<A>

 

Council

MINUTES

14TH MEETING

 

August 27, 2013

 

The Council meets in Regular Session in the Council Chambers this day at 4:09 PM.

 

PRESENT: Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and C. Saunders (City Clerk).

 

ALSO PRESENT: A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J. Braam, J. Clark, B. Coxhead, S. Datars Bere, J.M. Fleming, B. George, A. Hagan, J. Jessop, G. Kotsifas, D. Lazenby, L. Livingstone, A. Macpherson, V. McAlea Major, D. O’Brien, J. Page, R. Paynter, M. Ribera, L.M. Rowe, J. Smout, M. Turner, B. Warner, B. Westlake-Power and B. Whitelaw.

 

At the beginning of the Meeting all Members are present except Councillor S. Orser.

 

I

DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

 

Councillor M. Brown discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 13 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee and the related Bill No. 382, having to do with an application by the City of London relating to Day Care Centres in schools, by indicating that he is employed by the Thames Valley District School Board.  Councillor M. Brown further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 2 of the 22nd Report of the Corporate Services Committee, having to do with Sherwood Forest Public School, by indicating that he is employed by the Thames Valley District School Board.  Councillor M. Brown further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to the 22nd Report of the Corporate Services Committee, having to do with a matter pertaining to the purpose of instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which  could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency; commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition, by indicating that he is employed by the Thames Valley District School Board.

 

Councillor J.P. Bryant discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 18 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee, having to do with the application by the City of London with respect to secondary dwelling units, by indicating that her house contains a secondary dwelling unit.

 

Councillor B. Polhill discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 16 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee, having to do with the application by the City of London relating to the Veterans Memorial Parkway, by indicating that the roadway expansion goes past the front door of his business.

 

Councillor N. Branscombe discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 16 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee, having to do with the application by the City of London relating to the Veterans Memorial Parkway, by indicating that her spouse owns and operates a business at Oxford Street/Veterans Memorial Parkway.

 

II

REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC

 

            None.

 

III

ADDED REPORTS

 

            1.         23rd Report of the Corporate Services Committee

 

            2.         9th Report of the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee

 

            3.         12th Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee

 

IV

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, IN CAMERA

 

MOTION FOR IN CAMERA SESSION

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve that Council rise and go into Committee of the Whole in camera, for the purpose of considering the following:

 

a)

A matter pertaining to the purpose of instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which  could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency; commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition. (C-1/22/CSC)

 

b)

A matter pertaining to proposed or pending acquisition of land by the municipality in connection with the Dingman Creek Erosion Control Facility project; litigation with the Ontario Municipal Board, File No. LC130020, with respect to the expropriation of part of properties municipally located on Dingman Drive, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, in connection with litigation with the Ontario Municipal Board, File No. LC130020, in respect of the expropriation of part of properties municipally located on Dingman Drive; and directions and instructions to officers and employees or agents of the municipality regarding conduct of litigation in connection with litigation at the Ontario Municipal Board, File No. LC130020 in respect of the expropriation of part of properties municipally located on Dingman Drive. (C-2/22/CSC)

 

c)

A matter pertaining to proposed or pending acquisition of land by the municipality in connection with the Springbank Drive road widening project and related expropriations; litigation or potential litigation with respect to the expropriation of temporary easement on a property located at 339 Springbank Drive, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, in connection with the expropriation of temporary easement on a property located at 339 Springbank Drive; and directions and instructions to officers and employees or agents of the municipality regarding  settlement negotiations and conduct of litigation in connection with the expropriation of temporary easement on a property located at 339 Springbank Drive. (C-3/22/CSC)

 

d)

 

A matter pertaining to labour relations and employee negotiations, advice and recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation, including communications necessary for that purpose, relating to the Corporation’s associations and unions. (ADDED)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

The Council rises and goes in camera at 4:14 PM, with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members present except Councillor S. Orser.

 

At 4:15 PM Councillor S. Orser enters the meeting.

 

The Committee of the Whole at 5:00 PM rises and Council resumes in regular session at 5:06 PM, with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members present.

 

V

RECOGNITIONS

 

1.

His Worship the Mayor presents the 2013 Queen Elizabeth Scholarships to the following recipients: Julian Donovan from Regina Mundi Catholic College (average 98.83%), Emily Dzongowski from Mother Teresa Catholic Secondary School (average 97.83%) and Jason Mile from Sir Wilfrid Laurier Secondary School (average 97.83%).

 

2.

His Worship the Mayor presents a certificate for "London's Featured Community Organization" to the London Health Sciences Foundation.

 

At 5:15 PM Councillor S.E. White leaves the meeting.

 

VI

CONFIRMATION AND SIGNING OF THE MINUTES OF THE THIRTEENTH MEETING HELD ON JULY 30, 2013

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve the Minutes of the 13th Meeting held on July 30, 2013.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (14)

 

VII

COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve referral of the following communications for consideration with the noted clauses:

 

1.

Properties located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397/4407 Wellington Road South (OZ-8120) (Refer to the Planning and Environment Committee Stage for consideration with clause 4 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee.)

 

a)

D.H. Wood, Wood Bull LLP;

 

b)

A. McCloskey, Ministry of Natural Resources;

 

c)

G. A. Epp, M.Sc., Ph.D., AECOM Canada Ltd.

 

d)

(ADDED) J. Brick, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and

 

e)

(ADDED) G. Smith, Friends of Meadowlily Woods Community Association

 

2.

B. and S. Neubauer, 250 Crumlin Sideroad - Veterans Memorial Parkway (Z-8194) (Refer to the Planning and Environment Committee Stage for consideration with clause 16 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee.)

 

3.

(ADDED) M. Horley, By E-mail - Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation Study Area (Refer to the Planning and Environment Committee Stage for consideration with clause 5 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee.)

 

4.

(ADDED) J. Roberston, By E-mail - 9th Report of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (Refer to the Community and Protective Services Committee Stage for consideration with clause 7 of the 15th Report of the Community and Protective Services Committee.)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (14)

 

Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve that pursuant to section to section 7.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business be changed to permit consideration of clause 4 of the 18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee to be heard at 6:00 PM.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)

 

NAYS: S. Orser (1)

 

VIII

MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE IS GIVEN

 

            None.

 

At 5:20 PM Councillor S.E. White enters the meeting.

 

IX

REPORTS

 

 

18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee

                        Councillor B. Polhill presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clauses 1 to 22, excluding clauses 4, 13,16 and 18.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that Councillor W.J. Polhill disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 16 of this Report, having to do with the application by the City of London, relating to the Veterans Memorial Parkway, by indicating that he lives in the area.

 

That it BE NOTED that Councillor N. Branscombe disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 16 of this Report, having to do with the application by the City of London, relating to the Veterans Memorial Parkway, by indicating that her spouse owns property in the Oxford Street/Veterans Memorial Parkway area.

 

2.

Properties located at 3700 Colonel Talbot Road and 3645 Bostwick Road (O-7609)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to the letter of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board, relating to By-law No. C.P.-1284-(st)-331 to approve Official Plan Amendment 541, the Southwest Area Secondary Plan, the Ontario Municipal Board BE REQUESTED to amend Schedules 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 12 of the Southwest Area Secondary Plan - Conceptual Road Network and Appendix 1 –  Proposed Schedule “A” amendment to the Official Plan, as it applies to the W3 Lambeth Farms property, to:

 

a)         modify the open space configuration on the W3 Lambeth Farms property on all the identified Schedules, Conceptual Plan and proposed Official Plan Schedule “A” amendment;

 

b)         apply a Low Density Residential land use in place of the Open Space land use on all the identified Schedules and proposed Official Plan Schedule “A” amendment;

 

c)         modify the location of the proposed neighbourhood park from the northwest corner of Bostwick Road and proposed Kilbourne Road extension to the W3 Lambeth Farms property on all the identified Schedules; and,

 

d)         modify Schedule 2, to shift the Multi-use Pathway Planned Route to the east, so that it forms part of the open space pathway connection.  (2013-L01)

 

3.

Property located at 260 Sarnia Road (Z-8075)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the report dated August 20, 2013, relating to the decision by the Ontario Municipal Board, concerning the appeal by Ayman Shana’a Holdings Inc., with respect to an amendment to the Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, a Municipal Council decision relating to the property located at 260 Sarnia Road BE RECEIVED.   (2013-D14A)

 

5.

Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation Study Area

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, in response to the letter of appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board dated July 5, 2013, submitted by Patton Cormier & Associates, on behalf of JLC Homes Ltd., relating to By-Law L.S.P. 3471-177, as it relates to 186 Wharncliffe Road North, the following actions be taken:

 

a)            the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council has reviewed its decision relating to this matter and sees no reason to alter it; and,

 

b)                        the City Solicitor BE REQUESTED to represent the Municipal Council’s interests in these matters and retain outside expert witnesses in support of the Municipal Council’s position;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

 

·                     a communication dated August 15, 2013, from J. Biviano, 143 Central Avenue;

·                     a communication dated August 16, 2013, from C. Horley and K. Norman, by e-mail; and,

·                     a communication dated August 14, 2013, from D. Horley, by e-mail.     (2013-L01)

 

6.

Property located at 699 Wonderland Road North (H-8212)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Services and Planning Liaison, based on the application of ESAM Construction Limited, relating to the property located at 699 Wonderland Road North, the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Associated Shopping Area Commercial (h-25*ASA3/ASA4/ASA8) Zone TO an Associated Shopping Area Commercial (ASA3/ASA4/ASA8) Zone to remove the holding “h-25” provision.  (2013-D14B)

 

7.

Building Division Monthly Report for June 2013

 

That the Building Division Monthly Report for June 2013 BE RECEIVED.   (2013-D00)

 

8.

8th Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee

 

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 8th Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee (EEPAC) from its meeting held on July 18, 2013:

a)         the warranty on trees for the Gore Road Class EA BE EXTENDED to two years, as per City of London policy (recommendation #17);

 

b)         Mr. C. Haines, Project Manager, Dillon Consulting, BE ADVISED that the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee (EEPAC) expressed its appreciation to him for responding to the EEPAC comments relating to the Gore Road Class EA;

 

c)     the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to provide the following information with respect to the twelve invasive species included in the Street Tree Guideline document the number and percentage of total street tree plantings in each of the years 2010, 2011 and 2012;

 

d)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to provide a qualitative impact assessment of the effects of the 12 approved street tree invasive species on the Environmentally Significant Areas currently being inventoried; it being noted that the ESA’s being inventoried are Medway, Meadowlily, the Coves and Westminster Ponds; and,

 

e)         that clauses 4 to 14, inclusive, of the 8th Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee BE RECEIVED;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation and received the attached excerpt from the City of London Approved Street Tree List from D. Sheppard, Chair, EEPAC, with respect to these matters.

 

9.

7th Report of the Advisory Committee on the Environment

 

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 7th Report of the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE) from its meeting held on July 17, 2013:

 

a)            the following actions be taken with respect to a Property Assessment for Clean Energy (PACE) program:

 

i)          the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to consider the inclusion of policies to promote sustainability and sustainability programs in ReThink London OPA review; it being noted that the ACE will provide ReThink London, a report  with respect to proposed sustainability policies and programs; and,

 

ii)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to consider a PACE program as part of their participation in the Collaboration on Home Energy Efficient Retrofits in Ontario (CHEERIO) initiative; and,

 

b)            that clauses 2 to 6, inclusive, of the 7th Report of the ACE BE RECEIVED;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from J. Howell, Vice Chair, with respect to these matters.

