26TH REPORT OF THE
Planning
and Environment Committee
Special meeting held on October 17, 2012,
commencing at 7:04 PM, at Centennial Hall, London, Ontario.
PRESENT: Councillor B. Polhill (Chair),
Councillors J.P. Bryant, D.G. Henderson, J.B. Swan and S. White and C. Saunders
(Acting Secretary).
ABSENT: Councillor J.B. Swan.
ALSO PRESENT: Councillors D.
Brown, M. Brown and H.L. Usher, J.M. Fleming, E. Lalande, J. Page, D. O’Brien,
M. Tomazincic and B. Turcotte
1.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
None.
None
Recommendation: That, on the recommendation
of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be
taken with respect to the application of1279154 Ontario Limited, relating to
the property located at 425 Wharncliffe Road South:
a) the
attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on October 30, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in
conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Highway Service Commercial Special Provision (HS2(4))
Zone, which permits automobile sales and service establishments, offices,
medical/dental offices, clinics, laboratories, retail stores, and liquor,
beer and wine stores TO a Holding Highway Service Commercial Special
Provision (h-5•HS2(_)) Zone to add to the list of permitted uses to include a
methadone clinic, dispensing methadone to a maximum of 200 clients per day,
subject to a holding provision that requires a public site plan process;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to address the following matters through
the site plan process, prior to recommending the removal of the h-5 holding
provision:
i) enhanced
landscaping fronting onto Wharncliffe Road South;
ii) a
direct and easily identifiable pedestrian walkway from Wharncliffe Road South
through the parking lot to the main entrance of the facility;
iii) adequate
bicycle parking facilities;
iv) fencing,
made of high quality and lasting materials, to avoid any opportunity for
pedestrian movement from the subject site to adjacent sites;
v) adherence
to Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design principles; and,
vi) discrete
entrance facilities to allow for client privacy;
c)
the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner BE DIRECTED to
undertake a review, after March 20, 2013, of By-law No. Z.-1-122090, which
sets out regulations with respect to the establishment of methadone clinics
and methadone pharmacies in the City of London, to consider the
appropriateness of including separation distances between methadone clinics
and to include separation distances between methadone clinics and methadone
pharmacies and Day Care Centres, using a similar public consultation process
as was undertaken prior to By-law No. Z.-1-122090 being enacted;
|
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with
respect to this matter:
·
a
communication, dated June 25, 2012, from S.A. Campbell, Bayfield Realty Advisors
Inc.;
·
a
communication, dated September 11, 2012, from M. Gutz, by e-mail;
·
a
communication from J. Langille, 29-368 Belgrave Ave.; and,
·
a
communication from G & E Markes, 44 MacKay Ave;
it being pointed out
that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the
following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
A.
Patton, Patton Cormier and Associates, on behalf of the applicant – indicating
that his client operations 47 clinics throughout Ontario; indicating that his
client specializes in treating persons with addictions, including addiction to
OxyContin, which requires the use of methadone to treat the addiction; indicating
that addiction touches everyone; indicating that there are other methadone
clinics in the City of London that many people are not aware of; indicating
that methadone clinics are safe, unobtrusive and have no impact on neighbouring
properties; indicating that the by-law amendment undertaken to introduce
regulations for methadone clinics and pharmacies was a result of public
consultation and no appeals to the by-law were received; indicating that his
client’s proposal meets the regulations set out in the by-law; expressing
concern with the proposed limit on the dispensing of methadone to a maximum of
200 clients per day; indicating that his client was not advised of the proposed
cap on dispensing; indicating that there are legal issues with respect to the
proposed cap; indicating that the proposal represents sound land use planning;
referring to page 12 of the staff report and expressing concern that potential
impacts are being tested against the 528 Dundas Street clinic which is unfair
as 528 Dundas Street is a very large clinic; indicating that he had advised
Councillor Denise Brown that his client had placed an offer to purchase the
subject property; indicating that the subject property exceeds the location
criteria established by the Zoning By-law; indicating that concerns expressed
must be related to land use matters only; indicating that placing a cap on
dispensing is a human rights issue and impacts an individual’s rights to access
health care; and requesting that the Planning and Environment Committee approve
the application as submitted, without a restriction on the number of clients
that can be dispensed to a day.
