Planning and Environment Committee

Report

9th Meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee
-
2021 Meeting - Virtual Meeting during the COVID-19 Emergency
Please check the City website for current details of COVID-19 service impacts.
Meetings can be viewed via live-streaming on YouTube and the City website
PRESENT:
  • Councillors P. Squire (Chair),
  • S. Lewis,
  • S. Lehman,
  • A. Hopkins,
  • S. Hillier,
  • and Mayor E. Holder
ALSO PRESENT:
  • H. Lysynski, M. Ribera and C. Saunders

     

    Remote Attendance: Deputy Mayor J. Morgan and Councillors M. Cassidy, J. Helmer, E. Peloza and M. van Holst; G. Barrett, J. Dann, B. Debbert, L. Dent, M. Feldberg, J. Gardiner, K. Gonyou, M. Greguol, P. Kavcic, P. Kokkoros, G. Kotsifas, L. Maitland, C. Maton, H. McNeely, L. Mottram, B. Page, M. Pease, D. Popadic, A. Riley, M. Schulthess, B. Somers, M. Tomazincic and P. Yeoman

    The meeting is called to order at 4:00 PM, with Councillor P. Squire in the Chair, Councillor S. Lewis present and all other Members participating by remote attendance


That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That Items 2.1 to 2.6, inclusive, BE APPROVED.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, based on the application by Ironstone, relating to the property located at 234 Edgevalley Road, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “A” BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R5/Residential R6 (h*R5-7/R6-5) Zone TO a Residential R5/Residential R6 (R5-7/R6-5) Zone to remove the “h” holding provision. (2021-D09)




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to entering into a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Southside Construction Management Limited, for the subdivision of land over Concession 1, Part Lot 44, situated on the east side of Boler Road, north of Southdale Road West, municipally known as 704 and 706 Boler Road:

    a) the Special Provisions, to be contained in a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Southside Construction Management Limited, for the Boler Heights Subdivision (39T-15503) appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “A”, BE APPROVED;

    b) the Applicant BE ADVISED that Development Finance has summarized the claims and revenues appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “B”; and,

    c) the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute this Agreement, any amending agreements and all documents required to fulfill its conditions. (2021-D12)




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to entering into a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London, Landea North Developments Inc. and Landea Developments Inc., for the subdivision of land over Part Lot 22, Concession 5 (Township of London), City of London, County of Middlesex, situated on the north side of Bridgehaven Drive, south of Sunningdale Road West, west of Applerock Avenue, municipally known as 1196 Sunningdale Road West:

    a) the Special Provisions, to be contained in a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London, Landea North Developments Inc. and Landea Developments Inc., for the Creekview Subdivision Phase 4 (39T-05512_4) appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “A”, BE APPROVED;

    b) the Applicant BE ADVISED that Development Finance has summarized the claims and revenues appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “B”;

    c) the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “C”; and,

    d)  the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute this Agreement, any amending agreements and all documents required to fulfill its conditions. (2021-D12)




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, based on the application by Foxwood Developments (London) Inc, relating to the property located at 1600 Twilite Boulevard, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix “A” BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15th, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R1 (h*h-100*R1-4) and (h*h-100*R1-13) Zones TO a Residential R1 (R1-4) and (R1-13)) Zones to remove the “h and h-100” holding provisions. (2021-D09)




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That the Building Division Monthly Report for March, 2021 BE RECEIVED for information. (2021-A23)




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That the 4th Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on May 20, 2021 BE RECEIVED for information.




    Motion Passed
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:E. Holder

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the application by Incon Developments Ltd., relating to the lands located at 349 Southdale Road East:

    a) the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Residential R3 (R3-3) Zone TO a Residential R6 (R6-5) Zone to permit cluster housing in the form of townhouse dwelling units with a maximum density of 34 units per hectare; and,

    b)  the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the following issues were raised at the public meeting with respect to the application for Draft Plan of Vacant Land Condominium relating to the property located at 349 Southdale Road East:

     

    i)  safety;

    ii)  privacy;

    iii) tree ownership on the property line; and,

    iv)  possible removal of the chain link fence;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter.  (2021-D09)