 

10.

Properties located at 407 McMahen Street and portions of 652, 654 and 656 Elizabeth Street (Z-8182)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of the City of London, relating to the property located at 407 McMahen Street and portions of the properties located at 652, 654 and 656 Elizabeth Street, the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject properties FROM a Residential R2 Special Provision (R2-1(10)) Zone, which permits single detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings, duplex dwellings and converted dwellings; a Holding Residential R5/Residential R9 Special Provision (h-5•R5-3/R9-7(6)•H20) Zone, which permits townhouses, apartment buildings, lodging houses and continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum height of 20m; a Residential R10 (R10-1•H36) Zone, which permits townhouses, apartment buildings, lodging houses and continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum height of 36m; and a Holding Residential R5 (h-5•R5-4) Zone, which permits townhouse dwellings TO a Community Facility Special Provision (CF2(1)) Zone, which permits public recreational buildings, public swimming pools, studios, community centres, day care centres, convenience stores and eat-in restaurants;

 

 

it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the public  participation meeting associated with this matter.   (2013-D14A)

 

11.

Property located at 432 Grey Street (Z-8200)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the City of London zoning review, relating to the property located at 432 Grey Street:

 

a)         the attached proposed by-law, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Residential R3 (R3-1) Zone, which permits single detached, semi-detached, duplex, triplex, fourplex and converted dwellings TO a Neighbourhood Facility Special Provision (NF( )) Zone, to permit churches, elementary schools and community centres with special provisions for lot frontage, interior side yards and parking;

 

b)         the Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to consider the following design issues through the site plan process:

 

i)          the ability of the site to accommodate access to the rear and interior side yards;

ii)         the feasibility of accommodating front yard parking; and,

iii)         the ability to meet landscaped open space requirements;

 

it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual made an oral submission in connection therewith:

 

Reverend Delta McNeish, Beth Emmanuel Church – expressing appreciation to the City for taking care of the archaeological process that is almost completed; advising that the items that have been found at 275 Thames Street are now being cleaned; and indicating that they have sent a letter to the City to get some direction on what they need to do to move the project forward in terms of zoning and planning.   (2013-D14A)

 

12.

Property located at 275 Callaway Road

 

That, on the recommendation of the Manager of Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken with respect to the site plan approval application by Richmond Village (London) Inc., relating to the property located at 275 Callaway Road:

 

a)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that there were no issues raised at the public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with respect to the application for site plan approval; and,

 

b)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the site plan application for the residential development.   (2013-D11)

 

14.

Property located at 1166 Hamilton Road

 

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken with respect to the site plan approval application for an apartment building by JLC Homes Ltd., relating to the property located at 1166 Hamilton Road:

 

a)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that there were no issues raised at the public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with respect to the application for site plan approval; and,

 

b)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the site plan application for a four storey apartment building with 23 units.    (2013-D11)

 

15.

Veterans Memorial Parkway South Extension (OZ-8195)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the application of the City of London, relating to amendments to the City’s Official Plan and Zoning By-law for the Veterans Memorial Parkway South Extension:

 

a)         the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Schedule “C” Transportation Corridors, of the Official Plan to add “Freeway” to an extension of the Veterans Memorial Parkway from Highway 401 to Wilton Grove Road to implement the recommendations of the Veterans Memorial Parkway Extension and Highway 401 Interchange Improvements Transportation Environmental Study Report (TESR); and,

 

b)         the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Section 4.21 Road Allowance Requirements – Specific Roads of Zoning By-law Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan as amended in part a), above), to add Veterans Memorial Parkway as a “Freeway” with a 30m limit of allowance (measured from the centerline) in Section 4.21 Road Allowance Requirements – Specific Roads of the Z.-1 Zoning By-law;

 

it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the public  participation meeting associated with this matter.   (2013-D14A)

 

17.

Property located at 982 Gainsborough Road (Z-8178)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the application of Highland Communities Ltd., relating to the property located at 982 Gainsborough Road:

 

a)         the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Holding Business District Commercial (h-17*BDC1/BDC2) Zone, which provides for and regulates a mix of retail, restaurant, neighbourhood facility, office and residential uses located along pedestrian-oriented business districts in older parts of the City and an Urban Reserve (UR3) Zone which permits existing dwellings, agricultural uses (except for mushroom farms, commercial greenhouses livestock facilities and manure storage facilities), conservation lands, managed woodlot, wayside pit, passive recreation use, kennels, private outdoor recreation clubs, riding stables and a Holding Urban Reserve (h-2*UR3) Zone, which permits the same range of uses as the UR3 zone subject to a holding provision which requires the submission of an Environmental Impact Study or Subject Lands Status Report to determine the extent to which development may be permitted TO a Holding Business District Commercial (h-11*h-17*BDC1/BDC2) Zone and a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-5*h-11*h-17*R9-7(_)*H50) Zone, to permit apartment buildings, lodging house class 2, senior citizens apartment buildings, handicapped persons apartment buildings and continuum-of-care facilities up to a maximum height of 50m (15 storeys) and a density of 150 units per hectare; a special provision is recommended to allow for the reduction of the easterly side yard to 12m and a maximum projection into the required yard for apartment balconies to a maximum of 3m; the use of three holding provisions is required in order to ensure that access and sanitary servicing concerns are addressed before the development of the site and that the site plan will be reviewed through a public process;

 

b)         the Site Plan Approval Authority, BE REQUESTED to address the following items through the site plan approval process:

 

i)              ensure pedestrian paths are situated to maximize their direct and continuous connection with pedestrian paths in the commercially zoned portion of the site to the north;

ii)             detail the design of the ‘hard landscape space’ north of the podium component to create a ‘forecourt’ shared space linking  the lobby entrance with the service road through the use of continuous paving treatments and landscaped features positioned to delineate vehicular and pedestrian pathways;

 

iii)            position the lobby entrance, a public art installation, or significant landscape element to create a view terminus, visible from Gainsborough Road, aligned with the internal road connecting the residential portion of the site with Gainsborough Road;

iv)           minimize surface parking and ensure all parking visible from the ‘service road’ is screened to emphasize the pedestrian quality in the north part of the residentially zoned portion of the site;

v)            ensure siting and construction of the apartment buildings is consistent with the conceptual site plan and elevations/renderings included as Appendix “B”;

vi)           the Owner shall grant a municipal easement of an appropriate size and alignment, consistent with the rear lane concept identified in the Hyde Park Community Plan, for public access across this site, all to the satisfaction of the City; and,

vii)          minimize the potential impacts of the underground parking entrance, garbage facilities, lighting and other potential impacts on neighbouring properties;

 

c)         the request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject property FROM an Urban Reserve (UR3) Zone and a Holding Urban Reserve (h-2*UR3) Zone, which permits existing dwellings, agricultural uses except for mushroom farms, commercial greenhouses livestock facilities and manure storage facilities, conservation lands, managed woodlot, wayside pit, passive recreation use, kennels, private outdoor recreation clubs and riding stables TO a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (R9-7(_)*H50) Zone, to permit apartment buildings, lodging house class 2, senior citizens apartment buildings, handicapped persons apartment buildings and continuum-of-care facilities with a special provision to allow for the reduction of the easterly side yard to maximum of 12m and maximum projection for the apartment’s balconies into the required yards to a maximum of 3m BE REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

i)             the City of London’s Transportation Department has concerns about the proposed access to this site in relation to the proximity of the intersection of Gainsborough Road and Coronation Drive and is requesting a holding provision until the submitted Transportation Impact Analysis is updated to address this matter; and,

ii)            the City of London’s Wastewater and Drainage Engineering Division also has concerns regarding how the south portion of the property will be serviced as the future servicing for the subject site is have not been built in and will be located over adjacent lands to the east which is not owned by the applicant;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

 

·                     a communication dated August 12, 2013 from C. Creighton, Land Use Planner, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and,

·                     a communication dated August 19, 2013 from K. & M. Johnson, 1108-1035 Coronation Drive;

 

it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:

 

·                     M. Pease, IBI Group, on behalf of the applicant – see attached presentation.

·                     Shelly McKeen, 1009-1030 Coronation Drive – advising that it appears that there have been no negotiations through the City for the undeveloped land owned by other land owners; expressing concern with a development of this size, on a property of this size, which she believes is approximately 6.5 acres; indicating that it is within the guidelines; however it seems like a huge development on a small piece of land; advising that they see traffic problems on Hyde Park Road now; reiterating that the north part of Hyde Park Road will not be completed until 2015; indicating that there is a proposal for land use change at the corner of Coronation Drive and South Carriage Way; noting that she has not read the reports on this proposal; indicating that if the land use change proposal is to go ahead there will be a bigger influx of traffic; advising that she would really like to see the City consider the traffic in the north end; advising that Gainsborough Road and Hyde Park Road are very busy now; indicating that they cannot access Hyde Park Road from South Carriage Road easily on the weekdays from 7:00 AM to approximately 9:00 AM; advising that there is no stop light and there are no cross walks; indicating that there is a park for public use to the west but she cannot access the park without putting her life at risk trying to cross the street; advising that she has asked the City before to install traffic lights and/or a crosswalk; indicating that she does not see anything being presented immediately; advising that Hyde Park does have an Official Plan; indicating that the housing is currently low and medium density; indicating that she lives in a high rise and she understands high rise development and sees how the City clusters high rises so she understands how this proposal will start a cluster of high rises in the Hyde Park area; advising that she really wants the City to think about the transportation and the access for the public now; indicating that she understands that the people residing on South Carriage Way are upset with the traffic going through their subdivisions.

·                     Dan Foster, 509-1030 Coronation Drive – indicating that he recently moved to London from Ottawa; indicating that, after seeing the development in Ottawa, there is a message for City of London Planners; advising that the message is that, in that taking the individual zoning requests on a case by case basis, they all make sense; advising that they all incrementally add a little bit of traffic; indicating that there are safety issues that need to be addressed now; noting that Hyde Park Road will be developed by 2015; advising that there is no stop light on South Carriage Road; indicating that he does not see how people move around in this subdivision; noting as an example, that to the west of their building, Tricar had originally received zoning to build a building complimentary to their building; advising that there is a woodlot, from their point of view, right where Coronation Drive stops; indicating that there are turkeys and deer in the woodlot even though it has not been deemed significant; enquiring as to when the City advises them of what the plan is for Coronation Drive; hearing nothing about making South Carriage Drive safer today; advising that every time he tries to get out of the laneway, he takes his life into his hands; advising that it is an accident waiting to happen; indicating that this is all hours of the day, not just 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM; indicating that if he was a resident living in the rest of the subdivision, he would wonder why, when the residents of 1030 Coronation Drive want to come west, they come through their subdivision; indicating that that seems like a pretty poor plan; noting that there are traffic calming measures in that subdivision, including a traffic circle; advising that there are all kinds of kids running through there; admitting that he does not feel comfortable driving through the subdivision or even going out Wonderland Road South, towards the University; advising that if he takes Coronation Drive out, he has a 10 minute wait and he is taking his life into his hands; indicating that the site plan makes sense by putting the building in the back of the lot; advising that the residents at 1030 Coronation Drive should have some input into the detailed planning of the services; indicating that the applicant has done a good job angling the apartments so that the people living there will have unobstructed views all the time but they have obstructed their views and he lives on that side of the building; understanding the density issues, but he does not want to have to listen to all the noise of people moving in and out of the units and garbage collection; indicating that the applicant needs to do a better job of setting garbage collection on the other side so that it lines up with the commercial nature which is in and out anyway; noting that, if the garbage collection area is moved, the applicant would not have to worry about a berm; and requesting that the staff figure out what they doing with Coronation Drive and make that raceway complete.

