to the 7th and 8th Reports of the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) from its meetings held on June 11, 2014
and July 9, 2014, respectively:
a) on the
recommendation of the Director of Land Use Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application of Greta Ton Swart requesting permission for changes to the
windows of the designated heritage property located at 314 Grosvenor Street
BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the
proposed window alteration and has advised that the impact of such alteration
on the heritage features of the property identified in the reasons for
designation is negligible; it being further noted that the LACH reviewed and
received a report dated June 11, 2014, from the Managing Director, Planning
and City Planner and heard a verbal delegation from G. Swart, property owner,
with respect to these matters;
b) that
clause 2 of the 7th Report of the LACH, relating to the proposed demolition
of the property located at 646 Dingman Drive, BE REFERRED for consideration
with clause 25 of the 13th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee;
Clause
2 reads as follows:
“That the following actions be taken with respect to the
demolition of the building located at 646 Dingman Drive:
a)
the Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) does not object to the demolition of
the building located at 646 Dingman Drive and do not recommend designation;
and,
b)
the property owners BE REQUESTED to salvage any heritage
materials for reuse.”;
c) notice
of the Municipal Council's intention to designate the property located at
1156 Dundas Street (McCormick’s Factory) to be of cultural heritage value or
interest BE GIVEN, for the revised reasons, as appended to the 7th Report of
the London Advisory Committee on Heritage Report, under the provisions of
Section 29(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18;
d) the
revised report dated July 3, 2014, prepared by the LACH Planning and Policy
Sub-Committee, with respect to comments relating to The London Plan, BE
FORWARDED to the Civic Administration for consideration;
e) that
part a) of clause 2 of the 8th Report of the LACH BE REFERRED for
consideration with clause 26 of the Planning and Environment Committee; it
being noted that part a) of clause 2 reads as follows:
“the
following actions be taken with respect to the Stewardship Sub-Committee
Report from its meeting held in June 2014:
a) the
Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the LACH reviewed the heritage
attributes of the residential structure at 1057 Richmond Street and noted
that the building was not worthy of designation, either for its historical or
architectural attributes; it being noted that the LACH indicated that it
objects to the demolition of a structural sound and functional listed
property without a development proposal in place; and,”
f) the
notice of the Municipal Council’s intention to designate the property located
at 273 Regent Street to be of cultural heritage value or interest BE GIVEN
for the revised reasons, as appended to the 8th Report of the LACH, under the
provisions of Section 29(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.
O. 18;
g) the
report dated July 9, 2014, from the Managing Director, Planning and City
Planner, with respect to the Heritage Alteration Permit Application from the Ontario
Dental Nurses Association for the designated property located at 869-871
Dundas Street BE DEFERRED to a future meeting of LACH, to allow the
applicant/ representative to present further information with respect to these
matters;
h) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit Application by
the City of London, for the property located at 1017 Western Road (Grosvenor
Lodge) BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the
proposed alteration and has advised that the impact of such an alteration on
the heritage features identified in the reasons for designation is negligible;
i) on the
recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the
advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect
to the Heritage Alteration Application of T. Kingsmill, for the properties
located at 126, 128, 130 and 132 Dundas Street and 129 Carling Street:
i) the
heritage alteration application by T. Kingsmill for the above-noted
properties BE APPROVED;
ii) prior
to any demolition or construction activity, a detailed interior and exterior
photo documentation of the existing buildings BE COMPLETED; and,
iii) a
detailed conservation plan BE DEVELOPED AND SUBMITTED to the City’s
Heritage Planner to assist in the monitoring of the conservation of the front
façade of 126, 128, 130 and 132 Dundas Street;
it being
noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposal and has advised
that the impact of such alteration on the heritage features identified in the
reasons for designation is sympathetic to the identified heritage features
and is supported by the Downtown Heritage Conservation District’s Principles,
Goals and Objectives; it being further noted that the LACH received a copy of
the Proposed Adaptive Reuse of Kingsmill Building by Kingsmill and Fanshawe
College, and heard a presentation from T. Kingsmill, Property Owner, V. Cote,
Trinity Consulting and L. Axford, AMEC, with respect to these matters;
j) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with
the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit
Application by T. Hill and P. Morgan, for the property located at 434 English
Street BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the
proposal and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage
features would see the restoration of heritage character to the residence; it
being noted that the LACH heard a verbal report from T. Hill, property owner,
with respect to these matters;
k) the
Civic
Administration BE ASKED to request a Heritage Impact Assessment for the
property located 510 Central Avenue, as the property is adjacent to the East
Woodfield Heritage Conservation District; it being noted that the LACH
reviewed and received a Notice dated June 12, 2014, from B. Debbert, Senior
Planner, with respect to an application submitted by 2353034 Ontario Limited,
relating to the properties located at 609 William Street and 510 Central
Avenue;
l) the
LACH heard a verbal delegation from A. Beaton and M. Tovey, with respect to
an update on the St. George-Grosvenor Heritage Conservation District and
public meeting;
m) that
clauses 4 to 13, inclusive, of the 7th Report of the LACH BE RECEIVED; and,
n) that
clauses 9 to 16, inclusive, of the 8th Report of the LACH BE RECEIVED;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from W. Kinghorn, Chair,
LACH, with respect to these matters.
|