That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Feasibility Study for the conversion of Bruce Street and
Elmwood Avenue from one-way to two-way operation:
a) the Feasibility Study BE
RECEIVED;
b) NO
ACTION BE TAKEN to convert Bruce Street and Elmwood Avenue to two-way
operation; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to review the potential for improving
signage, bike paths and traffic calming measures on Bruce Street and Elmwood
Avenue, taking into consideration the effect any such changes may have to the
surrounding area.
it being noted that the Civic Works
Committee (CWC) received the attached presentation from M. Elmadhoon,
Manager, Transportation Planning with respect to this matter;
it being further noted that the CWC received
the following submissions with respect to this matter;
a) a communication dated October
18, 2013, from M. Park, 45 Elmwood Avenue East;
b) a
communication dated November 1, 2013, from J. Galardo and D. Slade, 191
Elmwood Avenue East;
c) a communication dated October
19, 2013, from M. and B. Warder, 188 Bruce Street;
d) a
communication dated October 23, 2013, from N. Armstrong and J. Arnold, 132
Bruce Street;
e) a communication dated October
20, 2013, from M. E. Walker, 19 Edward Street;
f) a communication dated October
21, 2013, from J. Hardy, 105 Bruce Street;
g) a communication dated October
22, 2013, from D. and W. Scott, 35 Elmwood Avenue;
h) a
communication dated October 19, 2013 from N. Bullbrook and S. Viragos, 24
Bruce Street;
i) a
communication dated November 1, 2013 from G. & M. Bauman, 195 Elmwood
Avenue East;
j) a communication dated October
27, 2013 from D. Hutchison, 171 Bruce Street;
k) a communication dated November
2, 2013 from D. Read, 165 Bruce Street;
l) a
communication dated November 5, 2013 from A. (Fewster) Manias, 64 Elmwood
Avenue;
m) communications
dated November 4, 2013 and November 5, 2013 from C. Lynch, 43 Bruce Street;
n) a communication dated November
5, 2013 from J. Howell, 46 Bruce Street; and,
o) a
communication dated November 6, 2013 from E. Belch, 41 Bruce Street and D.
Payne, 38 Bruce Street;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
• A.
Bergeron, 93 Bruce Street – expressing concern with speeding on Bruce Street
and the potential for creating speeding in both directions with the proposed
conversion to two-way; stating this is a high pedestrian area with speeds of
60 km to 70 km causing dangerous situations which could result in accidents;
and requesting that speed calming measures be put in place.
• S.
Davis, 95 Bruce Street – stating that his biggest concern is the width of
Craig Street which creates a dangerous situation with parking and passing;
and suggesting that converting Bruce Street to two-way traffic would create
the same dangerous situation and potential for accidents as is the case on
Craig Street.
• B.
Porter, 58 Byron Avenue East – stating that he sees the big problem with
conversion is the lack of community awareness of what is happening with
municipal planning and the move to convert one-way streets back to two-way
streets and feels that there isn’t enough background provided as to why these
changes are being proposed; stating there is currently a bike route to the
north on Byron Avenue connecting Greenway with the other parks down Byron
Avenue to Craig Street to Ridout Street; stating the width of Bruce Street is
wider than other streets in the area and shouldn’t create a problem; advising
Byron Avenue is 2 feet narrower and is two- way with parking; recalling that
the original conversion of these streets took place with the development of
the Horton Street extension, turning those streets into thoroughfares to move
traffic through the areas not to service the areas; suggesting that the lack
of signage at intersections could be the cause for wrong-way traffic on these
streets; stating that parked cars can create traffic calming measures.
• D.
Read, 165 Bruce Street – reiterating his comments as outlined in his
communication dated November 2, 2013, appended to the CWC agenda dated
November 11, 2013.
• G.
Osinski, 28 Elmwood Avenue – indicating he was pleased to see the rationale
for the Study; stating he agrees with many of the comments with respect to
the perceived safety concerns, but that there really aren’t any real
concerns; stating he would like to have seen details with respect to bicycles
travelling in the wrong direction included in the Study in order to determine
the reason for this situation; advising that his research indicated that as
both Bruce Street and Elmwood Avenue feed the heart of Wortley Village,
cyclists travel the wrong direction to access the ValuMart; identifying a
need for two-way bike lanes on Elmwood Avenue; advising that there are a lot
of young children in the area, as well as a local day care and Victoria
Public School; advising that the current system works well but the conversion
would possibly create a need for additional crosswalks for children to access
the Public School; advising he is against the conversion to two-way streets;
and suggesting there are other methods to address the safety concerns,
including two-way bike paths on both or one of these streets.
• K.
McClellan, 22 Elmwood Avenue East – stating she is against the conversion to
two-way; stating that she feels there are two issues that need to be
addressed due to the number of children and pets in the area: speed control
and signage; advising that traffic speeds up between the stop sign on Edward
Avenue to the stop light on Wharncliffe Road; and suggesting speed bumps need
to be installed to reduce speeds and better signage to avoid wrong-way
traffic.
• J.
Howell, 46 Bruce Street - providing comments as outlined in her communication
dated November 5, 2013, appended to the CWC agenda dated November 11, 2013;
• R.
Schieven, 66 Bruce Street – stating she supports the conversion to a two-way
street; advising she lived in the Beaches area of Toronto which had lots of
narrow two-way streets which created the best calming traffic measures;
suggesting that despite people’s complaints, parked cars stop speeding;
stating people speeding on Bruce Street from Wharncliffe Road to Ridout
Street is her biggest concern; and stating she feels the conversion to two-way
is the best solution and hoping that is the direction that will be taken.
• B.
Garvin, 74 Bruce Street – stating she is not in favour of the two-way
conversion; expressing concern with the speed, volume and especially the
elimination of parking, and the impact on guests who may have to park several
streets away; and advising she would like to see things remain the way they
are but would support traffic calming measures.
• M.
Bratti, 79 Bruce Street – thanking the Committee for the opportunity to speak;
stating this is an emotional issue for her and that she supports the change;
advising she lives on a racetrack with traffic coming off Wharncliffe Road
with no stopping until Wortley Road with speeders flying past the slower
traffic; advising she shares the concern about loss of parking; stating that
during construction and road closures traffic continued to access the street
despite unsafe conditions and created safety issues; stating that people are
not aware of the large number of small children and pets in the area;
suggesting that anyone who feels that a two-way street is unsafe for children
doesn’t realize the current speed of the traffic; expressing her concern is
heightened by recent speed-related pedestrian accidents; and stating there is
a need to slow traffic down and that the traffic on two-way streets in the
area is slower.
• G.
Brown, 59 Ridout Street - providing comments as outlined in the attached
communication.
• S.
Alexi, 90 and 98 Elmwood Avenue East – advising that she is against the
conversion to two-way streets; expressing street parking is a high priority
for her, her tenants and her tenants’ visitors; suggesting speeding happens
on every street; advising that Old South is a stop sign heaven; and advising
that she is also speaking on behalf of her tenants who were unavailable to
attend this meeting.
• J.
Odegaard, 81 Elmwood Avenue East – advising he is definitely against making
streets two-way; advising his family has lived here since 2007 and enjoys
things the way they are; and suggesting property values could decrease with a
change to two-way traffic.
• D.
Hutchison, 171 Bruce Street - providing comments as outlined in his
communication dated October 27, 2013, appended to the CWC agenda dated
November 11, 2013. (2013-T08)
|