·                     Donna Szpakowski, Chair, Hyde Park Business Association – expressing support for the zoning amendment from Urban Reserve to High Density as this property was already identified as being high density in the 1999 Hyde Park Community Plan; noting that this supports the Hyde Park Community Plan, which was created with over 600 residents involved; indicating that the Hyde Park Community Plan speaks to increasing the residential population in the Hyde Park hamlet, which supports the growth and sustenance of local businesses in the area; expressing support for the holding provisions that Councillor M. Brown will be putting forward tonight as they pertains to the commencement of construction for these lands; hoping that a holding provision will be added for the 2014-2015 Hyde Park Road widening and its impact on residents, businesses, vehicles, pedestrians and safety, along with existing road safety concerns that they have attempted to lobby for; advising that, at this time, Hyde Park Road does not have the infrastructure to logistically or safely sustain traffic due to construction or increased residential counts until the Hyde Park Road widening has been completed and there is a loop that takes people off of Hyde Park Road and Gainsborough Road; expressing agreement with the comments made by Mr. D. Foster that the community is very involved in how access is gained, how noise is handled and such large additions to their community; indicating that Hyde Park’s character and vision was built into the Community Plan and the Hyde Park Business Association maintains that the hamlet of Hyde Park, which they envision as east and west along Gainsborough Road would be compromised by more than three high rises with the lands to be designated high density now or in the future within the hamlet; and advising that what they are asking is that if they have to have three high rises, that for the sake of the hamlet and for the sake of the visioning of the Hyde Park area that it be limited just to three.

·                     Apple Dobbin, 976 Gainsborough Road – expressing concern with the volume of traffic on Hyde Park Road and Gainsborough Road as both roads are very busy now; indicating that, if a new road is going to be added for the two new apartment buildings, it is going to make things much worse; indicating that, if they only have to make turns out and in, it is going to be very troubling to a lot of people; advising that the traffic situation is one that is very essential and has to be looked at very carefully and essentially for all the people who live around that little area; enquiring as to where the road is being installed; and reiterating that the roads are very dangerous for the traffic along Gainsborough Road and Hyde Park Side Road.

 

·                     Michelle Doornbosch, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of Marquis Holdings Inc. – indicating that the dental office is located directly west of the subject site; advising that the building was constructed in 2006; wanting to ensure that the long-term viability of their property is maintained; indicating that, with all the traffic comments that have been made, there has been no mention of the existing entrance into the dental office; indicating that the applicant’s presentation outlines a blocked in entrance to the property directly to the west of the dental office; noting that this is not entirely accurate as the applicant shows the building on the property line; advising that the entrance to the dental office is directly adjacent to the proposed entrance at Gainsborough Road; advising that there is no mention in the staff report or the traffic impact analysis as to how that is to be handled; advising that she met with the developer last week to  outline their concerns; noting that she has not seen any updated plans as to how that is to be addressed; indicating that she does support the h-11 and the h-5 holding provisions to ensure that access can be addressed and this is a public site plan process; advising that she wants to ensure that their clients concerns are addressed through the process; indicating that they looked at the development agreement for the property from 2006; noting that there is provision in it for joint access, but there is no provision to require the existing entrance to close; reiterating that their biggest concern is that the two entrances cannot function as they are shown on the plan; hoping that some revisions can be made so that there are no impacts from this proposed development on the existing traffic patterns to that entrance.    (2013-D14A)

 

19.

Proposed Stoneycreek Pathway

 

The S. Evoy, 29 Stoneycreek Crescent, BE GRANTED delegation status at the September 24, 2013 Planning and Environment Committee meeting with respect to the proposed Stoneycreek Pathway.  (2013-R04)

 

20.

Tricar Subdivision (Phase 2) - 39T-11504

 

That C. Linton, Norquay Sunningdale Land Corp. BE DENIED delegation status at a future Planning and Environment Committee meeting with respect to the Tricar Subdivision, Phase 2, as there is an existing policy and process in place with respect to this matter.

 

21.

Near-Campus Neighbourhood Amendments (Z-8218)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner and the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official, the following actions be taken with respect to city-wide Zoning By-law and minor variance applications relating to Near-Campus Neighbourhood amendments:

 

a)            the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner BE DIRECTED to prepare Zoning By-law amendments to:

 

i)          amend Section 2 of the Zoning By-law to modify the Parking Area definition to exclude Private Garages from the parking area calculation;

ii)         amend Section 4.19. of the Zoning By-law to require that Private Garages located in the rear yard are to be regulated as accessory uses as set out in Subsection 4.1 of the Zoning By-law when a Private Garage is an accessory structure; and,

iii)         amend Section 5.3 and Table 5.3 of the Zoning By-law Z.-1 to permit 1.2m interior side yard depths for all Residential R1-1 to R1-5 and R1-12 to R1-13 variations while requiring that one side yard depth be a minimum of 3.0m where no private garage is attached to the dwelling;

 

b)         a special meeting of the Planning and Environment meeting be convened on Monday, September 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM for the purpose of holding a public participation meeting in connection with the proposed Zoning By-law amendment referred to in clause a), above; and,

 

c)         the actions taken by Civic Administration to initiate Minor Variance applications for various lots zoned Residential R1-1 to R1-5 and R1-12 to R1-13 to seek relief from the regulations of the Zoning By-law pertaining to the interior side yard depth BE ENDORSED.   (2013-D14A)

 

 

 

 

22.

Property located at 13 Blackfriars Street

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the report dated August 20, 2013, relating to the property located at 13 Blackfriars Street BE RECEIVED. (2013-L01/R01)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Pohill to Approve clause 13.

 

13.

City-Wide Day Care Centres in Schools (Z-8211)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of the City of London, relating to Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, the proposed by-law as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to revise the definitions of “Elementary School” and “Secondary School” provided in Section 2 Definitions of By-law Z.-1 to include “Day Care Centre” as a permitted accessory use, to add “Day Care Centre” to the list of permitted uses in the Neighbourhood Facility (NF) Zone and to remove “Day Care Centre” from the list of permitted uses in the Neighbourhood Facility (NF1) Zone variation;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication, dated August 12, 2013, from C. Creighton, Land Use Planner, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, with respect to this matter;

 

it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the public  participation meeting associated with this matter.   (2013-D14A)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor S.E. White to Approve clause 16.

 

16.

Veterans Memorial Parkway (Z-8194)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of the City of London for amendments to the City’s Zoning By-law for the Veterans Memorial Parkway, the following actions be taken:

 

a)            the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Section 4.21 Road Allowance Requirements – Specific Roads of Zoning By-law Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to add, amend, delete various streets in Section 4.21 Road Allowance Requirements – Specific Roads of Z.-1 Zoning By-law; and,

 

b)            the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to  report back on how to address the portion of the secondary collector identified through the auto mall property, north to Cuddy Court;

 

it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:

 

·                    Terry McSpadden, 2257 Trafalgar Street – indicating that this has been the family home since 1955 when it was built; advising that it is the first home to the west of Veterans Memorial Parkway (VMP), on the south side of Trafalgar Street, on the north side of the 3M office building; advising that he understands that the engineering detail is not complete or barely started on the proposed fly over, Trafalgar Street over the VMP for that intersection and that will quite profoundly affect their outlook from the front of their home; expressing concern with noise; advising that when the home was built in 1955, Trafalgar Street was a gravel road and it was a country setting; noting that there was nothing in that area at all but as the city has grown and annexations have occurred, the home is in a situation now far different from when it was built; expressing concern that, now that the VMP has gone from an expressway to a freeway, from the original Highway 100, which was basically a country road, to one of noise; noting that the noise, especially through the evening, is incredibly loud, particularly in motorcycle season; realizing that there has been a lot of discussion about berming along the VMP for the people that live between Trafalgar Street and Admiral Drive; noting that they already have a berm that is probably 15 feet high; further noting that they have nothing; advising that it is so loud at times that they have to stop talking if they are in their backyard; expressing concern with egress from the property; noting that they have no details on this yet as to what might happen and they are often told that this is a 30 to 50 year plan but it seems as if things are moving along much more quickly than anticipated; noting that they are hoping to be kept advised of the process as it goes along; advising that they have been in contact with the Planner; advising that they see their concerns as a diminishment of their family property which is of importance to them because their plans took into account the increasing value of their property and perhaps different uses in the future; advising that, as the city has progressed and enveloped them, the options that they had anticipated some time ago seem to be disappearing; advising that what they would like to do is to continue their conversations with the Planner to see if there is some relief that they can obtain through rezoning or subdivision of their lands, as they own over half an acre of property; expressing appreciation to the Committee for the opportunity to express his concerns; indicating that they are very happy with the roundabout that was installed at Hale Street and Trafalgar Street; advising that the homes on the northeast quadrant of the roundabout have a concrete wall in front of them that is probably 50 to 100 feet in front of their homes and is a barrier which prevents them from having outlook from their property; indicating that, in their case, between a piece of their land being taken away for a right turn lane onto the VMP and the city boundary being 15 to 20 feet in front of their front porch, they anticipate a wall, if you look at where the fly over has to start and where it has to go to, that will meet or exceed the height of the homes at Hale Street and Trafalgar Street; and indicating that they are really concerned at their retirement age on the impact on their retirement resources.  

·                     Michelle Doornbosch, Zelinka Priamo Limited – advising that the plan before the Committee shows the addition of a secondary collector that cuts through the recently approved auto mall, in the subdivision plan that has been approved; advising that three of the dealerships are under construction; indicating that the design of the subdivision does not allow for that collector road to go through; indicating that they are going on record advising that that is a concern and there is no opportunity to connect that road through the subdivision; and noting that it would have to be located further west of the subdivision lands.   (2013-D14A)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)

 

RECUSED: B. Polhill, N. Branscombe (2)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 18.

 

18.

Secondary Dwelling Units (OZ-8053)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of the City of London, for an Official Plan Amendment to amend existing policies, relating to secondary dwelling units and for a Zoning By-law Amendment to introduce regulations related to secondary dwelling units, the following actions be taken:

 

a)         a public participation meeting BE HELD at the Planning and Environment Committee on September 24, 2013, with respect to the proposed amendments; and,

 

b)         the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment BE INTRODUCED at a future meeting of the Municipal Council;

 

it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the attached communication, dated August 20, 2013, from B. Lansink, 507 Colborne Street, with respect to this matter;

it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the public  participation meeting associated with this matter.    (2013-D14A)

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (14)

 

RECUSED: J.P. Bryant (1)

 

 

15th Report of the Community and Protective Services Committee

                        Councillor B. Armstrong presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Armstrong to Approve clauses 1 to 10, inclusive.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

2.

6th Report of the Accessibility Advisory Committee

 

That the 6th Report of the Accessibility Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on June 27, 2013, BE RECEIVED.

