|
|
Council
MINUTES
11TH MEETING
|
|
|
June 11, 2013
|
|
|
|
The Council meets in Regular Session in the
Council Chambers this day at 4:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
PRESENT: Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson,
P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and C.
Saunders (City Clerk).
ABSENT: Councillor N. Branscombe.
ALSO PRESENT: A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J.
Braam, B. Coxhead, S. Datars Bere, A. Dunbar, J. Edward, C. Finn, J. Fleming,
M. Hayward, G.T. Hopcroft, K. Kearns, G. Kotsifas, I. Listar, L. Livingstone,
J. Lucas, I. Mackay, V. McAlea Major, D. Mounteer, D. O’Brien, J. Page, R.
Paynter, L.M. Rowe, R. Sharpe, B. Warner, B. Westlake-Power, B. Whitelaw, J.
Winston and J. Yanchula.
|
|
At the beginning of the Meeting all Members
are present, except Councillors N. Branscombe, D. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen and J.P. Bryant.
|
|
Councillor J.P. Bryant discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause 9 of the 10th Report of the Community and
Protective Services Committee, having to do with the Residential Rental Units
Licensing fees, by indicating that she has a rental unit in her home.
Councillor B. Armstrong discloses a
pecuniary interest in clause 9 of the 10th Report of the Community and
Protective Services Committee, having to do with the Residential Rental Units
Licensing fees, by indicating that he owns rental properties.
|
|
Councillor J.B. Swan discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to the 17th Report of the
Corporate Services Committee, having to do with a matter pertaining to
instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; reports or advice or
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied
in confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which
could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive
position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other
negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that
similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or
gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency;
commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to
the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value;
information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the
Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed
acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to
the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to
any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition, by indicating that his
employer leases space from an involved party. Councillor J.B. Swan further
discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 2 of the 6th Report of the
Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee, having to do with the Orchestra
London Business Plan, by indicating that Orchestra London is his employer.
Councillor P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary
interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential Appendix to the 17th Report of the
Corporate Services Committee, having to do with a matter pertaining to
instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; reports or advice or
recommendations of officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied
in confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which
could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive
position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other
negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that
similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or
gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency;
commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to
the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value;
information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the
Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed
acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to
the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to
any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition, by indicating that he is the
Executive Director of a social service agency that has a has a purchase of
service agreement with Ontario Works. Councillor P. Hubert further discloses
a pecuniary interest in clause 5 of the 6th Report of the Investment and
Economic Prosperity Committee, having to do with a letter regarding improving
Downtown London, by indicating that he is involved with a social service
agency that provides cleaning services in the Downtown.
|
None.
|
g)
|
A matter pertaining
to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and any
communications necessary for the purpose, and a proposed or pending acquisition
or disposition of land by the municipality or local board, related to the
Western Fair District. (C-2/6/IEPC)
|
|
|
|
|
h)
|
A matter pertaining to advice that is
subject to solicitor-client privilege and any communications necessary for
the purpose, related to the May 31, 2013 communication from the Information
and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario regarding Methadone Clinics.
|
|
|
|
|
i)
|
A matter pertaining to instructions and
directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; reports or advice or recommendations of
officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed
acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied in
confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which
could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive
position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other
negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that
similar information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or
gain to any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency;
commercial, information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to
the Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value;
information concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could
reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic interests of the
Corporation or its competitive position; information concerning the proposed
acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to
the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to
any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
j)
|
Seven matters pertaining to advice that is
subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for
that purpose, and for the purpose of giving directions or instructions to
officers, employees or agents of the municipality, as necessary, with respect
to possible indemnification from the Corporation in response to
communications from certain Council Members in relation to potential legal
expenses in responding to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection
with his investigation pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
The Council rises and goes in camera at 4:14
PM, with Mayor J. F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members present except
Councillors N. Branscombe and P. Van Meerbergen.
The Committee of the Whole rises and Council
resumes in regular session at 5:07 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and
all Members present, except Councillors N. Branscombe, P. Van Meerbergen and
J.P. Bryant.
Councillor J.P. Bryant enters the meeting at
5:08 PM.
At
5:17 PM, Councillor P. Van Meerbergen enters the meeting.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve the Minutes of the 10th Meeting
held on May 14, 2013.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve that Council convene as the
Approval Authority pursuant to the provisions of the Expropriation Act,
R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26, as amended, for the purpose of considering
Communication No. 1 from the Manager, Realty Services dealing with the proposed
expropriation of lands.
Motion Passed
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve That, the Council of The
Corporation of the City of London, as Approving Authority pursuant to the
Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E. 26, as amended, on the recommendation
of the Manager of Realty Services, with the concurrence of the Managing
Director Environmental and Engineering Services and City Engineer, and the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the expropriation of lands for the Hyde Park Road Widening and
Improvement Project – Phase 1, between Oxford Street West and South Carriage
Road:
a) the
proposed expropriation of land, as described in Appendix ‘A’, attached
hereto, in the City of London, County of Middlesex, BE APPROVED; it being
noted that the reasons for making the decision are as follows:
i)
the
subject lands are required by The Corporation of the City of London for the
widening of Hyde Park Road;
ii)
the
design of the project will address the current and future transportation demands
along the corridor; and,
iii)
the
design is in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
Study Recommendations for the Hyde Park Road Widening and Improvements
accepted by Council on January 10, 2012;
b) a
certificate of approval BE ISSUED by the City Clerk, on behalf of the
Approving Authority, in the prescribed form;
it being noted that there were no requests
for a Hearing of Necessity received.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve that the meeting of the
Approving Authority be adjourned and that the City Council resume in regular
session.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The meeting of the Approval Authority
adjourns and City Council resumes in Regular Session at 5:58 PM.
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve that, the Council of The
Corporation of the City of London, as Expropriating Authority pursuant to the
Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.E. 26, as amended, the following
actions be taken with respect to the approval by the Approving Authority June
11, 2013 of the proposed expropriation of lands, as required for the Hyde
Park Road Widening and Improvements Project – Phase 1, between Oxford Street
West and South Carriage Road:
a) the
proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on June 11,
2013, by The Corporation of the City of London as Expropriating Authority,
with respect to the lands described in Schedule ‘A’, of the staff report
dated June 11, 2013;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to take all necessary steps to prepare a
plan or plans showing the Expropriated Lands and to register such plan or
plans in the appropriate registry or land titles office, pursuant to the
Expropriations Act. R.S.O. 1990, c. E. 26, within three (3) months of the Approving
Authority granting approval of the said expropriation;
c) the
City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to sign on behalf of the Expropriating Authority,
the plan or plans as signed by an Ontario Land Surveyor showing the
Expropriated Lands; and,
d) the
City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED to execute and serve the notices of
expropriation required by the Expropriations Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.26 and
such notices of possession that may be required to obtain possession of the
Expropriated Lands.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown to
Approve clauses 1 to 5, 7 and 8.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor B.
Armstrong disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 9 of this Report, having
to do with residential rental units licensing fees, by indicating that he
owns rental properties.
|
|
That the 4th Report of the Accessibility Advisory
Committee, from its meeting held on April 25, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
|
That the 6th Report of the London Housing
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on May 8, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Manager, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013 to
approve and adopt the standard form for Facility Rental Contracts (Schedule
'A' of the proposed by-law) and to authorize the Managing Director, Parks and
Recreation, or Designate(s), to insert information and execute contracts
which employ the form.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 6th Report of the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (AWAC),
from its meeting held on May 2, 2013:
a) on the recommendation of the
AWAC, the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to provide the actual number of
cats and dogs destroyed, in addition to the number of cats and dogs
euthanized per 1,000 residents, as noted in the 2013 Animal Services Business
Plan Summary; it being noted that the number of animals destroyed increased
to 1,647 in 2011, and the AWAC feels that the actual real number, as opposed
to the number per 1,000 residents, provides greater transparency; and,
b) clauses 2 to 14, inclusive, BE
RECEIVED;
it being noted that the Community and
Protective Services Committee received a verbal delegation from S. Rans, AWAC
Chair, with respect to this matter.
|
|
That consideration of the food truck pilot
program BE REFERRED to a special meeting of the Community and Protective
Services Committee (CPSC), to be held in advance of the June 11, 2013
Municipal Council meeting, with staff to revise the proposed by-law to
include consideration of increased licenses to be available, increased
locations and menu recommendations; it being noted that the CPSC received the
attached presentation from the Manager of Licensing and Municipal Law
Enforcement Services;
it being pointed out that the following
persons made a verbal presentation in connection therewith:
- D. McBurney, #4 – 466 South Street –
suggesting that lots of the carts that are at events are “mom and pop”
businesses, and shouldn’t be affected; noting concern with the food
trucks being in the Downtown area, and creating more unemployment for
restaurants; and suggesting that the food trucks go where the market is,
as there are lots of areas in the City where people can’t get to
restaurants because they are not within walking distance.
- B. Ryan, 3 Hammond Crescent – advising
that she has provided some information to staff and noting that this
proposal will create unemployment with a loss of menial jobs in the
restaurant industry; noting that London is known for having the highest
per capita number of restaurants, and this proposal will destroy this;
suggesting that those restaurants that are in buildings are actually
part of their community and a food truck moving from place to place
won’t be a community partner; advising that the situation of Richmond
Row will cause additional problems and noting concern for health and
safety.
- K. Navakos, 790 William Street –
noting disappointment with the lack of imagination in the report, and
considering it too restrictive with respect to locations; suggesting
that the “lottery” will result in chain-restaurant-type food trucks,
rather than creative cuisine because overhead and start-up costs will be
high; advising there are lots of creative chefs in the community that
will hire additional help and noting that this type of activity is very
popular and successful in other cities; encouraging a more creative and
less restrictive approach; and suggesting that the community will
benefit from a broadened proposal.
- D. Cooke, Western Fair Farmers’ Market
– noting that he is perhaps one of the instigators of this initiative
and advising that public spaces are under-serviced; outlining for the
Committee own his business and noting that the proposal is not required
for the continued success of his own business, but he believes in the
good that could come of this for the community as a whole.
- P. Henshaw, 55 Cartier Road – advising
that he is interested in a food truck as a second income and that he
considers it an exciting opportunity; noting the success of these
ventures in other cities; suggesting that this will not detract from
restaurants and noting concern for the restrictive locations, adding
that it is perhaps okay for a pilot but there’s room for expansion.
- S. Quigley, Emerging Leaders – noting
the proposal is bold and an opportunity to expand businesses; suggesting
that entrepreneurs be allowed into the market and that will determine
success; suggesting that the proposal is too restrictive and not in
synch with the demographic that doesn’t go out before 9 pm; advising
that the current proposal is limiting and that the businesses should be
chosen based on quality, not a lottery.
- M. Navakos, Farmers’ & Artisan
Market, Western Fair – suggesting that the proposed by-law is
restrictive and limits creativity for an exciting initiative; as
presented this will allow chain restaurants to gain access to Victoria
Park; and suggesting a more sustainable model be piloted.
