|
Council
MINUTES
1ST MEETING
|
|
December 3, 2013
|
|
The Council meets in Regular Session in the
Council Chambers this day at 4:30 PM.
|
|
PRESENT: Mayor J.F. Fontana and
Councillors B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and C. Saunders (City Clerk).
ALSO PRESENT: A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, A.L.
Barbon, G. Belch, J. Braam, U. Candido, B. Coxhead, S. Datars Bere, J. Edward,
J.M. Fleming, A. Hagan, N. Hall, M. Hayward, G.T. Hopcroft, J. Kobarda, G.
Kotsifas, L. Livingstone, V. McAlea Major, D. O’Brien, J. Page, R. Paynter,
M. Ribera, L. Rowe, B. Warner and B. Westlake-Power.
|
At the beginning of the Meeting all Members
are present except Councillors D. Brown, M. Brown, J.P. Bryant, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen and S.E. White.
|
At
4:35 PM Councillors D. Brown, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson and P. Van Meerbergen
enter the meeting.
Councillor P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 7 of the 22nd Report of the Community and Protective
Services Committee and the related Bill No. 3, both having to do with the
Purchase of Service Agreement for Ontario Works employment assistance
services, by indicating that he is the Executive Director of a social
service agency with a Purchase of Service Agreement with Ontario Works.
Councillor N. Branscombe discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause 9 of the 25th Report of the Planning and Environment
Committee and the related Bill No. 24, both having to do with properties
located at 595 and 607 Industrial Road, by indicating that her spouse
operates a business in close proximity to the subject properties.
Councillor J.P. Bryant discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause 10 of the 30th Report of the Corporate Services Committee,
having to do with an appointment to the Environmental and Ecological Planning
Advisory Committee, by indicating the applicant is a friend and a
neighbour. Councillor J.P. Bryant further discloses a pecuniary interest in
clause 14 of the 25th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee,
having to do with secondary dwelling units, by indicating that she has a
secondary dwelling unit at her residence.
|
Councillor P. Van Meerbergen discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause C-2 of the Confidential Appendix to the 30th
Report of the Corporate Services Committee and any related by-law that may be
brought forward in public session, having to do with a matter pertaining to
potential litigation and advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of providing instructions and directions to officers and employees of
the Corporation with respect to a potential arbitration concerning the
apportionment of costs for social housing, Ontario Works, Child Care and Land
Ambulance between Middlesex County and the City of London, as his spouse operates
childcare business.
|
None.
Councillor
P. Hubert leaves the meeting at 4:43 PM.
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve that pursuant to section to
section 7.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business be changed
to permit consideration of lause 1 of the 1st Report of the Committee of the
Whole, having to do with the apportionment of costs for social housing,
Ontario Works, Child Care and Land Ambulance between Middlesex County and the
City of London, as the first order of business after the Committee of the
Whole in camera session.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)
RECUSE: P. Hubert (1)
|
MOTION FOR IN CAMERA SESSION
|
f)
|
A matter pertaining to instructions and
directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose; reports or
advice or recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial
information supplied in confidence pertaining to a proposed acquisition the
disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly
the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or
other negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that
similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or
gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency;
commercial, information relating to a proposed acquisition that belongs to
the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value;
information concerning a proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation
or its competitive position; information concerning a proposed acquisition,
the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the
financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any
negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition regarding the Industrial Land
Strategy. (C-1/1/SPPC)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (13)
|
The Council rises and goes into Committee of
the Whole, in camera, at 4:43 PM, with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all
Members present except Councillors P. Hubert and S. White.
Councillor P. Hubert enters the meeting at
5:01 PM.
The Committee of the Whole rises at 5:20 PM
and Council resumes in regular session at 5:25 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in
the Chair and all Members present except Councillor S.E. White.
Councillor S.E. White enters the meeting at
5:26 PM.
|
1st Report of the Committee of the Whole
|
1.
That, as a procedural matter pursuant to
Section 239 (6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, the following recommendation be
forwarded to City Council for deliberation and a vote in public session:
That, on
the recommendation of the City Solicitor, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Consolidated Municipal Service Management Agreements in respect
of the apportionment of costs for Housing, Land Ambulance, Child Care, and
Ontario Works services as between The Corporation of the City of London and The
Corporation of the County of Middlesex:
a)
the
proposed revised Consolidated Municipal Service
Management Agreements for Housing, Land Ambulance, Child Care, and Ontario
Works services BE ACCEPTED in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and
b) the City Clerk be
directed to bring forward the necessary by-laws for the consideration of
Municipal Council to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the
Agreements.
Motion made by
Councillor J.L. Baechler and seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve that,
on
the recommendation of the City Solicitor, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Consolidated Municipal Service Management Agreements in respect
of the apportionment of costs for Housing, Land Ambulance, Child Care, and
Ontario Works services as between The Corporation of the City of London and The
Corporation of the County of Middlesex:
a)
the
proposed revised Consolidated Municipal Service
Management Agreements for Housing, Land Ambulance, Child Care, and Ontario
Works services BE ACCEPTED in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and
b) the City Clerk be
directed to bring forward the necessary by-laws for the consideration of
Municipal Council to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the
Agreements.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
RECUSED: P. Van Meerbergen (1)
|
Councillor Hubert reports progress on the
remaining in camera matters.
|
At 6:32 PM His Worship the Mayor, together
with P. Shanahan, Chair, London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory
Committee, present the 2013 Diversity, Race Relations and Inclusivity Awards to
the following recipients:
Lavish Nightclub
Small Business and Small Labour Category
Open Closet Regional HIV/AIDS Connection
Youth/Young Adult Groups or Organizations Category
Rogers Television (London and Region)
Corporations, Large Business and Large Labour Category
Western University's Indigenous Services
Institutions Category
LUSO Community Services, London Cross Cultural Learner
Centre
and South London Neighbourhood Resource Centre
Social/Community Services (including Not-for-Profits), Education and Training
Category
His
Worship the Mayor recognizes Cohen Highley for receiving the Ontario Leadership
in Employment Accessibility Award from the
Ontario Chamber of Commerce.
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve the Minutes of the 19th
Meeting held on November 19, 2013.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion made by Councillor N. Branscombe and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve referral of the following
Communications, as noted:
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
|
VIII
|
MOTIONS OF
WHICH NOTICE IS GIVEN
|
|
|
|
None.
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant to
Approve clauses 1, 2, 4, 5 and clauses 7 to 9.