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Hillier
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, based on the application by Connor Wilks c/o Thames Village Joint Venture Group, relating to the lands located at 1752 – 1754 Hamilton Road, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix ‘A’ BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Residential R1 (R1-14) Zone TO a Holding Residential R1 (h•h-100•R1-3) Zone;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter;

    it being further noted that the Municipal Council approves this application for the following reasons:

     

    • the recommended zoning by-law amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement;
    • the recommended zoning conforms to the in-force polices of The London Plan, including but not limited to the Neighbourhoods Place Type, Our Strategy, City Building and Design, Our Tools, and all other applicable London Plan policies;
    • the recommended zoning conforms to the policies of the (1989) Official Plan, including but not limited to the Multi-Family, Medium Density Residential designation; and,
    • the zoning will permit single detached dwellings which are considered appropriate and compatible with existing and future land uses in the surrounding area, and consistent with the zoning that was applied to the adjacent draft-approved plan of subdivision. (2021-D09) 


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following properties BE REMOVED from the Register of Cultural Heritage Resources:


    a) 1033-1037 Dundas Street
    b) 1 Kennon Place
    c) 19 Raywood Avenue
    d) 32 Wellington Road
    e) 34 Wellington Road
    f) 90 Wellington Road
    g) 98 Wellington Road
    h) 118 Wellington Road
    i) 120 Wellington Road
    j) 122 Wellington Road
    k) 126 Wellington Road
    l) 134 Wellington Road
    m) 136 Wellington Road
    n) 138 Wellington Road
    o) 140 Wellington Road
    p) 142 Wellington Road
    q) 166 Wellington Road
    r) 220 Wellington Road
    s) 247 Wellington Road
    t) 249 Wellington Road
    u) 251 Wellington Road
    v) 253-255 Wellington Road
    w) 261 Wellington Road
    x) 263 Wellington Road
    y) 265 Wellington Road
    z) 267 Wellington Road
    aa) 269 Wellington Road
    bb) 271 Wellington Road
    cc) 273 Wellington Road
    dd) 275 Wellington Road
    ee) 285 Wellington Road
    ff) 287 Wellington Road
    gg) 289 Wellington Road
    hh) 297 Wellington Road
    ii) 301 Wellington Road
    jj) 327 Wellington Road
    kk) 331 Wellington Road
    ll) 333 Wellington Road
    mm) 72 Wellington Street
    nn) 44 Wharncliffe Road North;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter. (2021-R01) 


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (6)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, E. Holder, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (6 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, the following actions be taken with respect to the application by 2445727 Ontario Inc. (Phil Pattyn), relating to the property located at 16 Wethered Street:

     

    a)  the application by 2445727 Ontario Inc. (Phil Pattyn), relating to the property located at 16 Wethered Street BE REFERRED back to the Civic Administration for further discussion with the applicant and to report back at a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting; and,

     

    b)  the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to review the proposal within the context of the Near Campus Neighbourhood Policies, as they relate to residential intensification, focusing on lots that front onto neighbourhood streets, but are immediately adjacent to rapid transit place types or urban corridor place types;

     

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the staff presentation with respect to this matter;

     


    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter. (2021-D09) 


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the request to demolish the garage on the heritage designated property at 325 Victoria Street BE PERMITTED, and the Chief Building Official BE ADVISED of Municipal Council’s intention in this matter;

     

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated May 24, 2021, from C. Egerton, 315 Victoria Street, with respect to this matter;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter. (2021-P10D/R01) 


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:P. Squire

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the application by 2560334 Ontario Limited, relating to the property located at 135 Villagewalk Boulevard:


    a) the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that no issues were raised at the public meeting with respect to the application for Site Plan Approval to permit the construction of a 2 commercial pads in the southeast corner of the subject lands and associated accesses; and,

     

    b) the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports issuing the Site Plan Application;

     

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

     

    • a communication dated May 26, 2021, from S. Lebert, by e-mail; and,
    • a communication dated May 26, 2021, from A. Mustard-Thompson, by e-mail;

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter. (2021-D11) 