·
Penny
Moore – indicating that she was a health care worker and is a cancer survivor;
indicating that there are myths about methadone and that methadone is also a
treatment for pain and not only to treat addiction; indicating that there are
concerns raised with respect to the disposal of needles and that this is not
just a concern relating to clinics; indicating that clinics need to be more
spread out throughout the city; indicating that the administration of methadone
is controlled by the College of Physicians; indicating that providing more
clinics throughout the city, more patients would be served without lineups;
indicating that people have a right to access health care; indicating that she
lives in the area of the proposed clinic; and indicating that patients are
required to sign a contract indicating that they will not sell methadone.
·
Kelly
Armstrong – indicating his concern is with the intensity of the use and the
number of clinics in one area; indicating concern that it will be difficult to
implement a cap of 200 patients a day without the proper tools; indicating that
an intensity of bars in an entertainment district would be negative;
questioning if due diligence was undertaken regarding the number of patients to
be served in this area; indicating that clinics need to spread out in the
community to ensure that the patients are being served; indicating that the
number of clinics in one area causes an undue burden on the area; indicating
that smaller clinics throughout the city would be better; and indicating that a
more conservative approach should be undertaken.
·
Sarah
Metcalf – indicating that there is too much concentration of clinics in the
area; indicating that this clinic does not treat pain, but rather addiction;
indicating concern with the disposal of needles and the closeness of day cares
to the proposed clinic; indicating concern with the exposure to children
waiting for buses; and indicating concern that the lawyer for the applicant has
threatened legal action.
·
Roger
Depauw – indicating concern that there are three methadone dispensing clinics
within 1 ½ kilometers of each other; questioning how many wards have methadone
clinics; indicating concern with respect to the number of methadone clinics in old
south; indicating concern that the patients being treated do not live in the
area; and indicating no objection to methadone clinics, but rather concern with
3 methadone clinics being located in one area.
·
Cheryl
Austin, owner of Western Animal Clinic – indicating concern that the
establishment of another methadone clinic in the area will effect businesses in
the area; indicating that her Clinic has been broken into on a number of
occasions; indicating that veterinary clinics are routinely broken into to
access drugs; indicating that her staff pick up disposed needles and she pays
to have those needles disposed of; indicating that the area already is serviced
by existing methadone clinics; indicating that the Dairy Queen and daycare will
not survive; indicating that Mr. Patton’s comment that he will be appealing the
placement of a cap on the number of patients that can be served in a day is an
indication that this will be a high volume clinic; and indicating concern with
the concentration of methadone clinics in the area.
·
Abe
Oudshoorn - indicating that he is a nurse; indicating that people need to
focus on facts; indicating that the five methadone clinics are full, with one
overflowing with patients; indicating that methadone is a synthetic
replacement to opiates; indicating that patients do not get high on methadone;
indicating that patients can continue to work when taking methadone; indicating
that the impact of addiction is worsening and is a result of the lack of
treatment being made available; indicating that lack of treatment results in
increased costs to policing and health care; indicating that treating addiction
will reduce crime and other related impacts; indicating that all clinics are
for profit; indicating that people need to stick to the facts; and indicating
that he supports the application.
·
Lauren
Star – indicating that she has small children; indicating concern with the
volume of people that will be accessing the clinic; indicating that the
patients will be stigmatized; indicating that the applicant has never indicated
how many patients he intends to treat at the clinic; indicating lack of trust
for the company given recent charges; and indicating that spreading the
clinics throughout the city would be better.