 

3.

7th Report of the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee

 

That the 7th Report of the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on July 18, 2013, BE RECEIVED.

 

4.

8th Report of the London Housing Advisory Committee

 

That the 8th Report of the London Housing Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on July 10, 2013, BE RECEIVED.

 

5.

Neighbourhood Watch London

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director of Neighbourhood, Children and Fire Services, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to provide funding in the amount of $19,105 from the remaining 3rd installment of funds to Neighbourhood Watch London, for the 2013 budget year. (2013-P15)

 

6.

Request for Proposal 10-13 Supply and Delivery of Incontinence Products

 

That, on the recommendation Administrator, Community Services/Long Term Care, the following actions be taken with respect to RFP 10-13, the Supply and Delivery of Incontinence Products:

 

a)         the current contract with Stevens Company Ltd., 425 Railside Drive, Brampton, Ontario L7A 0N8 BE EXTENDED for two (2) additional years at an approximate annual contract expenditure of $ 127,934;

 

b)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this contract extension; and,

 

c)         the above-noted approval BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or having a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this approval.  (2013-L04B)

 

7.

9th Report of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee

 

That the following actions be taken with respect to the 9th Report of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (AWAC), from its meeting held on August 1, 2013:

 

 

a)         the following actions be taken with respect to the 2013 AWAC Draft Work Plan:

i)      under the "Feral Cat Day/Week" project, the following initiatives BE APPROVED:

A)  "educational initiatives" for specific colony areas;

B)   participate with the City of London at the Western Fair Pet Show;

C)  promote donations to Rescue Groups for the Trap, Neuter, Release Program (TNR);

D)   promote the importance of managing feral colonies; and,

E)  educate the public about TNR;

 

ii)   Animal Welfare Services BE REQUESTED to advise the AWAC of any available funding for printing brochures/flyers;

 

iii)   a Working Group BE ESTABLISHED consisting of B. Barr, G. Sturm and T. Satchell, to develop a program and budget for the Feral Cat Day/Week and report back at the September meeting of the AWAC;

 

iv) $50.00 BE APPROVED from the AWAC Budget for the Working Group to gather feral cat information; it being noted that the AWAC has sufficient funds in its 2013 Budget for this expenditure;

 

b)         the Manager, Licensing & Municipal Law Enforcement BE INVITED to attend the September 5, 2013 AWAC meeting to provide feedback on the AWAC deferred matters list as at August 1, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration, including the City Solicitor, BE ASKED investigate and report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee (CPSC), with respect to:

 

i)    amendments to the City of London Animal Control By-law that would ban the sale of cats and dogs from puppy mills in retail outlets; and,

 

ii)   the potential for agreement(s) with neighbouring municipalities related to the matter of puppy mills, licensing and enforcement;

 

d)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to provide an update to the AWAC with respect to when the Request for Proposal for Animal Services will be awarded; and

 

e)         clauses 5 to 14 of the 9th Report BE RECEIVED;

 

it being noted that the CPSC received the attached presentation from B. Sayler and S. Rans, AWAC, with respect to this matter.   (2013-P14)

 

8.

Surveillance Cameras - Dundas Street between Adelaide Street and Rectory Street

 

That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to initiate a Community Task Force for the Old East Village for the purpose of developing a neighbourhood safety plan which would include various options and tools to increase public safety, and that NO ACTION BE TAKEN at this time, related to the request for camera installation on Dundas Street;

 

it being noted that the Community and Protective Services Committee received the following communications related to this matter:

 

•           two communications from Councillor S. Orser.

•           a communication dated August 16, 2013, from J. Diplock, Old East Village Community Association.

•           a communication dated August 15, 2013, from K. Keane, Old East Village BIA.   (2013-P15)

 

9.

E-Bikes

 

That the communication dated August 2, 2013, from Councillor D. Brown, with respect to an expanded report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee related to amendments to the Parks and Recreation By-law regarding the use of e-bikes, BE FORWARDED to the Civic Administration for inclusion in the aforementioned report.  (2013- RO4/CO1)

 

 

 

 

10.

Music on Patios

 

That the communication dated July 30, 2013, from Councillor D. Brown, with respect to possible amendments to section 4.18 of the Zoning By-law to permit acoustic music on patios, BE NOTED AND FILED.   (2013-C01/P11)

 

Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor D. Brown calls for a separate vote on clause 10.

 

Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor S. Orser calls for a separate vote on clauses 7 and 8.

 

Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor H.L. Usher calls for a separate vote on clause 9.

 

The motion to Approve clauses 1 to 6 is put.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor S. Orser and seconded by Councillor D.G. Henderson to Amend part c) of clause 7 by adding a new part iii) as follows:

 

"iii)    “rescue pet stores” BE EXCLUDED from any potential by-law amendments as noted in part c)i), above;”

 

Pursuant to section 11.6 of the Council Procedure By-law, the motion moved by Councillor S. Orser and seconded by Councillor D.G. Henderson is, at the joint request of the mover and seconder and with the consent of Council, withdrawn.

 

The motion to Approve clause 7 is put.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

The motion to Approve clause 8 is put.

 

Councillor S. Orser provides the attached handout.

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and seconded by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Amend clause 8 in line 2, by deleting the word "Community" and by replacing it with the words "Neighbourhood Safety".

 

At 5:52 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places Councillor P. Hubert in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.

 

At 5:59 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana resumes the Chair and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council Board.

 

The motion to Amend clause 8 in line 2 is put.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan and seconded by Councillor S.E. White to further Amend clause 8 in line 2 by adding the words "with Councillor S. Orser as the Task Force Chair", after the words "Task Force".

 

Motion Failed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, S.E. White (7)

 

NAYS: B. Armstrong, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (8)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Armstrong and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve clause 8, as amended.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Clause 8, as amended, reads as follows:

 

That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to initiate a Neighbourhood Safety Task Force for the Old East Village for the purpose of developing a neighbourhood safety plan which would include various options and tools to increase public safety, and that NO ACTION BE TAKEN at this time, related to the request for camera installation on Dundas Street;

 

it being noted that the Community and Protective Services Committee received the following communications related to this matter:

 

•           two communications from Councillor S. Orser.

•           a communication dated August 16, 2013, from J. Diplock, Old East Village Community Association.

•           a communication dated August 15, 2013, from K. Keane, Old East Village BIA.   (2013-P15)

 

The motion to Approve clause 9 is put.

 

Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Amend clause 9, in line 4, by deleting the word "inclusion" and by replacing it with the word "consideration".

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Armstrong and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clause 9, as amended.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Clause 9, as amended, reads as follows:

 

That the communication dated August 2, 2013, from Councillor D. Brown, with respect to an expanded report back to the Community and Protective Services Committee related to amendments to the Parks and Recreation By-law regarding the use of e-bikes, BE FORWARDED to the Civic Administration for consideration in the aforementioned report.  (2013- RO4/CO1)

 

 

 

 

The motion to Approve clause 10 is put.

 

At 6:10 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places Councillor P. Hubert in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.

 

At 6:17 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana resumes the Chair and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council Board. 

 

Motion Failed

 

YEAS: B. Armstrong, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, S.E. White (5)

 

NAYS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (10)

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve that the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the appropriate Standing Committee, with respect to by-law amendments that would permit acoustic music on patios, during reasonable hours, in the City of London for the Committee’s consideration. 

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (11)

 

NAYS: J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, J.P. Bryant (4)

 

Clause 10 reads as follows:

 

That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the appropriate Standing Committee, with respect to by-law amendments that would permit acoustic music on patios, during reasonable hours, in the City of London for the Committee’s consideration. 

 

 

18th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee (Continued)

                        Councillor B. Polhill presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 4.

 

4.

Properties located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397/4407 Wellington Road South (OZ-8120)

 

That, on the direction of Municipal Council, in recognition of the circumstance where these lands have been previously zoned and designated to permit a range of commercial uses, and that an “Unevaluated Vegetation Patch” (Patch 10102) as identified on Schedule “B-1” of the Official Plan is located on a portion of these lands, the following actions be taken with respect to the application of PenEquity Realty Corporation, relating to the property located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397 and 4407 Wellington Road South:

 

a)            the attached proposed by-law, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend the Official Plan as follows:

 

i)             by adding a special policy in Chapter 10 – “Policies for Specific Areas” to permit cinema use outside of the downtown area in the New Format Regional Commercial Node; and,

ii)            by amending Schedule B-1- Natural Heritage Features, to delete “Unevaluated Vegetation Patch”;

 

b)            the attached, revised, proposed BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal           Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan as amended in part a), above), FROM a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision/Light Industrial (h*RSC1(9)/RSC5/LI6) Zone, a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision (h*RSC1(9)/RSC3/ RSC4(5)/RSC5) Zone, which permits a wide range of service         commercial uses such as automobile services, home and auto supply, service repair and light industrial uses and a Community Shopping Area (CSA6), which allows for a large range of commercial uses TO a Holding Associated Shopping Area Commercial Special Provision (h*h-5*h-      18*h-55*h-103*h-141*h__­_*h___*h___*ASA3/ASA5/ASA6(__)/ASA7(__)/ ASA8(__)) Zone, to allow for commercial retail use, 14,000m2 of commercial recreational use, 4,000m2 cinema use, a gas bar use, a hotel use, home improvement and furnishing stores, and liquor, beer and wine stores subject to holding provisions to ensure the provision of municipal servicing, archaeological evaluation be completed, a transportation study be completed, Ministry of Transportation and Upper Thames River Conservation Authority permits be obtained, an Ontario Wetland evaluation to be completed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources, urban design matters be addressed, and a natural heritage compensation agreement between the City and the applicant be entered into to address the natural heritage compensation measures to be implemented    resulting from the removal of the Unevaluated Vegetation Patch (Patch 10102);”

 

c)         the Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to consider the following design issues through the site plan process:

 

·                     ensure a high level of architectural and landscape quality on all portions of the site with visual exposure to Highway 401;

·                     ensure that the design of the buildings located along Highway 401 and Dingman Drive are of a high design standard and do not appear as “the back of house”;

·                     screen all parking areas visible from Highway 401 as well as Dingman Drive using enhanced landscaping;

·                     create a block pattern on the site in order to allow for future redevelopment;

·                     create a high quality main street through the centre of the site that includes:

·                     on-street parking;

·                     wide sidewalks;

·                     street trees;

·                     landscaping as well as street furniture (i.e.: lamp posts, signage, benches, garbage bins, etc.);

·                     improved pedestrian experience and access throughout the site;

·                     locate buildings along the main street that are oriented towards the street with accented main pedestrian entry points, transparent glass, articulated facades and rooflines, in order to create an active frontage;

·                     include a key building at the view terminus of the proposed main street (e.g., proposed movie theatre);

·                     provision of a variety of high quality materials (such as transparent glass, brick, stone, etc.) on all proposed buildings, in particular the elevations facing Highway 401, Dingman Drive and the mainstreet;

·                     create a centralized public space, located along the main street;

·                     provide for continuous pedestrian connections through the site;

·                     ensure all buildings have a walkway to the proposed on site main street commercial corridor as well as continuous walkways connecting to other buildings on the site;

·                     include adequately sized landscape islands to break up large surface parking areas, these landscape islands should include trees as well as enhanced landscaping;