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lehman
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    That, on the recommendations of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, with respect to the demolition request for the existing dwelling on the heritage listed property at 126 Price Street, the following actions be taken:


    a) the Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that Municipal Council consents to the demolition of the dwelling on the property; and,

    b) the property at 126 Price Street BE REMOVED from the Register of Cultural Heritage Resources;

     

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

    • a communication dated May 22, 2021, from W. Rohrer and C. Scott; and,
    • a petition signed by approximately 24 individuals is on file in the City Clerk's Office;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter. (2021-P10D/R01)


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lehman
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, based on the application by Habitat for Humanity Heartland Ontario Inc., relating to the property located at 1697 Highbury Avenue North, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Residential R5/Residential R6 (R5-2/R6-4) Zone and an Open Space (OS5) Zone TO a Residential R5 Special Provision (R5-7(_)) Zone and an Open Space (OS5) Zone;


    it being noted that the following site plan matters were raised during the application review process:

    i) orientation of the easterly stacked townhouse building to Highbury Avenue North;
    ii) visual access for the southerly end units to the open space area and the Thames River interface be enhanced by providing increased number of windows and/or balconies;
    iii) naturalization of the Open Space lands on the site; and,
    iv) the potential conveyance of all or part of the Open Space lands to the City;

     

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the staff presentation with respect to this matter;

     

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter;

     

    it being further noted that the Municipal Council approves this application for the following reasons:

     

    • the recommended amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, which encourages the regeneration of settlement areas and land use patterns within settlement areas that provide for a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment. The PPS directs municipalities to permit all forms of housing required to meet the needs of all residents, present and future;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to the in-force policies of The London Plan, including but not limited to the Key Directions;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to the in-force policies of the 1989 Official Plan, including but not limited to the Low Density Residential designation and Environmental Policies; and,
    • the recommended amendment facilitates the development of a site within the Built-Area Boundary and the Primary Transit Area with an appropriate form of infill development. (2021-D09)


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lehman
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the application by 1630 HP Inc., relating to the property located at 1634 – 1656 Hyde Park Road, 1480 North Routledge Park and Part of 1069 Gainsborough Road:

    a) the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Business District Commercial (BDC) Zone and a Business District Commercial Special Provision (BDC(39)) Zone TO a Business District Commercial Special Provision Bonus (BDC*B-_) Zone;

    the Bonus Zone shall be implemented through one or more agreements to facilitate the development of a mixed-use apartment building, with a maximum height of 8-storeys or 29 metres and a maximum density of 169 units per hectare, in general conformity with the Site Plan, Renderings and Elevations appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Schedule “1” to the amending by-law, and provides for the following:

    1) Exceptional Building Design

    i) providing an ‘L”-shaped mixed-use building that is generally in keeping with the vision of the current Official Plan as well as The London Plan by providing for continuous street walls along the Hyde Park Road and North Routledge Park frontages;
    ii) providing a 7-storey massing along Hyde Park Road that includes a significant step-back above the second storey and 8-storey massing along North Routledge Park;
    iii) providing for appropriate scale/ rhythm/ materials/ fenestration;
    iv) incorporating all parking in the rear yard and underground, away from the adjacent street frontages;
    v) providing ground floor commercial space with transparent glazing and principal entrances facing the Hyde Park Road frontage creating an active edge;
    vi) providing ground floor residential units with individual entrances and patio spaces along the North Routledge Park frontage;
    vii) providing a rooftop patio;
    viii) providing a parking lot layout that accommodates appropriate driveway alignments across North Routledge Park; and,
    ix) relocating the existing heritage structure and providing a glass link between the heritage structure and the new building along the North Routledge Park frontage, and a recessed courtyard immediately south of the heritage structure;

    2) Provision of Affordable Housing

    • a total of five (5) one-bedroom units will be provided for affordable housing. Subject to the concurrence of the City, some or all of these five (5) one-bedroom units may be allocated from the adjacent development owned and/or managed by the Proponent, noting the bonus zone requirement and encumbrance would remain specific to the Subject Lands;
    • rents not exceeding 80% of the Average Market Rent (AMR) for the London Census Metropolitan Area as determined by the CMHC at the time of building occupancy;
    • the duration of affordability set at 50 years from the point of initial occupancy;
    • the proponent enter into a Tenant Placement Agreement (TPA) with the City of London to align the affordable units with priority populations; and,
    • these conditions to be secured through an agreement registered on title with associated compliance requirements and remedies;