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor J.P. Bryant
disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 10 of this Report, having to do with
the filling of a vacancy on the Environmental and Ecological Planning
Advisory Committee, by indicating that the applicant is a neighbour and a
friend.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, on
the advice of the Manager of Realty Services, the following actions be taken
with respect to the City-owned property municipally known as 42 St. Julien
Street, St. Julien Street Operations Centre:
a) the
Lease Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and the London
Police Services Board (LPS), appended to the staff report dated November 26,
2013 as Appendix "A", BE APPROVED; and
b) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013 as
Appendix “B” BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on
December 3, 2013 to approve the Lease Agreement and to authorize the Mayor
and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the City of London Community Suite:
a) on
the recommendation of the City Manager, the Municipal Council BE ADVISED that
the Community Suite has been committed for use by the Canadian Hockey League
as part of the successful bidding process for the 2014 Memorial Cup; it being
noted that on July 30, 2013, the Municipal Council approved financial support
for this event; and
b) on
the recommendation of the City Clerk, the proposed by-law appended to the
staff report dated November 26, 2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting on December 3, 2013 to delete and replace Council Policy 22(3)
entitled “City of London Community Suite Policy” with a revised Policy which
delegates authority to the City Manager to approve use of the Community Suite
in those circumstances where an international or national event requires the
use of the Community Suite as a bid condition in order to secure the event,
and which requires the City Manager to advise the Municipal Council of any
such approval upon his/her notification that the subject bid was successful.
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, and in accordance with the policy for City events at the Budweiser
Gardens, the following event BE APPROVED as a City of London Day at the
Budweiser Gardens:
Signatures – Taste
Test of London’s Best
June 16, 2014
|
That, on the recommendation of the Chief
Technology Officer, the following actions be taken with respect to the
Network Modernization Request for Proposal which deals with networking
software and hardware such as switches, routers, wireless, network management
software, design and implementation, ongoing maintenance and support:
a) the
submission from Telus Communications Company, 215 Slater Street, Floor 7,
Ottawa, ON K1P 0A6 for modernizing the City of London digital network
infrastructure and their submitted total cost for hardware, software and
implementation services of $2,487,224 (excluding HST), BE ACCEPTED;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this contract;
c) approvals
hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this
approval; and
d) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of Financing
Report, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, as Appendix
‘A’.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Chief
Technology Officer the following actions be taken with respect to the Storage
Area Network, Backup and Recovery Renewal Project Request for Proposal which
deals with Storage Area Network (SAN) systems hardware, software and backup
and recovery systems hardware and software, associated peripherals such as
switches, implementation services and ongoing maintenance and support:
a) the
submission from OnX Enterprise Solutions Ltd, 231 Shearson Crescent, Suite
204, Cambridge, Ontario, N1T 1J5 for modernizing the City of London Storage
Area Network and Backup and Recovery systems and their submitted total cost
for hardware, software and implementation services of $1,786,892 M (excluding
HST), BE ACCEPTED;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this contract;
c) approvals
hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this
approval; and
d) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Source of Financing
Report, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, as Appendix
‘A’.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Deputy
City Treasurer, the taxes on the blocks of land described in the attached
Schedules BE APPORTIONED as indicated on the Schedules pursuant to Section
356 of the Municipal Act, 2001; it being noted that there were no members of
the public in attendance at the public hearing associated with this matter,
to speak before the Corporate Services Committee.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Approve clause 3.
That consideration of the staff report
dated November 26, 2013, with respect to the Agency of Record Agreement
between The Corporation of the City of London and CB Richard Ellis Limited,
BE DEFERRED to the next meeting of the Corporate Services Committee in
conjunction with the receipt of additional information from the Civic
Administration with respect to agreement details, fees for services, best
practices in other municipalities and any other relevant information that
would assist the CSC in considering this matter.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Approve clause 6.
Pursuant to section 17.2 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor D. Brown calls for a separate vote on parts a) and
b) of clause 6.
That the following actions be taken
regarding the Council Service London Team:
a) the
City Clerk BE DIRECTED to implement a staffing model that provides for 1
Executive Assistant, 2 Administrative Assistants, 2 Co-op positions, as well
as the creation of a permanent reception position, commencing in 2014; it
being noted that this model can be accommodated within the existing budget;
and
b) the
City Clerk BE DIRECTED to report back, at the beginning of the next Council
term, on possible amendments to Council Policy 28(2) “Council Members’
Expense Account” to increase the annual expense allocation to $30,000 and to
provide clarification as to how the additional funds could be utilized.
|
The
motion to approve part a) of clause 6 is put.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Armstrong, J.B.
Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
NAYS: B. Polhill, D.G. Henderson, H.L.
Usher (3)
|
The motion to Approve part b) of clause 6
is put.
|
Motion Failed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.L.
Baechler (3)
NAYS: B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N.
Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
|
Clause
6, as adopted, reads as follows:
That the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to implement
a staffing model that provides for 1 Executive Assistant, 2 Administrative
Assistants, 2 Co-op positions, as well as the creation of a permanent reception
position, commencing in 2014; it being noted that this model can be
accommodated within the existing budget
Motion
made by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve clause 10.
That Derek Ellis BE APPOINTED as a Voting
Member on the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee for
the term ending February 28, 2015.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White
(14)
RECUSED: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve clauses 1 and 2.
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That Councillor J.P. Bryant BE ELECTED as
Vice Chair of the Corporate Services Committee for the term ending November
30, 2014.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
to Approve clauses 1 - 6, and clause 8.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That the 8th Report of the Transportation
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 5, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer and the
Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken
with respect to the Hyde Park Nos. 5 and 6 Stormwater Management Facilities:
a) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with a Subject Lands Status
Report/Scoped EIS for the Hyde Park No. 5 SWM Facility site;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with the design and construction
of Hyde Park No. 5 SWM Facility, in the general location identified in the
Hyde Park Community Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management (SWM) Municipal Class
Environmental Assessment (EA) Schedule ‘B’ study accepted by Council in 2002,
subject to any requirements identified through the Subject Lands Status
Report/Scoped EIS;
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to conduct a Public Participation Meeting
prior to the construction of the Hyde Park No. 5 SWM Facility, in order to
provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the recommended design
and compensation strategy developed as part of the evaluation consistent with
a Subject Lands Status Report/Scoped EIS for the Hyde Park No. 5 SWM Facility
site;
d) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to proceed with the design and construction
of Hyde Park No. 6 Stormwater Management Facility in the location identified
in the Hyde Park Community Storm Drainage and Stormwater Management (SWM)
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Schedule ‘B’ study accepted by
Council in 2002;
e) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to conduct a Public Participation Meeting
prior to the construction of the Hyde Park No. 6 SWM Facility, in order to
provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the recommended design;
and,
f) the
delegation request from A. Valestro, 133 John Street, Unit 1, BE REFERRED to
the Public Participation Meeting to be scheduled at a future date with
respect to this matter. (2013-E08)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, the proposed
by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 25, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council Meeting of December 3, 2013 to approve
the Non-Disclosure Agreement with London Hydro with respect to obtaining and
utilizing electricity use data for the purposes of creating energy maps to
support the City of London’s upcoming Community Energy Action Plan, and to
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement on the City’s
behalf. (2013-L04)
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Water and Wastewater, the Operational Plan for the London-owned
portion of the Elgin-Middlesex Pumping Station BE ENDORSED as per the
requirements of O. Reg. 188/07. (2013-E08)
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 2013 External Audit of London’s Drinking Water Quality Management
System and 2013 Management Review:
a) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to provide an updated report to the
Municipal Council which reflects the fact that the Municipal Council has
approved the additional resources required to address the 2013 audit
findings; and,
b) the
staff report dated November 25, 2013 with respect to the 2013 External Audit
of London’s Drinking Water Quality Management System, and the subsequent
Management Review meeting, BE RECEIVED. (2013-E08)
|
That it BE NOTED that Mayor J. F. Fontana
enquired about the possibility of utilizing three lanes along Richmond Street
for moving traffic during peak hours, rather than maintaining two lanes in
either direction at all times. The Civic Administration advised that
switching lane directions is problematic and that Bus Rapid Transit is the
optimal solution for managing traffic.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clause 7.