·                     submit an updated urban design brief to the Urban Design Review Panel for a more comprehensive review of the final proposal through the site plan process; and,

·                     plant three trees for every tree removed, at a location of the applicant’s choice, on the property;

 

d)         the request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 from a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special   Provision/Light Industrial (h*RSC1(9) /RSC5/LI6) Zone, a Holding Restricted Service Commercial         Special Provision (h*RSC1(9)/RSC3/RSC4(5)/RSC5) Zone, which permits a wide range of service commercial uses such as automobile services, home and auto supply, service repair and light industrial uses and a Commercial Shopping Area (CSA6) Zone, which allows for a large range of commercial uses to an Associated Shopping Area Commercial Special Provision (ASA3/ASA5/ASA6(_)/ASA7(_)/ASA8) Zone and an Open Space (OS1) Zone, to allow for 50,183m2 of commercial retail use, 13,564m2 of commercial recreational use, 3,921m2 cinema use, a gas bar use and a passive recreational use, BE REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

i)              the requested amendment does not include the holding provisions to ensure the orderly development of the site; a permit from the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and the Ministry of Natural Resources being satisfied that the wetland is not considered a Provincially Significant Wetland; and,

 

ii)             the requested amendment does not include the additional uses as recommended by the Municipal Council;

 

e)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to determine if there are similar instances where “Unevaluated Vegetation Patches” on Schedule “B-1” of the Official Plan are not shown as “Open Space” or “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, and to initiate an Official Plan Amendment to show these lands as “Open Space” or  “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, noting that this would then make these lands subject to the City’s Tree       Conservation By-law (By-Law C.P.-1466-249);

 

f)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to work with the Applicant to develop the Natural Heritage Compensation Agreement required by the h(_) holding provision for Municipal Council approval that reflects the natural heritage value of the natural heritage feature to be removed, and is consistent with the compensation achieved through the Sovereign Woods resolution, it being noted that the Natural Heritage Compensation Agreement may include both natural heritage lands and lands that may be planted; and,

 

g)         pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the proposed by-law as the by-law is consistent with the request of the applicant, is consistent with what was circulated to the public and the changes are minor in nature;

 

it being noted out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

 

·                     a communication from G. Faul, Lambeth Community Association;

·                     a communication from J. Cuthbert, by e-mail;

·                     a communication from C. Richardson, by e-mail;

·                     a communication, dated August 11, 2013, from G. Smith, President, Friends of Meadowlily Woods Community Association;

·                     a communication, dated August 7, 2013, from K.E. Risler, 5-192 Elmwood Avenue;

·                     a communication, dated August 12, 2013, from D. Johnston, President and CEO, PenEquity Realty Corporation;

·                     a communication, dated August 14, 2013, from K. Lakhotia, General Manager, London Economic Development Corporation;

·                     a communication, dated July 25, 2013, from C. Creighton, Land Use Planner, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority;

·                     a communication, dated August 16, 2013, from J. Brick, Coordinator, Hydrology and Regulatory Services, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and,

·                     a communication, dated August 15, 2013, from D. Johnston, President and CEO, PenEquity Realty Corporation.    (2013-D14A)

 

Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve the referral of clause 4 back to the Civic Administration, as the application is premature given the outstanding policy concerns involving the Ministry of Natural Resources surrounding the designation of the wetland, the policies of the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority prohibiting development in a wetland and the lack of an environmental impact study determining how the provincially significant woodland can be protected as a result of a proposed development on adjacent lands; it being further noted that the municipality will hire an ecologist to evaluate the wetland using the Ontario Wetlands Evaluation System.

 

At 7:14 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places Councillor P. Van Meerbergen in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board. 

 

Moved by Councillor J.B. Baechler and seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve that pursuant to section 9.6 of the Council Procedure By-law, Mayor J.F. Fontana be permitted to speak longer that 5 minutes with respect to clause 4.

 

At 7:40 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana resumes the Chair and Councillor P. Van Meerbergen takes his seat at the Council Board.

 

 

 

 

 

Motion Failed

 

YEAS: J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (5)

 

NAYS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, S.E. White (10)

 

Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Recess.

 

Motion Passed

 

The Council recesses at 8:11 PM and reconvenes at 8:50 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members present except Councillor S.E. White.

 

At 8:51 PM Councillor S.E. White enters the meeting.

 

Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Amend clause 4 as follows:

 

1.        By deleting the first paragraph and part a) in their entirety and by replacing them with the following:

 

“That, on the direction of Municipal Council, with respect to the applications of PenEquity Realty Corporation, relating to the property located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397 and 4407 Wellington Road South:

 

a)            in recognition of the circumstances where these lands have been previously zoned and designated to permit a range of commercial uses, the attached revised proposed by-law, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council Meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend the Official Plan by adding a special policy Chapter 10 – “Policies for Specific Areas” to permit cinema use outside of the downtown area in the New Format Regional Commercial Node;”

 

2.        By adding the following new part b) as follows and by renumbering   the remaining parts accordingly:

 

“b)    the attached revised proposed by-law, to amend Schedule B-1 Natural Heritage Features, to delete the “Unevaluated Vegetation Patch”, BE INTRODUCED at a future meeting of the Municipal Council, after the Ontario Wetland evaluation, noted in part c), below, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources;”

 

3.    By adding the following new part d) and by renumbering the remaining clauses accordingly:

 

“d)        in the event that the Ontario Wetland evaluation noted in c) above, results in a portion of the subject land being deemed to be a Provincially Significant Wetland, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to bring forward the necessary amendment to Schedule B-1 Natural Heritage Features, to identify the Provincially Significant Wetland;”

 

4.       By deleting the original part f) in its entirety and by replacing it with the following new part in its place:

 

“the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to work with the Applicant to develop the Natural Heritage Compensation Agreement required by the h(_) holding provision, to include natural heritage lands, for Municipal Council approval, that reflects the natural heritage value of the natural heritage feature to be removed at a ratio of 6:1, which is consistent with the compensation achieved for Sovereign Woods; it being understood that the Applicant will not undertake any tree removal on any of the land that is identified as a potential natural heritage feature, prior to the Municipal Council removing the holding provisions, set out in part c) above;”

 

5.         By amending the original part g) in the second line by adding the word “revised” before the word “proposed”, and by changing the word “by-law” in line 3 to “by-laws”, and by changing the word “is” in line 3 to the word “are”.

 

 

 

6.       By adding the following new part after the original part f):

 

“the Applicant BE REQUESTED to consider undertaking appropriate traffic management, including the provision of an adequate transit terminal and/or a park and ride concept for this development.”

 

At 9:04 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana places Councillor P. Hubert in the Chair and takes a seat at the Council Board.

 

At 9:10 PM Mayor J.F. Fontana resumes the Chair and Councillor P. Hubert takes his seat at the Council Board.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

NAYS: H.L. Usher (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve clause 4, as amended.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, S.E. White (10)

 

NAYS: J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (5)

 

Clause 4 as amended, reads as follows:

 

That, on the direction of Municipal Council, with respect to the applications of PenEquity Realty Corporation, relating to the property located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397 and 4407 Wellington Road South:

 

a)            in recognition of the circumstances where these lands have been previously zoned and designated to permit a range of commercial uses, the attached revised proposed by-law, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council Meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend the Official Plan by adding a special policy in Chapter 10 – “Policies for Specific Areas” to permit cinema use outside of the downtown area in the New Format Regional Commercial Node;

 

b)            the attached revised proposed by-law, to amend Schedule B-1 Natural Heritage Features, to delete “Unevaluated Vegetation Patch”, BE INTRODUCED at a future meeting of the Municipal Council, after the Ontario Wetland evaluation, noted in part c), below, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources;

 

c)         the attached, revised, proposed BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan as amended in part a), above), FROM a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision/Light Industrial (h*RSC1(9)/RSC5/LI6) Zone, a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision (h*RSC1(9)/RSC3/ RSC4(5)/RSC5) Zone, which permits a wide range of service commercial uses such as automobile services, home and auto supply, service repair and light industrial uses and a Community Shopping Area (CSA6), which allows for a large range of commercial uses TO a Holding Associated Shopping Area Commercial Special Provision (h*h-5*h-      18*h-55*h-103*h-141*h__­_*h___*h___*ASA3/ASA5/ASA6(__)/ASA7(__)/ ASA8(__)) Zone, to allow for commercial retail use, 14,000m2 of commercial recreational use, 4,000m2 cinema use, a gas bar use, a hotel use, home improvement and furnishing stores, and liquor, beer and wine stores subject to holding provisions to ensure the provision of municipal servicing, archaeological evaluation be completed, a transportation study be completed, Ministry of Transportation and Upper Thames River Conservation Authority permits be obtained, an Ontario Wetland evaluation to be completed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Natural Resources, urban design matters be addressed, and a natural heritage compensation agreement between the City and the applicant be entered into to address the natural heritage compensation measures to be implemented             resulting from the removal of the Unevaluated Vegetation Patch (Patch 10102);

 

d)         in the event that the Ontario Wetland evaluation noted in c) above, results in a portion of the subject land being deemed to be a Provincially Significant Wetland, the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to bring forward the necessary amendment to Schedule B-1 Natural Heritage Features, to identify the Provincially Significant Wetland;

 

e)         the Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to consider the following design issues through the site plan process:

 

·                     ensure a high level of architectural and landscape quality on all portions of the site with visual exposure to Highway 401;

·                     ensure that the design of the buildings located along Highway 401 and Dingman Drive are of a high design standard and do not appear as “the back of house”;

·                     screen all parking areas visible from Highway 401 as well as Dingman Drive using enhanced landscaping;

·                     create a block pattern on the site in order to allow for future redevelopment;

·                     create a high quality main street through the centre of the site that includes:

·                     on-street parking;

·                     wide sidewalks;

·                     street trees;

·                     landscaping as well as street furniture (i.e.: lamp posts, signage, benches, garbage bins, etc.);

·                     improved pedestrian experience and access throughout the site;

·                     locate buildings along the main street that are oriented towards the street with accented main pedestrian entry points, transparent glass, articulated facades and rooflines, in order to create an active frontage;

·                     include a key building at the view terminus of the proposed main street (e.g., proposed movie theatre);

·                     provision of a variety of high quality materials (such as transparent glass, brick, stone, etc.) on all proposed buildings, in particular the elevations facing Highway 401, Dingman Drive and the mainstreet;

·                     create a centralized public space, located along the main street;

·                     provide for continuous pedestrian connections through the site;

·                     ensure all buildings have a walkway to the proposed on site main street commercial corridor as well as continuous walkways connecting to other buildings on the site;

·                     include adequately sized landscape islands to break up large surface parking areas, these landscape islands should include trees as well as enhanced landscaping;

·                     submit an updated urban design brief to the Urban Design Review Panel for a more comprehensive review of the final proposal through the site plan process; and,

·                     plant three trees for every tree removed, at a location of the applicant’s choice, on the property;

 

f)         the request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 from a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision/Light Industrial (h*RSC1(9) /RSC5/LI6) Zone, a Holding Restricted Service Commercial Special Provision (h*RSC1(9)/RSC3/ RSC4(5)/RSC5) Zone, which permits a wide range of service commercial uses such as automobile services, home and auto supply, service repair and light industrial uses and a Commercial Shopping Area (CSA6) Zone, which allows for a large range of commercial uses to an Associated Shopping Area Commercial Special Provision (ASA3/ASA5/ASA6(_)/ASA7(_)/ASA8) Zone and an Open Space (OS1) Zone, to allow for 50,183m2 of commercial retail use, 13,564m2 of commercial recreational use, 3,921m2 cinema use, a gas bar use and a passive recreational use, BE REFUSED for the following reasons:

 

iii)            the requested amendment does not include the holding provisions to ensure the orderly development of the site; a permit from the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and the Ministry of Natural Resources being satisfied that the wetland is not considered a Provincially Significant Wetland; and,

iv)           the requested amendment does not include the additional uses as recommended by the Municipal Council;

 

 

 

 

g)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to determine if there are similar instances where “Unevaluated Vegetation Patches” on Schedule “B-1” of the Official Plan are not shown as “Open Space” or “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, and to initiate an Official Plan Amendment to show these lands as “Open Space” or  “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, noting that this would then make these lands subject to the City’s Tree       Conservation By-law (By-Law C.P.-1466-249);

 

h)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to work with the Applicant to develop the Natural Heritage Compensation Agreement required by the h(_) holding provision, to include natural heritage lands, for Municipal Council approval, that reflects the natural heritage value of the natural heritage feature to be removed at a ratio of 6:1, which is consistent with the compensation achieved for Sovereign Woods; it being understood that the Applicant  will not undertake any tree removal on any of the land that is identified as a potential natural heritage feature, prior to the Municipal Council removing the holding provisions, set out in part c), above;

 

i)          the Applicant BE REQUESTED to consider undertaking appropriate traffic management, including the provision of an adequate transit terminal and/or a park and ride concept for this development; and,

 

j)          pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the revised proposed by-laws as the by-laws are consistent with the request of the applicant, are consistent with what was circulated to the public and the changes are minor in nature;

 

it being noted out that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications with respect to this matter:

 

·                     a communication from G. Faul, Lambeth Community Association;

·                     a communication from J. Cuthbert, by e-mail;

·                     a communication from C. Richardson, by e-mail;

·                     a communication, dated August 11, 2013, from G. Smith, President, Friends of Meadowlily Woods Community Association;

·                     a communication, dated August 7, 2013, from K.E. Risler, 5-192 Elmwood Avenue;

·                     a communication, dated August 12, 2013, from D. Johnston, President and CEO, PenEquity Realty Corporation;

·                     a communication, dated August 14, 2013, from K. Lakhotia, General Manager, London Economic Development Corporation;

·                     a communication, dated July 25, 2013, from C. Creighton, Land Use Planner, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority;

·                     a communication, dated August 16, 2013, from J. Brick, Coordinator, Hydrology and Regulatory Services, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and,

·                     a communication, dated August 15, 2013, from D. Johnston, President and CEO, PenEquity Realty Corporation.    (2013-D14A)

 

Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve “That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake a review, in the most expedient manner, of “Unevaluated Vegetation Patches” shown on Schedule “B-1” of the Official Plan that are not shown as “Open Space” or “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan and to initiate an Official Plan Amendment to designate the lands as Open Space, where appropriate, as soon as possible, on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, noting that this would make these lands subject to the City’s Tree Conservation By-law (By-law C.P.-1466-249); it being noted that the municipality will hire an ecologist to assist with the review.”

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)

 

NAYS: B. Polhill, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

New clause 4A reads as follows:

 

That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake a review, in the most expedient manner, of “Unevaluated Vegetation Patches” shown on Schedule “B-1” of the Official Plan that are not shown as “Open Space” or “Environmental Review” on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan and to initiate an Official Plan Amendment to designate the lands as Open Space, where appropriate, as soon as possible, on Schedule “A” of the Official Plan, noting that this would make these lands subject to the City’s Tree Conservation By-law (By-law C.P.-1466-249); it being noted that the municipality will hire an ecologist to assist with the review.

 

 

22nd Report of the Corporate Services Committee

                        Councillor P. Van Meerbergen presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clauses 1 to 11, excluding clause 3.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

2.

Sherwood Forest Public School

 

That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to review and report back on the following matters related to the surplus school property known as Sherwood Forest Public School:

 

a)         the potential acquisition of the subject property, on the basis that:

 

i)          there is a municipal need for community green space for the adjacent neighbourhood; and

 

ii)         the City of London’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies a need for amenities in the neighbourhood; and

 

b)         the potential severance and disposition of any portion of the subject property that might be declared surplus to the City of London’s needs and disposed of in accordance with the City of London’s Sale and Other Disposition of Land Policy, should Council decide to proceed with the acquisition of the subject property.

 

4.

RFP 13-06 - Vote Tabulation System and Election Software

 

That, on the recommendation of the City Clerk, the following actions be taken with respect to the provision of Vote Tabulation System and Election Software:

 

a)         the proposal submitted by Election Systems & Software, 1885 Clements Road, Unit 207 Pickering ON L1W 3V4, at their proposed total cost of 267,584.94, including HST, BE ACCEPTED;

 

b)         the source of financing for this expenditure BE APPROVED as a drawdown from the Municipal Election Expense Reserve Fund:

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this purchase, and

 

d)         approval hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this approval.

 

5.

Amendment to Council Policy 3(8) - City of London Days

 

That, on the recommendation of the City Clerk, the proposed by-law (Appendix “A”) appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on August 27, 2013 to delete and replace Council Policy 3(8) entitled “City of London Days at the Budweiser Gardens” with a new Policy which reflects the Municipal Council’s direction of July 30, 2013 to provide for use of City of London Days for local purposes and to also provide further clarity in terms of notification and eligibility for use of City of London Days in accordance with the City of London’s agreement with the Budweiser Gardens.

 

 

 

 

6.

Residential Tax By-law for New Affordable Housing Program - Project at 205 Commissioners Road West

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director of Municipal Housing, with the concurrence of the Managing Director Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the attached revised proposed by-law  BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on August 27, 2013, to tax the affordable housing property at 205 Commissioners Road West at an effective tax rate equal to the residential tax rate; and the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to give written notice of the by-law to the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and the secretary of all area school boards.

 

7.

Residential Tax By-law for Investment in Affordable Housing Program - Project at 1461 Huron Street

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director of Municipal Housing, with the concurrence of the Managing Director Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated August 20, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on August 27, 2013, to tax the affordable housing property at 1461 Huron Street at an effective tax rate equal to the residential tax rate; and the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to give written notice of the by-law to the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation and the secretary of all area school boards.

 

8.

Development Charge Complaint - 75 Blackfriars Street

 

That the Municipal Council BE ADVISED that after convening as a Tribunal under section 26 of Part IV of By-law C.P.-1473-212 and pursuant to By-law A.-6361-177 that would delegate the hearing to the Corporation Services Committee from the Board of Control, to hear a complaint from Southside Construction Management Limited in respect of the development charge imposed by The Corporation of the City of London in connection with development on the land known as 75 Blackfriars Street, the hearing adjourned to the Corporate Services Committee meeting being held at 1:00 PM on September 10, 2013, in order to permit the complainant and Civic Administration to provide the Tribunal with copies of relevant case law regarding the issues raised in this development charge complaint, as well as a full copy of the City of London’s Development Charges By-law, with the relevant sections highlighted for the assistance of the Tribunal, for consideration in addition to the oral submissions that were made and the following Exhibits that were filed with the Tribunal at the hearing held on August 20, 2013:

 

Exhibit #1:                   Notice of Hearing dated July 29, 2013

Exhibit #2:                   Written complaint from Southside Construction Management Limited date stamped in the Mayor’s Office on June 27, 2013

Exhibit #3:           Staff report dated August 20, 2013, from the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official

Exhibit #4:                 Undated submission under the letterhead of Patton Cormier & Associates, made at the Corporate Services Committee on August 20, 2013

Exhibit #5:                   A PowerPoint presentation made at the Corporate Services Committee hearing on August 20, 2013, from the Deputy Chief Building Official in support of the City’s imposition of development charges for the development.

 

 

9.

Resignation from the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee

 

That the communication dated July 18, 2013 from Michelle Edwards, resigning her appointment to the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee, BE ACCEPTED and Ms. Edwards BE THANKED for participating on the Committee.

 

10.

Resignation from the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee

 

That the communication dated July 19, 2013 from Greg Vilks, resigning his appointment to the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee, BE ACCEPTED and Dr. Vilks BE THANKED for participating on the Committee.

 

 

 

11.

Resignation from the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee

 

That the communication dated July 21, 2013 from Curtis Peterson, resigning his appointment to the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee, BE ACCEPTED and Mr. Peterson BE THANKED for participating on the Committee.

 

Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor N. Branscombe calls for a separate vote on clause 2.

 

The motion to Approve clauses 1 to 11, excluding clauses 2 and 3 is put.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

The motion to Approve clause 2 is put.

 

Motion made by Councillor N. Branscombe and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Amend clause 2 as follows:

 

a)       in line 1, by adding the words “at the September 24, 2013 meeting of the Corporate Services Committee” after the words “report back”; and,

 

 

b)        in part a)ii) by adding the words “Strengthening Neighbourhoods Strategy and” after the words “City of London’s” and by changing the word “identifies” to the word “identify”.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (10)

 

NAYS: B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, D.G. Henderson (4)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen and seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve clause 2, as amended.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (10)

 

NAYS: B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, D.G. Henderson (4)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Clause 2, as amended, reads as follows:

 

That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to review and report back at the September 24, 2013 meeting of the Corporate Services Committee on the following matters related to the surplus school property known as Sherwood Forest Public School:

 

a)         the potential acquisition of the subject property, on the basis that:

 

i)          there is a municipal need for community green space for the adjacent neighbourhood; and

 

ii)         the City of London’s Strengthening Neighbourhoods Strategy and Parks and Recreation Master Plan identifies a need for amenities in the neighbourhood; and

 

 

 

b)         the potential severance and disposition of any portion of the subject property that might be declared surplus to the City of London’s needs and disposed of in accordance with the City of London’s Sale and Other Disposition of Land Policy, should Council decide to proceed with the acquisition of the subject property.

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve parts a) and b) of clause 3.

 

3.

1156 Dundas Street - REOI and RFQUAL 13-03 for the Purchase and Re-Adaptive Use of Former McCormick Building

 

That the following actions be taken with respect to the property located at 1156 Dundas Street, the former McCormick Building:

 

a)         the Request for Expression Of Interest/Request for Qualifications (REOI/RFQUAL) submissions by Sierra Construction (Woodstock) Limited and Allied Construction Corporation, BE RECEIVED;

 

b)         a Request for Proposals (RFP) with the two pre-qualified proponents submissions BE PROCEEDED with; and

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve part c) of clause 3.

 

c)         pursuant to section 13.7 of the Council Procedure By-law, the actions of the Municipal Council taken at its meeting of April 30, 2013, related to the adoption of clause 2 of the 9th Report of the Committee of the Whole, concerning 1156 Dundas Street, BE RECONSIDERED;

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (13)

 

NAYS: J.F. Fontana, J.P. Bryant (2)

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve part d) of clause 3.