    3) Relocation, conservation, and adaptive re-use of the existing heritage designated structure at 1656 Hyde Park Road:

    • the owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City of London;

    b) pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as determined by the Municipal Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the proposed by-law as the recommended zoning implements the site concept submitted with the application;

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding this matter;

    it being further noted that the Municipal Council approves this application for the following reasons:

    • the recommended amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), 2020, which encourages the regeneration of settlement areas and land use patterns within settlement areas that provide for a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment. The PPS directs municipalities to permit all forms of housing required to meet the needs of all residents, present and future;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to tin-force policies of The London Plan, including but not limited to the Key Directions and the Main Street Place Type policies;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to the in-force policies of the 1989 Official Plan, including but not limited to the Main Street Commercial Corridor designation;
    • the subject lands represent an appropriate location for mixed-use residential intensification, within the Hyde Park Village Core and the recommended amendment would permit development at an intensity that is appropriate for the site and the surrounding neighbourhood;
    • the recommended amendment secures units for affordable housing through the bonus zone; and,
    • the recommended amendment facilitates the development of a site within the Built-Area Boundary and the Primary Transit Area with an appropriate form of infill development.

    (2021-D09)


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:A. Hopkins

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    That, on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the application by Farhi Holdings Corporation, relating to the property located at 435-451 Ridout Street North:

    a) consistent with Policy 19.1.1. of the Official Plan for the City of London (1989), the subject lands, representing a portion of 435-451 Ridout Street North BE INTERPRETED to be located within the Downtown Area designation;

    b) consistent with Policy 43_1 of The London Plan, the subject lands, representing a portion of 435-451 Ridout Street North, BE INTERPRETED to be located within the Downtown Place Type;

    c) the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix "A" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend The London Plan by ADDING a new policy the Specific Policies for the Downtown Place Type and by ADDING the subject lands to Map 7 – Specific Policies Areas – of The London Plan;

    it being noted that The London Plan amendments will come into full force and effect concurrently with Map 7 of the London Plan;
    d) the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Appendix "B" BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 15, 2021 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan (2016) as amended in part c) above), to change the zoning of a portion of the subject property FROM a Heritage/Regional Facility (HER/RF) Zone and a Downtown Area Special Provision (DA2(3)*D350) Zone TO a Holding Downtown Area Special Provision Bonus (h-3*h-55*h-_*DA2(3)*D350*B-_) Zone;

    the Bonus Zone shall be implemented through one or more agreements to facilitate a high quality mixed-use office/residential apartment building, with a maximum height of 40-storeys (125 metres), and a maximum density of 500 units per hectare, in general conformity with the Site Plan and Elevations appended to the staff report dated May 31, 2021 as Schedule “1” to the amending by-law in return for the following facilities, services and matters:

    1) Exceptional Building Design

    i) retention in situ of the heritage buildings along the Ridout Street frontage;
    ii) materials on the podium of the building that are in-keeping with the surrounding heritage buildings;
    iii) a slender point tower design;
    iv) the tower portion of the building located to the south of the podium to increase the spatial separation between the tower and the Eldon House property;
    v) interesting architectural design features on the tower that will enhance the downtown skyline and break up the building mass;
    vi) terraces overlooking Harris Park and providing opportunity for activating these terraces with the proposed adjacent office/commercial uses; and,
    vii) connections between Ridout Street North and Queens Avenue to Harris Park that provide new entrance opportunities to further connect the Downtown with the Park.