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the waste diversion and garbage collection updates:
a) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to prepare business plans for the following
initiatives from the report “Road Map 2.0 – The Road to Increased Resource
Recovery and Zero Waste”:
i) the
provision of two blue boxes, at no cost, to residents of newly-constructed
homes as part of recycling education and awareness;
ii) the
establishment of a multi-residential recycling cart purchase program that
sells roll-out carts at cost; and,
iii) the
addition of vegetable oil and used oil collection to the EnviroDepots;
it being noted that
the above-noted initiatives have public support and can be achieved with
minimal cost;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the Civic Works Committee,
by April 2014, with respect to:
i) an
identification and evaluation of best practices implemented in other
municipalities for garbage and recycling collection;
ii) an
evaluation of the City of London’s current collection system in order to
identify opportunities for further savings through optimization;
iii) public
feedback with respect to frequency of garbage and recycling collection; and,
iv) an
evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of contracting garbage
collection, and identification of the processes that are required to be
followed if such an option were to be pursued;
c) the
report entitled “Road Map 2.0 – The Road to Increased Resource Recovery and
Zero Waste” BE RECEIVED and BE APPROVED for release for the purpose of public
engagement, which will include outreach through traditional media, social
media, the City’s website and at community events between January 2, 2014 and
April 30, 2014;
it being further noted the Civic Works
Committee received the attached presentation from the Director, Environment,
Fleet and Solid Waste with respect to this matter. (2013-E07)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, S. Orser,
J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan (2)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clauses 1 to 8, clause 10 and clauses 12, 13 and 15 to 17.
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor N.
Branscombe disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 9 of this report, having to
do with the application by the City of London relating to the properties located
at 595 and 607 Industrial Road, by indicating that her spouse owns and operates
a business in close proximity to the Airport.
2.
|
Properties located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman
Drive and the rear portion of 4397/4407 Wellington Road South (OZ-8120)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED,
in response to letters of appeal to an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning
By-law Amendment for properties located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and
the rear portion of 4937 and 4407 Wellington Road South, that the Municipal
Council has reviewed its decision related to these matters and sees no reason
to alter it; it being noted that the following letters of appeal were
received regarding these matters:
a) B.R.
Card, on behalf of the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority and Wood
Bull, on behalf of Greenhills SC Ltd., dated July 24, 2013, relating to the
Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 for the properties; and,
b) Goodmans,
on behalf of Costco Wholesale Corporation, dated September 24, 2013, relating
to Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 for the properties;
it being further noted that the Planning
and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated
November 15, 2013, from S. Mahadevan, Wood Bull, relating to this matter.
(2013-D14A/L01)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED,
in response to a letter of appeal to Zoning By-law Amendment Z-1-132225 for
the property located at 982 Gainsborough Road, that the Municipal Council has
reviewed its decision related to this matter and sees no reason to alter it;
it being noted that a letter of appeal dated September 25, 2013, submitted by
Patton Cormier & Associates, on behalf of Markey Holdings Inc., was
received regarding this matter. (2013-D14A/L01)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with the concurrence of the Deputy City
Treasurer, the following actions be taken with respect to the renewal of the
five year Agreement with the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority for
the management of Environmentally Significant Areas in the City of London:
a) whereas
Clause 2 of the existing Agreement permits an extension of the Agreement for
a further term, and whereas, Section 14.3 (c) of the City of London
Procurement of Goods and Services Policy permits the renewal of contracts,
therefore the Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to renew the Agreement with
the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority for the management of
Environmentally Significant Areas in the City of London as a “Sole Source”
Contract for a period of five years;
b) the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013,
to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the final updated and
revised five year Agreement with the Upper Thames River Conservation
Authority for the management of Environmentally Significant Areas in the City
of London;
c) the
Tree Hazard Management Policy, as appended to the staff report as Appendix
“B” BE ENDORSED for use in Environmentally Significant Areas that are subject
to this Agreement in accordance with Clause 1 (c) of the said Agreement to
address risk management issues while protecting the environmental value of
aging trees;
d) the
flow through operating budget for this Agreement BE INCLUDED in the Planning
Services base budget for 2014 to 2018; and,
e) the
budget reduction of $72,000, for this project, BE REFERRED to the 2014 Budget
deliberations;
it being noted that, in order to meet the
proposed 2014 Operating Budget target, the value of the contract, in 2014,
has been reduced by 15% ($72,000) to $408,066;
it being further noted that the Planning
and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated
November 23, 2013 from A. Caveney, 46 Kingspark Crescent, with respect to
this matter; and,
it being pointed out that the Planning and
Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from A.Shivas, Coordinator,
Lands and Facilities, Upper Thames River Conservation Area, with respect to
this matter. (2013-L04)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Planning, related to the application of Hyde Park
Crossings Ltd., relating to the property located at 1331 Hyde Park Road, the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2103, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013,
to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
change the zoning of 1331 Hyde Park Road FROM a Holding Business District
Special Provision (h*BDC2 (4)) Zone TO a Business District Commercial Special
Provision (BDC2 (4)) Zone, to remove the holding “h” provision. (2013-D14B)
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the information report from the Managing Director, Development and
Compliance Services & Chief Building Official, in response to the
presentation provided at the October 16, 2013 Planning and Environment
Committee by D. Ailles, York Developments and L. Courtney, 3493 Colonel
Talbot Road, relating to the property located at 3493 Colonel Talbot Road:
a) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back within two months of receipt
of a completed application by York Developments and L. Courtney, 3493 Colonel
Talbot Road, relating to the property located at 3493 Colonel Talbot Road;
and,
b) the Civic Administration BE
DIRECTED to consider the following:
i) the
feasibility of accelerating the completion of the stormwater management
facility to 2014;
ii) the
cost of accelerating the stormwater management facility; and,
iii) determining
whether or not accelerating the stormwater management facility is in accordance
with the Development Charges Study and the Growth Management Implementation
Strategy. (2013-D14)
|
That the Building Division Monthly Report
for October 2013 BE RECEIVED. (2013-D00)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, related to the application of Dancor
Construction Ltd., relating to the property located at 1420 Global Drive, the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013,
to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Light Industrial
(LI1/LI2/LI6) Zone TO a Light Industrial Special Provision (LI1/LI2/LI6(_))
Zone; it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the
public participation meeting associated with this matter. (2013-D14A)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, related to the application of S. &
J. Foster, relating to the property located at 1193 Sunningdale Road East,
the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013,
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3,
2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official
Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Residential R1
(R1-14) Zone TO a Residential R1 (R1-8) Zone on the northern portion of the
subject site and a Residential R1 (R1-13) Zone on the remainder of the site;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-D14A)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager
of Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken
with respect to a City-initiated application to amend the requirements
relating to the implementation of holding provisions in Zoning By-law No.
