<A>

4TH REPORT OF THE

 

Public Safety Committee

 

meeting held on April 2, 2012, commencing at 6:00 PM, at the London Convention Centre.

 

PRESENT:  Councillor D. Brown (Chair), Councillors B. Armstrong, J.P. Bryant, P. Hubert and B. Polhill and J. Martin (Secretary). 

 

 

ALSO PRESENT:   Councillors N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D. Henderson, S. Orser,, J. Swan, J. Barber, Police Chief B. Duncan, O. Katolyk, Deputy Chief B. Shea.

 

 

I.

DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

 

1.

No pecuniary interest(s) are disclosed.

 

II.

CONSENT ITEMS

 

III.

SCHEDULED ITEMS

 

IV.

ITEMS FOR DIRECTION

 

2.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING - Public Nuisance By-law

 

Recommendation:  That the following actions be taken with respect to the attached proposed Public Nuisance By-law entitled “A by-law to prohibit and regulate public nuisances within the City of London”, in order to address nuisance parties and gatherings;

 

a)       the Public Safety Committee (PSC) supports in principle the proposed Nuisance By-law;

 

b)       that the proposed by-law BE REFFERED to a special PSC meeting to be held in May 2012;

 

c)       the proposed by-law BE REFERRED to Civic Administration and the Town and Gown Committee for further review;

 

d)       the Near Campus Strategy, including modification of zoning by-law,  BE CIRCULATED to Municipal Council and the Town and Gown Committee;

 

e)       the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to contact the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to discuss possible changes to the Planning Act to restrict the number of students per household; and,

 

f)        the Town & Gown Committee BE REQUESTED to review the possibility of enacting a Student Code of Conduct;

 

it being noted that the Public Safety Committee heard the attached presentation from the Manager, Bylaw Enforcement, and a verbal delegation from B. Duncan, Chief,  and received written submissions from the following, with respect to this matter;

 

•           D. Pellarin, dated April 2, 2012

•           E. A. Smuck, dated March 30, 2012

•           H. W. Rundle, dated March 30, 2012

•           A. Mahon, dated March 29, 2012

•           F. Fontaine, dated March 29, 2012

•           M. MacLean, dated March 29, 2012

•           V. F. Norejko, dated March 22, 2012

•           C. Engelmeyer, dated April 1, 2012

•           G. Wild & J. Kasperski Wild, dated April 2, 2012

•           C. Joles, dated April 2, 2012

 

it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made an oral submission in connection therewith;

 

•           Joe Hoffer, Cohen Highley – advising that the London Property Management Association (LPMA) supports the by-law; noting that LPMA has approximately 500 members; advising that the LPMA rents to students and that the vast majority are good tenants; indicating that this is of equal concern to all landlords, as all landlords have an interest in their properties; recommending that the Council seek the ability of the Province to get unpaid fines collected through the issuance/renewal of drivers licenses; advising that a weakness is the prohibition of one or any items such as litter on the lawn; recognizing that the intent is the nuisance parties and indicating that it is overreaching as any citizen can call the Police.

•           Dennis Pellarin, 1019 Waterloo Street – providing comments as outlined in the attached communication.

•           O. Hobson, 43 Evergreen Avenue – expressing opposition to the proposed by-law; indicating that the by-law is being rammed through as a quick fix; advising that it increases the discretionary powers of the police; indicating that the police are the after-hours by-law enforcement already;  advising that there should be an honest public review;  enquiring as to why the failure happened; indicating that there is no sense of respect, which needs to be taught; requesting a review of the efforts being undertaken; advising that there have been positive initiatives undertaken, such as the public gardens; indicating that the prevention of the behavior should be focused on and advising that this is not a positive by-law.

•           Michael, resident of London – suggesting that the preventative measures should be creative; and that partying is the first priority for students, with learning being the second priority.

•           Derek McBurney, #4-406 South Street – advising that a loophole of the by-law is that it doesn’t determine how to handle a person who doesn’t take responsibility and advising that small groups are invited to parties and it gets out of control.

•           Pauline House, resident of London – indicating that she lives in Huron Heights, Phase 1 and expressing panic when a for sale sign goes up that her area is next,  advising that there should be no tolerance for these instances; advising that the residents are working to engage the students; enquiring as to how this gets controlled so that it doesn’t happen; advising that at 3:30 p.m. on St. Patrick’s Day, students were throwing cups at cars and pedestrians on Cheapside Street; enquiring as to how to make those responsible pay fines and enquiring as to whether or not a limit on the number of students living in one house can be enforced.

•           Dave Jones – enquiring as to who has the authority to order the by-law to be in effect; and enquiring as to what constitutes a party; it being noted that Police Chief Brad Duncan responded to Mr. Jones’ enquiries.

•           Rene, resident of London – expressing opposition to the by-law; and enquiring why the community has to be punished for the actions of some students.

•           Greg Anthony – advising that he is a London Property Management Association member and a real estate representative; advising that 1/3 of the group involved in the March 17th incident were minors; enquiring as to  how this by-law addresses minors; and suggesting that parents be held accountable.

•           Veronica Barahona, Fanshawe Student Union – advising that this is not a campus issue; advising that the by-law is too immediate and too reactive; recommending that the Town and Gown Committee review this by-law as it targets students.

•           Steve, resident of London – indicating that he is a proud Fanshawe College graduate; advising that he delivered a proactive proposal to Fanshawe College, the London Police and Ward Councillors a couple of weeks ago; and enquiring as to why the Liquor Control Board of Ontario is not contacted as to how minors were able to get alcohol.