    2) Provision of four (4) levels of underground parking, of which a minimum of 100 parking spaces will be publicly accessible

    3) Provision of Affordable Housing

    The provision of affordable housing shall consist of:

    • a minimum of twelve (12) residential units or five percent (5%) of the total residential unit count (rounded to the nearest unit), whichever is greater;
    • the mix of affordable one- and two-bedroom units will be based on the same proportion of one- and two-bedroom units as within the final approved plan. Subject to availability and with the concurrence of the City, some or all of these units may be secured through existing vacancies in developments owned and/or managed by the proponent or associated corporate entity;
    • rents not exceeding 80% of the Average Market Rent (AMR) for the London Census Metropolitan Area as determined by the CMHC at the time of building occupancy;
    • the duration of affordability shall be set at 50 years from the point of initial occupancy; and,
    • the proponent shall enter into a Tenant Placement Agreement (TPA) with the City of London to align the affordable units with priority populations;

    4) Conservation, retention, and adaptive re-use of the existing heritage designated buildings at 435, 441, and 451 Ridout Street North

    • the owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City of London;

    5) Construction of a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certified building

    it being noted that the following site plan matters were raised during the public participation process:

    i) design the parking and drop-off areas between the building and the adjacent streets (Ridout Street North and Queens Avenue) as a shared plaza space, using pavers or patterned concrete to:

    I) tie into the design of the terraces
    II) reduce the amount of asphalt
    III) provide a welcoming entrance to the development
    IV) provide for a stronger connection between the stairs leading to Harris Park and the City sidewalks along the streets;

    ii) design the westerly stairway as a more naturalized landscape solution to soften the experience and avoid blank brick walls. This stairwell should provide for a grand entrance feature between the development and the Park;
    iii) final location and design of all vehicular accesses on-site, including service access;
    iv) final location, design, and landscaping of publicly accessible spaces, including terraces, staircases, and walkways;
    v) the final building design is to incorporate bird-friendly design features;
    vi) the applicant is to work with the City of London with regards to compensation restoration to create a wetland and other natural features (ie forest), either on-site or within Harris Park; and,
    vii) the final building design is to include a fully enclosed mechanical penthouse, clad in materials complementary to the building, to screen rooftop mechanical equipment and contribute positively to the skyline.

    f) pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as determined by the Municipal Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the proposed by-law as the changes in building height and setback to the residential component of the building are minor in nature and the illustrations circulated in the Notice of Application and Notice of Public Meeting accurately depict the development as proposed;

    it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

    · a communication dated May 20, 2021, from C. Naismith, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 20, 2021, from D. McKillop, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 20, 2021, from R. Lacy, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 20, 2021, from K. Baker, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 20, 2021, from C. Ryan, by e-mail;
    · communications dated May 20, 2021, from E. Rath, by e-mail;
    · the staff presentation;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from C. Littlejohn, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from K. Kydd, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from U. Troughton, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from B. McQuaid, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from G. Hodder, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from M. Conklin, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from M. Young, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from M.A. Colihan, 191 Sherwood Avenue;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from B. Reilly and R. Shroyer, 574 Victoria Street;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from S. Skaith, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from S. Andrejicka, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 26, 2021, from M. Temme, 66 Palmer Street;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from M.L. Collins, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 26, 2021, from H. Guizzetti, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 26, 2021, from M. Rooks, by e-mail;
    · a communication from M. Whalley, 39-250 North Centre Road;
    · communications dated May 26, 2021, from A.M. Valastro, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from B. Spratley, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from S. Shroyer, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from C. Woolner, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from K. Elgie, Chair, Board of Directors, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from K. Peckham, Wide Eye Television Inc.;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from J. Grainger, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. Devereux, 926 Colborne Street;
    · a communication dated May 21, 2021, from P. and J. Wombwell, 174 Guildford Crescent;
    · a communication dated May 21, 2021, from M. Romhanyi, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from S. Saunders, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J.C. Garnett, University Librarian Emeritus, Western University;
    · a communication dated May 26, 2021, from S. Bentley, 34 Mayfair Drive;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from L. Brown, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from B. and S. Morrison, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from A. Martin, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from D. Rogers, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from S. Agranove, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. Manness, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from N. Bol, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from A. Warren, Director of Operations, The Wedding Ring;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. Farquhar, 383 St. George Street;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. Hunten, 253 Huron Street;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. and D. Surry, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from B. and H. Luckman, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from G. Nicodemo, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from K. and G. Patton, 20-50 Northumberland Road;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from S. Lunau, 1096 Kingston Avenue;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from J. Spencer, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 25, 2021, from K. McKeating, President, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario - London Region;
    · a communication dated May 28, 2021, from A. Little, by e-mail;
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from D. Oates, by e-mail; and,
    · a communication dated May 27, 2021, from C. Mellamphy, by e-mail;

    it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with these matters, the individuals indicated on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions regarding these matters;

    it being further noted that the Municipal Council approves these applications for the following reasons:

    • the recommended amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, which encourages land use patterns within settlement areas that provide for a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment, as well as • enhancing the vitality and viability of downtowns and mainstreets;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to the in-force policies of The London Plan, including but not limited to the Downtown Place Type and Key Directions;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to the in-force policies of the 1989 Official Plan, including but not limited to the Downtown Area designation;
    • the recommended amendment conforms to Our Move Forward: London’s Downtown Plan, by providing for a landmark development on an underutilized site;
    • the recommended amendment secures units for affordable housing through the bonus zone; and,
    • the recommended amendment facilitates the development of an underutilized site at an important location in the Built Area Boundary and Primary Transit Area. (2021-D09)


    Yeas: (4)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, and P. Squire
    Nays: (1)A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (4 to 1)

    Additional Votes:


  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    Motion to open the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (4)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, and P. Squire
    Absent: (2)E. Holder, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (4 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    Motion to close the public participation meeting.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Lehman

    That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 5th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage from its meeting held on May 12, 2021:

    a) M. Corby, Senior Planner, BE ADVISED of the following comments from the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) with respect to the Notice of Application for Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), dated January 2021, from Zelinka Priamo Ltd., with respect to the property located at 850 Highbury Avenue North, previously received by the LACH:

    i) sufficient information has not been received as part of the application in order to appropriately assess the impacts of the proposed applications on the significant heritage resources on this property; it being noted that:

    A) the HIA should be prepared by a qualified heritage professional;
    B) the HIA should include an assessment of impacts to identified heritage resources of the proposed development, among other content as identified in Info Sheet #5 provided by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries; it being noted that the HIA provided with the application does not speak to the impacts of the proposed development or proposed policy changes on the cultural heritage resources on the site; and,
    C) the LACH is supportive of maintaining the overall land use concept identified within the proposal, which is generally consistent with that in the London Psychiatric Hospital Secondary Plan (LPHSP); it being noted that this includes the proposed low density residential in the core area with concentration of higher densities along adjacent arterial roadways (the ‘bowl’ concept) and the revisions to the road and pedestrian networks, which appear to support the protection and enhancement of the cultural heritage resources;

    • the LACH emphasizes the need to consider the built heritage resources as landmarks within the cultural heritage landscape, and that the assessment of impacts must address the cultural heritage landscape including views and vistas as described through the appropriate governing documents;
    • the LACH acknowledges the differences or ‘inconsistencies’ between elements of the Heritage Conservation Easement, designating by-law L.S.P.-3321-208, and the LPHSP as identified within the HIA, but notes that these documents each have different forms and functions, and do not necessarily conflict (save for mapping discrepancies); it being noted that where these differences or ‘inconsistencies’ are identified, the more detailed description and assessment should apply;
    • the LACH does not support many of the proposed changes to heritage policies within the LPHSP which serve to reduce protection of the heritage resources and introduce greater uncertainty; it being noted that sufficient rationale or justification for these revisions to heritage policies have not been provided within the Final Proposal Report or HIA (examples include but are not limited to:

    o LPHSP 20.4.1.4 – “Retain as much of the identified cultural and heritage resources of the area as possible feasible”;
    o LPHSP 20.4.1.5.II.a) – “provide for ….and mixed-use buildings where possible”;
    o LPHSP 20.4.2.2 – “Development proposed through planning applications… will need not only to consider the significant heritage buildings, but also the unique cultural heritage landscape where possible”;
    o PHSP 20.4.3.5.2.III. d) “Built form adjacent to the Treed Allee within the Heritage Area shall should be encouraged to oriented towards the Allee in applicable locations”; and,
    o LPHSP 20.4.4.10 - “shall” to “should”);