Z.-1:
a) the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013,
to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
amend Section 3.8.2 (Holding Zone Provisions) by revising the “Purpose” to
state that the “h” symbol shall not be deleted until the required security
has been provided for the development agreement or subdivision agreement and
the Municipal Council is satisfied that the conditions of the approval of the
plans and drawings for a site plan or the conditions of the approval of a
draft plan of subdivision will ensure a development agreement or subdivision
agreement is executed by the applicant and the City prior to development;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take all necessary steps in connection
with future applications to bring forward a by-law for the purpose of
removing “h” holding provisions at the same time as special provisions are
recommended for subdivision agreements or special provisions are prepared for
development agreements; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to undertake a comprehensive review of the
current practice of applying holding provisions in By-law No. Z.-1, and
report back on alternative planning and zoning tools that may be employed to
redefine and reduce the use of redundant or unnecessary holding provisions in
By-law Z-1;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-D14A)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Land Needs Background Study for the
2011 Official Plan Review, the Land Needs Background Study BE ADOPTED as a
Background Document for the Rethink London Official Plan Review process;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
• Joe
Pereira, on behalf of Kape Developments - confirming that staff is asking the
Planning and Environment Committee to adopt the staff recommendation; and,
enquiring how appeals work relating to matter.
• Sergio
Pompilii, Sergio E. Pompilii & Associates Ltd. - understanding that, in
two weeks, they have an opportunity to look at the scenario for the area he
is concerned with, being East London, to see if they can be brought in;
advising that there is not an oversupply for growth in East London;
indicating that East London is different from other areas of the city; advising
that there has been a decrease in the population in East London because there
is not the land supply for housing, which hurts East London; and, advising
that there is an existing population and existing infrastructure in East
London that needs to be dealt with. (2013-D08)
|
That, it BE NOTED that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated November
25, 2013, from S. Stapleton, Vice-President, Auburn Developments, withdrawing
his request for delegation status relating to this matter. (2013-L01/D12)
|
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to the 11th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage
(LACH) from its meeting held on November 13, 2013:
a) the
minutes of the Stewardship Sub-Committee and verbal presentation from J.
Lutman, from its meeting held on October 30, 2013:
i) the
residence located at 371 Wharncliffe Road North BE ADDED to the Inventory of
Heritage Resources as a Priority 2 listing, for historical and contextual
reasons; and,
ii) a
notice of the Municipal Council's intention to designate the property located
at 664 Dundas Street (Clay Arts Building) to be of cultural heritage value or
interest BE GIVEN, for the reasons appended to the 11th Report of the London
Advisory Committee on Heritage, under the provisions of Section 29(3) of the
Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18.;
b) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director of Land Use Planning and City
Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration
Permit Application of the Roman Catholic Diocese of London, requesting
permission for a revision to the designation by-law of the designated
heritage property located at 1070/1040 Waterloo Street, BE APPROVED; it being
noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed revision and has
advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage features of the
property identified in the reasons for designation is negligible; and,
c) clauses 3 to 8, inclusive, of
the 11th Report of the LACH BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, pursuant to the PricewaterhouseCoopers
Quarterly Report on Internal Audit results and further direction from
Municipal Council respecting planning application fees, the proposed by-law,
as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting on December 3, 2013;
it being noted that the Planning and
Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated November
22, 2013 from J. Kennedy, London Development Institute, with respect to this
matter. (2013-C01)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 9.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, related to the application of the City
of London, relating to the properties located at 595 and 607 Industrial Road,
the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013,
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3,
2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official
Plan), to change the zoning on a portion of the subject lands FROM a General
Industrial (GI1) Zone and Open Space (OS4) Zone (595 Industrial Road) and a
General Industrial/Heavy Industrial (GI1/HI1) Zone and Open Space (OS4) (607
Industrial Road) TO an Open Space (OS4) Zone on a portion of the lands;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-D14A)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
RECUSED: N. Branscombe (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 11.
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Planning, the following actions be taken with respect to
the application of Southside Group of Companies, relating to the property
located at 3804 South Winds Drive:
a) the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013,
to amend the Official Plan to change the designation on Schedule “A” (Land
Use from Environmental Review to Open Space) and to change the delineation on
Schedule “B” (Flood Plain & Environmental Features from Potential
Environmentally Significant Area (Potential ESA) to Environmentally
Significant Area (ESA));
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the public participation meeting of
the Planning and Environment Committee held with respect to this matter,
issues were raised with respect to the following:
i) the
quantity and quality of the water supply;
ii) the
encroachment into Environmentally Significant Areas;
iii) the
compliance with the Provincial Policy Statement; and,
iv) flooding
concerns;
c) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports issuing draft
approval of the proposed plan of residential subdivision, submitted by
Southside Construction Limited (File No. 39T-09503), prepared by Zelinka
Priamo Ltd., drawing No. SSD/LON/05-01, as red-line amended, which shows 17
single detached lots, a park block, a park and open space block served by two
local public streets, SUBJECT TO the conditions contained in the attached,
revised, Appendix "C";
d) the proposed by-law as appended to the
staff report dated November 26, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on December 3, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No.
Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan, as amended in part a), above),
to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM an Agricultural (AG1) Zone, a
Holding Agricultural (h-2•AG1) Zone, an Environmental Review (ER) Zone, a
Holding Open Space (h-2•OS4) Zone, and an Open Space (OS5) Zone TO a Holding
Residential R1 Special Provision (h. h( ).h( ).h( )•R1-14( ) Zone, to
permit single detached dwellings with a minimum lot area of 3000 square
metres (32,292 sq.ft.) and to an Open Space (OS5) Zone, to permit such uses
as conservation lands, conservation works, passive recreation uses which
include hiking trails and multi-use pathways and managed woodlots; it being
noted that the Holding (h) Provisions are to ensure that there is orderly
development through the execution of a subdivision agreement; to ensure the
proposed stormwater management system servicing this subdivision is
constructed and operational to the satisfaction of the City, to ensure
private individual sanitary disposal systems on each lot are installed in
accordance with applicable recommendations and in compliance with the overall
servicing strategy for this subdivision to the satisfaction to the City, and
to ensure private water wells on each lot are in compliance with the overall
servicing strategy for this subdivision to the satisfaction of the City;
e) the
“Estimated Claims and Revenues Report”, provided as Appendix ‘D’ to the
associated staff report, dated November 26, 2013 BE APPROVED; and,
f) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back at a future meeting of the
Planning and Environment Committee on the cost of providing services, such as
water, to the subject lands;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Richard
Zelinka, Zelinka Priamo Ltd. – expressing support for the staff
recommendation; indicating that this application has been worked on for quite
a long time; advising that this is a Rural Settlement Area; noting that it
does not require an Official Plan Amendment for the Rural Settlement
component; further noting that this is already part of the City of London’s
Official Plan; advising that the Official Plan amendment component of this
recommendation relates to providing details on the extent of the
environmental lands and the appropriate designations for those lands;
indicating that the planned function for these lands is, and has always been
since before annexation, has been Rural Settlement; advising that this
designation intends for there to be large lots on private services;
reiterating that the designation requires private services; noting that this
is not an area where the applicant can come forward and propose anything
other than private services; indicating that, through the initial public
meeting, it was identified that there are residences in the area that have
had problems with their own services, particularly with water and water wells
in the area; advising that, because of these problems, the City of London
undertook a rigorous review process; noting that this is one of the reasons
for the long delay that they have had in coming back; advising that the City
was being very cautious in its approach to this area; indicating that with
the multiple peer reviews, as there had to be a peer review every time new
information was brought forward by the applicant, it was peer reviewed by the
City’s peer reviewer for the hydrogeological information that was brought
forward to ensure that the lots that were being proposed are adequate for the
private services and to make specifications, particularly with respect to two
points; noting that one of the points is that the water wells are going to
have to go to the deep aquifer; advising that people on the shallow aquifer
are having problems and will have to go to the deep aquifer in this area,
which will support a 22 lot subdivision readily and tertiary treatments for
sanitary purposes on each of the lots; noting that this is not the
conventional septic system, but rather a tertiary treatment system which is a
higher level of treatment for each lot; having determined that these private
services could be supported on the original 22 lots, the applicant turned
around and reduced it to 17 lots so that there is an extra margin of comfort
on this whole matter; advising that the larger lots are also in keeping with
the surrounding area; identifying that Condition 90 in the proposed plan of
residential subdivision needs further discussion with the Fire Department and
staff; expressing concern with Condition 33 ii) as the statement is
self-contradictory in that the applicant is required to put in the cadillac
of tertiary treatment systems and, yet, this system requires there to be a
conventional footprint system on each lot as well; requesting that Condition
33 ii) be referred back to staff to allow them to have further discussion to
resolve that apparent inconsistency; expressing concern with Condition 54,
which is a Condition for the applicant to provide cash-in-lieu to cover the
cost of removing the cul-de-sacs at the edge of development for Street “A”
and South Winds Drive; noting that the applicant will have to remove the
cul-de-sac at South Winds Drive at his own expense; indicating that the
anomaly is that the two cul-de-sacs that are being built as part of this
subdivision do not lead into lands that are designated residential, do not
lead into lands that are designated Urban Reserve; advising that they lead
into Agricultural lands; indicating that there is no expectation, not just in
the near future, but not even for the long-term future of this municipality,
that those lands will go into residential development; reiterating that they
are asking that the cash-in-lieu for the removal of the cul-de-sacs be
removed from the Conditions; requesting that this be considered further by
staff before the Conditions are approved; advising that additional wells have
been drilled in this area; advising that reports have been completed
indicating that the deep aquifer has a tremendous volume of water; indicating
that the hydrogeotechnical reports demonstrate that, even with the 22 lots
that were originally proposed, the expectation is that the water level within
that aquifer would go down less than an inch at full usage; reiterating that
there has been additional work done, which, he believes, the residents were
concerned about; advising that the City required that the additional work be
done; advising that an Environmental Impact Study has been completed for the
stormwater management pond and there has been considerable attention paid to
the stormwater management outlet; indicating that the optimal route has been
identified through the study of this area; indicating that the stormwater
route will be an old tractor trail that goes down the side of the slope;
advising that this is the optimal route because it does not require major
disturbance of the slopes in this area; advising that the City of London and
the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority are requiring that there be an
additional study at the detailed design stage; noting that this stage is when
the storm outlet has all of the final engineering details and it also has to
go through an Environmental Impact Study as well to ensure that everything
has been done properly; advising that there is no requirement that all
Environmentally Significant Area lands be in public ownership; advising that
all Environmentally Significant Area lands in this area are all private
ownership and a large portion of those lands will remain in private
ownership; advising that there will be no lot lines differentiating the
property from the Environmentally Significant Area; advising that there will
be clear monumentalization, as required by the City, to ensure that there is
a clear understanding of where the Environmentally Significant Area starts;
reiterating that this is not a redesignation of Agricultural lands, this is a
Rural Settlement Designation that has been applied to this area since the
lands were in the Township of Westminster; reiterating that this is the
intended use for these lands; indicating that this area is being used as it
is intended to be used, the same as a huge portion of the lands in the urban
areas within the City of London are used; advising that fire services are
provided at a different level of service as there are no hydrants; advising
that this is appropriate for rural settlement areas; indicating that the developer has reviewed the proposal,
which is why it has taken so long to come back; indicating that the applicant
has reduced the number of lots; and, reiterating that this application has
been supported by staff, by peer reviewers and by the consultants who
provided the initial comments.