- J. Helmer, 24 Amy Street – advising
that he has a website called “Better London” which has garnered 800+
online signatures in support of this initiative and that people are
excited; suggesting that the by-law “do less” and be less restrictive,
that the pilot should start big and add rules if/when they are required;
and commenting that this is a great idea that is being slowed down.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 5th Report of the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory
Committee (LDRRAC), from its meeting held on May 16, 2013:
a) on
the recommendation of the LDRRAC, the attached Media Relations
Protocol for the LDRRAC, BE ADOPTED; it being noted that in the event that
race relations and/or diversity-related issues arise, the Protocol would be
observed to promote the delivery of a timely, insightful and responsive
communication to the City by the LDRRAC members; and,
b) clauses 2 to 8, inclusive, BE
RECEIVED.
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (14)
Motion
made by Councillor D. Brown to Approve that clause 6 be adopted.
That, on the recommendation of Managing
Director of Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official,
the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on June 11, 2013 to provide for the
licensing and regulation of methadone pharmacies and methadone clinics in the
City of London; it being noted that the Community and Protective Services
Committee received the attached presentation from the Manager of
Licensing and Municipal Law Enforcement Services;
it being pointed out that the following
persons made a verbal presentation in connection therewith:
- D. McBurney, #4 – 466 South Street –
extending thanks to staff for the report and recommendation, noting that
he is addressing the Committee on behalf of those taking methadone; advising
that the cameras and security guards will help individuals using the
facilities feel safer and noting that the fees should be higher.
- D. Warren, #507 – 311 Central – advising
that she is a registered nurse and a member of best-practice working group
related to methadone, whose goal is to reduce stigmatization of patients;
noting that she has over 25 years of addictions experience and has never
felt threatened; advising that patients frequently have hesitation in
seeking treatment and cameras will affect patient privacy; and suggesting
that as a health care provider, she doesn’t feel the by-law is reflective
of the reality of the service.
- Dr. M.L. McDowall – advising that she
has a practice in London, and questioning how many other health
professionals require licensing within the City; noting that patients are
already stigmatized in society and the restrictive by-law will not help
this; suggesting that she is speaking to the Committee for those without a
voice, and advising that these are the people who need help the most;
asking for the evidence-base research behind the by-law’s restrictions to
be provided and suggesting that the perception of problems is not
adequate.
- B. Ryan, 3 Hammond Crescent – advising
that she was a methadone patient (pain) for over 10 years; suggesting that
the guidelines are pretty good, but questioning who the cameras are there
to protect.
- Dr. G. Sidhu – advising that he is a
psychiatrist and addictions specialist, noting that he is already licensed
(as all doctors are) by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario,
and that further licensing is not required; noting that in his practice he
sees a variety of patients and prescribes a variety of medications, like
all doctors throughout the province; suggesting that this by-law is a
“witch hunt” and requesting that Council reconsider the by-law; and noting
that his practice is already subject to inspection and audit from the
College of Physicians, and should not be subject to inspection from
municipal bureaucrats.
- S. Quigley, #6 – 59 Pennybrook Crescent
– advising that he has worked in an area with a high addiction population
and suggesting that Council has to think about the public outcry about
methadone locations in their considerations; noting that cameras create a
stigmatization with respect to seeking treatment and create a mental
barrier for patients; questioning whether the same requirements are
necessary for other medical practitioners in London and requesting that
the Committee and Council consider these points very carefully because it
will send a very clear message as to how we treat some people with
illnesses versus others.
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor M. Brown to Approve that clause 6 BE AMENDED in line 2
by deleting the words "the proposed by-law appended to the staff report
dated May 27, 2013," and replacing them with the words "the attached
proposed revised by-law,".
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 6, as amended.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant (11)
NAYS: J.L. Baechler, D.G. Henderson, S.E.
White (3)
|
Motion made by Councillor S. Orser and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve reconsideration of clause 6, as
amended.
Motion
Passed
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clause 6, as amended.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, M. Brown, P. Hubert, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant (10)
NAYS: S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, D.G.
Henderson, S.E. White (4)
Clause 6, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of Managing
Director of Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official,
the attached proposed revised by-law, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting on June 11, 2013 to provide for the licensing and regulation
of methadone pharmacies and methadone clinics in the City of London; it being
noted that the Community and Protective Services Committee received the attached
presentation from the Manager of Licensing and Municipal Law Enforcement
Services;
it being pointed out that the following
persons made a verbal presentation in connection therewith:
- D. McBurney, #4 – 466 South Street –
extending thanks to staff for the report and recommendation, noting that
he is addressing the Committee on behalf of those taking methadone;
advising that the cameras and security guards will help individuals
using the facilities feel safer and noting that the fees should be
higher.
- D. Warren, #507 – 311 Central –
advising that she is a registered nurse and a member of best-practice
working group related to methadone, whose goal is to reduce
stigmatization of patients; noting that she has over 25 years of
addictions experience and has never felt threatened; advising that
patients frequently have hesitation in seeking treatment and cameras
will affect patient privacy; and suggesting that as a health care
provider, she doesn’t feel the by-law is reflective of the reality of
the service.
- Dr. M.L. McDowall – advising that she
has a practice in London, and questioning how many other health
professionals require licensing within the City; noting that patients
are already stigmatized in society and the restrictive by-law will not
help this; suggesting that she is speaking to the Committee for those
without a voice, and advising that these are the people who need help
the most; asking for the evidence-base research behind the by-law’s
restrictions to be provided and suggesting that the perception of
problems is not adequate.
- B. Ryan, 3 Hammond Crescent – advising
that she was a methadone patient (pain) for over 10 years; suggesting
that the guidelines are pretty good, but questioning who the cameras are
there to protect.
- Dr. G. Sidhu – advising that he is a
psychiatrist and addictions specialist, noting that he is already
licensed (as all doctors are) by the College of Physicians and Surgeons
of Ontario, and that further licensing is not required; noting that in
his practice he sees a variety of patients and prescribes a variety of
medications, like all doctors throughout the province; suggesting that
this by-law is a “witch hunt” and requesting that Council reconsider the
by-law; and noting that his practice is already subject to inspection
and audit from the College of Physicians, and should not be subject to
inspection from municipal bureaucrats.
- S. Quigley, #6 – 59 Pennybrook
Crescent – advising that he has worked in an area with a high addiction
population and suggesting that Council has to think about the public
outcry about methadone locations in their considerations; noting that
cameras create a stigmatization with respect to seeking treatment and
create a mental barrier for patients; questioning whether the same
requirements are necessary for other medical practitioners in London and
requesting that the Committee and Council consider these points very
carefully because it will send a very clear message as to how we treat some
people with illnesses versus others.
|
Motion
made by Councillor D. Brown to Approve clause 9.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Development & Compliance Services and the Chief Building Official,
a public participation meeting BE HELD at a future meeting of the Community
and Protective Services Committee to consider:
a) a
$55.00 fee for new applications and renewal applications, in an effort to
achieve full cost recovery of the Residential Rental Units Licensing (RRUL)
program; and
b) no
additional fee to be charged for multiple rental units, for new or renewal
RRUL applications. (2013-P09)
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher (11)
NAYS: S.E. White (1)
RECUSED: B. Armstrong, J.P. Bryant (2)
|
Motion
made by Councillor D. Brown to Approve clauses 1 and 2.
|
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary interests
were disclosed.
That the matter of a City-wide food truck
pilot program BE REFERRED back to the Civic Administration for further
refinements to the proposed by-law including, but not limited to, additional
considerations such as menu revisions and/or evaluation criteria, proponent
selection parameters, a more creative proposal solicitation, locations, etc. in
order to ensure the program will be successful.
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Amend clause 2 by adding the following at
the end of the clause, "it being noted that notwithstanding the referral
back related to this proposal, the Civic Administration will work with a
specific proponent to accommodate an immediate use of a proposed food truck,
within the current regulations."
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, J.B. Swan, S. Orser,
J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (8)
NAYS: B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, H.L. Usher, S.E. White (6)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve clause 1 and clause 2, as amended.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, D.
Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant (11)
NAYS: J.B. Swan, P. Van Meerbergen, S.E.
White (3)
Clause 2, as amended, read as follows:
2. That
the matter of a City-wide food truck pilot program BE REFERRED back to the
Civic Administration for further refinements to the proposed by-law
including, but not limited to, additional considerations such as menu
revisions and/or evaluation criteria, proponent selection parameters, a more
creative proposal solicitation, locations, etc., in order to ensure the
program will be successful; it being noted that notwithstanding the referral
back related to this proposal, the Civic Administration will work with a specific
proponent to accommodate an immediate use of a proposed food truck, within
the current regulations.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Recess.
The Council recesses at 7:12 PM and
reconvenes at 8:10 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members
present except Councillor N. Branscombe.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan to
Approve clauses 1 and 2.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee held general discussions with The Honourable D. Matthews,
MPP; T. Armstrong, MPP and J. Yurek, MPP with respect to the following
matters:
a) Budget
i) Provincial
Budget
ii) City
of London Pre-Budget Submission to the Ontario Standing Committee on Finance
b) Provincial Infrastructure Plan
c) Bus Rapid Transit
d) Integration of Education, Child
Care and Early Learning Systems; and
e) Interest Arbitration Reform
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (14)
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clause 9.
|
That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED
to utilize the services of student interns to assist with implementing the
various recommendations pertaining to the increased engagement of
post-secondary students in local government by September 2013, as detailed in
the communication appended as Item #9 on the Corporate Services Committee’s
May 28, 2013 Agenda, from A. Fearnall, President, University Students’
Council, Western University; it being noted that A. Fearnall and A. Gourlay,
President, Fanshawe Student Union, gave a verbal overview with respect to
this matter.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clauses 1 to 7, and clauses 12 to 18.