 

d)         investigations into potential municipal uses for the property if brought into municipal ownership, including partnership opportunities, BE PROCEEDED AND REPORTED BACK UPON to Council, if necessary, after the Municipal Council has had an opportunity to consider proposals from the proponents noted in b), above.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

23rd Report of the Corporate Services Committee

                        Councillor J.P. Bryant presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Approve clauses 1 and 2.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

2013 Debenture Issue Update

 

That on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the following actions be taken with respect to the 2013 debenture issue update:

 

a)         the issue of a ten-year serial debenture for $50,000,000 BE APPROVED, noting the average all-in-rate is 3.299%; and

 

b)         the proposed by-law D.-768-283 appended to the staff report dated August 26, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting of August 27, 2013, for three readings to authorize the borrowing upon serial debentures for a ten-year term for $50,000,000 towards the cost of certain capital works of The Corporation of the City of London;

 

it being noted that the Corporate Services Committee received a verbal overview from J. Senese, Manager III, Financial and the attached presentation from Les Peterdy, CFA, Director,  Government Finance, TD Securities, with respect to this matter.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

14th Report of the Civic Works Committee

                        Councillor P. Van Meerbergen presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clauses 1 to 13, inclusive.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

2.

Comments on Environmental Bill of Rights Registry - Making Choices Reviewing Ontario's Long-Term Energy Plan

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director, Environment, Fleet and Solid Waste, the attached comments BE ENDORSED and BE SUBMITTED by the Civic Administration, on behalf of the Municipal Council, to the Ministry of the Environment’s Environmental Bill of Rights Registry posting (EBR 011-9490) titled Making Choices: Reviewing Ontario’s Long-Term Energy Plan; it being noted that the due date for comments is September 9, 2013. (2013-E02)

 

3.

Comments on Environmental Bill of Rights Registry - Conservation First A Renewed Vision for Energy Conservation in Ontario

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director,  Environment, Fleet and Solid Waste, the attached comments BE ENDORSED and BE SUBMITTED by the Civic Administration, on behalf of the Municipal Council, to the Ministry of the Environment’s Environmental Bill of Rights Registry posting (EBR 011-9614) titled Conservation First: A Renewed Vision for Energy Conservation in Ontario; it being noted that the due date for comments is September 9, 2013.(2013-E02)

 

4.

Comments on Environmental Bill of Rights Registry - Waste Reduction Act and Waste Reduction Strategy

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director, Environment, Fleet and Solid Waste, the attached comments BE ENDORSED and BE SUBMITTED by the Civic Administration, on behalf of the Municipal Council, to the Ministry of the Environment’s Environmental Bill of Rights Registry posting (EBR 012-9260) titled Waste Reduction Act and posting (EBR 012-9262) titled Waste Reduction Strategy; it being noted that the due date for comments for both postings is September 4, 2013.(2013-E02)

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

Watermain Realignment Around Westminster Road Bridge Agreement with Ministry of Transportation for Cost Sharing

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director, Water and Wastewater with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following actions be taken with respect to the Watermain Realignment around the Westminster Road Bridge:

 

a)         the draft Agreement negotiated between Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, represented by the Minister of Transportation for the Province of Ontario (MTO) and The Corporation of the City of London, for the realignment of the watermain around the Westminster Road Bridge over Highway 401 in the City of London, as appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013 BE APPROVED substantially in the form attached and as approved by the City Solicitor;

 

b)         the proposed by-law as appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council Meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 to:

 

i)          approve the Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario, represented by the Minister of Transportation for the Province of Ontario (MTO);

 

ii)          authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement; and,

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this matter.  (2013-L04A)

 

6.

Trunk Sewer Inspection Irregular Result (Tender 13-39)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following actions be taken with respect to the award of contract for the Trunk Sewer Inspection (ES3067):

 

a)         the bid submitted by Andrews Infrastructure, 222 Laurier Ave. East, Suite 200 Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6P2 at their tendered price of $148,600.00, including contingency, (HST extra) BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted by Andrews Infrastructure was an irregular result (only one bid received) but came in below the estimated expenditure and meets the City's specifications and requirements in all areas;

 

b)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project; and,

 

d)         the approval herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order, or contract record relating to the subject matter of this approval.  (2013-LO4)

 

7.

Ridout Street Brick Sewer Rehabilitation Project No. ES2693 RFP No. 13-22 - Irregular Result

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following actions be taken with respect to the award of a contract for the Ridout Street Brick Sewer Rehabilitation project:

 

a)         the proposal submitted by Liqui-Force Services, 2015 Spinks Drive, Kingsville, ON at its price of $1,675,492.50 excluding H.S.T., for the Ridout Street Brick Sewer Rehabilitation project BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that Liqui-Force Services was the only contractor to respond to a Request for Proposal and their submission meets the City's specifications and requirements in all areas;

 

b)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project; and,

 

d)         the approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order for the material to be supplied and the work to be done relating to this project.  (2013-L04)

 

8.

Contract Award: York Street/Richmond Street and York Street/Talbot Street Traffic Signal Rebuilds Single Source and Irregular Bid (Tender No. T13-71)

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following actions be taken with respect to awarding the York Street/Richmond Street and York Street/Talbot Street Traffic Signal Rebuilds:

 

a)         the bid submitted by CRU Solutions Inc., 180 Whiting Street, Unit B, Ingersoll, N5C 3B5, at its submitted tendered price of $378,994.00 (excluding HST) for the York Street/Richmond Street and York Street/Talbot Street traffic signal rebuilds BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted by CRU Solutions Inc. was the only complete bid received and meets the City’s specifications and requirements in all areas;

 

b)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

 

d)         the approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order for the material to be supplied and the work to be done relating to this project (Tender 13-71); and,

 

e)         the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.  (2013-L04)

 

9.

Greenway Wastewater Treatment Plant Rotating Drum Thickner Engineering Project No. ES5084-11

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the following actions be taken with respect to the additional engineering fees for the Greenway Wastewater Treatment Rotating Drum Thickener Project:

 

a)         the engineering fees for R.V. Anderson Associates Limited BE INCREASED by $68,436.50 which includes a 10% contingency and excludes HST, in accordance with the estimate, on file, to carry out additional engineering design and contract administration, based upon the Fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services, 2006, recommended by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers, and in accordance with Section 15.2 (g) of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy;  it being noted that a change in project scope is required to address building deficiencies and to custom design an operating system which will enable savings of $150,000 in construction costs;

 

b)         the financing for the engineering fees BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

 

d)         the approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract or issuing a purchase order for the work to be done relating to this project; and,

 

e)         the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.  (2013-L04)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.

Gore Road Bridge Replacement Detailed Deign and Tendering Appointment of Consulting Engineer

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with respect to the appointment of a Consulting Engineer for the Gore Road Bridge (4-BR-15) Replacement Project (TS1214):

 

a)         Dillon Consulting Limited, 130 Dufferin Avenue, London, On, N6A 5R2, BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers for the detailed design and tendering for the Gore Road Bridge Replacement Project at an upset amount of $378,037.00 (excluding H.S.T.); it being noted that this firm has provided a proposal for consultant engineering services, in accordance with Section 15.2 (g) of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy and based upon the fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services, recommended by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers;

 

b)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

 

d)         the approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract with the Consultant for the work; and,

 

e)         the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.  (2013-A05)

 

11.

Highbury Avenue over CN Rail Bridge Rehabilitation Detailed Design and Tendering-Appointment of Consulting Engineer

 

That, on the recommendation of the Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with respect to the appointment of a Consulting Engineer for the Highbury Avenue over CN Rail Bridge (4-BR-09) Rehabilitation Project (TS1763-12):

 

a)         Stantec Consulting Ltd., 600-170 Queens Avenue, London, On, N6A 5J7,  BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers for the detailed design and tendering of the Highbury Avenue Bridge Rehabilitation Project at an upset amount of $134,692.00 (excluding H.S.T.); it being noted that this firm has provided a proposal for consultant engineering services, in accordance with Section 15.2 (d) of the Procurement of Goods and Services Policy and based upon the fee Guideline for Professional Engineering Services, recommended by the Ontario Society of Professional Engineers;

 

b)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the Sources of Financing Report appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013;

 

c)         the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that are necessary in connection with this project;

 

d)         the approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal contract with the Consultant for the work; and,

 

e)         the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations.  (2013-A05)

 

12.

Amendments to the Traffic and Parking By-law.

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the proposed by-law as appended to the staff report dated August 19, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013 for the purpose of amending the Traffic and Parking By-law (P.S. 111).  (2013-C01)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.

The Great Lakes Sewage Report Card 2013

 

That the Civic Works Committee received a presentation from the Managing Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer and the Director, Water and Wastewater, with respect to the Great Lakes Sewage Report Card 2013 prepared by Ecojustice; it being noted that the Civic Works Committee was advised that while the Report Card is a tool to assist with identifying issues with wastewater management, it did not clearly reflect both the positive improvements completed by the City of London nor future improvements planned by the City of London with respect to this matter.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

9th Report of the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee

                        Councillor J.B. Swan presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clauses 1 to 7, inclusive.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

2.

Annual Update on the Agreement between the City of London and the Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology

 

That the Report dated August 26, 2013, from the Managing Director, Corporate Services, City Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, with respect to the annual update on the Agreement between the City of London and the Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, BE RECEIVED.

 

3.

Update on the Glanworth Branch Library

 

That the following actions be taken with respect to the Glanworth Branch Library:

 

a)       the communication dated July 26, 2013, from J. Morgan,  Chair, London Public Library Board, with respect an update on the Glanworth Branch Library, BE RECEIVED; and,

 

b)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to identify a Source of Financing for the Glanworth Branch Library Revitalization Project in the amount of $28,025.

 

4.

Transatlantic Alliance

 

That the communication dated August 9, 2013, from P. Friedrich, Minister fur Bundesrat, Europa und Internationale Angelegenheiten, with respect to a Transatlantic Alliance, BE RECEIVED.

 

5.

Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) - Broader Plan for Gaming within Municipalities

 

That the delegation from P. Pellizzari, Executive Director of Policy and Social Responsibility, J. Pastore, Director of Municipal and Community Relations and T. Bitonti, Senior Manager of Media Relations, Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation, with respect to the OLG's broader plan for gaming within municipalities, and the Municipal Council resolution adopted at its meeting held on June 11, 2013 with respect to this matter, BE RECEIVED.

 

6.

Project Proposal for the Pottersburg Brownfield

 

Recommendation:  That the attached presentation from B. Welton, Principal Consultant, ACE Partnerships Inc., with respect to the Pottersburg Brownfield project proposal, BE FORWARDED to the Civic Administration for further review and possible advancement.

 

 

7.

Municipality Contribution Agreement - Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation

 

Recommendation:  That the following actions be taken with respect to a Municipality Contribution Agreement:

 

a)         the by-law appended to the staff report dated August 26, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on August 27, 2013, to:

 

i)      approve the Municipal Contribution Agreement (Schedule A) and;

 

ii)     authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute an amended Municipality Contribution Agreement between the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) and the City of London, with respect to casino revenue; and,

 

b)         the City Manager BE DIRECTED to identify a designated staff liaison between the Western Fair District, the OLG and the City of London.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

12th Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee

                        Councillor J.L. Baechler presents.

 

Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve clauses 1 to 4, inclusive.

 

1.

Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest

 

That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.

 

2.

City Clerk - 2nd and 3rd Reports of the 2013 Council Compensation Review Task Force

 

That the 2nd and 3rd Reports of the 2013 Council Compensation Review Task Force, from its meetings held on July 26, 2013 and August 7, 2013 BE RECEIVED.