·
Joe
Liberatore, 3920 South Winds Drive – indicating that he was going to rehash
everything and go through the Notice process because very few of his
neighbours are represented here because of the inopportune way that they
received the Notices; advising that he received it by accident when he came
back from work; advising that they have a lawyer from McKenzie Lake, who is
representing one of the other owners who cannot be here because of illness;
reacting to what was said, when the comment was made about shallow wells
being lost, it was not a shallow well; noting that 113 feet is not a shallow
well; advising that it is a deep well and it was his well that was lost;
advising that, when the well was lost, the first thing he did was go to the
Ministry of the Environment; indicating that the Ministry of the Environment
advised him that all of the guidelines were met and there is nothing that can
be done; advising that he drilled a new well; advising that he drilled the
new well an extra 20 feet, at his own expense; enquiring as to what guarantee
is there, that when these 17 wells go in, that none of them are going to lose
their water again; indicating that the reference relating to the applicant
reducing the number of lots from 22 to 17, everyone is forgetting that the
area of the lots remains the same; indicating that the highest water use will
be in the Summer for irrigation purposes; noting that you will be using an
astronomical amount of water, the same as the 22 lots; indicating that the
reduction in lots from 22 to 17 does not alleviate all of their concerns
because it does not; indicating that at the last meeting, it was left that
they were going to get some kind of study from the former City Engineer;
noting that he was in contact with Mr. McNally; indicating that they were
looking at bringing in the cost of water for the residents that have been
there since the City of London’s tax grab when they were taken over from the
Town of Westminster; apologizing for his frank speaking; expressing
frustration that when you pay City taxes for 20 years and you have had no
improvements, except that they are allowed to gift wrap two bags of garbage a
week and deliver it to the street, that is the improvement that they have
received; indicating that they should be treated like any other tax payer in
the City; enquiring as to where the report from Mr. McNally is; realizing
that Mr. McNally is no longer here, but someone from the City should have met
with them, advised them of the cost and what the City can do; reiterating that
nothing has happened; and, advising that they then receive the Notice
advising of the public participation meeting on this matter.
·
Steve
Gibson, McKenzie Lake – indicating that the concern has always related to the
water supply; advising that when his client advised him of this public
participation meeting yesterday, he has had discussions with the City
representative; advising that he is looking to receive the peer study;
indicating that the information has not been provided to the landowners;
indicating that, at this point, the primary concern has not been answered as
to the supply and the quality of the water and the effects of the difference
between the number of lots, whether it is 17 or 22; advising that the
original objection about the water supply has not been answered to the
satisfaction of the residents along South Winds Drive.
·
Sandy
Levin, 59 Longbow Road – advising that he was one of the people who reviewed
the Environmental Impact Study; indicating that he has some questions and
concerns to try and clarify, particularly the redline changes, to see if they
have addressed some of the concerns; indicating that, it appeared, in the
Environmental Impact Statement, that the backyards of some of the lots
included lands that were designated Environmentally Significant Area;
indicating that, even though there are some conditions of approval regarding
future tree removal, encroachment into Environmentally Significant Area lands
is very difficult to enforce, as Members of the Committee know; indicating
that Condition 21 on Page 168 of the Planning and Environment Committee
Agenda does not require fencing; noting that, in the Condition, monumenting
is sufficient; advising that, this suggests to him that it still includes
Environmentally Significant Area lands, which makes it easier to encroach and
also makes it more likely that invasive species from those lots will end up
in the Environmentally Significant Area; expressing appreciation that there
is a requirement for all subdividers, who build adjacent to parts of the
natural heritage system, to prepare a booklet of educational material;
reminding the Committee that the brochure also come with lots of other
material that new homeowners get; noting that it is only in the hands of the
new homeowner, not any future owners; advising that work still needs to be
done on how to make the information more readily available, not only to the
people immediately adjacent to the Environmentally Significant Area, but also
to those who enjoy them; realizing that there was a discussion about this
earlier today; advising that, with respect to the Stormwater Management Pond,
which also remains to be seen, another Environmental Impact Statement is
going to be required; enquiring as to why the Environmental Impact Statements
would not have been done at the same time; and, indicating that it is not
clear, at this point in time, whether the storm works are also going to be
located in the Environmentally Significant Area.
·
Valerie
M’Garry, 37 Milmanor Place, Delaware – see attached submission.
(2013-D14A/D12)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White
(14)
NAYS: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 14.
That, the application of the City of
London, relating to an Official Plan Amendment to introduce new city-wide
policies related to secondary dwelling units and for a Zoning By-law
Amendment to introduce regulations related to secondary dwelling units BE
REFERRED back to the Civic Administration at a future public participation
meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee, for the following:
a) to provide further
clarification;
b) to receive advice from the
London Housing Advisory Committee; and,
c) to receive advice from the Town
& Gown Committee. (2013-D14A)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, S.E. White
(14)
RECUSED: J.P. Bryant (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve reconsideration of clause 2, to
allow discussion on the item.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: S. Orser, D.G. Henderson (2)
|
Motion
made by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve clause 2.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED,
in response to letters of appeal to an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning
By-law Amendment for properties located at 3130 and 3260 Dingman Drive and
the rear portion of 4937 and 4407 Wellington Road South, that the Municipal
Council has reviewed its decision related to these matters and sees no reason
to alter it; it being noted that the following letters of appeal were
received regarding these matters:
a) B.R.
Card, on behalf of the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority and Wood
Bull, on behalf of Greenhills SC Ltd., dated July 24, 2013, relating to the
Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 for the properties; and,
b) Goodmans,
on behalf of Costco Wholesale Corporation, dated September 24, 2013, relating
to Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 for the properties;
it being further noted that the Planning
and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication dated
November 15, 2013, from S. Mahadevan, Wood Bull, relating to this matter.
(2013-D14A/L01)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, S.E. White (10)
NAYS: J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (5)
|
Motion
made by Councillor H.L. Usher and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve
that Council recess.
Motion
Passed
The Council recesses at 6:43 PM and
reconvenes at 7:30 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members
present except Councillor P. Van Meerbergen.
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown to
Approve clauses 1 to 11, excluding clause 7.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
That the communication dated November,
2013, from M. Coteau, Minister, Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, with
respect to the 2014 Volunteer Service Awards program, BE RECEIVED. (2013-M11)
|
That the 11th Report of the London Housing
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 13, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
That the 12th Report of the Animal Welfare
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on November 7, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Development & Compliance Services and the Chief Building
Official, the staff report dated November 25, 2013, with respect to animal
welfare services funding, BE RECEIVED for information. (2013-F05)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director of Housing, Social Services, and Dearness Home, the staff report
dated November 25, 2013, with respect to service and rate structure reviews
for social assistance, BE RECEIVED for information. (2013-S04)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Fire
Chief, with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Neighbourhood, Children
and Fire Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the supply
and delivery of automatic external defibrillators:
a) the
submission from Physio-Control Canada Sales, Ltd., 7111 Syntex Drive, 3rd
Floor, Mississauga, ON L5N 8C3, for the supply and delivery of automatic
external defibrillators, with training capabilities, at the proposed price of
$78,965.25, HST extra, BE ACCEPTED;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this purchase;
c) the
approval hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or having a purchase order, or contract of record relating to
the subject matter of this approval; and,
d) the
funding for this purchase BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report, as appended to the staff report dated November 25, 2013. (2013-F18)
|
That, on the recommendation of the Division
Manager, Corporate Security and Emergency Management, with the concurrence of
Managing Director, Corporate Services and Chief Human Resources Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the 2013 Emergency Management
Program:
a) the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated November 25, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting of December 3, 2013 to:
i) adopt
the Emergency Management Program, including the London Emergency Response
Plan as set out in Schedule “A” of the by-law; and,
ii) repeal
By-law A.-6786-77; and,
b) the
staff report dated November 25, 2013 with respect to this matter and
including the details of 2012 Emergency Management Program BE RECEIVED for
information. (2013-P03)
|
That an immediate $100/month increase to
Ontario Works rates for a single adult, funded by the Province, BE ENDORSED
and that the Province BE ADVISED of the Council position with respect to this
matter; it being noted that the proposed increase was recognized as a need in
the Commission for the Review of Social Assistance in Ontario, 2012; it being
further noted that the Community and Protective Services Committee received a
verbal presentation from A. Oudshoorn, Chair London Homeless Coalition, with
respect to this matter.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 5th Report of the Council Housing Leadership Committee, from
its meeting held on November 18, 2013:
a) on
the recommendation of the Director, Municipal Housing, with the concurrence
of the Managing Director of Housing, Social Services, and Dearness Home, the
following actions be taken with respect to a proposed Housing Development
Corporation (HDC):
i) the
interim report entitled “Business Model Development for a Housing Development
Corporation for the City of London” from SHS Consulting Inc., BE RECEIVED;
and,
ii) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back at a future meeting of the
Council Housing Leadership Committee outlining potential action plans and
resource requirements; it being noted that the action plans should include
appropriate validation and the cost of governance;
it being noted that
the Council Housing Leadership Committee heard a verbal presentation from C.