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Manager, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on June 11, 2013 for the
purpose of amending By-law No. A-44, “A by-law respecting the Civic
Administration”, by amending the title “Managing Director, Housing and Social
Services” to “Managing Director, Housing, Social Services and Dearness Home”.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
following actions be taken with respect to reserve funding housekeeping:
a) the
roles and responsibilities for the establishment of, contribution to,
drawdown from and windup of reserves and reserve funds, as contained in the
staff report dated May 28, 2013, BE ENDORSED; it being noted that the City
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer or designate will uphold those roles and
responsibilities;
b) the following actions be taken
with respect to various reserve funds:
i) the
Public Sector Major Grants Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining balance
BE TRANSFERRED to the Economic Development Reserve Fund, once all commitment
payments have been made; it being noted that the Economic Development Reserve
Fund Plan includes funding for both Fanshawe College and Western University;
ii) the
City Services Solid Waste Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining balance
BE TRANSFERRED to the City Services Growth Studies Reserve Fund;
iii) the
City Services Public Works Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining balance
BE TRANSFERRED to the City Services Roads Reserve Fund;
iv) the
Westminster Road Improvements Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining
balance BE TRANSFERRED to the City Services Roads Reserve Fund;
v) the
Westminster Road Legal Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining balance BE
TRANSFERRED to the City Services Growth Studies Reserve Fund;
vi) the
Westminster Frontend Reserve Fund BE CLOSED and the remaining balance BE
TRANSFERRED to the City Services Growth Studies Reserve Fund; and,
c) the
proposed by-law included as Appendix A to the staff report dated May 28, 2013
to repeal the by-law establishing the Public Sector Major Grants Reserve Fund
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013;
it being noted that the reserve funds recommended for closure in
recommendations b) ii) through b) vi), above, do not have active by-laws due
to the nature of when and how they were created;
d) the
proposed by-laws included as Appendix B to the staff report dated May 28,
2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on June 11, 2013 to
establish the following reserve funds:
i) the
Technology Services Reserve Fund;
ii) the
Material Recovery Facility Reserve Fund;
iii) the
Water Customer Assistance Reserve Fund;
iv) the
Parking Facilities Reserve Fund; and,
v) the
Municipal Affordable Homeownership Revolving Loan Reserve Fund.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer BE AUTHORIZED to proceed with the issue of debentures to provide
permanent financing for capital works in an amount not to exceed $50,000,00,
as detailed in Appendix A to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, through
debentures in the capital markets, with the flexibility to postpone the
issuance for unfavourable market conditions.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
staff report dated May 28, 2013 outlining the transition from the current
method of Electronic Bid Document Distribution via the City’s Website to
Biddingo, BE RECEIVED for information.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the report dated May 28, 2013 regarding the 2013 World Figure
Skating Championships:
a) the report BE RECEIVED for
information; and
b) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back, as soon as possible, with
details as to what a $100,000 investment by the City of London in the 2014
Memorial Cup might generate in terms of reciprocal benefit to the community;
it being noted that the Corporate Services
Committee heard a verbal delegation from J. Winston, Tourism London and the
Director of Water and Wastewater with respect to this matter.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager
Realty Services, the following actions be taken:
a) the
request submitted by O. C. Holdings ‘87 Inc. to extend its option to purchase
until May 1, 2015, on approximately 10.24 acres of land located on the east
side of Innovation Drive, described as Parts 2, 3 and 4, Plan 33R-17213, as
outlined on the location map attached as Schedule “C” to this report,
BE APPROVED; and
b) the
proposed by-law (Appendix “B”) appended to the staff report dated May 28,
2013 BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11,
2013, to approve this request and to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk
to execute the Amended Option Agreement.
|
|
That the Covent Garden Market BE AUTHORIZED
to spend an amount of approximately $37,000, plus HST, to replace the
existing sweeper utilized by the Covent Garden Market.
|
|
That the following individuals BE APPOINTED
to the London Advisory Committee on Heritage for the term ending February 28,
2015:
Voting:
• Sarah A. Stephens (Member at
Large)
• Derek Dudek (London Home
Builders' Association)
|
|
That the following individual BE APPOINTED
to the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee for the term ending February 28,
2015:
Voting:
• Joan Lalonde (Member at Large)
|
|
That the following individuals BE APPOINTED
to the London Diversity and Race Relations Advisory Committee for the term
ending February 28, 2015:
Voting:
• Adriana Medina (Member at
Large)
• Ian Silver (Member at Large)
• Darrin Wettlaufer (Member at
Large)
|
|
That the communication dated May 13, 2013
from Sheila Wilson, resigning her appointment to the London Diversity and
Race Relations Advisory Committee, BE ACCEPTED and Ms. Wilson BE THANKED for
participating on the Committee.
|
|
That the communication dated May 1, 2013
from Lois Jackson, resigning her appointment to the Animal Welfare Advisory
Committee, BE ACCEPTED and Ms. Jackson BE THANKED for participating on the
Committee.
|
|
That the communication dated April 17, 2013
from George Goodlet, resigning his appointment to the London Advisory
Committee on Heritage, BE ACCEPTED and Mr. Goodlet BE THANKED for
participating on the Committee.
|
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve that clause 4 be amended in the fifth line by correcting the
amount to read “$50,000,000.”.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
The
motion to adopt clauses 1 to 3, clause 4, as amended, clauses 5 to 7 and
clauses 12 to 18 is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (14)
Clause
4, as amended, reads as follows:
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, the
Managing Director, Corporate Services and City Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer BE AUTHORIZED to proceed with the issue of debentures to provide
permanent financing for capital works in an amount not to exceed $50,000,000,
as detailed in Appendix A to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, through
debentures in the capital markets, with the flexibility to postpone the
issuance for unfavourable market conditions.
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clause 11.
|
That the communication dated April 30, 2013
from Councillor S. E. White requesting approval of sponsorship funding for
Girl Power to undertake a tree planting project along the Veterans Memorial
Parkway, in partnership with Landscape Ontario, BE NOTED AND FILED.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve an amendment to clause 11 by
adding the following wording at the end of the clause, “it being noted that an
email has been sent to individual Councillors, relating to sponsorship of this
initiative.”
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
NAYS: H.L. Usher (1)
|
The
motion to adopt clause 11, as amended, is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (13)
NAYS:
H.L. Usher (1)
Clause
11, as amended, reads as follows:
That the communication dated April 30, 2013
from Councillor S. E. White requesting approval of sponsorship funding for Girl
Power to undertake a tree planting project along the Veterans Memorial Parkway,
in partnership with Landscape Ontario, BE NOTED AND FILED; it being noted that
an email has been sent to individual Councillors, relating to sponsorship of
this initiative.
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clause 8.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation’s (OLG) Charitable
Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative (E-Bingo):
a) a
public participation meeting BE HELD by the Corporate Services Committee with
respect to the potential introduction of an E-Bingo site within the City of
London, with notice to be circulated to Charity Associations, charities,
Bingo Hall operators, the OLG, and relevant social service agencies, in order
to seek stakeholder input in determining if the City of London should proceed
with entering into a Charitable Gaming Centre Municipality Agreement for
Forest City Bingo; and
b) representatives
of the OLG BE INVITED to a future meeting of the Investment and Economic
Prosperity Committee to provide information regarding its broader plan for
gaming in municipalities.
|
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor P. Hubert calls for a separate vote on parts a)
and b) of clause 8.
|
The motion to Approve part a) of clause 8
is put.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Van Meerbergen,
D. Brown, H.L. Usher (10)
NAYS: P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (4)
|
|
The motion to Approve part b) of clause 8
is put.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve that clause 10 be adopted.
That the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to report
back to the Corporate Services Committee by September 2013, with respect to
details of a Council Service London Team that is premised on a semi-independent
support model, similar to that found in the City of Mississauga, with details
to include:
a) establishment
of a budget of approximately $30,000 for each Council Member, half of which
could only be used to acquire additional administrative support, while the
other half of the budget could also be used for that purpose, in addition to
any other expenses as permitted by Council Policy; and
b) cost
and staffing implications of moving towards a semi-independent support model.
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Brown and seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve that
clause 10 BE AMENDED in the first line of part a) by deleting the word
“approximately” and by replacing it with the words "up to", before
the figure $30,000 and by adding after the amount of “$30,000” the words “,
within the existing budget for the Councillors’ Office”.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (11)
NAYS: P. Van Meerbergen, H.L. Usher, S.E.
White (3)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan and
seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Approve clause 10 as amended.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, D. Brown, J.P. Bryant (11)
NAYS: P. Van Meerbergen, H.L. Usher, S.E.
White (3)
Clause 10, as amended, reads as follows:
That the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to report
back to the Corporate Services Committee by September 2013, with respect to
details of a Council Service London Team that is premised on a
semi-independent support model, similar to that found in the City of
Mississauga, with details to include:
a) establishment
of a budget of up to $30,000, within the existing budget for the Councillors’
Office, for each Council Member, half of which could only be used to acquire
additional administrative support, while the other half of the budget could
also be used for that purpose, in addition to any other expenses as permitted
by Council Policy; and
b) cost and staffing implications
of moving towards a semi-independent support model.
|
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clauses 1 to 7 and the following new
clause 8, under “Part V. “Deferred Matters/Additional Business”.
|
|
1.
|
Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest
|
|
That it BE NOTED
that Councillor
J.B. Swan disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause C-1 of the Confidential
Appendix to this Report having to do with a matter pertaining to instructions
and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a
proposed acquisition of land; reports or advice or recommendations of
officers and employees of the Corporation pertaining to a proposed
acquisition of land; commercial and financial information supplied in
confidence pertaining to the proposed acquisition the disclosure of which
could reasonably be expected to, prejudice significantly the competitive
position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other
negotiations of the Corporation, result in similar information no longer
being supplied to the Corporation where it is in the public interest that similar
information continue to be so supplied, and result in undue loss or gain to
any person, group, committee or financial institution or agency; commercial,
information relating to the proposed acquisition that belongs to the
Corporation that has monetary value or potential monetary value; information
concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be
expected to prejudice the economic interests of the Corporation or its
competitive position; information concerning the proposed acquisition whose
disclosure could reasonably be expected to be injurious to the financial
interests of the Corporation; and instructions to be applied to any
negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the
Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to a communication dated June 4, 2013 from
Councillor S. Orser in relation to potential legal expenses in responding to
summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his investigation
pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman
Act.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to a communication dated June 6, 2013 from
Councillor B. Polhill in relation to potential legal expenses in responding
to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his investigation
pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman
Act.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to a communication dated June 6, 2013 from
Councillor S.E. White in relation to potential legal expenses in responding
to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his investigation
pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman
Act.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to a communication dated June 10, 2013 from
Mayor J.F. Fontana in relation to potential legal expenses in responding to
summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his investigation pursuant
to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman Act.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to a communication dated June 10, 2013 from
Councillor D. Henderson in relation to potential legal expenses in responding
to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his investigation
pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman
Act.
|
|
7.
|
Councillor J.B. Swan - Request for Lawyer -
Council Member Indemnification
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to the attached communication
dated June 11, 2013 from Councillor J.B. Swan in relation to potential legal
expenses in responding to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection
with his investigation pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act.
|
|
8.
|
Councillor P. Van Meerbergen - Request for
Lawyer - Council Member Indemnification
|
|
That it BE NOTED that the Corporate
Services Committee received advice that is subject to solicitor-client
privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, and for the
purpose of giving directions or instructions to officers, employees or agents
of the municipality, as necessary, with respect to possible indemnification
from the Corporation in response to the attached communication
dated June 11, 2013 from Councillor P. Van Meerbergen in relation to
potential legal expenses in responding to summonses from the Ontario
Ombudsman in connection with his investigation pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal
Act, 2001 and the Ombudsman Act.