·
Nicholas
Black – indicating that he is entitled to voice his opinion; indicating that 95
percent of the people who have spoken have indicated that they oppose the
clinic; indicating that there is another clinic a block and a half away from
this clinic; indicating that allowing this clinic would be a poor decision;
indicating concern with the impact to business and residential values; and
indicating that a class action suit will be brought against this City for loss
of property value.
·
Sam
Osak – Western Day Care Centre – indicating concern that day care centres were
not included in the separation distance requirement; indicating that Day Care
Centres were not included in order to allow for more clinics; indicating that
there are other opportunities to dispense methadone at smaller clinics;
indicating that public safety should be one of the highest priorities;
indicating that primary clinics and pharmacies should be separated; and
requesting that amendments to the by-law be made to include licensed day care
centres in the separation distance requirements.
·
Megan
Telfer – indicating that she is the child of an addict; indicating concerns
with the competency of the doctors operating the clinics as a result of the
recent allegations of improper practices and poor management; indicating
concern that the clinic would back on to a large green space area which
provides a good place for people to hide; indicating that separation distance
should include Montessori schools; indicating concern for the children
attending the day care as they are vulnerable and are being exposed; indicating
that addicts have the option of not being addicts, but children do not have a
choice; requesting that the Zoning By-law be amended to include a separation
distance for day care centres; enquiring as to whether minutes were taken from
the meeting at the Hillside Church; indicating that there were allegations
against the company discussed at the Hillside meeting; and indicating that
Council needs to consider the credibility of the applicant.
·
Stephen
Hunt – indicating that he has no issues with smaller clinics; asking if there
has been a specific study undertaken that identifies the need for an additional
methadone clinic in this area: references the discussion paper that had been
prepared as part of the original study regarding methadone clinics; indicating
concern with five dispensaries within a five kilometer area; indicating that methadone
clinics should be separated from one another; requesting that policies restrict
methadone clinics from being located within the vicinity of schools, daycares,
parks and places of worship; and indicated that he does not want a repeat of
528 Dundas Street.
·
Dan
Procap – thanking those people who attended the Hillside Drive meeting;
indicating that each ward has a responsibility to host a methadone clinic;
indicating an unfairness that three of the five existing clinics are in this
ward; and indicating that house sales in the area have increased as a result of
the methadone clinics.
·
Ms.
Rogerson, Dance London – advising that she has 350 students; indicating that
the dance studio is not shown on the location map; indicating that during their
camps, the children are walked to Dairy Queen daily; indicating that there is
always staff at the studio; and indicating that she wants to keep her students
safe.
·
Justin
Langille – indicating that he is documenting the project to determine whether
or not the planning stages lead to the right conclusion; indicating that he
worked and lived in East Vancouver, which is one of the worst, roughest areas
in Canada and he came to know it as a great community; advising that he works
in housing stability, which means that he works shifts to ensure that people
that are ill are kept safe and clean and to help people from becoming homeless;
advising that methadone provides people with a resource to get on with another
phase of their life; indicating that he wholeheartedly welcomes another
methadone clinic in Old South; advising that he has seen how people can become
integrated in their community, not marginalized; indicating that it is hard
when people cannot access what they need every day; advising that heroin is
coming back on the market now that OxyContin is more controlled; advising that
they should be seeking to integrate addicts into their neighbourhoods; noting
that it is not safe for addicts to be in the same area as children; advising
that this is an important decision that will help people now; and advising that
this also supports safe injection sites, safe smoking sites for crack and can
assist addicts and the community.
·
Lori
– indicating that her biggest concern is not children; advising that there are
seniors in the area and you need to be concerned about them; recognizing that
there is a need for methadone clinics; advising that if you put the clinic
here, you will have lawsuits as people will get hit by traffic on Wharncliffe
Road if they are in pain or cannot think straight; advising that there needs to
be a reality check; and advising that having them enter a clinic and then go
back home is not solving the problem.