Pacini, SHS Consulting Inc., A. Spence, MaRS and N. Tasevski, Purpose
Capital, with respect to this matter;
b) on
the recommendation of the Managing Director, Neighbourhood, Children and Fire
Services and the Managing Director of Housing, Social Services, and Dearness
Home, the following actions be taken with respect to the Homeless Prevention
and Housing Plan, 2010 to 2024:
i) the
Homeless Prevention and Housing Plan 2010 to 2024, BE APPROVED substantially
in the form appended to the 5th Report of the Council Housing Leadership Committee;
ii) the
above-noted Plan BE ADOPTED as the Local Service Management Plan, as required
under the Housing Services Act, 2011; and,
iii) a
copy of the Municipal Council resolution relating to the Homeless Prevention
and Housing Plan 2010 to 2024 and the Plan BE FORWARDED to the Provincial
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for review;
it being noted that any final amendments to
the Plan, based on provincial review, will be included in its final published
version and will be shared with the Municipal Council; and,
c) clauses 3 and 4 BE RECEIVED.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
Motion
made by Councillor D. Brown to Approve clause 7.
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director of Housing, Social Services and Dearness Home, the proposed by-law,
as appended to the staff report dated November 25, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the
Municipal Council meeting of December 3, 2013 to:
a) approve
the Amending Agreement with Goodwill Industries, Ontario Great Lakes for the
delivery of the Circles Initiative; and,
b) authorize
the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Amending Agreement. (2013-L04)
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor D. Brown to Approve clauses 1 to 3.
1. Disclosures
of Pecuniary Interest
That
it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.
2. Election
of Vice-Chair for the Term Ending November 30, 2014
That
Councillor Bill Armstrong BE APPOINTED Vice-Chair for the term ending November
30, 2014.
3. Long
Term Care and Adult Day Program Management Consulting and Administrator
Services Contract Amendment
That,
on the recommendation of the Managing Director of Housing, Social Services and
Dearness Home, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on December 3, 2013 to:
a) approve
the Amending Agreement between Extendicare (Canada) Inc. (Schedule 1) and The
Corporation of the City of London to provide Administrator Services and
Management Consulting Services to the Dearness Home from November 1, 2013 to
October 31, 2014; and,
b) authorize
the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the above-noted Agreement.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, S. Orser,
J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (11)
NAYS: B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen (4)
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve that Council rise and go into
Committee of the Whole, in camera, for the purpose of continuing its
consideration of a matter pertaining to instructions and directions to officers
and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications
necessary for that purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers
and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
commercial and financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to a
proposed acquisition the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to
prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly
with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in
similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is in
the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied, and
result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution
or agency; commercial, information relating to a proposed acquisition that
belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary
value; information concerning a proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation
or its competitive position; information concerning a proposed acquisition, the
disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the
financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any
negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the Corporation
concerning the proposed acquisition regarding the Industrial Land Strategy.
Motion Passed
The Council rises and goes into Committee of
the Whole, in camera, at 7:47 PM, with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all
Members present.
The Committee of the Whole rises at 8:00 PM
and Council resumes in regular session at 8:02 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in
the Chair and all Members present.
Councillor P. Hubert reports progress with
respect to a matter pertaining to instructions and directions to officers and
employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications
necessary for that purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers
and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land;
commercial and financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to a
proposed acquisition the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to
prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly
with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in
similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is in
the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied, and
result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial
institution or agency; commercial, information relating to a proposed
acquisition that belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or
potential monetary value; information concerning a proposed acquisition whose
disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of
the Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning a proposed
acquisition, the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to be
injurious to the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be
applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of
the Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition regarding the Industrial
Land Strategy.
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
to Approve clauses 1 and 2.
|
1. Disclosures
of Pecuniary Interest
That
it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests were disclosed.
2. Tabling
of the 2014 Draft Budget
That the 2014 Draft Budget BE RECEIVED and BE
REFERRED to the 2014 Budget review process; it being noted that the Strategic
Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation from the
Managing Director, Corporate Services & City Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer and the Director, Financial Planning and Policy, with respect to this
matter.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (15)
|
None.
Councillor D. Brown enquires about what could
be done to address concerns about roadways rutted with snow and situations
where people are removing snow from their property onto public roadways or onto
neighbouring properties. The Chair directed that Councillor Brown’s enquiry be
referred to the Civic Works Committee for consideration.
Councillor B. Armstrong enquires about why
the $500,000 funding for the noise wall along the Veterans Memorial Parkway was
included as an “Emerging Issue” within the 2014 Draft Budget. The Chair
directed that Councillor Armstrong bring his enquiry forward as part of the
2014 Budget process.
None.
Councillor
J.L. Baechler leaves the meeting at 8:13 PM.
BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND
THIRD TIME:
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Introduction and First
Reading of Bill No.s 1, 2 and 4 to 23 and 25.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Second Reading of Bill No.s 1, 2
and 4 to 23 and 25.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No.s 1, 2 and 4 to 23 and 25.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Councillor
P. Hubert leaves the meeting at 8:14 PM.
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve Introduction and First Reading
of Bill No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor N. Branscombe to Approve Third Reading and Enactment
of Bill No. 3.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Introduction and First
Reading of Bill No. 24.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen,
D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: N. Branscombe (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 24.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen,
D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: N. Branscombe (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of Bill
No. 24.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen,
D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: N. Branscombe (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor J.P. Bryant to Approve Introduction and First Reading
of Added Bill No.s 26, 27 and 29.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve Second Reading of Added Bill No.s
26, 27 and 29.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve Third Reading and
Enactment of Added Bill No.s 26, 27 and 29.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve Introduction and First Reading of Bill
No. 28.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Van Meerbergen (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve Second Reading of Bill No. 28.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Van Meerbergen (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Orser and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Approve Third Reading and Enactment of
Bill No. 28.