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
to Approve clauses 1, 2, 4 and 6 to 9 and 11 to 14.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
|
That the 4th Report of the Transportation
Advisory Committee, from its meeting held on May 7, 2013, BE RECEIVED.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Environment, Fleet & Solid Waste, the following actions be
taken with respect to the Household Special Waste Program:
a) the
proposed by-law as appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting of June 11, 2013 to approve an
agreement with the Recycling Council of Ontario to fund a portion of the
City’s Household Special Waste Program and to authorize the Mayor and the
City Clerk to execute the Agreement;
b) staff
BE DIRECTED to expand the service area of the Household Special Waste Depot
to include Elgin County; it being noted that Council will need to approve
agreements with individual municipalities before their residents can use the
Depot on a full cost recovery basis; and,
c) Civic
Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts that
are necessary in connection with this matter. (2013-E07)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
of Environment, Fleet and Solid Waste, the comments and discussion contained
in the staff report dated May 27, 2013 BE ENDORSED and BE SUBMITTED by City
staff to the Ministry of the Environment’s Environmental Bill of Rights
Registry posting (EBR 011-8592) titled “Environmental Activity and Sector
Registry (EASR) Regulation for Landfill Gas Power Generating Facilities”; it
being noted that the City generally supports the Province of Ontario’s
overall direction to simplify the process for approving relatively low-risk
and low-impact landfill gas power plant projects; it being understood that
because the due date for comments is May 31, 2013, the attached
comments will be forwarded to the Ministry immediately, with a formal Council
resolution to follow after the June 11, 2013 Council meeting. (2013-E02)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services & City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the award of contracts for the
2013 Lifecycle Renewal Program, Contract #1: Grosvenor Street Reconstruction
Project (ES2464-13, EW3765-13):
a) the
bid submitted by Van Bree Drainage and Bulldozing Limited (Van Bree), 7074
Nauvoo Road, Warwick Township, ON, N0N 1J4, at its corrected tendered price
of $1,466,271.90 (excluding H.S.T.), for the 2013 Infrastructure Lifecycle
Renewal Program, Contract #1 project, BE ACCEPTED; it being noted that the
bid submitted by Van Bree was the lowest of eight bids received and meets the
City's specifications and requirements in all areas;
b) Stantec
Consulting Ltd. (Stantec), 800 – 171 Queens Avenue London, ON, N6A 5J7, BE
AUTHORIZED to carry out the resident inspection and contract administration
for the said project in accordance with the estimate, on file, at an upset
amount of $175,340.00 (excluding H.S.T.), based upon the Fee Guideline for
Professional Engineering Services recommended by the Ontario Society of
Professional Engineers, and in accordance with Section 15.2 (g) of the City
of London’s Procurement of Goods and Services Policy; it being noted that
this firm completed the engineering design;
c) minor
future additional annual operating costs of $900.00 BE RECOGNIZED as a result
of this project; it being noted that these costs are as a result of new
infrastructure installation, and will be considered and accommodated within
future Wastewater Operating Budgets;
d) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED as set out in the Sources of Financing
Report appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013;
e) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this project;
f) the
approval given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract or issuing a purchase order for the material to be supplied
and the work to be done relating to this project (Tender 13-34); and,
g) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2013-L04)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads and Transportation, the following actions be taken with
respect to the Ontario One Call initiative:
a) a
contracted service delivery model for the provision of underground utility
locates BE CONTINUED; and,
b) future
additional operating costs for the mandatory Ontario One Call service,
estimated in the amount of $22,000, BE APPROVED as a first priority from
available assessment growth in 2014, subject to Budget approval. (2013-E06)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City Engineer the
following actions be taken with respect to amendments to the Traffic and
Parking By-law:
a) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013 as Appendix
“A”, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11,
2013 for the purpose of amending the Traffic and Parking By-law (P.S. 111);
and,
b) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013 as Appendix
“B”, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013
for the purpose of amending the Traffic and Parking By-law (P.S. 111) with
respect to temporary changes on Bruce Street effective September 20, 2013.
(2013-C01)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Supply and Delivery of
Polymers for Wastewater Treatment (T13-56):
a) the
bid submitted by BASF Canada Inc., 100 Milverton Dr., 5th Floor, Mississauga,
ON L5R 4H1 at its tendered price of $1,242,052.99 (excluding HST), for the
supply and delivery of Polymers at the Wastewater Treatment Plants BE
ACCEPTED; it being noted that the bid submitted by BASF Canada Inc., was the
lowest of three bids received and meets the City’s requirements in all
areas;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this contract; and,
c) approval
hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or issuing a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this
approval. (2013-E07)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services and City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the Traffic Marking Paint Single
Source (SS13-24):
a) approval
hereby BE GIVEN to enter into a supply contract for 2013 for the supply and
delivery of White and Yellow Traffic Marking Paint with Ennis Paint Canada
ULC, 850 McKay Road, Pickering, ON L1W 2Y4;
b) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this contract; and,
c) approval
hereby given BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a formal
contract or having a purchase order relating to the subject matter of this
approval. (2013-L04B)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Environmental & Engineering Services & City Engineer, the
following actions be taken with respect to the appointment of Consulting
Engineers for the 2014-2015 Infrastructure Lifecycle Renewal Program
(ES2414-12, ES2464-11, EW3765-13, TS1446-12, TS5123-12, TS4067-13):
a) the
following Consulting Engineering firms BE APPOINTED Consulting Engineers for
the pre-design and design of the said projects, in the amounts identified
below, in accordance with the estimate on file, based upon the Fee Guideline
for Professional Engineering Services, recommended by the Ontario Society of
Professional Engineers; and in accordance with Section 15.2 of the City of
London’s Procurement of Goods and Services Policy; it being noted that these
consultants shall obtain approval to proceed with subsequent phases of
engineering for their projects subject to satisfying all financial, reporting
and other conditions contained within this Policy:
i) Contract
1: Spriet Associates, 155 York Street, London ON, N6A 1A8 in the amount of
$214,203.00, exclusive of HST;
ii) Contract
2: R.V. Anderson Associates Limited, 557 Southdale Road East Suite 200 in the
amount of $174,625.00, exclusive of HST;
iii) Contract
3: AECOM Canada Ltd., 285 King Street, Suite 300, London ON, N6B 3M6, in the
amount of $284,245.50, exclusive of HST;
iv) Contract
4: Archibald, Gray & McKay Engineering Limited, 3514 White Oak Road,
London ON, N6E 2Z9, in the amount of $216,436.00, exclusive of HST;
v) Contract
5: Stantec Consulting Ltd, 800-171 Queens Avenue, London, ON, N6A 5J7, in the
amount of $245,338.50, exclusive of HST;
vi) Contract
6: IBI Group 350 Oxford Street West, Suite 203, London, ON, N6H 1T3, in the
amount of $128,832.55 exclusive of HST;
vii) Contract
A: AECOM Canada Ltd., 285 King Street, Suite 300, London ON, N6B 3M6, in the
amount of $124,454.00 exclusive of HST;
viii) Contract
B: Dillon Consulting Ltd., 130 Dufferin Avenue, Suite 1400, London, ON, N6A
5R2, in the amount of $195,965.00, exclusive of HST;
ix) Contract
C: Archibald, Gray & McKay Engineering Limited, 3514 White Oak Road,
London ON, N6E 2Z9, in the amount of $204,094.00 exclusive of HST;
x) Contract
D: Delcan Corporation, 1069 Wellington Road South, Suite 214, London ON, N6E
2H6, in the amount of $190,358.30, exclusive of HST; and,
xi) Contract
E: Dillon Consulting Ltd., 130 Dufferin Avenue, Suite 1400, London, ON, N6A
5R2, in the amount of $74,800.00 exclusive of HST;
b) the
financing for design of the projects identified in (a), above, BE APPROVED in
accordance with the Sources of Financing Report as appended to the staff
report dated May 27, 2013;
c) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all the administrative acts
that are necessary in connection with this program;
d) the
approvals given herein BE CONDITIONAL upon the Corporation entering into a
formal contract with each Consultant for the respective project; and,
e) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute any contract or other
documents, if required, to give effect to these recommendations. (2013-A05)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the City
Clerk, the proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 27, 2013,
BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting on June 11, 2013 to amend
By-law No. A-46, as amended, entitled “A by-law to provide for Various Fees and
Charges” in order to include fees related to commemorative street requests
and also permit applications for approved works, where the works do not
involve road cuts, traffic management plans or disruptions within the
travelled portion of the roadway; it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-C01)
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clause 3.
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Roads & Transportation, NO ACTION BE TAKEN with respect to
replacing the lighting in the vicinity of the Bradley Avenue pedestrian
tunnel. (2013-T01)
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clause 5.
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Environment, Fleet, & Solid Waste, and the W12A Landfill Public
Liaison Committee, funding of $15,000 BE APPROVED from the W12A Landfill
Community Mitigative Measures Fund for the Glanworth Library Revitalization
Project, subject to the project resulting in a continuation of library
services in Glanworth. (2013-F11)
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Motion
made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve clause 10.
That, the following actions be taken with
respect to Trowbridge Avenue Parking Passes and the Residential Parking Pass
Pilot Program:
a) NO
ACTION BE TAKEN with respect to changing the parking regulations on Trowbridge
Avenue (all), Mary Avenue (all) and Pinewood Drive from Mary Avenue to Randol
Drive; and,
b) the Civic Administration
BE DIRECTED to discontinue the Residential Parking Pass Pilot Program within
the City of London, for the purpose of achieving a consistent approach
throughout the City, and to provide adequate notice of the Program’s
discontinuation to those areas currently participating in the Residential
Parking Pass Pilot Program. (2013-T02)
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Defer of consideration of clause 10 to the
next meeting of Municipal Council, in order for the Ward Councillor to be in
attendance to participate in the debate.
Motion
Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen
to Approve clause 15.
|
|
15.
|
Southwest
Area Plan - Service Policies and Plans
|
|
That the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED
to report back as soon as possible, to the appropriate committee, with
respect to servicing policies and plans related to the Southwest Area Plan.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill to
Approve clauses 1 to 22.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the 4th Report of the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee from
its meeting held on April 24, 2013:
a) the
Managers of Parks Operations, Parks Planning and Design and Risk Management
BE REQUESTED to review the City’s safety standards for the possible inclusion
of adult activity equipment in parks, trails and recreation areas; it being
noted that the Trees and Forests Advisory Committee received a product
catalogue and presentation from B. Bekkers, Landmark by Crozier, with respect
to this matter; and,
b) clauses 2 to 8, inclusive, BE
RECEIVED.
|
|
That the 5th Report of the Advisory
Committee on the Environment from its meeting held on May 1, 2013 BE
RECEIVED.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the proposed by-law, as appended to the
staff report dated May 28, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to amend Council Policies 19(35) and
19(35A), relating to the City of London Urban Design Awards, to ensure that
the program aligns with the Royal Architecture Institute of Canada’s (RAIC)
National Urban Design Awards program. (2013-C01)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the proposed by-law, as appended to the
staff report dated May 28, 2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council
meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to amend the Telecommunication
Facilities Consultation Policy to provide an exemption for amateur radio
antenna support structures. (2013-C01)
|
|
6.