·
Holly
Doty – advising that the limit of health care may be limited by the Municipal
Council; indicating that a family member or neighbour may not be able to
receive the help that they need; requesting that addicts be thought of as
people; and requesting that health care not be limited.
·
Megan
Walker, - expressing support for a harm reduction model; advising that she has
seen many people struggle with addiction, die of overdose or commit suicide;
advising that she is 100% supportive of methadone clinics; advising that having
the clinics saves lives, allows people to restore their self-respect, and
allows families to stay together; advising that methadone works and should not
be feared; advising that methadone is prescribed in clinics, like other
medication; indicating that this is a health care issue between a patient and a
doctor; indicating that it doesn’t matter if there is a clinic close to
seniors; advising that these people are not to be feared; indicating that the
discrimination that she continues to hear is appalling; advising that it is a
basic human right for everyone to have health care; advising that she is
extremely upset that the community does not realize that, while property values
have soared, there is a clinic in the neighbourhood; indicating that there are
150 patients accessing the clinic every day; indicating that there is nothing
to fear; recommending that the cap of 200 clients per day be removed; noting
that whether the number is met or not, it is arbitrary; advising that people
cannot discriminate based on a disability, which addiction is; and reiterating
that a cap on the number of clients is not appropriate.
·
Holly
and Grant Doty – advising that this has been a huge learning curve for the
community; advising that they are attending the meeting to hear the real
answers; advising that they have no idea who is coming, how many or how much
they will be paying; noting that this is where the fear is coming from; advising
that other businesses have a sense of what their business plan will be;
advising that Mr. Patton’s comments were concerning; and enquiring as to the
comparison that was made to the AIDS Hospice.
·
Trish
Harding – advising that she is all for helping people that are troubled and
addicted; advising that on a W-5 documentary, OxyContin was thought to be a
solution; enquiring as to where all the addicted people are coming from; also
enquiring as to what is being done to assist people before they become
addicted; and requesting that people be helped in a discreet manner; noting
that this is not a discreet site.
·
Frank
Felice – advising that he has been following the news on the property located
at 528 Dundas Street; requesting that when a community comes forward, please
respect their comments and opinions; indicating that the City of London is the
only player; advising that the College of Physicians and Surgeons should be
part of this debate as they have tools to assist with these matters; noting
that the Ministry of Health should also be at the meeting; indicating that
there are problems with methadone clinics; advising that citizens are concerned
as there is no recourse for the clinic at 528 Dundas Street; expressing
appreciation to the City for tackling the problem with limited tools; enquiring
whether the debate needs to be widened to find better solutions to these
problems; advising that a good example of the problem is that the clinic operator
brought his lawyer to the meeting; noting that business owners do not want to
deal with the community; requesting the establishment of a Task Force on
Methadone Treatment to have the operators engage the community; and advising
that none of the recommendations have been adopted by any of the people who
provide this service.
·
Bev
Irwin – advising that she is a nurse; indicating that this is a for profit
clinic; and indicating concern with the number of dispensaries in the area.
·
Jim
Watkin – advising that he is a registered social worker who has been working
with people who use drugs; reminding people that we are talking about “people”;
indicating that there are needles in the area as there are no facilities to
properly dispose of them; advising that this is marginalizing and stigmatizing
people; advising that this substance has been used since the 1960’s; advising
that methadone only works for opiates, not cocaine or methamphetamines;
advising that this is not about homeless people, drug dealers or sex workers;
indicating that there are 21 active crack houses on Hamilton Road; and advising
that the City is handling addictions very poorly.
·
Steve
Alexander – advising that the AIDS facility provided one million needles over a
year and a half; advising that he takes the bus 92 times per month; expressing
empathy for the addicts; advising that the Middlesex London Heath Unit should
open its own methadone clinic and make a lot of money; and advising that the
agencies that receive money from the City need to be more accountable.