•           Valerie Miretti, resident of London – advising that she lives near the University of Western Ontario and is currently attending Fanshawe College; indicating that the proposed measures are fine and indicating that the citizens are helping.

 

•           Patrick Searle, University of Western Ontario Students Council – advising that students and leaders support the economy; advising that the majority are good students, with a few bad apples; enquiring as to who is responsible for the overflow on someone else’s lawn; enquiring as to whether or not the proposed by-law is proactive or reactive and encourage that everyone stand together.

•           William Rosas – indicating that the government has gone too far as the by-law restricts freedom; advising that the by-law is too vague; indicating that allowing discretion is too dangerous and that the by-law infringes on civil rights.

•           Peter Tamburas – advising that this is an ethical issue and enquiring as to how the incident on Fleming Drive justifies the proposed by-law.

•           Rocky Miretti – expressing support for the proposed by-law; advising that the by-law shows accountability; advising that it protects the integrity of the neighburhoods in the community; advising that the number of rental properties is increasing; and suggesting that someone look at repeat complaints about rental properties and address the problem properties.

•           Eugene Petroli – enquiring as to whether Police receive advice when a party exceeds fire by-laws; and recommending that students be proactively educated on the fire code and acceptable occupancy.

•           Wayne Hargrove, resident of London – expressing support for the proposed by-law; advising that he moved out of Fleming Drive in 2009 because his family feared for their safety; advising that 3 or more people constitutes an unlawful assembly and enquiring as to whether or not you can restrict the use of glass in specific areas.

•           Joanna – advising that the by-law is reactive.

•           Heather Enger – Hartlet St – indicating that she doesn’t understand why these parties are held on the front lawn; advising that she did not see the police on St. Patrick’s Day; advising that she is a landlord and lives in the area of her rental property; advising that she has fantastic students and that the rental property is an investment; indicating that she has previously complained to By-law Enforcement about the number of students living in a house; enquiring as to how we enforce 2 and 3 bedroom units being listed as 4 and 5 bedroom units and requesting that the by-law not be rushed through as there is enough power without updating the by-law.

•           Darryl Torium – advising that he is a local landlord; indicating that he has had great success with students and they do contribute to the community; advising that this was a few bad apples; advising that he has tenants he has been attempting to evict for the last three months; indicating that he would like to add something to the by-law to give the University of Western Ontario and Fanshawe College the power to penalize, such as withholding grades or expelling students for their behavior.

•           Bill Brock – advising that respect needs to be given from both sides; advising that Civil unrest is not a reason to riot or defy authority; advising that this is off-campus authority; indicating that a solution would be for Fanshawe College to buy up the area properties and control the housing; and requesting the the community be given more time for dialogue.

•           Brian Gibson – advising that he lives in Ward 2; enquiring as to whether or not landlords can be encouraged to self-police their own property; advising that there is a need to address the event spillover onto other properties; encouraging more public participation with the students and the community; advising that there is always more that can be done and recommending that healthy activities for students be encouraged.

•           Edgar Allen Smuck, 928 Western Road – presenting information included on the Public Safety Committee Added Agenda.

•           Amanda Alison – advising that she is a Fanshawe College graduate; indicating that social media invites everyone to a party; and enquiring as to whether or not the social media can be monitored so that events can be nipped in the bud.

•           Darryl Bedford, OPSEU President – advising that many students are affected and the reputation of the College is on the line.

•           Michael Dee – advising that he is an area resident and landlord; advising that he agrees with instituting a code of conduct; indicating that a damage deposit is another tool used in other communities; and it may help the landlord to improve tenant accountability.

•           Joanna Markum – advising that Fanshawe opens up their green space and parking lots to host large parties.

•           Meredith Fontaine – enquiring as to how often the Police are called onto campus for party issues; advising that students don’t belong in residential family homes; indicating that there was no police presence from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., the following day; and indicating that this issue has been discussed for 15 years.

•           Ted WillIams – expressing support for this proactive step; advising that the problems on Fleming Drive are Fanshawe College’s responsibility; indicating that Fanshawe should be held responsible for student behaviour and advising that it is the cost of doing business.

•           Sandra Boerson – indicating that this is reactive; indicating that this only deals with a small part of the problem; advising that being connected and encouraging engagement doesn’t help; advising that the party should have been stopped at 200 people; advising that a mattress was burnt near the University of Western Ontario on the same night; advising that there are not enough police; advising that codes of conduct do make a difference and the students get the message that no one cares.

•           Irvine – advising that he lives north of Cheapside Street; indicating that a majority of the students are fabulous; enquiring as to whether or not there is a law limiting rental properties, how many students are allowed in each house, the fire regulations, and parking for cars; and advising that rental property is a business venture in a residential area.

•           Cynthia Eldridge, Second St – spoke to the need to provide positive role models for the students through the use of community organizations.

•           Barb Louanny – advising she was originally informed that this area was zoned as single-family homes but recently was advised that it is no longer zoned for single-family residences and enquiring as to what has changed.

•           Shirley Williams - indicating support for the by-law and concerns for resale value of homes in the neighbourhood and enquiring whether steps are in place for the May 24th weekend.

 

 

V.

DEFERRED MATTERS/ADDITIONAL BUSINESS

 

VI.

ADJOURNMENT

 

That the meeting adjourned at 8:40 PM.