|
Emerald Ash Borer Program Status Report
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to an update on the Emerald Ash Borer Program:
a) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to identify tree planting capacities and to
report back to a future meeting of the appropriate Standing Committee;
b) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to submit an updated business plan with
respect to this matter as part of the 2014 Budget process; it being noted
that the business plan should provide information pertaining to the necessity
for replanting trees; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back on the possible
establishment of a program where the Development Industry may be required to
plant two trees for every tree it removes and/or establish a cash-in-lieu
fund.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Services and Planning Liaison, based on the application of SJMA
Architecture Inc., relating to the property located at 4448 Colonel Talbot
Road, the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated May 28,
2013, BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11,
2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official
Plan), to change the zoning of 4448 Colonel Talbot Road FROM a Holding
Arterial Commercial Special Provision (h-5•h-17•h-18•h-42•AC2(6)) Zone TO a
Holding Arterial Commercial Special Provision (h-17•AC2(6)) Zone to remove
the holding “h-5”, “h-18” and “h-42” provisions. (2013-D14B)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, Development Services, the following actions be taken
with respect to entering into a subdivision assignment agreement between The
Corporation of the City of London and Norquay Sunningdale Land Corp., for the
subdivisions of land over Part of Lot 41, Registrar’s Compiled Plan 1029,
(Geographic Township of London), City of London, County of Middlesex,
situated on the south side of Sunningdale Road West, on the west side of
Richmond Street and Meadowlands Way:
a) the
Assignment Agreement for the Tricar Subdivision (Phase 2) (39T-11504), as
appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, between The Corporation of
the City of London and Norquay Sunningdale Land Corp. BE APPROVED;
b) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement referred to
in part a), above, any amending agreements and all documents required to
fulfill its conditions; and,
c) the
execution of this Assignment Agreement by the City BE DELAYED until such time
that the owner has provided the City with a copy of the Transfer document as
proof of the purchase and sale. (2013-L04)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, Development Services, the following actions be taken
with respect to entering into a subdivision agreement between The Corporation
of the City of London and 160 Sunningdale Road West Ltd., for the
subdivisions of land over Part of Lot 41, Registrar’s Compiled Plan 1029, (Geographic
Township of London), City of London, County of Middlesex, situated on the
south side of Sunningdale Road West, on the west side of Richmond Street and
Meadowlands Way:
a)
the
Special Provisions, as appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, to be
contained in a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of
London and 160 Sunningdale Road West Ltd. for the Tricar Subdivision, (Phase
2) (39T-11504) BE APPROVED;
b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Related Costs
and Revenues” provided as Schedule “B” to the associated staff report, dated
May 28, 2013;
c) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement referred to
in part a), above, any amending agreements and all documents required to
fulfill its conditions; and,
d) the
Municipal Council BE ADVISED that the applicant has entered into a purchase
and sale agreement with Norquay Sunningdale Land Corp.; it being noted that
an assignment agreement is being presented to the Planning and Environment
Committee meeting to be held on May 28, 2013, in a separate report.
(2013-L04)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official,
the following actions be taken with respect to entering into a subdivision
agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Sifton Properties
Limited, for the subdivisions of land over Part of Lots 8 and 9 Broken Front
Concession “B” and part of the Road Allowance between Concession 1 and Broken
Front Concession “B”, (Geographic Township of Westminster), City of London,
County of Middlesex, municipally referred to as 1603 Hamilton Road:
a) the
Subdivision Agreement, as appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013,
between The Corporation of the City of London and Sifton Properties Limited
(39T-09502), BE APPROVED;
b) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Sources of
Financing” provided as Appendix “A” as appended to the staff report dated May
28, 2013;
c) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement referred to
in part a), above, any amending agreements and all documents required to
fulfill its conditions; and,
d) the
Municipal Council BE ADVISED that the following anticipated reimbursements
from the Capital Works Budget have been negotiated:
e) for
lands dedicated to the City for the construction of Old Victoria No. 2 SWM
Facility, (being Block 153 of the Draft Approved Plan 39T-09502), the
estimated cost of which is $252,254.38, (1.007 ha) at $247,100/hectare
($100,000/acre) and 0.252 ha at $13,590/ hectare ($5,500/acre), plus
applicable taxes. (2013-L04)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to
entering into a subdivision agreement between The Corporation of the City of
London and Highland Green London Inc., for the subdivisions of land over Part
of Lot 28, Concession 1, (Geographic Township of Westminster), City of
London, County of Middlesex, situated on the south side of Commissioners Road
East between Carnegie Lane and Upper Queens, municipally known as 181-199
Commissioners Road East:the Special Provisions, as appended to the staff
report dated May 28, 2013 as Schedule “C”, to be contained in a Subdivision
Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Highland Green
London Inc. for the Highland Green Subdivision; (39T-08501) BE APPROVED;
a) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Related Costs
and Revenues” provided as Schedule “B” to the associated staff report, dated
May 28, 2013; and,
b) the
Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute the Agreement referred to
in part a), above, any amending agreements and all documents required to
fulfill its conditions. (2013-L04)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Senior
Planner, Development Services, the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the
Municipal Council supports a six (6) month extension of draft approval for
draft approved plan 39T-00510, submitted by Oliver and Associates Realty
Inc., relating to the property located at 3557 Colonel Talbot Road, SUBJECT
TO the previously imposed conditions. (2013-D12)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken
with respect to a request by Sifton Properties Limited to proceed with the
preparation of the River Bend South Secondary Plan:
a) the
previously established Terms of Reference BE UPDATED and presented at a
public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee in
July, 2013;
b) upon
adoption of the Terms of Reference, noted in part a), above, by the Municipal
Council, Sifton Properties Limited BE REQUESTED to update the required
background studies and complete the Secondary Plan process, with input from
the City of London, in accordance with the approved Terms of Reference;
c) final
approval for the Secondary Plan BE WITHHELD until such time as the Part II
Order issues, relating to the Tributary ‘C’ Municipal Class EA, have been
resolved;
d) subdivision
concept plans BE CIRCULATED as part of the Secondary Plan process; and,
e) subdivision
applications NOT BE ACCEPTED within the River Bend South area as they are
considered incomplete until such time as the Part II Order issues, relating
to the Tributary ‘C’ Municipal Class EA, have been resolved. (2013-D08)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, Development Services, the staff report, dated May 28,
2013, relating to the purchase, by Farhi Holdings Corporation (FHC), on
December 12, 2012, of the remaining lands of Draft Approved Plan 39T-03511,
(Woodhull subdivision), from 777552 Ontario Limited (Phyllis Matthews) BE
RECEIVED; it being noted that FHC plans to assume the development as
approved. (2013-D12)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of John Kudelka, relating to the property located
at 1030 Elias Street:
a) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1,
(in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Light Industrial Special Provision (LI1(4)) Zone, which
permits manufacturing, warehouse and business service establishments, as well
as the occasional use of space within an existing industrial building, as a
private club for pigeon racing enthusiasts and a Light Industrial (LI1/LI7)
Zone, which permits bakeries, business services establishments, laboratories,
manufacturing and assembly industries, support offices, paper and allied
products, pharmaceutical and medical product industries, printing,
reproduction and data processing industries, research and development
establishments, warehouse establishments, wholesale establishments, custom
workshops, brewing on premises establishments, service and trades, automobile
body shops, automobile repair garages, building or contracting
establishments, repair and rental establishments, service and repair
establishments, service trades, and truck sales and services establishments,
TO a Light Industrial Special Provision (LI1(__)/LI7) Zone, to permit a
commercial recreation establishment (indoor rock climbing) in addition to the
above permitted industrial uses, and to reduce the required parking ratio
related to the commercial recreation establishment; and,
b) pursuant
to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal
Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the proposed by-law, as the
proposed amendments are minor in nature;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
John
Kudelka, applicant – expressing appreciation to the staff for their effort
with this application; expressing concern with section 2 b) i) of the by-law
under “Regulation – Landscaped Open Space” by indicating that the existing
landscaping may not align with the 7% required; noting that the percentage of
landscaping may be closer to 5%; expressing concern with section 2 b) ii) of
the by-law under “Regulation – Parking for Commercial Recreation
Establishment (Minimum)” by indicating that, in consultation with the
Planner, a ratio of one space per 30 square metres has been established;
noting that this property currently has 43 parking spaces; and requesting the
wording be changed to “not less than the current 43 parking spaces on the
property”. (2013-D14A)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, with respect to the application of Briar
de Lange, relating to the properties located at 1930 and 1950 Hyde Park Road,
the proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to
amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to
change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Restricted Service
Commercial (RSC1/RSC4/RSC5) Zone, which permits animal clinics, kennels,
automotive sales and service establishments, auto supply stores, catalogue
stores, duplicating shops, home improvement and furnishing stores, repair and
rental establishments, service and repair establishments, studios, taxi
establishments, bake shops, day care centres, financial institutions, florist
shops, personal service establishments, restaurants, video rental establishments,
brewing on premises establishments, auction establishments, building or
contracting establishments, building supply outlets, bulk sales
establishments, dry cleaning and laundry plants, manufacturing and assembly
industries with related sales, garden stores, printing establishments,
service trades, support offices, warehouse and wholesale establishments,
commercial schools, truck sales and industrial malls TO an Associated
Shopping Area (ASA1/ASA2/ASA3) Zone, to permit animal hospitals, convenience service
establishments, convenience stores, dry cleaning and laundry plants,
duplicating shops, financial institutions, grocery stores, restaurants,
retail stores, personal service establishments, pharmacies, printing
establishments, video rental establishments, brewing on premises, repair and
rental establishments, service and repair establishments, studios,
supermarkets, clinics, day care centres, laboratories, and medical/dental,
professional and service offices;
it being pointed out that there were no oral
submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with this
matter. (2013-D14A)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Planning, Development Services, the following actions be taken
with respect to the site plan approval application of Sorin Marinescu,
relating to the properties located at 3 Front Street and 5 Front Street:
a) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the public meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, no issues were
raised;
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the
granting of these Site Plan applications for two duplex dwellings; and,
c) the
financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Related Costs
and Revenues” provided as Schedule “A” to the associated staff report, dated
May 28, 2013;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual
made an oral submission in connection therewith:
·
Sorin
Marinescu, applicant – indicating that, on December 6, 2009, a flood was
caused by a main artery pressurizing and breaking overnight; noting that it
flooded the entire area; indicating that, at the moment, the development
space is dead water storage space, which is why the Upper Thames River
Conservation Authority agreed to the development; indicating that there is no
danger of the river flooding; advising that the perimeter of the house will
be above the 100 year flood line; noting that all of the openings will be
above the 250 year flood line so everything should be safe. (2013-D11)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Manager,
Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken
with respect to the site plan approval application for surface parking at an
existing automobile sales and service establishment, by Zelinka Priamo
Limited, relating to the property located at 1206 Oxford Street East:
a) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, at the public meeting of the Planning and
Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, no issues were
raised; and,
b) the
Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the
granting of the Site Plan application for the commercial development;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-D11)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of Fattema El shakaki, relating to the property
located at 1464 Adelaide Street North:
a) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013 to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1,
(in conformity with the Official Plan), to amend the Convenience Commercial
Special Provision (CC6(1)) Zone, which permits convenience service
establishments, convenience business service establishments, convenience
stores, day care centres, financial institutions, food stores, offices,
personal service establishments, studios, and take-out restaurants, without
drive-through facilities, dwelling units together with any other permitted
uses, brewing on premises establishments, and medical/dental offices, and
prohibits outdoor patios, by stating that for the purposes of the Convenience
Commercial Special Provision (CC6(1)) Zone, a studio shall be considered to
include a fitness centre, and restricting fitness centres to a maximum gross
floor area of 100 square metres; and,
b) the
request to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1 to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Convenience Commercial Special Provision (CC6(1)) Zone TO a
new Convenience Commercial Special Provision (CC6(__)) Zone, to permit
commercial recreation establishments, BE REFUSED for the following reasons:
i) it