·
David
Ward – advising that he heard a lot of good information at the community
meeting held at Hillside Church; noting that the City is better prepared this
time; advising that the Civic Administration plans for the uses that best meet
the needs of those that use pharmacies and clinics; enquiring as to whether or
not most of the people in attendance live in this area of London; requesting
that this proposal be fair and equitable across the City and not concentrated
in one part of London; requesting that the Civic Administration’s
recommendation be denied; requesting that people stop thinking of it as being
in your backyard; advising that at the meeting held at the Hillside Church and
the meeting tonight, it is clear that no one is being denied medical
assistance; indicating that it is better to have a diverse range of facilities
throughout London, rather than in one area; expressing disappointment with Mr. Patton’s
comments relating to business people using methadone; and advising that it is a
community service to clean up needles.
·
Peter
VanEsche – advising that methadone clinics serve a valuable need in the
community; noting that there are already three clinics in the area; enquiring
as to whether or not the City is responsible for the location of the clinics;
noting that four clinics are not necessary in the Old South area; and advising
that there should be no objection to the 200 client cap.
·
Sharon
Halbury – advising that the proposed methadone clinic is within view of her
house; advising that, when she moved here, she was looking for a good
neighbourhood to raise her daughter; noting that there is an excellent
education system in the area and it is close to all amenities; indicating that
she never dreamed she would live close to five methadone clinics; indicating
that they are the voices for the children, the seniors and the neighbourhood;
recommending that if it does not feel good, then do not do it; indicating that
they brought all of the neighbours out so that you could hear their voices and
deny the application; advising that she will have trouble selling her house;
and stating that, if this was your neighbourhood, you would not recommend the
placement of the methadone clinic.
·
Laura
Peralla – advising that she uses the bus system and sees the problem;
indicating that she comes from a family background; advising that she does not
want three methadone clinics in the area; advising that methadone users are not
going to take two buses to utilize this methadone clinic; enquiring as to a
different location for this clinic; advising that it will affect businesses and
their green spaces.
·
Michael
Jamieson – advising that he is a resident of Lockwood Park and a neighbour of
Councillor H.L. Usher; advising that there is another methadone clinic proposed
for a property located on Wellington Road; indicating that he is not
originally from London; advising that there are huge issues with the Downtown
area; advising that he has seen the City grow in a better direction; advising
that it is nice to see younger people moving into the area; advising that there
are lots of stigmatisms with methadone clinics; advising that he is attending
the meeting to educate himself on the issue; advising that London has very
strong communities; advising that he is the father of a newborn and he works
seven days a week to give his family a nice life; and indicating that a
methadone clinic at this location does not allow his family to live that dream.
·
Chris
Innison – advising that he is on the Board of Directors of the London Model
Railroad; indicating that there is a lack of information and education for the
public; requesting information on how large the clinic will be in terms of
patients per day; noting that, as a business, they should have reasonable
expectations; expressing concern with the perception; advising that more
information would go a long way; and noting that the City of London’s by-law
helps to propagate the stigmatism.
·
Michael
– indicating that he had been notified that another clinic would be opening up
in his area; providing an example of Lockwood Park and that there are huge
issues in the Downtown; indicating that the problems are systemic; and
indicating that he is a new father.
·
Marvin
Sumner – advising that the cap was put in place after the application was submitted;
noting that when the meeting was held at Hillside Church, the cap was raised;
also noting that the Ministry of Health indicates that the cap can be put into
place; requesting that the by-law be revised to allow a cap to be put into
place before any more applications are received; indicating that these meetings
could have been avoided if the cap was put in place; and requesting that the
operation of the clinics be verified.
·
Matt
Shaw, Owner, Dairy Queen – advising that he purchased the Dairy Queen this
year; advising that they cater to large groups of children and that this will
impact their business; advising that his female staff have expressed concern
working near a methadone clinic; and requesting that a better location for the
clinic be found.