    • the LACH requests clarification from City of London Heritage and Planning staff on the next steps with respect to this development application, including how the impacts to built heritage resources and the cultural heritage landscape will be assessed and addressed as the planning and design phases progress (for example, can/will an HIA be required for subsequent zoning bylaw amendment applications and/or site plan applications); it being noted that the LACH respectfully requests that these assessments be provided to LACH for review and comment;
    • the LACH respectfully requests to be consulted early on any proposed changes to the designating bylaw or heritage conservation easement and would welcome a delegation from the proponent to present on heritage matters on the property; and,
    • the LACH requests information from City Staff and/or the proponent on the current physical conditions of the heritage structures on the site;

    b) on the recommendation of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act seeking retroactive approval for the removal and replacement of the windows on the heritage designated property located at 40 and 42 Askin Street, By-law No. L.S.P.-2740-36 and Wortley Village-Old South Heritage Conservation District, BE REFUSED; it being noted that this Heritage Alteration Permit application is seeking retroactive approval for window replacements that were previously considered and refused by Municipal Council;

    it being noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) encourages the applicant to work with the Heritage Planner to address the concerns raised by the LACH at the meeting;

    it being further noted that a verbal delegation from P. Scott, with respect to this matter, was received;

    c) on the recommendation of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the demolition request for the existing dwelling on the heritage listed property located at 126 Price Street:
    i) the Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council consents to the demolition of the dwelling on the property; and,
    ii) the property at 126 Price Street BE REMOVED from the Register of Cultural Heritage Resources;

    d) on the recommendation of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following properties BE REMOVED from the Register of Cultural Heritage Resources:

    • 1033-1037 Dundas Street ;
    • 1 Kennon Place;
    • 19 Raywood Avenue;
    • 32 Wellington Road;
    • 34 Wellington Road;
    • 90 Wellington Road;
    • 98 Wellington Road;
    • 118 Wellington Road;
    • 120 Wellington Road;
    • 122 Wellington Road;
    • 126 Wellington Road;
    • 134 Wellington Road;
    • 136 Wellington Road;
    • 138 Wellington Road;
    • 140 Wellington Road;
    • 142 Wellington Road;
    • 166 Wellington Road;
    • 220 Wellington Road;
    • 247 Wellington Road;
    • 249 Wellington Road;
    • 251 Wellington Road;
    • 253-255 Wellington Road;
    • 261 Wellington Road;
    • 263 Wellington Road;
    • 265 Wellington Road;
    • 267 Wellington Road;
    • 269 Wellington Road;
    • 271 Wellington Road;
    • 273 Wellington Road;
    • 275 Wellington Road;
    • 285 Wellington Road;
    • 287 Wellington Road;
    • 289 Wellington Road;
    • 297 Wellington Road;
    • 301 Wellington Road;
    • 327 Wellington Road;
    • 331 Wellington Road;
    • 333 Wellington Road;
    • 72 Wellington Street; and,
    • 44 Wharncliffe Road North;

    e) on the recommendation of the Managing Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act seeking consent for alterations to the heritage designated property located at 426 St James Street BE GIVEN, subject to the following terms and conditions:

    • the new railing be 24” in height above the porch floor to maintain the proportions of the porch;
    • wood be used as the material for the alterations;
    • all exposed wood be painted; and,
    • the Heritage Alteration Permit be displayed in a location visible from the street until the work is completed;

    f) on the recommendation of the Director, Development Services, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the request to demolish the garage on the heritage designated property located at 325 Victoria Street BE PERMITTED, and the Chief Building Official BE ADVISED of Municipal Council’s intention in this matter; it being noted that the communication, dated May 10, 2021, from B. Jones and K. Mckeating, as appended to the Added Agenda, and the verbal delegations from D. Lee, E. Van den Steen, B. Jones and K. McKeating, with respect to this matter, were received;

    g) on the recommendation of the Director, City Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the potential designation of Labatt Memorial Park as a National Historic Site of Canada:

    i) the above noted initiative BE ENDORSED; and,
    ii) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake the application process with respect to this matter;

    h) clauses 1.1, 2.1 to 2.4, inclusive, 3.1, 3.2, 4.7 and 4.8 BE RECEIVED for information.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:A. Hopkins
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 4th Report of the Advisory Committee on the Environment, from its meeting held on May 5, 2021:

     

    a)  the following actions be taken with respect to Greener Homes London:

    i) the presentation, as appended to the Added Agenda, from S. Franke, London Environmental Network, and a verbal delegation from S. Franke, with respect to the Greener Homes London program, BE RECEIVED;

    ii) a representative from London Hydro BE INVITED to a future meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Environment to speak with respect to:


    · future infrastructure improvements to assist with climate change reductions;
    · alternative energy sources for providing power to the city;
    · fuel forecasting to support the Climate Energy Action Plan and net zero targets; and,
    · demand side management strategy and on-bill financing for home energy retrofitting;

     

    b)  the following actions be taken with respect to the Notice of Planning Application, dated March 31, 2021, from C. Parker, Senior Planner, with respect to Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments related to Encouraging the Growing of Food in Urban Areas – City-Wide:

    i) the Civic Administration BE ADVISED that the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE) supports the amendments made to date and the amendment that is currently under review; it being noted that the ACE has been involved with the urban agriculture process and development; and,

    ii) the above-noted Notice BE RECEIVED;

     

    c)  Jack Gibbons of the Ontario Clean Air Alliance BE INVITED to a future meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Environment to speak to the current campaign of the Clean Air Alliance; and

     

    d)  clauses 1.1, 2.1, 3.1 and 3.2, inclusive,  and 4.1 BE RECEIVED for information.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lehman
    Seconded by:S. Lewis

    That the Deputy City Manager, Planning and Economic Development BE DIRECTED to update the Deferred Matters List to remove any items that have been addressed by the Civic Administration.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins
    Absent: (1)E. Holder


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)
  • Moved by:S. Lewis
    Seconded by:S. Hillier

    That the following actions be taken with respect to the 4th Report of the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on May 26, 2021:

    a)        the Educational Initiatives and Outreach Sub-Committee recommendations, appended to the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee (TFAC) Agenda, BE FORWARDED to the Civic Administration for consideration and to report back at a future meeting of the TFAC; it being noted that the TFAC reviewed and received the "May 2021: TFAC Educational Initiatives and Outreach Subcommittee: A Few Suggestions and Comments" on the City of London Website;

    b)        the following actions be taken with respect to creating ecosystems in London:

    i)         a Working Group BE ESTABLISHED consisting of J. Kogelheide, A. Hames and A. Morrison, to review the creation of ecosystems in the City; and,
    ii)        the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to attend a future Trees and Forests Advisory Committee meeting to provide an update on the initiatives currently being undertaken;

    it being noted that the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee reviewed and received a communication from J. Kogelheide with respect to this matter;

    c)        the following actions be taken with respect to the Advisory Committee Review - Interim Report VI:

    i)         A. Cantell BE REQUESTED to prepare recommendations on the Advisory Committee Review - Interim Report VI and to report back at the next meeting of the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee meeting; and,
    ii)        the Chair of the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee (TFAC) BE REQUETED to attend a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting to provide an overview of the TFAC recommendations with respect to these matters;

    it being noted that the TFAC reviewed and received staff report dated May 17, 2021, with respect to these matters;

    d)        the following actions be taken with respect to the Urban Forestry Communications Strategy:

    i)         Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to attend the next meeting of the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee to provide an update on the Urban Forestry Communications Strategy;
    ii)        P. Nichoson BE INCLUDED on the existing Working Group; it being noted that the Working Group consists of A. Cantell and M. Demand; and,
    iii)       the Urban Forestry Communications Strategy BE INCLUDED on the 2021 Trees and Forests Advisory Committee Work Plan.
    e)        clauses 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2, inclusive, 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, BE RECEIVED for information.


    Yeas: (5)S. Lewis, S. Hillier, S. Lehman, P. Squire, and A. Hopkins


    Motion Passed (5 to 0)

The meeting adjourned at 8:40 PM.