 

3.

Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer - Strategic Change in Delivery of Development Charge Exemptions and Incentives Policies

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the following actions be taken with respect to Development Charge (DC) Exemptions Policy for the 2014 Development Charges Study:

 

a)         the following Development Charge exemptions outlined in the current Development Charges By-law BE MAINTAINED for the 2014 Development Charges By-law:

 

            i)          all mandatory statutory DC exemptions:

 

A.         expansions of existing industrial buildings to the extent reflected in the Development Charges Act (generally up to 50%);

B.         municipal and school board buildings; and,

C.        construction of additional dwelling units, as prescribed in the DC Act regulations.

 

            ii)         a parking building or structure;

 

            iii)         a bona fide non-residential farm building;

 

iv)        a structure that does not have municipal water and sanitary facilities and that is intended for seasonal use only;

 

v)         a temporary garden suite installed in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended; and,

vi)        an air supported structure or arch framed structure clad with fabric-type material, temporary in nature, the purpose of which is to provide indoor facilities for recreational and sports activities owned and operated by a non-profit organization for public use;

 

it being noted that the above exemptions maintain existing City policy, and are for uses that have no perceptible impact on growth infrastructure requirements;

 

b)         the City Planner BE DIRECTED to prepare or amend Community Improvement Plans (CIPs), listed in order of priority, for the following forms and areas of development to provide the basis for providing grants to individuals for a portion of, or all of, development charges paid:

 

i)          existing exemptions/grants/discounts to be provided for in CIPs effective on the effective date of the 2014 Development Charges By-law (no later than August 4, 2014):

 

A.         residential units, Downtown Area, Old East Village Area, and SoHo Area;

B.         new industrial buildings and expansions not exempt by statute, city-wide; and,

C.        hospitals, universities, places of worship/cemeteries and not-for-profit organizations that are exempt from taxation by the Assessment Act, city-wide (currently 50% of CSRF rate exempted).

 

ii)         new grant to be considered for adoption in a CIP following Council adoption of the 2014 Development Charges By-law:

 

A.         small businesses/minor commercial expansion, city-wide;

 

it being noted that the staff report dated August 26, 2013 outlines the implementation plan for bringing forward these CIPs for Council consideration, including input opportunities from interested stakeholders;

 

it being further noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation from P. Christiaans, Director, Development Finance, with respect to this matter.

 

4.

Managing Director, Planning and City Planner - ReThink London Discussion Papers - What We've Heard

 

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the report dated August 26, 2013 with respect to public feedback regarding the ReThink London discussion papers BE RECEIVED; it being noted that the Corporate Services Committee heard the attached presentation from G. Barrett, Manager III, Land Use Planning Policy, with respect to this matter.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

X

DEFERRED MATTERS

 

            None.

 

XI

ENQUIRIES

 

1.

Councillor D. Brown - Enquiry - 425 Wharncliffe Road South

 

Councillor D. Brown enquired as to how the methadone clinic being operated at 425 Wharncliffe Road South can do so without fulfilling zoning and licensing requirements.  The Development & Compliance Services staff and the City Solicitor were requested to report back to the Planning and Environment Committee as to what actions, if any, that could be taken to ensure that both the conditions of zoning approval and licensing requirements are met.

 

XII

EMERGENT MOTIONS

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve that pursuant to section 19.2 of the Council Procedure By-law, leave be given for the introduction of an emergent motion with respect to a report back regarding the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Dalmagarry Road and Fanshawe Park Road West.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve that the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back, at a Special Meeting of the Civic Works Committee, to be held prior to the September 17, 2013 meeting of Municipal Council, to treat this as a priority and provide all available options for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Dalmagarry Road and Fanshawe Park Road West, as soon as possible, within the 2013 construction year.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

At 9:58 PM Councillor B. Polhill leaves the meeting.

 

 

14th Report of the Committee of the Whole

                        Councillor N. Branscombe presents.

 

PRESENT:  Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and C. Saunders (City Clerk).

 

ALSO PRESENT:  A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J. Braam, J. Clark, B. George, A. Hagan, J. Jessop, D. Lazenby, L. Livingstone, V. McAlea Major, J. Page, L.M. Rowe, J. Smout, M. Turner and B. Warner.

 

Motion made by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve progress on the in camera items as noted in the motion to go in camera.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

At 9:59 PM Councillor B. Polhill enters the meeting.

 

XIII

BY-LAWS

 

BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME:

 

Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve First Reading of Bill No.s 357 to 388, including the revised Bill No. 366 and excluding Bill No.s 382 and 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

 

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Second Reading of Bill No.s 357 to 388, including the revised Bill No. 366 and excluding Bill No.s 382 and 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of Bill No.s 357 to 388, including the revised Bill No. 366 and excluding Bill No.s 382 and 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (15)

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve First Reading of Bill No. 382.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 382.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of Bill No. 382.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)

 

RECUSED: M. Brown (1)

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve First Reading of Bill No. 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)

 

RECUSED: B. Polhill, N. Branscombe (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)

 

RECUSED: B. Polhill, N. Branscombe (2)

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of Bill No. 384.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)

 

RECUSED: B. Polhill, N. Branscombe (2)

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve First Reading of Bill No. 389.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (13)

 

NAYS: H.L. Usher, S.E. White (2)

 

At 10:14 PM Councillor N. Branscombe leaves the meeting.

 

Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 389.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (12)

 

NAYS: H.L. Usher, S.E. White (2)

 

Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of Bill No. 389.

 

Motion Passed

 

YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (12)

 

NAYS: H.L. Usher, S.E. White (2)

 

AT 10:15 PM Councillor N. Branscombe enters the meeting.

 

The following by-laws are passed and enacted as by-laws of The Corporation of the City of London:

 

Bill No. 357

By-law No. A.- 7005-261

 

A by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council Meeting held on the 27th day of August, 2013. (City Clerk)

 

Bill No. 358

By-law No. A.-7006-262

 

A by-law to appoint deputies to the City Clerk. (City Clerk)

 

 

 

Bill No. 359

By-law No. A.-5273(cl)-263

 

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. A.-5273-82 entitled, “A by-law to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the City of London.” (Manager By-law Enforcement)

 

Bill No. 360

By-law No. A.-5273(cm)-264

A by-law to amend By-law No. A.-5273-82 entitled, “A by-law to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers for the City of London.” (Manager By-law Enforcement)

 

Bill No. 361

By-law No. A.-7007-265

 

A by-law to delete and replace Council Policy 3(8) entitled “City of London Days at the Budweiser Gardens”. (5/22/CSC)

Bill No. 362

By-law No. A.-7008-266

 

A by-law to exempt from taxation for municipal and school purposes a portion of the multi-residential assessed value of the property at 205 Commissioners Road West, in the City of London. (6/22/CSC)

 

Bill No. 363

By-law No. A.-7009-267

 

A by-law to exempt from taxation for municipal and school purposes a portion of the multi-residential assessed value of the property at 1461 Huron Street, in the City of London. (7/22/CSC)

 

Bill No. 364

By-law No. A.-7010-268

 

A by-law to authorize an Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario represented by the Minister of Transportation (MTO) for the relocation of watermain around the Westminster Road Bridge;  and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement. (5/14/CWC)

 

Bill No. 365

By-law No. C.P.-1284(th)-269

 

A by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to the Veterans Memorial Parkway corridor. (15/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 366

By-law No. C.P.-1284(ti)-270

 

A by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397/4407 Wellington Road South. (4/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 367

By-law No. PS-111-13126

 

A by-law to amend By-law PS-111 entitled, “A by-law to regulate traffic and the parking of motor vehicles in the City of London.” (12/14/CWC)

 

Bill No. 368

By-law No. S.-5584-271

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as part of Highbury Avenue South, south of The King’s Highway No. 401) and to repeal By-law No. S.-5576-230. (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 369

By-law No. S.-5585-272

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as part of Horton Street East, west of Thames Street) (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 370

By-law No. S.-5586-273

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Oxford Street West, west of Rathowen Street) (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 371

By-law No. S.-5587-274

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Westdel Bourne, south of Oxford Street West) (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 372

By-law No. S.-5588-275

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Dundas Street, east of First Street) (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 373

By-law No. S.-5589-276

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Dundas Street, west of Highbury Avenue North and as widening to Highbury Avenue North, north of Dundas Street) (Chief Surveyor)

 

 

 

Bill No. 374

By-law No. S.-5590-277

 

 

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Highbury Avenue North, north of Kilally Road)    (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 375

By-law No. S.-5591-278

 

A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in the City of London as public highway.  (as widening to Commissioners Road West, east of Stephen Street)   (Chief Surveyor)

 

Bill No. 376

By-law No. S.-5592-279

 

A by-law to permit Mary Theresa Hepburn    to maintain and use an encroachment upon    the road allowance for Princess Avenue, City of London. (City Solicitor)

 

Bill No. 377

By-law No. S.-5593-280

 

A by-law to permit Mary Theresa Hepburn    to maintain and use an encroachment upon    the road allowance for Princess Avenue, City of London. (City Solicitor)

 

Bill No. 378

By-law No. S.-5594-281

 

A by-law to assume certain works and services in the City of London. (Fanshawe Ridge Subdivision – Phase 1; 33M-548)  (City Engineer)

 

Bill No. 379

By-law No. Z.-1-132219

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to remove holding provisions from the zoning of the lands located at 699 Wonderland Road North. (6/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 380

By-law No. Z.-1-132220

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 407 McMahen Street and a portion of lands located at 652, 654 & 656 Elizabeth Street. (10/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 381

By-law No. Z.-1-132221

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 432 Grey Street. (11/18/PEC)

Bill No. 382

By-law No. Z.-1-132222

 

A by-law to amend Section 2 – (Definitions) and Section 33 (Neighbourhood Facility) (NF) Zone of By-law No. Z.-1. (13/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 383

By-law No. Z.-1-132223

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 Section 4.21 by adding the road allowance for south extension to Veterans Memorial Parkway. (15/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 384

By-law No. Z.-1-132224

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 Section 4.21 by adding, deleting and replacing the road allowance for various streets. (16/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 385

By-law No. D.-768-283

By-Law to authorize the borrowing upon installment debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000,000.00 towards the cost of certain capital works of The Corporation of the City of London. (1/23/CSC)

 

Bill No. 386

By-law No. Z.-1-132225

 

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 982 Gainsborough Road. (17/18/PEC)

Bill No. 387

By-law No. Z.-1-132226

A by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and the rear portion of 4397/4407 Wellington Road South. (4/18/PEC)

 

Bill No. 388

By-law No. A.-7011-282

A By-law to approve the Municipality Contribution Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation; and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Municipality Contribution Agreement. (7/9/IEPC)

 

Bill No. 389

By-law No. A.-7012-284

 

A by-law to delete and replace Council Policy 1(10) entitled “Race Relations Recognition Award” with a new policy entitled “Diversity, Race Relations and Inclusivity Award”. (14/13/SPSC)

 

 

 

 

XIV

 

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Adjourn.

 

Motion Passed

 

The meeting adjourns at 10:16 PM.

 

 

 

_________________________________

                                                                                          Joe Fontana, Mayor

 

 

_________________________________

                                                                                          Catharine Saunders, City Clerk

 

No Item Selected