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, N. Branscombe, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (12)
RECUSED: P. Van Meerbergen (1)
The following by-laws are passed and
enacted as by-laws of The Corporation of the City of London:
|
Bill No. 1
By-law No. A.-7037-1
|
A by-law to confirm
the proceedings of the Council Meeting held on the 3rd day of December,
2013. (City Clerk)
|
Bill No. 2
By-law No. A.-7038-2
|
A by-law to approve and authorize the
execution of a Non-Disclosure Agreement with respect to obtaining and
utilizing address-level electricity use data for the purposes of creating and
updating energy maps and related analytical tools between London
Hydro and The Corporation of the City of London. (4/20/CWC)
|
Bill No. 3
By-law No. A.-7039-3
|
A By-law to approve
the Amending Agreement to the Employment Assistance Services Agreement
between The Corporation of the City of London and Goodwill Industries,
Ontario Great Lakes. (7/22/CPSC)
|
Bill No. 4
By-law No. A.-7040-4
|
A by-law
to repeal By-law No. A.-6786-77 (A by-law to repeal By-law No. A.-6661-135 and to adopt an emergency management program and plan) and to
adopt an emergency management program and plan. (9/22/CPSC)
|
Bill No. 5
By-law No. A.-7041-5
|
A By-law to
authorize a Lease Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and
the London Police Services Board, covering the use of the City owned property
at 42 St. Julien Street, and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the Agreement. (2/30/CSC)
|
Bill No. 6
By-law No. A.-7042-6
|
A by-law to delete
and replace Council Policy 22(3) entitled “City of London Community Suite
Policy”.
(4/30/CSC)
|
Bill No. 7
By-law No. A.-7043-7
|
A
By-law to approve an Agreement between the Corporation of The City of London
and the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority; and to authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the Agreement. (4/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 8
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(tn)-8
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to
3804 Southwinds Drive. (11/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 9
By-law
No. CP-20
|
A
by-law to provide for the Tariff of Fees for the processing of applications
under the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended and to
repeal By-law CP-18. (17/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 10
By-law
No. C.P.-1491-9
|
A
by-law to exempt from Part Lot Control, lands located on the south side of
Silverfox Crescent, at Denview Avenue, legally described as part of Block 80 in Registered
Plan 33M-622,
more particularly described as Parts 1-9 in Plan 33R18754 in the City of
London and County of Middlesex. (8/8/BNEC-2011)
|
Bill No. 11
By-law No. L.S.P.-3432-10
|
A
by-law to designate 275 Thames Street to be of historical and contextual
value or interest. (13/21/PEC)
|
Bill No. 12
By-law No. S.-5610-11
|
A
by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume certain
reserves in the City of London as public highway. (as
widening to Ashland Avenue, south of Florence Street).
(Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 13
By-law
No. S.-5611-12
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of
London as public highway. (as widening to Wortley Road, south of Langarth Street
East).
(Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 14
By-law No. S.-5612-13
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of
London as public highway. (as widening to Clayton Walk). (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 15
By-law No. S.-5613-14
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of
London as public highway. (as widening to Meadowlands Way, at Callingham Drive). (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 16
By-law No. S.-5614-15
|
A by-law to lay
out, constitute, establish and assume certain reserves in the City of
London as public highway. (as part of Callingham Drive, east of Meadowlands Way). (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 17
By-law No. S.-5615-16
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish
and assume lands in the City of London as public highway. (for the purposes
of a public highway for pedestrian use only.) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 18
By-law No. S.-5616-17
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish
and assume lands in the City of London as public highway. (as widening to
Saunby Street, at Gunn Street) (Chief Surveyor)
|
Bill No. 19
By-Law No. W-8-14001
|
A by-law
to amend By-law W-8 entitled, “Regulation of Water Supply in the City of
London.” (2/15/SPPC)
|
Bill No. 20
By-law No.
WM-28-14001
|
A by-law
to amend By-law WM-28 entitled, “A by-law for regulation of wastewater and
stormwater drainage systems in the City of London.” (2/15/SPPC)
|
Bill No. 21
By-law No.
Z.-1-142245
|
A by-law
to amend certain portions of text in Section 3 of By-law No. Z.-1.
(12/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 22
By-law No.
Z.-1-142246
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to remove holding provisions from the zoning of the lands
located at 1331 Hyde Park Road. (5/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 23
By-law No.
Z.-1-142247
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1420 Global Drive.
(8/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 24
By-law No.
Z.-1-142248
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 595 and 607
Industrial Road. (9/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 25
By-law No.
Z.-1-142249
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1193
Sunningdale Road East. (10/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 26
By-law No.
Z.-1-142250
|
A by-law
to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located 3804 South Winds
Drive. (11/25/PEC)
|
Bill No. 27
By-law No.
A.-7044-18
|
A by-law
to authorize and approve a Land Ambulance Services Cost Apportionment
Agreement between The Corporation of the County of Middlesex and The
Corporation of the City of London and to authorize the Mayor and the City
Clerk to execute the Agreement.
|
Bill No. 28
By-law No.
A.-7045-19
|
A by-law
to authorize and approve a Child Care Services Cost Apportionment and Agency
Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and The Corporation
of the County of Middlesex and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute the Agreement.
|
Bill No. 29
By-law No.
A.-7046-20
|
A by-law
to authorize and approve a Housing Services Cost Apportionment Agreement between
The Corporation of the City of London and The Corporation of the County of
Middlesex and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the
Agreement.
|
Bill No. 30
By-law No.
A.-7047-21
|
A by-law
to authorize and approve an Ontario Works Services Cost Apportionment and
Agency Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and The
Corporation of the County of Middlesex and to authorize the Mayor and the
City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
|
Bill No. 56
By-law No. A.-7058-42
|
A by-law
to authorize and approve an Amending Agreement for an Agreement between The
Corporation of the City of London (the City) and Extendicare (Canada) Inc.
(Extendicare) for the provision of Administrator and Management Consulting
Services at the Dearness Home; and to authorize the Mayor and the Clerk to
execute the Amending Agreement.
|
Motion
made by Councillor N. Branscombe and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to
Adjourn.
Motion
Passed
The
meeting adjourns at 8:21 PM.
_________________________________
Joe
Fontana, Mayor
_________________________________
Catharine
Saunders, City Clerk