·
Joseph
Fisher – indicating that he will try not to waste too much oxygen on this
subject; indicating that Mr. Patton is paid to be here; advising that his
motive is profit; noting that he is not against profit; indicating that you
cannot tell someone that they cannot make a living; advising that his client
has a right to set up a methadone clinic; advising that he does not want one in
his neighbourhood; enquiring as to how many people have been able to get off
the treatment; and advising that people go from one addiction to another.
·
Jeremy
Hanford – indicating that he has owned and operated a tire service since 1971;
expressing support for assisting people; agreeing that disbursement of the
clinics across the City is correct; and advising that there is a bus stop at
the corner of Wharncliffe Road South and Lambeth Avenue.
·
Andrew
Binks – enquiring as to the maximum number of people who can be assisted at
this facility; also enquiring as to what would happen if another application is
received; recommending separation distances be established so that there are
not so many clinics close together.
·
Eric
Saunder – advising that there are already two clinics in the area; advising
that there was a truck set on fire in the area when a drug deal went bad;
advising that he has the police on speed dial; advising that he can smell
marijuana being smoked across the street; expressing disbelief in the validity
of methadone clinics; noting that some addicts end up on cocaine; advising that
more research on a cure needs to be completed; indicating that this legalizes
drug dealers in their area; advising that this is hurting the businesses and
daycares; and indicating that licensing may assist in addressing problems.
·
Gary
Brown, 35A – 59 Ridout Street – advising that he is involved in the community;
advising that it is a knee-jerk reaction that is happening in this area;
advising that he did not realize that there is a methadone clinic three blocks
from his house; advising that the City’s policies should be given a chance;
requesting that clinics be restricted to busy areas where they can be shut
down; and advising that there is clearly a need for methadone clinics in the
City.
·
Patrick
Chadwick – advising that if dance schools, karate schools and daycares are in
the restrictions, they are being discriminated against; advising that there are
seniors in the area who need consideration; and advising that this application
is discriminatory and will be appealed.
·
Paul
Lecks – expressing support for smaller clinics spread throughout the City;
indicating that a large clinic is not a good idea; recommending that fences be
installed around the property; advising that the applicant does not want a
limit set on the number of people they are allowed to treat as it would limit
his profit; and advising that Mr. Patton’s comments that he will take this
matter to the Ontario Municipal Board if the cap is set at 200 people per day
should be taken into consideration.
·
Brenda
Sherwell – enquiring as to whether or not Councillors are aware that petitions
were circulated with over 500 signatures on them.
·
Chris
Nielson – questioning how many have been open; questioning if any of the
community concerns have been addressed; and indicating that the London Model
Railway group is opposed to the application.
·
Marsha
Pip, Beale Street – advising that her main concern is the limit of 200 people;
advising that if you work an eight hour day, you will see 25 people; noting
that this is one person every 2 minutes; advising there may be a large number
of clients showing up at once; advising that there are only three or four
parking spaces available.
·
Trisha
Harding – advising that the proposed clinic should not be allowed at this
location; indicating that she cannot keep up with what is going on; enquiring
as to who makes the decisions; and indicating that there are no specifics and
that there are too many loose ends.
·
Rita
Crawley – advising that she is against the installation of the proposed clinic;
advising that she has worked in the mental health field as a nurse in group
homes; noting that in every area that she has worked in, there have been caps
for the safety of the employees and clients; advising that she loves where she
lives; advising that the other clinics have succeeded because the owner has
placed caps on the limits of clients seen per day; indicating that if this
clinic is installed, without caps, it will change the City; advising that
people have been stealing copper pipes; and advising that her children will not
be able to go to Source for Sports.
·
John
Carter – advising that the information is provided on the City of London
website; advising that this is the wrong location for this company; advising
that he has spent time talking to the neighbours; advising that people who
attended the Hillside Church meeting were unable to attend the meeting tonight;
and advising that there were several signatures on the petitions. (2012-D11-06)
None.
The
meeting adjourned at 11:43 PM