is more appropriate to modify the existing special provision as the
prohibition on outdoor patios continues to be appropriate for the site;
ii) the
more limited use of a fitness centre is more appropriate than the full range
of uses permitted by the commercial recreation establishment definition; and,
iii) a
maximum limit on the Gross Floor Area (GFA) for the fitness centre use is
necessary in order to ensure the fitness centre operates at a community
oriented scale;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-D14A)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the
Director, Land Use Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken
with respect to the Cultural Heritage Landscape Official Plan Amendment for
the Western Counties Health and Occupational Centre:
a) the
proposed by-law, as appended to the staff report dated May 28, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to
amend Section 13.5.5 of the Official Plan to add the Western Counties Health
and Occupational Centre Grounds as a Listed Cultural Heritage Landscape and
to adopt the Western Counties Health and Occupational Centre Cultural
Heritage Plan (Appendix “B”) as a Guideline document pursuant to Section
19.2.2 of the Official Plan by amending Section 19.2.2. ii) to add it to the
list of Guidelines;
b) the
staff report, dated May 28, 2013, with respect to the Cultural Heritage
Landscape Official Plan Amendment for the Western Counties Health and
Occupational Centre, BE RECEIVED; it being noted that specific matters
addressed in the staff report include:
i) a
comprehensive history of the site;
ii) an
assessment of the site’s cultural heritage value;
iii) a
review of Municipal and Provincial Land Use Policy pertaining to heritage
designation, and;
iv)
a
recommended, phased implementation plan for the site’s conservation, rehabilitation
and public use;
c) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to negotiate amendments to the existing
Three Party Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement, dated August 23 2004,
between The Corporation of the City of London, London Health Sciences Centre
and St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, to reflect the existing site conditions
and future use of the Western Counties Occupational Centre grounds relative
to the revised infrastructure needs;
d) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to determine an appropriate commemoration
for former Heritage Planner Chris Nelson for her accomplishments relating to
cultural heritage; and,
e) the
attached communication, dated May 27, 2013, from S. Levin, Chair,
Conservation Committee, Nature London, BE RECEIVED;
it being pointed out that there were no
oral submissions made at the public participation meeting associated with
this matter. (2013-R01)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with
respect to the application of Gus Aggelopoulos, relating to the property
located at 404-408 Pall Mall Street & 660 Colborne Street:
a) the
attached, revised, proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal
Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1,
(in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject
property FROM a Residential R8/Convenience Commercial (R8-1/CC) Zone, which
permits such uses as apartment buildings, stacked townhouses, emergency care
establishments and continuum-of-care facilities at a maximum height of 13.0
metres and a maximum density of 40 units per hectare, and convenience service
establishments, convenience stores, financial institutions and personal
service establishments without drive-through facilities, TO a Residential
R8/Convenience Commercial Special Provision (R8-1/CC(_)) Zone, to permit in
addition to the above-noted uses, a restaurant, without a drive-through
facility, to a maximum gross floor area of 75 square metres within the
existing building, and to require a minimum of five on-site parking spaces
for all uses within the existing building;
b) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to undertake the following actions with
respect to boulevard parking:
i) review
the Owner’s compliance in all respects with the Agreement between the City
and Owner under Section 11 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as
amended (The Boulevard Parking Agreement);
ii) if
necessary, require the Owner to comply with the Agreement, in all respects,
or alternatively, enter into a revised Boulevard Parking Agreement to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; it being noted that the revised Agreement
would need to include appropriate landscaping; and,
iii) report
back to the Planning and Environment Committee; and,
c) pursuant
to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as determined by the Municipal
Council, no further notice BE GIVEN in respect of the proposed by-law as:
i) the
restriction of the recommended use to within the existing building was the
basis on which notice of application and notice of public meeting were given;
and,
ii) the
requirement for a minimum of five on-site parking spaces recognizes an existing
site condition, and was discussed at the public meeting held on May 28, 2013;
it being pointed out that at the public
participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals
made oral submissions in connection therewith:
·
Matt
Falls, 421 Pall Mall Street – indicating that he submitted a communication to
the Planning Department which is included in the staff report; indicating
that the communications provided by area residents include two enquiries for
clarification, three letters of support and eight expressing opposition;
noting that the letters of opposition include the local area neighbourhood
association, Piccadilly Area Neighbourhood Association; enquiring about
parking and the movement of equipment or traffic around the site; enquiring
about the type of garbage storage container to be used and who would be
responsible for garbage service; expressing concern with people throwing
paper cups on their lawns; indicating that this is a further degrading of the
area residents premises; respecting that the applicants have tried to work
with the neighburhood; noting that it does not make this any better for the
area residents; requesting the larger area of the neighbourhood that is in
objection to this be taken into consideration; indicating that this is the
first time he has heard of the installation of a patio; and inquiring as to
whether or not the recommendation of the Planning and Environment Committee
will remain the same if a patio is added to the application.
·
Mr.
Wright, owner – advising that they live in the greater neighbourhood; noting
that they live north of Oxford Street, near the University; indicating that
he is also a lawyer at Siskinds, which is right across the street from the
subject property; indicating that their children attend school half a block
from the subject property; noting that they are very much in the
neighbourhood and interested in the neighbourhood; advising that this is
something that they have enjoyed in their travels and do not see a lot of in
Ontario; and indicating that the espresso bar will be an improvement.
·
Charmaine
Specter, 408 Pall Mall Street – expressing support for the application;
enquiring about the amount of parking available; indicating that there is not
much room for vehicles to maneuver around the building; noting that the
building has been damaged on both corners; suggesting that perhaps parking
spaces 5 and 6, as shown on the map presented during the Planning and
Environment Committee meeting, can be changed to be adaptive so that it is
easier for a car to go around the building; enquiring as to whether or not
the owners are planning to have a patio in the front of the building;
advising that the tin building at the back is garbage storage for the
tenants; noting that there are approximately 5 spaces for garbage bins, with
room for blue boxes; indicating that the current façade is not pleasing to
the environment; indicating that the variety store is closed more often than
it is open; hoping that the espresso bar is not open until 1:00 AM; and
indicating that she believes that this proposal will enhance the
neighbourhood.
·
George
Namo, Owner, Helen’s Variety – advising that he presently serves coffee, but
is unable to accommodate everything the applicant is asking for; and,
enquiring as to the reason for the zoning amendment.
·
Bert
Killian, 428 Pall Mall Street – advising that this is a very congested
intersection; indicating that, approximately 5 or 6 years ago, the residents
had the stop sign installed to allow the children to cross the intersection
safely; indicating that the amount of traffic in this area has been
undersold; indicating that you can walk up the street to the variety store at
Maitland Street and Pall Mall Street; advising that there is congestion now,
with the railway crossing and the bus stop right there; advising that he
spent several years in the safety business and this is a safety issue; and
recommending that this application be reviewed for safety.
·
Ben
Billings, Insites Consulting, on behalf of the applicant – advising that the
essential approach to this application is not to make many changes to the
site; indicating that the site functions for the convenience store that
exists there now; advising that the premise that they are operating on is
that the espresso bar will not introduce any increased impact to the site;
indicating that the garbage facility that is there now is anticipated to be
more than sufficient for any refuse that is generated from the espresso bar;
advising that they will comply with the Engineering Department regulations
relating to the minimum five parking spaces that currently exist; advising
that they are working with what they have; noting that refuse is a concern;
further noting that they will ensure that refuse is properly stored;
anticipating normal city service for garbage collection; indicating that they
will supply receptacles for litter; indicating that they are trying to
improve the neighbourhood; advising that a majority of the clientele for the
espresso bar would be walk-in traffic from the area; noting that it is going
to be a local establishment run by a local family that is quite excited about
this opportunity; indicating that they will continue to work with the
neighbours to ensure that the minor details outlined at the public participation
meeting are looked after; advising that they will work with the City with
respect to the existing boulevard parking agreement, and any amendments
required, to ensure that it properly reflects what is going on with the site
today and what is proposed for the future; advising that they would like to
install a patio during summer months; noting that they need to discuss this
idea with City staff; indicating that they are requesting the zoning
amendment to allow them to install an espresso bar; and advising that they do
not believe that their application will exacerbate any safety issues that
exist today. (2013-D14A)
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Planning and City Planner, the Ontario Municipal Board BE ADVISED
that Municipal Council consents to an amendment of Section 2.2, Heritage
Character Statement, in the Downtown Heritage Conservation District Plan, by
adding the following words, as underlined:
Industrial and
wholesale structures developed in response to the road and rail systems
running through the Downtown. Concentrated around York and Richmond, a prime
example is the terra cotta McMahen-Granger building. The commercial,
industrial and administrative functions of the Downtown brought a
concentration of financial services to the area. As one of the largest
concentrations of similar-use buildings today, they too reflect the prolonged
periods of development. Jeffery’s London Life, Cronyn’s Huron and Erie/Canada
Trust, and Ivey’s Northern Life all left buildings representative of their
respective rise to national significance. In fact, London Life continues
to have a significant presence in the Downtown. The Plan anticipates that
London Life will maintain this significant presence in the Downtown, and that
the current streetscape elevations along Dufferin Avenue, Wellington Street
and Queens Avenue will be conserved as the site continues to develop over
time. In most cases the financial service sector drew their investment
funds from the Downtown’s industries and wholesalers including J. W. Little’s
dry goods empire, the Hobbs glass works and the Joseph Smith Southern Cigar
Factory, all of which built significant structures in the Downtown.
(2013-R01)
|
Pursuant
to section 12.3 of the Council Procedure By-law, Councillor J.L. Baechler calls
for a separate vote on clause 6.
The
motion to Approve clauses 1 to 22, excluding clause 6 is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (14)
|
Motion made by Councillor J.L. Baechler and
seconded by Councillor B. Polhill to Amend clause 6, to add a new part d), as
follows:
"
d) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the appropriate Standing
Committee with respect to the potential use of First Quarter Corporate
surplus funds, if available, in order to facilitate a Fall planting of trees,
in 2013;"
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor B. Polhill and
seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve clause 6, as amended.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
Clause
6, as amended, reads as follows:
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to an update on the Emerald Ash Borer Program:
a) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to identify tree planting capacities and to
report back to a future meeting of the appropriate Standing Committee;
b) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to submit an updated business plan with
respect to this matter as part of the 2014 Budget process; it being noted
that the business plan should provide information pertaining to the necessity
for replanting trees; and,
c) the
Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back on the possible
establishment of a program where the Development Industry may be required to
plant two trees for every tree it removes and/or establish a cash-in-lieu
fund
d) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to report back to the appropriate Standing
Committee with respect to the potential use of First Quarter Corporate
surplus funds, if available, in order to facilitate a Fall planting of trees,
in 2013. (2013-E04)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown to
Approve clauses 1 and 2.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that Councillor J. Swan
disclosed a pecuniary interest in clause 2 of this report, having to do with
the Orchestra London Business Plan, by indicating that he is employed by
Orchestra London.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Deputy
City Treasurer and the Director, Corporate Investments and Partnerships, the
report dated May 21, 2013, with respect to the Orchestra London Business Plan
BE RECEIVED for information.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: J.B. Swan (1)
|
Motion
made by Councillor M. Brown to Approve clause 3.
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the Investment and Economic Prosperity projects and the related
public input received:
a) the
report dated May 21, 2013 from the Director, Corporate Investments and
Partnerships, with respect to this matter BE RECEIVED, noting that there will
be improved communications on all the projects under development;
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to continue the advancement of the plan
described in the December 18, 2012, “A Path to Prosperity: Community Business
Ideas to Stimulate Our Economy”;
c) the
attached draft template for Economic Development Projects in the
Capital Budget from the Corporate Investments and Partnerships division, BE
RECEIVED; and,
d) the
City Manager BE REQUESTED to provide an update on the following related
matters at the next meeting of the Investment and Economic Prosperity
Committee:
(i) identification
of any proposed additional resources that could assist in fast-tracking job
creation ideas and/or projects;
(ii) a
project management plan, to assist with project tracking; and,
(iii) an
overall public communication plan related to these matters.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P.
Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: J.B. Swan (1)
|
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan to
Approve clauses 4 to 9.
Pursuant to section 12.3 of the Council
Procedure By-law, Councillor P. Hubert calls for a separate vote on clause 5.
|
That, on the recommendation of the Director
of Corporate Investments and Partnerships, the following actions be taken
with respect to the proposed Employment Program Support proposal:
a) the
proposed by-law appended to the staff report dated May 21, 2013, BE
INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on June 11, 2013 to:
(i) approve
the Grant Agreement with WIL Counselling and Training for Employment, for the
Employment Program Support;
(ii) authorize
the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement; and,
(iii) approve
the amount of the Grant;
b) the
Employment Program Support BE APPROVED, on a pilot basis for one year, with
the Employment Sector Council London Middlesex and the London Middlesex
Immigrant Employment Council, with an option to extend the pilot for one (1)
additional year, based on the year-end update report and subject to a source
of financing;
c) the
Corporate Investments and Partnerships staff BE DIRECTED to report back at
the end of one year of the Grant Agreement, on the results of the program,
providing job matching statistics associated with the two organizations and
an evaluation of the results for the potential of a second year of funding;
d) the
Civic Administration BE AUTHORIZED to undertake all administrative acts which
are necessary in connection with this award; and,
e) the
financing for this project in the amount of $101,980 BE APPROVED as set out
in the Sources of Financing Report included as Appendix 3 to the associated
staff report, dated May 21, 2013;
it being noted that the Investment and
Economic Prosperity Committee heard a verbal update from A. Langille, WIL
Counselling and Training for Employment, with respect to this matter.
|
|
That the communication dated May 9, 2013,
from R. T. Usher, Board Chair and J. MacDonald, Executive Director, London
Downtown Business Association, BE RECEIVED.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to the London Focus Ontario Fall 2012 Survey:
a) the
communication dated April 18, 2013, from G. Macartney, CEO, London Chamber of
Commerce with respect to this matter, BE RECEIVED; it being noted that the
City Manager has already responded to this communication; and,
b) the
Chamber of Commerce BE ENCOURAGED to undertake its own survey to “get the
pulse of business” in the community and provide its comments and suggestions
to the Municipal Council.
|
|
That the following actions be taken with
respect to a service London initiative:
a) the
communication from Councillor P. Hubert, with respect to a Service London
initiative BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for consideration in its
review of services in London; it being noted that the Investment and Economic
Prosperity Committee re-iterates its support for a one-stop business
enterprise centre for the City of London; and,
b) the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to place the Business Enterprise Centre back
on the City’s agenda and that the London Economic Development Corporation
(LEDC) BE IDENTIFIED as the lead for this initiative, with the Civic
Administration to determine a City representative as the co-lead;
it being noted that the Investment and
Economic Prosperity Committee heard a verbal delegation from Councillor P.
Hubert, with respect to this matter.
|
|
That D. Harvey, Executive Director of the
Grand Theatre BE GRANTED delegation status at the June 24, 2013 Investment
and Economic Prosperity Committee meeting to provide an update on the
semi-annual program and financials of the Grand Theatre.
|
|
Motion made by Councillor J.B. Swan to
Approve that the following actions be taken with respect to the Western Fair
District:
a) the
communications dated April 26, 2013, from Councillor J. Swan and the Municipal
Council resolution adopted at its meeting held on April 16, 2013, with
respect to the Western Fair District, respectively, BE REFERRED to the Civic
Administration for review;
b) the
Western Fair District BE INVITED to the next Investment and Economic Prosperity
Committee (IEPC) meeting to give an overview of its Strategic and Development
Plans; and,
c) the
concept and basic parameters of film related business(es) in the City of
London BE REFERRED to the Director of Corporate Investment and Partnerships,
for consideration; it being noted that the IEPC heard a verbal delegation
from J. Hart, Film Director, with respect to this matter.
|
The
motion to Approve clause 5 is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
RECUSED: P. Hubert (1)
The
motion to Approve clauses 4, 6, 7 and 8 is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
The
motion to Approve clause 9 is put.
Motion
Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (14)
At
9:47 PM Councillor J.B. Swan leaves the meeting.
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown to
Approve clauses 1, 2 and 4.
|
|
That it BE NOTED that no pecuniary
interests were disclosed.
|
|
That the following actions be taken
regarding the 2013 Risk-Based Audit Plan – Boards and Commissions:
a) the report dated May 23, 2013
with respect to this matter BE RECEIVED; and,
b) the
proposed 2013 Risk-Based Audit Plan – Boards and Commissions, identified in
Appendix A of the above-noted Report, relating to the London Public Library
and London Transit Commission BE CONSIDERED for incorporation into the 2013
Risk-Based Audit Plan.
|
|
That, on the recommendation of the Managing
Director, Corporate Services, City Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, the
Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to engage KPMG LLP to perform the annual
Procedure and Findings Report of the Downtown Camera Program at a cost of
$3,250, exclusive of HST.
|
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P.
Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant,
S.E. White (13)
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown and
seconded by Councillor J.L. Baechler to Approve that pursuant to section 13.7
of the Council Procedure By-law, the actions of the Municipal Council taken at
its meeting held on December 11, 2012, related to the adoption of clause 4 of
the 5th Report of the Audit Committee, concerning the request and encouragement
of the Boards and Commissions to engage the services of PricewaterhouseCoopers
for the purpose of an internal audit of their existing processes BE
RECONSIDERED.
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
At
9:51 PM Councillor J.B. Swan enters the meeting.
|
Motion made by Councillor M. Brown to
Approve that the following actions be taken with respect to the engagement of
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) to undertake operational reviews of the Boards
and Commissions:
b) the report dated May 23, 2013
regarding this matter BE RECEIVED;
c) the following letters attached
to the above–noted report BE RECEIVED:
(i) London
Police Services dated April 10, 2013;
(ii) London
Transit Commission, dated March 28, 2013;
(iii) London
Public Library, dated April 12, 2013; and,
(iv) Museum
London, dated March 31, 2013;
d) PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP (PwC) BE AUTHORIZED to prepare an engagement letter for an operational
review of the London Transit Commission, on a project determined by PwC, in
consultation with London Transit, which is exclusive of London Transit’s
current initiatives underway; it being noted that the source of funding is
contained within the annual audit budget of $300,000;
e) any
demonstrable savings or efficiency gains resulting from the above-noted
operational review of the London Transit Commission BE APPLIED to the London
Transit’s Long-term Transit Growth Strategy;
f) PwC
LLP BE AUTHORIZED to prepare an engagement letter for an operational review
of the London Public Library, on a review of the Library’s sources of
revenue;
g)
the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to request the London Police
Services Board to clarify their intention to undertake an audit of the London
Police Services in 2013; and,
h) future
audits for Boards and Commission BE CONSIDERED at future Audit Committee
meetings to determine the scope and timing of those engagements;
it being noted that on-going savings
achieved should assist in providing sustainable annual budget requests.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
At
9:51 PM, the Council recesses.
Council
resumes in regular session with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair, and all
Members except Councillor N. Branscombe present, at 10:01 PM.
Councillor B. Polhill moves and seconded by
Councillor P. Hubert to Approve that Council rise and go into Committee of the
Whole, in camera, for the purpose of considering the following:
|
a)
|
A matter to be considered for the purpose
of instructions and directions to officers and employees of the Corporation
pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; advice that is subject to
solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that
purpose; reports or advice or recommendations of officers and employees of
the Corporation pertaining to a proposed acquisition of land; commercial and
financial information supplied in confidence pertaining to the proposed
acquisition the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to,
prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly
with the contractual or other negotiations of the Corporation, result in
similar information no longer being supplied to the Corporation where it is
in the public interest that similar information continue to be so supplied,
and result in undue loss or gain to any person, group, committee or financial
institution or agency; commercial, information relating to the proposed
acquisition that belongs to the Corporation that has monetary value or
potential monetary value; information concerning the proposed acquisition
whose disclosure could reasonably be expected to prejudice the economic
interests of the Corporation or its competitive position; information
concerning the proposed acquisition whose disclosure could reasonably be
expected to be injurious to the financial interests of the Corporation; and instructions
to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on
behalf of the Corporation concerning the proposed acquisition. (C-1/6/IEPC)
|
|
b)
|
Seven matters pertaining to advice that is
subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for
that purpose, and for the purpose of giving directions or instructions to
officers, employees or agents of the municipality, as necessary, with respect
to possible indemnification from the Corporation in response to communications
from certain Council Members in relation to potential legal expenses in
responding to summonses from the Ontario Ombudsman in connection with his
investigation pursuant to s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the
Ombudsman Act.
|
Motion Passed
The Council rises and goes in camera at 10:03
PM, with Mayor J. F. Fontana in the Chair and all Members present except
Councillor N. Branscombe.
The Committee of the Whole rises and Council
resumes in regular session at 10:36 PM with Mayor J.F. Fontana in the Chair and
all Members present, except Councillor N. Branscombe.
At
10:04 PM Councillors J.B. Swan and P. Hubert leave the meeting.
PRESENT:
Mayor J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, W.J. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L.
Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown,
H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White and C. Saunders (City Clerk)
ABSENT:
N. Branscombe
ALSO
PRESENT: A. Zuidema, J.P. Barber, J. Braam, M. Hayward, G. Kotsifas, V. McAlea
Major, D. Mounteer, L.M. Rowe, B. Warner and B. Westlake-Power.
|
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant and
seconded by Councillor S.E. White to Approve C-1
C-1
That, as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6)
of the Municipal Act, 2001, the following recommendation be forwarded
to City Council for deliberation and a vote in public session:
That, on the recommendation of the Manager
of Realty Services, with the concurrence of the Managing Director, Environmental
and Engineering Services and City Engineer and the Director of Environment,
Fleet and Solid Waste, with respect to the properties at 3405 Scotland Drive
and 4233 Scotland Drive, the following actions be taken:
a) a
W12A Landfill Property Value Protection Plan agreement for 3405 Scotland
Drive BE APPROVED;
b) 3405
Scotland Drive BE PURCHASED by the City, subject to negotiating a fair market
value price for the property;
c) a
W12A Landfill Property Value Protection Plan agreement for 4233 Scotland Drive
BE APPROVED; and
d) 4233
Scotland Drive BE PURCHASED by the City, subject to negotiating a fair market
value price for the property.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G.
Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White
(14)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor J.P. Bryant and
seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher to Approve clauses C-2 to C-8 as follows:
|
|
C-2 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 4, 2013 Councillor S. Orser BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the summons
of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the City
Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with any
summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-3 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 6, 2013 Councillor B. Polhill BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the
summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the
City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with
any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-4 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to her communication dated
June 6, 2013 Councillor S.E. White BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in her capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the
summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the
City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with
any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-5 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 10, 2013 Mayor J.F. Fontana BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the
summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the
City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with
any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-6 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 10, 2013 Councillor D. Henderson BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the
summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the
City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with
any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-7 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 11, 2013 Councillor J.B. Swan BE INDEMNIFIED for legal expenses
reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a member of
council in responding to any summons to give evidence under oath
by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the Ombudsman
pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and
the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is acting
honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a view to
the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to the
summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to the
City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated with
any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the legal
expenses.
|
|
C-8 That,
as a procedural matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act,
2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for
deliberation and a vote in public session:
That in response to his communication dated
June 11, 2013 Councillor P. Van Meerbergen BE INDEMNIFIED for legal
expenses reasonably incurred by the Council Member by reason of being a
member of council in responding to any summons to give evidence
under oath by the Ombudsman of Ontario pursuant to an investigation by the
Ombudsman pursuant to a complaint under s. 239.1 of the Municipal Act,
2001 and the Ombudsman Act on the basis that the Council Member is
acting honestly and in good faith in his capacity as a Council Member with a
view to the best interests of the Council or the Corporation in responding to
the summons of the Ombudsman; and, that the legal accounts be submitted to
the City Treasurer for payment following review of the accounts associated
with any summons by the City Solicitor only as to the reasonableness of the
legal expenses.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B.
Armstrong, J.B. Swan, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L.
Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (10)
NAYS: S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P.
Hubert (4)
|
Councillor
J.P. Bryan moves and seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan to Approve clause C-9.
C-9 That, as a procedural
matter pursuant to Section 239(6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, the
following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for deliberation and a
vote in public session:
That, on
the recommendation of the Manager Realty Services, with respect to the City
lands located on South Street, bounded by Waterloo Street to the east,
Wellington Street to the west and the Thames River to the south, the Civic
Administration BE DIRECTED to:
a) proceed
with the sale of lands through the Request for Proposal (RFP) method of sale
for the City owned non-hazard lands of parcels B and C, as per the attached
map, as the lands have redevelopment potential of their own;
b) keep the
City owned, non-hazard lands of parcel A, as per the attached
map, independent of the other City owned parcels at this time; it being noted
that a condition of purchase of the surplus non-hazard lands owned by the
UTRCA, is that the Sale and Other Disposal of Land Policy be applied to the
consideration of the future sale of the City lands and the expectation is that
an open RFP method of sale will apply; and,
c) respond
to the Fincore Group that the request to purchase City lands, on a Direct
Negotiation basis, is declined by the City based on parts a) and b), above.
Motion
Passed
YEAS:
J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, B. Armstrong, J.B. Swan, S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M.
Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P.
Bryant, S.E. White (14)
Councillor
J.B. Swan moves and seconded by Councillor D. Brown to Approve that pursuant to
section 2.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, section 11.10 of the said by-law
BE SUSPENDED for the purpose of permitting the meeting to proceed beyond 11:00
PM.
Motion
Passed
At
10:53 PM Councillor B. Armstrong leaves the meeting.
|
Councillor Orser enquires as to penalties
under the Ombudsman Act, related to recent 'tweets' by the Ombudsman. The
City Solicitor addresses the enquiry.
|
|
BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND
THIRD TIME:
|
|
Motion made by Councillor P. Hubert and
seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen to Approve the introduction and
first reading of Bill No.’s 235 to 272, including the revised Bill 250 and the
added Bill No.s 273, 274 and 275.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor D. Brown and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve second reading of Bill No.’s 235 to
272, including the revised Bill 250 and added the Bill No.s 273, 274 and
275.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
|
Motion made by Councillor H.L. Usher and
seconded by Councillor P. Hubert to Approve third reading and enactment of
Bill No.’s 235 to 272, including the revised Bill 250 and the added Bill No.s
273, 274 and 275.
|
|
Motion Passed
YEAS: J.F. Fontana, B. Polhill, J.B. Swan,
S. Orser, J.L. Baechler, M. Brown, P. Hubert, D.G. Henderson, P. Van
Meerbergen, D. Brown, H.L. Usher, J.P. Bryant, S.E. White (13)
|
|
Bill
No. 235
By-law
No. A.-6962-178
|
|
A by-law to confirm the proceedings of the Council Meeting held
on the 11th day of June, 2013. (City Clerk)
|
|
Bill
No. 236
By-law
No. A.-6963-179
|
|
A by-law to amend Council Policy 19(35) and 19(35A) entitled
“Urban Design Awards” and “Appendix to Urban Design Awards Program Policy.”
(4/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 237
By-law
No. A.-6964-180
|
|
A By-law to approve an Agreement for Phase 2 Funding of the City
of London’s Household Special Waste Program with the Recycling Council of
Ontario; and to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute the Amending
Agreement. (4/11/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 238
By-law
No. A.-6965-181
|
|
A by-law to approve and adopt the standard form for Facility
Rental Contracts; and to authorize the Managing Director, Parks and
Recreation to insert information and execute contracts which employ this
form. (4/10/CPSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 239
By-law
No. A-46-13001
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law A-46, being a by-law to provide for
Various Fees and Charges. (14/11/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 240
By-law
No. A.-6966-182
|
|
A by-law to repeal the Public Sector Major Grants Reserve Fund;
(3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 241
By-law
No. A.-6967-183
|
|
A by-law to establish the Technology Services Reserve Fund
(3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 242
By-law
No. A.-6968-184
|
|
A by-law to establish the Material Recovery Facility Reserve Fund.
(3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 243
By-law
No. A.-6969-185
|
|
A by-law to establish the Water Customer Assistance Reserve
Fund. (3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 244
By-law
No. A.-6970-186
|
|
A by-law to establish the Parking Facilities Reserve Fund.
(3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 245
By-law
No. A.-6971-187
|
|
A by-law to establish the Municipal Affordable Homeownership
Revolving Loan Reserve Fund. (3/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 246
By-law
No. A.-6972-188
|
|
A By-law to authorize an Amending Option Agreement between The
Corporation of the City of London and O.C. Holdings ’87 Inc., and to
authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the Agreement. (7/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 247
By-law
No. A-44-13001
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law A-44, being a by-law respecting the
Civic Administration, to change the title of “Managing Director, Housing and
Social Services” to “Managing Director, Housing, Social Services and Dearness
Home”, to better reflect the portfolio of the position. (2/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 248
By-law
No. A.-6853(a)-189
|
|
A by-law to amend the Telecommunication Facilities Consultation
Policy for the City of London. (5/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 249
By-law
No. C.P.-1284(tb)-190
|
|
A
by-law to amend the Official Plan for the City of London, 1989 relating to a portion of the Western Counties Health and Occupational
Grounds.(20/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 250
By-law
No. L-8
|
|
A By-law to provide for the licensing and regulation of
Methadone Clinics and Methadone Pharmacies in the City of London. (6/10/CPSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 251
By-law
No. PS-111-13120
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law PS-111 entitled, “A by-law to regulate
traffic and the parking of motor vehicles in the City of London.” (9/11/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 252
By-law
No. PS-111-13121
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law PS-111 entitled, “A by-law to regulate
traffic and the parking of motor vehicles in the City of London.” (9/11/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 253
By-law
No. S.-5566-191
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Jackson Road at Bradley
Avenue). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 254
By-law
No. S.-5567-192
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Sunningdale Road West
and Wonderland Road North). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 255
By-law
No. S.-5568-193
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Dundas Street, east of
Forest Lawn Avenue). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 256
By-law
No. S.-5569-194
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Highbury Avenue North,
north of Kilally Road). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 257
By-law
No. S.-5570-195
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Talbot Street, south of
Kent Street). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 258
By-law
No. S.-5571-196
|
|
A by-law to lay out, constitute, establish and assume lands in
the City of London as public highway. (as widening to Commissioners Road
West, west of Rosecliffe Terrace). (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 259
By-law
No. S.-5572-197
|
|
A by-law to lay out, establish and assume lands in the City of
London as public highway. (as widening to Westminster Drive, east of
Wellington Road South) (City Surveyor)
|
|
Bill
No. 260
By-law
No. S.-W.-2070(c)-198
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law W.-2070-226 entitled “A by-law to
authorize the Innovation Park – Phase 3 Project. (Project No. ID1168-1239)”
(3/11/FAC/2011)
|
|
Bill
No. 261
By-law
No. W.-5542-199
|
|
A by-law to authorize the 2012 Bus Purchase Replacement. (Project
No. MU1044-12) (3b/5/SPPC/2012)
|
|
Bill
No. 262
By-law
No. W.-5543-200
|
|
A by-law to authorize the 2012 Existing Facility Upgrades. (Project
No. MU1136-12) (3b/5/SPPC/2012)
|
|
Bill
No. 263
By-law
No. W.-5544-201
|
|
A by-law to authorize the 2013 Sewer Replacement (Project No.
ES2414-13). (8/6/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 264
By-law
No. W.-5545-202
|
|
A by-law to authorize the 2013 Road Rehabilitation – Local and
Rural (Project No. TS3014-13). (8/6/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 265
By-law
No. W.-5546-203
|
|
A by-law to authorize the Sherwood Forest Flooding Remediation
(Project No. ES2680). (5/10/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 266
By-law
No. W.-5547-204
|
|
A by-law to authorize the 2012 Road Rehabilitation and
Maintenance (Project No. TS1446-12). (13/6/CWC/2012)
|
|
Bill
No. 267
By-law
No. W.-5293(a)-205
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law No. W.-5293-145 entitled “A by-law to
authorize the 2011 Road Rehabilitation – Main (Project No. TS1446-11)
(4/10/CWC)
|
|
Bill
No. 268
By-law
No. Z.-1-132193
|
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to remove holding provisions from the zoning
for a portion of land located at 4448 Colonel Talbot Road. (7/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 269
By-law
No. Z.-1-132194
|
|
A by-law to amend By-law Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located
at 1030 Elias Street. (15/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 270
By-law
No. Z.-1-132195
|
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1930
& 1950 Hyde Park Road. (16/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 271
By-law
No. Z.-1-132196
|
|
A by-law to amend
By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 1464 Adelaide
Street North.
(19/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 272
By-law
No. Z.-1-132197
|
|
A
by-law to amend By-law No. Z.-1 to rezone an area of land located at 404-408
Pall Mall Street & 660 Colborne Street. (21/13/PEC)
|
|
Bill
No. 273
By-law
No. A.-6973-206
|
|
A by-law to authorize a Property Value Protection Plan Agreement
between The Corporation of the City of London and Walter Melnyk and Jenny
Marie Melnyk to provide property value protection for the property located at
3405 Scotland Drive. (1/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 274
By-law
No. A.-6974-207
|
|
A By-law to authorize a Property Value Protection Plan Agreement
between The Corporation of the City of London and Thomas Robinson and Teresa
Robinson to provide property value protection for the property located at
4233 Scotland Drive. (1/16/CSC)
|
|
Bill
No. 275
By-law
No. L.S.P-3432-208
|
|
A By-law to expropriate lands in the City of London, in the
County of Middlesex, for the Hyde Park Road Widening and Improvements – Phase
1 between Oxford Street and South Carriage Road.
|
Motion
made by Councillor J.B. Swan and seconded by Councillor S. Orser to Adjourn.
Motion
Passed
The
meeting adjourned at 11:02 PM.
_________________________________
Joe
Fontana, Mayor
_________________________________
Catharine
Saunders, City Clerk